Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Calculate maximum VO2?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Calculate maximum VO2?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-20, 09:47 AM
  #1  
deacon mark
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,971

Bikes: Habanero Titanium Team Nuevo

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 399 Post(s)
Liked 185 Times in 121 Posts
Calculate maximum VO2?

I have runner’s dystonia so cannot run full out for any length of time as gets get tied up. Cycling not an issue. I want to know what my estimated VO2 would be based on cycling time trial. I don’t have a power meter. Does some know of a chart that might provide this estimate. Running calculators do this pretty eas
deacon mark is offline  
Old 10-03-20, 11:53 AM
  #2  
RChung
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,413
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 915 Post(s)
Liked 1,132 Times in 488 Posts
Sorry for your dystonia.

The reason why you don't see rules of thumb like that is because power for a cycling time trial depends much more on terrain, wind, and aerodynamic position than running. However, if you do have a some way to convert your time trial into a power estimate, then given average metabolic economy for an average-sized adult a rough rule of thumb is about 75 watts per L of O2 per minute. So if you have an estimate of VO2 from running in terms of mL/min/kg, you can multiply by your mass to get mL/min, then divide by 1000 to get L/min, then see whether the power estimate from O2 is consistent with the power estimate from your time trial. It's a tad convoluted and there are several fudge factors in there, but it should put you into the right ballpark. Alternatively, you can go the opposite way and if you have a power estimate for the time trial you can do the calculation backward and see how your VO2 in terms of mL/min/kg for cycling compares with that for running.
RChung is offline  
Old 10-03-20, 02:15 PM
  #3  
deacon mark
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,971

Bikes: Habanero Titanium Team Nuevo

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 399 Post(s)
Liked 185 Times in 121 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
Sorry for your dystonia.

The reason why you don't see rs of thumb like that is because power for a cycling time trial depends much more on terrain, wind, and aerodynamic position than running. However, if you do have a some way to convert your time trial into a power estimate, then given average metabolic economy for an average-sized adult a rough rule of thumb is about 75 watts per L of O2 per minute. So if you have an estimate of VO2 from running in terms of mL/min/kg, you can multiply by your mass to get mL/min, then divide by 1000 to get L/min, then see whether the power estimate from O2 is consistent with the power estimate from your time trial. It's a tad convoluted and there are several fudge factors in there, but it should put you into the right ballpark. Alternatively, you can go the opposite way and if you have a power estimate for the time trial you can do the calculation backward and see how your VO2 in terms of mL/min/kg for cycling compares with that for running.
Well that is what I would like to try and do. Say some time trial over a relatively flat course with wind issue being minimized. I am have never strictly done a real time trail. I do however sometimes go out on a measure course I do and just go hard for say 25 miles. I can solo ride 25 in maybe 70 minutes. I now I can relatively easily do 25 miles at 20 mph. Frankly my issue is aerobically I am in good shape for age 59. I have huge endurance and resting pulse is like 40. I have been averaging 700-1000 miles riding a month for past 6 months. I just would like to figure my VO2. As you say running it is easy. I am runner first but over past 5 years the dystonia makes running for any length hard. I can actually sprint for say 1 minute hard but then have to walk or I will trip. I just cannot run long enough to get in my limit. My best 10ks at age 30 were 38 minutes. I think back when I could do this in my prime it was in the mid 50's. I am a total lone ranger riding but at times when around groups I do find that I can kick it and a lot and that surprises me although it should not since running with others much easier.
deacon mark is offline  
Old 10-03-20, 06:00 PM
  #4  
RChung
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,413
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 915 Post(s)
Liked 1,132 Times in 488 Posts
Well, if it's flat and there's minimal wind, then the only thing left is the aero drag. Unfortunately, for an average-sized rider on a road (not TT) bike, the CdA can range from maybe 0.275 m^2 up to maybe 0.40 m^2. If you can ride in the drops, probably mid to low 0.3x m^2. Then given your time you can figure out what your average power was. I suppose you could bracket it by assuming something like 0.3 and 0.4, and that would give you a range.

Here's another rough rule of thumb for getting from running speed to power: for an average-sized runner on flat firm ground, running speed in m/sec ~ watts/kg. So, if you used to run 10k in 38:00, that's about 4.4 m/sec, and you would have producing, ballpark, 4.4 watts/kg.
RChung is offline  
Old 10-04-20, 12:39 AM
  #5  
Dean V
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times in 153 Posts
Why do you want to know your Vo2 max?
Aside from all the variables with aero drag etc that have been mentioned I thought it wasn't a direct indicator of cycling performance anyway?
In other words, someone could have a higher Vo2 max than someone else, but a lower power/weight ratio.
Dean V is offline  
Old 10-04-20, 08:07 AM
  #6  
RChung
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,413
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 915 Post(s)
Liked 1,132 Times in 488 Posts
Although the OP mentions "max" in the subject line, the post itself makes clearer he's asking about VO2. You can't really maintain VO2Max in a TT. TT pace is lower than VO2Max pace. TT pace is closer to VO2 at LT (lactate threshold), or MLSS (maximum lactate steady state).

The OP wants to be able to estimate VO2 from cycling because he can't use the Daniels formula from running anymore.
RChung is offline  
Likes For RChung:
Old 10-04-20, 08:47 AM
  #7  
deacon mark
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,971

Bikes: Habanero Titanium Team Nuevo

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 399 Post(s)
Liked 185 Times in 121 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
Although the OP mentions "max" in the subject line, the post itself makes clearer he's asking about VO2. You can't really maintain VO2Max in a TT. TT pace is lower than VO2Max pace. TT pace is closer to VO2 at LT (lactate threshold), or MLSS (maximum lactate steady state).

The OP wants to be able to estimate VO2 from cycling because he can't use the Daniels formula from running anymore.


Exactly! Has nothing to do with my cycling ability I just wanted to figure it now and some estimate at my age. As far as cycling is concern I ride fine and thank goodness the dystonia has no effect on my cycling. I am a decent rider for sure but of course I have long background. Cycling is just so much more complicated to make comparisons to each ride and other factors. Running is straightforward you run and can make pretty fair generalizations. On the bike is all goes out the wind. Rarely would two rides on the same course exactly each day be the same. The other aspect is the even the same course can yield drastically different data on given days.
deacon mark is offline  
Old 10-06-20, 11:33 AM
  #8  
gsa103
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,400

Bikes: Bianchi Infinito (Celeste, of course)

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 754 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 77 Posts
Hill climbs are much better for estimating power, aero drag is basically one giant fudge factor. If you can find a nice long (a couple of km) 6% grade, time yourself. Weigh yourself & your bike, you should get a decent estimate for time. There's a some fudge factors for rolling resistance and aero drag, but at slower speeds those introduce MUCH less error.
gsa103 is offline  
Likes For gsa103:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.