Calculate maximum VO2?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Habanero Titanium Team Nuevo
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 399 Post(s)
Liked 185 Times
in
121 Posts
Calculate maximum VO2?
I have runner’s dystonia so cannot run full out for any length of time as gets get tied up. Cycling not an issue. I want to know what my estimated VO2 would be based on cycling time trial. I don’t have a power meter. Does some know of a chart that might provide this estimate. Running calculators do this pretty eas
#2
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,413
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 915 Post(s)
Liked 1,132 Times
in
488 Posts
Sorry for your dystonia.
The reason why you don't see rules of thumb like that is because power for a cycling time trial depends much more on terrain, wind, and aerodynamic position than running. However, if you do have a some way to convert your time trial into a power estimate, then given average metabolic economy for an average-sized adult a rough rule of thumb is about 75 watts per L of O2 per minute. So if you have an estimate of VO2 from running in terms of mL/min/kg, you can multiply by your mass to get mL/min, then divide by 1000 to get L/min, then see whether the power estimate from O2 is consistent with the power estimate from your time trial. It's a tad convoluted and there are several fudge factors in there, but it should put you into the right ballpark. Alternatively, you can go the opposite way and if you have a power estimate for the time trial you can do the calculation backward and see how your VO2 in terms of mL/min/kg for cycling compares with that for running.
The reason why you don't see rules of thumb like that is because power for a cycling time trial depends much more on terrain, wind, and aerodynamic position than running. However, if you do have a some way to convert your time trial into a power estimate, then given average metabolic economy for an average-sized adult a rough rule of thumb is about 75 watts per L of O2 per minute. So if you have an estimate of VO2 from running in terms of mL/min/kg, you can multiply by your mass to get mL/min, then divide by 1000 to get L/min, then see whether the power estimate from O2 is consistent with the power estimate from your time trial. It's a tad convoluted and there are several fudge factors in there, but it should put you into the right ballpark. Alternatively, you can go the opposite way and if you have a power estimate for the time trial you can do the calculation backward and see how your VO2 in terms of mL/min/kg for cycling compares with that for running.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Habanero Titanium Team Nuevo
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 399 Post(s)
Liked 185 Times
in
121 Posts
Sorry for your dystonia.
The reason why you don't see rs of thumb like that is because power for a cycling time trial depends much more on terrain, wind, and aerodynamic position than running. However, if you do have a some way to convert your time trial into a power estimate, then given average metabolic economy for an average-sized adult a rough rule of thumb is about 75 watts per L of O2 per minute. So if you have an estimate of VO2 from running in terms of mL/min/kg, you can multiply by your mass to get mL/min, then divide by 1000 to get L/min, then see whether the power estimate from O2 is consistent with the power estimate from your time trial. It's a tad convoluted and there are several fudge factors in there, but it should put you into the right ballpark. Alternatively, you can go the opposite way and if you have a power estimate for the time trial you can do the calculation backward and see how your VO2 in terms of mL/min/kg for cycling compares with that for running.
The reason why you don't see rs of thumb like that is because power for a cycling time trial depends much more on terrain, wind, and aerodynamic position than running. However, if you do have a some way to convert your time trial into a power estimate, then given average metabolic economy for an average-sized adult a rough rule of thumb is about 75 watts per L of O2 per minute. So if you have an estimate of VO2 from running in terms of mL/min/kg, you can multiply by your mass to get mL/min, then divide by 1000 to get L/min, then see whether the power estimate from O2 is consistent with the power estimate from your time trial. It's a tad convoluted and there are several fudge factors in there, but it should put you into the right ballpark. Alternatively, you can go the opposite way and if you have a power estimate for the time trial you can do the calculation backward and see how your VO2 in terms of mL/min/kg for cycling compares with that for running.
#4
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,413
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 915 Post(s)
Liked 1,132 Times
in
488 Posts
Well, if it's flat and there's minimal wind, then the only thing left is the aero drag. Unfortunately, for an average-sized rider on a road (not TT) bike, the CdA can range from maybe 0.275 m^2 up to maybe 0.40 m^2. If you can ride in the drops, probably mid to low 0.3x m^2. Then given your time you can figure out what your average power was. I suppose you could bracket it by assuming something like 0.3 and 0.4, and that would give you a range.
Here's another rough rule of thumb for getting from running speed to power: for an average-sized runner on flat firm ground, running speed in m/sec ~ watts/kg. So, if you used to run 10k in 38:00, that's about 4.4 m/sec, and you would have producing, ballpark, 4.4 watts/kg.
Here's another rough rule of thumb for getting from running speed to power: for an average-sized runner on flat firm ground, running speed in m/sec ~ watts/kg. So, if you used to run 10k in 38:00, that's about 4.4 m/sec, and you would have producing, ballpark, 4.4 watts/kg.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
Why do you want to know your Vo2 max?
Aside from all the variables with aero drag etc that have been mentioned I thought it wasn't a direct indicator of cycling performance anyway?
In other words, someone could have a higher Vo2 max than someone else, but a lower power/weight ratio.
Aside from all the variables with aero drag etc that have been mentioned I thought it wasn't a direct indicator of cycling performance anyway?
In other words, someone could have a higher Vo2 max than someone else, but a lower power/weight ratio.
#6
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,413
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 915 Post(s)
Liked 1,132 Times
in
488 Posts
Although the OP mentions "max" in the subject line, the post itself makes clearer he's asking about VO2. You can't really maintain VO2Max in a TT. TT pace is lower than VO2Max pace. TT pace is closer to VO2 at LT (lactate threshold), or MLSS (maximum lactate steady state).
The OP wants to be able to estimate VO2 from cycling because he can't use the Daniels formula from running anymore.
The OP wants to be able to estimate VO2 from cycling because he can't use the Daniels formula from running anymore.
Likes For RChung:
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Habanero Titanium Team Nuevo
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 399 Post(s)
Liked 185 Times
in
121 Posts
Although the OP mentions "max" in the subject line, the post itself makes clearer he's asking about VO2. You can't really maintain VO2Max in a TT. TT pace is lower than VO2Max pace. TT pace is closer to VO2 at LT (lactate threshold), or MLSS (maximum lactate steady state).
The OP wants to be able to estimate VO2 from cycling because he can't use the Daniels formula from running anymore.
The OP wants to be able to estimate VO2 from cycling because he can't use the Daniels formula from running anymore.
Exactly! Has nothing to do with my cycling ability I just wanted to figure it now and some estimate at my age. As far as cycling is concern I ride fine and thank goodness the dystonia has no effect on my cycling. I am a decent rider for sure but of course I have long background. Cycling is just so much more complicated to make comparisons to each ride and other factors. Running is straightforward you run and can make pretty fair generalizations. On the bike is all goes out the wind. Rarely would two rides on the same course exactly each day be the same. The other aspect is the even the same course can yield drastically different data on given days.
#8
Senior Member
Hill climbs are much better for estimating power, aero drag is basically one giant fudge factor. If you can find a nice long (a couple of km) 6% grade, time yourself. Weigh yourself & your bike, you should get a decent estimate for time. There's a some fudge factors for rolling resistance and aero drag, but at slower speeds those introduce MUCH less error.
Likes For gsa103: