Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Tire Pressure

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Tire Pressure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-27-23, 10:03 AM
  #1  
rclouviere
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Central California
Posts: 70

Bikes: Trek Madone

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Tire Pressure

I’m confused about what air pressure to use for the most speed on tubeless tires. I’ve read a lot of info saying you should decrease the pressure a lot. However, the Silca guide says much higher (for me on smooth roads, 96 rear and 93.5 front).

Anyone have testing results/opinions?

Last edited by rclouviere; 11-27-23 at 12:58 PM.
rclouviere is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 10:18 AM
  #2  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,056

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22600 Post(s)
Liked 8,928 Times in 4,160 Posts
The Silca calcuator is a good starting point/guide, NOT gospel. Be sure you put in correct weight and actual measured tire width.

You probably can reduce the pressure by a few PSI and see how it feels.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Likes For datlas:
Old 11-27-23, 10:19 AM
  #3  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,811 Times in 3,319 Posts
I think just like with tubed tires, you should ride the bike and find out what pressure you prefer to run in them and watch your metrics to see if they confirm your perceptions. Pick a number to start with and go from there. The Silca recommendation is as good as any for a starting point.

Your actual road conditions, smoothness or roughness as well as the frequency of bumps will make a difference that no calculator will be able to precisely figure for you.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 10:27 AM
  #4  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 4,868 Times in 3,013 Posts
The Silca guide is a reasonable starting point. What width tyres and rider weight did you input?
PeteHski is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 10:48 AM
  #5  
choddo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times in 338 Posts
I don’t go above 80 on 25mm TLs. 80KG rider.
choddo is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 12:09 PM
  #6  
Biker Pete 
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Florida west coast
Posts: 166

Bikes: Kestrel Legend SL, Motobecane Grand Record

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 45 Posts
Originally Posted by rclouviere
I’m confused about what air pressure to use for the most speed on tubeless tires. I’ve read a lot of info saying you should decrease the pressure a lot. However, the Silca guide says much higher (for me on smooth roads, 96 rear and 85 front).

Anyone have testing results/opinions?
I’ve used the Silca tire pressure calculator and the front and rear tire pressures have never been different by 11psi. What info are you inputting?
Biker Pete is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 12:10 PM
  #7  
Sy Reene
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,640

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4737 Post(s)
Liked 1,533 Times in 1,004 Posts
Originally Posted by rclouviere
I’m confused about what air pressure to use for the most speed on tubeless tires. I’ve read a lot of info saying you should decrease the pressure a lot. However, the Silca guide says much higher (for me on smooth roads, 96 rear and 85 front).

Anyone have testing results/opinions?
If your tubeless wheels are hookless, you do indeed have to reduce your pressure by a lot to be safe per ETRTO. Make sure you also abide by the tire and rim manufacturers specifications -- ie. go with the lowest of the sources. See Silca disclaimer I pasted below

96R/85F -- that seems like a much larger difference than Silca's calculator usually returns between rear and front. Are you running different width tires in Front vs Rear?
Sy Reene is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 12:15 PM
  #8  
Eric F 
Habitual User
 
Eric F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,997

Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4957 Post(s)
Liked 8,098 Times in 3,833 Posts
Originally Posted by choddo
I don’t go above 80 on 25mm TLs. 80KG rider.
Similar for me. 80R/75F in 26mm Vittoria Corsa Pros. I'm about 180lbs/82kg.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Eric F is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 12:46 PM
  #9  
jadmt
Senior Member
 
jadmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Missoula MT
Posts: 1,767

Bikes: Handsome xoxo, Serotta atx, Canyon Endurace CF8

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 1,899 Times in 849 Posts
I have inputed data into the Silca calculator the Rene Herse Calculator and the SRAM calculator and all are pretty different.
jadmt is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 12:59 PM
  #10  
rclouviere
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Central California
Posts: 70

Bikes: Trek Madone

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Biker Pete
I’ve used the Silca tire pressure calculator and the front and rear tire pressures have never been different by 11psi. What info are you inputting?
you’re right. My mistake. Front 93.5.
rclouviere is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 04:53 PM
  #11  
DaveSSS 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,228

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1098 Post(s)
Liked 559 Times in 446 Posts
I use the pressure calculator at zipp.com. The results aren't said to be the fastest, AFAIK. The issue is often how smooth or rough the asphalt is. One pressure is never perfect for all conditions. I ride tubeless with hookless rims. At 135 pounds, I never exceed 60 psi with 28-30mm tires. I have a lot of chip sealed roads, so I tend to use lower pressure.
DaveSSS is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 06:26 PM
  #12  
Biker Pete 
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Florida west coast
Posts: 166

Bikes: Kestrel Legend SL, Motobecane Grand Record

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 45 Posts
Originally Posted by jadmt
I have inputed data into the Silca calculator the Rene Herse Calculator and the SRAM calculator and all are pretty different.
I haven’t tried the RH calculator…..thanks for the info!

I have used Silca and SRAM and find them to be within about 2psi for the rear tire, SRAM being lower. And this is with using the actual measured width for Silca. For example I use 28mm tires, SRAM asks for that value (and the inner rim width) and when inflated the tires actually measure 29mm on my wheels which, if you input 28 vs 29mm in the Silca calculator, makes a significant difference in the calculated pressure. Also, SRAM always has a greater difference between front and rear tires than Silca.

I also have looked closely at the info on rollingresistance.com……so much data to digest in this ‘modern era’ of cycling……I love it!!!
Biker Pete is offline  
Likes For Biker Pete:
Old 11-27-23, 06:43 PM
  #13  
Sy Reene
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,640

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4737 Post(s)
Liked 1,533 Times in 1,004 Posts
Originally Posted by Biker Pete
I haven’t tried the RH calculator…..thanks for the info!

I have used Silca and SRAM and find them to be within about 2psi for the rear tire, SRAM being lower. And this is with using the actual measured width for Silca. For example I use 28mm tires, SRAM asks for that value (and the inner rim width) and when inflated the tires actually measure 29mm on my wheels which, if you input 28 vs 29mm in the Silca calculator, makes a significant difference in the calculated pressure. Also, SRAM always has a greater difference between front and rear tires than Silca.

I also have looked closely at the info on rollingresistance.com……so much data to digest in this ‘modern era’ of cycling……I love it!!!
Never liked the SRAM calculator, because it is inferring how wide your tires will be for a given rim width, even though it's quite known that different manufacturers nominally label their tire sizes differently versus how they actually inflate. It also only has 2 road surfaces to choose from -- Dry or Wet. Nothing to do with actual texture -- eg. rocky, smooth, dirt, etc. And then of course, since they're heavily invested in selling the hookless variety of wheel through Zipp, I expect their bias on PSI recommendations is always going to be on the low side in order to satisfy the marketing side of their business.

For any calculator, what none of them seem to ask for is the inflated height as well. Even sites like BicycleRollingResistance, will show the inflated height as well as width. I presume a taller inflated height means more air volume than a lesser height (for an equivalent inflated width, and there are sometimes fairly significant differences between tire brands on inflated height.

Last edited by Sy Reene; 11-27-23 at 06:48 PM.
Sy Reene is offline  
Likes For Sy Reene:
Old 11-27-23, 06:56 PM
  #14  
surak
Senior Member
 
surak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,957

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 878 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times in 436 Posts
As Sy Reene pasted, Silca's usually is race-focused and gives you the estimated breakpoint pressure -- meaning the maximum pressure before rolling resistance is expected to increase. Note that going too high increases Crr more than running pressure under that breakpoint, so it should be treated as an upper limit. The reasons the common wisdom is to use lower pressure for tubeless setups than tubed are 1) that it's more comfortable, 2) you don't have to worry about pinch flats with tubeless, and 3) you won't increase Crr much, so the trade-off tends to be worth it, especially for running narrower tires.

My recommendations would be to try lower pressures and see whether you like how the bike handles. Your goal should be to have your bike feels smooth, not sluggish or squirmy.
surak is offline  
Likes For surak:
Old 11-27-23, 07:02 PM
  #15  
Biker Pete 
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Florida west coast
Posts: 166

Bikes: Kestrel Legend SL, Motobecane Grand Record

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 45 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
Never liked the SRAM calculator, because it is inferring how wide your tires will be for a given rim width, even though it's quite known that different manufacturers nominally label their tire sizes differently versus how they actually inflate. It also only has 2 road surfaces to choose from -- Dry or Wet. Nothing to do with actual texture -- eg. rocky, smooth, dirt, etc. And then of course, since they're heavily invested in selling the hookless variety of wheel through Zipp, I expect their bias on PSI recommendations is always going to be on the low side in order to satisfy the marketing side of their business.

For any calculator, what none of them seem to ask for is the inflated height as well. Even sites like BicycleRollingResistance, will show the inflated height as well as width. I presume a taller inflated height means more air volume than a lesser height (for an equivalent inflated width, and there are sometimes fairly significant differences between tire brands on inflated height.
Great info. I love getting down into the weeds with all this stuff.

Regarding my own journey, I just recently came into the ‘modern era’ with the purchase of a used Kestrel from 2016. Still old fashioned rim brakes, cabled shifters, no power meter. But I did ‘upgrade’ the Zipp carbon wheels optimized for 23mm tires with new ‘aero’ ‘tubeless ready’ carbon wheels optimized for 28mm tires. Hence my investigation into the tire pressure calculators.
Biker Pete is offline  
Likes For Biker Pete:
Old 11-28-23, 02:51 AM
  #16  
Turnin_Wrenches
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: Florida
Posts: 149

Bikes: Basso Diamante SV (2021), Trek Speed Concept SLR7 (2023), Time Alpe D'Huez (2023), Trek Madone SLR7 (2024)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Liked 83 Times in 48 Posts
Originally Posted by rclouviere
I’m confused about what air pressure to use for the most speed on tubeless tires. I’ve read a lot of info saying you should decrease the pressure a lot. However, the Silca guide says much higher (for me on smooth roads, 96 rear and 93.5 front).

Anyone have testing results/opinions?
I've seen a max. inflation of 72psi on some tubeless tires, so check the info on your tire against the Silca recommendation to make sure your tires can safely take 96 / 93.5 psi.

As for the pressure that will provide the most speed... there is no single magical number. It depends. And it will change based on weather conditions, road conditions, and the specific tires you are using. As stated by others, the Silca guide is a good starting point. Start there and feel free to experiment until you find what you like. At the end of the day, the best pressure is the one that works best for you.
Turnin_Wrenches is offline  
Likes For Turnin_Wrenches:
Old 11-28-23, 07:33 AM
  #17  
easyupbug 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,682

Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 569 Post(s)
Liked 584 Times in 410 Posts
Originally Posted by choddo
I don’t go above 80 on 25mm TLs. 80KG rider.
Same here by accident when I realized the pressure gage on my very old pump was reading way low when I replaced the pump.
easyupbug is online now  
Old 11-28-23, 08:29 AM
  #18  
DaveSSS 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,228

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1098 Post(s)
Liked 559 Times in 446 Posts
What hasn't been mentioned is to verify the accuracy of your pump gauge. That's not easy to do unless you want to purchase a pricey gauge that's for calibration purposes. I use liquid filled Winters brand gauges for calibration, with the gauge attached to some pipe with a presta valve attached to it. My old silca 0-160 psi gauge was off by 8 psi, only delivering 72 instead of 80. I replaced it with a much larger diameter Winters gauge. I use a 0-100 psi gauge, since I never use more than 60. I can compare several gauges at once. My newest lezyne pump is accurate.
DaveSSS is offline  
Likes For DaveSSS:
Old 11-28-23, 09:01 AM
  #19  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,954

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3955 Post(s)
Liked 7,303 Times in 2,948 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
What hasn't been mentioned is to verify the accuracy of your pump gauge.
Accuracy isn't very important for most people. Once you find a pressure that works best for you, the actual number on the pump is irrelevant. Day-to-day repeatability is all you really need.
tomato coupe is offline  
Likes For tomato coupe:
Old 11-28-23, 09:21 AM
  #20  
DaveSSS 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,228

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1098 Post(s)
Liked 559 Times in 446 Posts
Most tires have a specific rim width that's used as a basis for the advertised width. It's usually listed on the packaging. Wider rims will result in a wider mounted width. I have some 25mm internal width hookless rims. The narrowest tire that can be used is a 28mm and not all of those are approved for that rim width. 28mm tires will measure about 31mm on a 25mm IW rim and 30mm tires measure about 33mm. I've only used Michelin and Pirelli tires. Both measure about the same.
DaveSSS is offline  
Old 11-28-23, 09:33 AM
  #21  
DaveSSS 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,228

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1098 Post(s)
Liked 559 Times in 446 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
Accuracy isn't very important for most people. Once you find a pressure that works best for you, the actual number on the pump is irrelevant. Day-to-day repeatability is all you really need.
I have two pumps and want similar results. Those pushing the 73psi limit with hookless might want accuracy.
DaveSSS is offline  
Likes For DaveSSS:
Old 11-28-23, 09:58 AM
  #22  
Troul 
Senior Member
 
Troul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,395

Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,979 Times in 1,920 Posts
digital Air Pressure Regulators with a zero-out feature tends to be a less expensive route to test tire inflation tools for accuracy.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
Troul is offline  
Old 11-28-23, 10:01 AM
  #23  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times in 2,557 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
What hasn't been mentioned is to verify the accuracy of your pump gauge. That's not easy to do unless you want to purchase a pricey gauge that's for calibration purposes. I use liquid filled Winters brand gauges for calibration, with the gauge attached to some pipe with a presta valve attached to it. My old silca 0-160 psi gauge was off by 8 psi, only delivering 72 instead of 80. I replaced it with a much larger diameter Winters gauge. I use a 0-100 psi gauge, since I never use more than 60. I can compare several gauges at once. My newest lezyne pump is accurate.
"That's not easy to do unless you want to purchase a pricey gauge that's for calibration purposes." But there is something you can do that is easy and cheap. Every time you pump your tires with a known pump, squeeze them with your fingers. You will get to know what an 80 psi tire feels like. When a pump is far off, you'll know. (And you will start associating the finger squeeze with ride feel. Gauge no longer needed at all. I rode and raced for a decade before I owned a gauge. It was never an issue.)
79pmooney is offline  
Old 11-28-23, 10:06 AM
  #24  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,954

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3955 Post(s)
Liked 7,303 Times in 2,948 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
I have two pumps and want similar results.
Accuracy isn't very important for most people. You can do whatever you like.
Those pushing the 73psi limit with hookless might want accuracy.
The 73 psi limit is chosen somewhat arbitrarily and the actual maximum safe pressure varies with tire and rim combos. Inflating your tubeless tires right up to the 73 psi limit with a "calibrated" pump might make you feel safer, but it's not doing much for you.
tomato coupe is offline  
Likes For tomato coupe:
Old 11-28-23, 10:12 AM
  #25  
bblair
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 760

Bikes: Lynskey R230, Trek 5200, 1975 Raleigh Pro, 1973 Falcon ,Trek T50 Tandem and a 1968 Paramount in progress.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 380 Post(s)
Liked 395 Times in 234 Posts
Originally Posted by easyupbug
Same here by accident when I realized the pressure gage on my very old pump was reading way low when I replaced the pump.
Exactly my thoughts. How do I know how accurate my gauge is? Probably close enough.

If I were going for the world hour record on a track I would worry. Riding to the next town with a bunch of 70-year-old for cake and coffee, not so much. As long as I don't get a flat.

That said, I run Conti 5000 tires at about 90psi. Or so my pump says.
bblair is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.