Tire wear...again.
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northeastern MA, USA
Posts: 1,678
Bikes: Garmin/Tacx Bike Smart
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
191 Posts
Tire wear...again.
I posted a "mini review" of the Michelin Power Road, and some who read it were surprised at how quickly I wore out the rear tire. FWIW, this is a shot of my current rear tire, a Conti GP 4 Season, with about 1,800 miles on it. Shows a little wear, but a long way to go. I've switched to them since my "local support team" is on the road.
Likes For dmanthree:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,993
Bikes: Argon 18 Gallium, BH G7, Rocky Mountain Instinct C70
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times
in
306 Posts
I might be missing something here, and I admit that I am not familiar with GP 4 season tyres, but this looks like normal wear to my eye after 2,900 km.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northeastern MA, USA
Posts: 1,678
Bikes: Garmin/Tacx Bike Smart
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
191 Posts
But not these. They're excellent tires by any measure. Not a race tire, but damned good.
Likes For dmanthree:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,850
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6944 Post(s)
Liked 10,944 Times
in
4,677 Posts
That tire looks new to me.
Likes For Koyote:
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northeastern MA, USA
Posts: 1,678
Bikes: Garmin/Tacx Bike Smart
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
191 Posts
The front tire looks even better. Both have the same mileage on them. It's a very durable and long wearing tire and I expect to get about 3K miles out of the rear, a lot more out of the front. Honestly, it takes a few hundred miles of riding just to wear down the front tire center seam strip.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,850
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6944 Post(s)
Liked 10,944 Times
in
4,677 Posts
The front tire looks even better. Both have the same mileage on them. It's a very durable and long wearing tire and I expect to get about 3K miles out of the rear, a lot more out of the front. Honestly, it takes a few hundred miles of riding just to wear down the front tire center seam strip.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
I've never heard anything but praise for the longevity of GP 4 Seasons. I've heard they're pretty good in other ways too. I thought that looked almost brand new, too.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northeastern MA, USA
Posts: 1,678
Bikes: Garmin/Tacx Bike Smart
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
191 Posts
Nothing but praise from me, as well. They roll well enough so I'm considering just riding them all year, rather than just in the "off season" times. The peace of mind they provide is really nice. I've never flatted one. And yes, I just jinxed myself...
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,892
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4791 Post(s)
Liked 3,918 Times
in
2,548 Posts
I have slightly different tire priorities. #1, keeping me off the pavement. #2, reliable. #3, consistent so when I go to by the next tire, I am not surprised, even if the model had changed some.
For #1, I want tires with good, predictable grip. From the rubber compound, not the tread pattern so it stays a good gripping tire long after the thread is gone. #2 means good details. Quality beads and bead/tire connection. Tread that stays on. #3, I want to know what to expect if I do a downhill corner on a new tire. (I did a corner at the bottom of a fairly steep hill that I had done many times before on sewups. This was the late '80s. I had on brand new clinchers. Pouring rain but this was Seattle. I done that corner in the wet many times. Coming into the apex of the turn it was "Oh ***! I'm not going to make it." I don't like those surprises.)
I see the endless love her for Continentals. I tried them every 5-10 years for a while. About half those tires I flat out didn't trust. I don't think I ever wore them out. Just replaced them when a tire came along I felt safer on. About 20 years ago I started using Vittoria tires. First, what I call "the greenies", the early dual compound tires with part green tread. The medium weight ones made very good all weather commuter tires. This showed especially in the fall with the wet and rotting leaves. Now, Vittoria did have a stretch of real bead issues (probably as they were shifting manufacturing to Asia). I went away, tried a bunch of tires for a while, used Rubinos briefly (slippery!) then discovered Paselas. Not as grippy a tread, but very consistent and reliable. Still use them as my city/commuter and gravel tires. Then I started spending the big bucks on the Vittoria Open tires, especially the Open Paves and now the G+ and G2.0.
The caveat of the Paselas is the thin sidewalls. Very strong - but don't scrape them! Curbs and brake shoes will kill them quickly. They don't take kindly to scraping fenders. The Open Vittorias are more forgiving, but not a lot. I believe those thin sidewalls are a real part of the excellent ride and good grip. (And seems to be a consistent theme for all the tires I have really liked over the decades.)
For #1, I want tires with good, predictable grip. From the rubber compound, not the tread pattern so it stays a good gripping tire long after the thread is gone. #2 means good details. Quality beads and bead/tire connection. Tread that stays on. #3, I want to know what to expect if I do a downhill corner on a new tire. (I did a corner at the bottom of a fairly steep hill that I had done many times before on sewups. This was the late '80s. I had on brand new clinchers. Pouring rain but this was Seattle. I done that corner in the wet many times. Coming into the apex of the turn it was "Oh ***! I'm not going to make it." I don't like those surprises.)
I see the endless love her for Continentals. I tried them every 5-10 years for a while. About half those tires I flat out didn't trust. I don't think I ever wore them out. Just replaced them when a tire came along I felt safer on. About 20 years ago I started using Vittoria tires. First, what I call "the greenies", the early dual compound tires with part green tread. The medium weight ones made very good all weather commuter tires. This showed especially in the fall with the wet and rotting leaves. Now, Vittoria did have a stretch of real bead issues (probably as they were shifting manufacturing to Asia). I went away, tried a bunch of tires for a while, used Rubinos briefly (slippery!) then discovered Paselas. Not as grippy a tread, but very consistent and reliable. Still use them as my city/commuter and gravel tires. Then I started spending the big bucks on the Vittoria Open tires, especially the Open Paves and now the G+ and G2.0.
The caveat of the Paselas is the thin sidewalls. Very strong - but don't scrape them! Curbs and brake shoes will kill them quickly. They don't take kindly to scraping fenders. The Open Vittorias are more forgiving, but not a lot. I believe those thin sidewalls are a real part of the excellent ride and good grip. (And seems to be a consistent theme for all the tires I have really liked over the decades.)
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northeastern MA, USA
Posts: 1,678
Bikes: Garmin/Tacx Bike Smart
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
191 Posts
I have slightly different tire priorities. #1, keeping me off the pavement. #2, reliable. #3, consistent so when I go to by the next tire, I am not surprised, even if the model had changed some.
For #1, I want tires with good, predictable grip. From the rubber compound, not the tread pattern so it stays a good gripping tire long after the thread is gone. #2 means good details. Quality beads and bead/tire connection. Tread that stays on. #3, I want to know what to expect if I do a downhill corner on a new tire. (I did a corner at the bottom of a fairly steep hill that I had done many times before on sewups. This was the late '80s. I had on brand new clinchers. Pouring rain but this was Seattle. I done that corner in the wet many times. Coming into the apex of the turn it was "Oh ***! I'm not going to make it." I don't like those surprises.)
I see the endless love her for Continentals. I tried them every 5-10 years for a while. About half those tires I flat out didn't trust. I don't think I ever wore them out. Just replaced them when a tire came along I felt safer on. About 20 years ago I started using Vittoria tires. First, what I call "the greenies", the early dual compound tires with part green tread. The medium weight ones made very good all weather commuter tires. This showed especially in the fall with the wet and rotting leaves. Now, Vittoria did have a stretch of real bead issues (probably as they were shifting manufacturing to Asia). I went away, tried a bunch of tires for a while, used Rubinos briefly (slippery!) then discovered Paselas. Not as grippy a tread, but very consistent and reliable. Still use them as my city/commuter and gravel tires. Then I started spending the big bucks on the Vittoria Open tires, especially the Open Paves and now the G+ and G2.0.
The caveat of the Paselas is the thin sidewalls. Very strong - but don't scrape them! Curbs and brake shoes will kill them quickly. They don't take kindly to scraping fenders. The Open Vittorias are more forgiving, but not a lot. I believe those thin sidewalls are a real part of the excellent ride and good grip. (And seems to be a consistent theme for all the tires I have really liked over the decades.)
For #1, I want tires with good, predictable grip. From the rubber compound, not the tread pattern so it stays a good gripping tire long after the thread is gone. #2 means good details. Quality beads and bead/tire connection. Tread that stays on. #3, I want to know what to expect if I do a downhill corner on a new tire. (I did a corner at the bottom of a fairly steep hill that I had done many times before on sewups. This was the late '80s. I had on brand new clinchers. Pouring rain but this was Seattle. I done that corner in the wet many times. Coming into the apex of the turn it was "Oh ***! I'm not going to make it." I don't like those surprises.)
I see the endless love her for Continentals. I tried them every 5-10 years for a while. About half those tires I flat out didn't trust. I don't think I ever wore them out. Just replaced them when a tire came along I felt safer on. About 20 years ago I started using Vittoria tires. First, what I call "the greenies", the early dual compound tires with part green tread. The medium weight ones made very good all weather commuter tires. This showed especially in the fall with the wet and rotting leaves. Now, Vittoria did have a stretch of real bead issues (probably as they were shifting manufacturing to Asia). I went away, tried a bunch of tires for a while, used Rubinos briefly (slippery!) then discovered Paselas. Not as grippy a tread, but very consistent and reliable. Still use them as my city/commuter and gravel tires. Then I started spending the big bucks on the Vittoria Open tires, especially the Open Paves and now the G+ and G2.0.
The caveat of the Paselas is the thin sidewalls. Very strong - but don't scrape them! Curbs and brake shoes will kill them quickly. They don't take kindly to scraping fenders. The Open Vittorias are more forgiving, but not a lot. I believe those thin sidewalls are a real part of the excellent ride and good grip. (And seems to be a consistent theme for all the tires I have really liked over the decades.)