Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Tire & tube size 27x1-1/16

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Tire & tube size 27x1-1/16

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-23, 02:48 AM
  #1  
shkwak
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tire & tube size 27x1-1/16

I have a '70 Motobecane with a 27x1-1/16 size.
Now, I need an extra tube and tire of that size, but I can only find 27x1-1/4 or 27x1-1/8 on eBay, Amazon, etc.
Can I use those sizes instead of the 27x1-1/16 wheel? If anyone knows a place that sells 27x1-1/16 sized ones, please let me know.
shkwak is offline  
Old 12-27-23, 05:20 AM
  #2  
arex
Abuse Magnet
 
arex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,870

Bikes: '91 Mtn Tek Vertical, '74 Raleigh Sports, '72 Raleigh Twenty, '84 Univega Gran Turismo, '09 Surly Karate Monkey, '92 Burley Rock-n-Roll, '86 Miyata 310, '76 Raleigh Shopper

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times in 89 Posts
27x1-1/8 should be fine. 1-1/4 might be okay...someone else could confirm or deny that. You can also consider 700x25 or 28 tubes, too.

To clarify: You can use slightly smaller tubes, because they do stretch safely, up to a point. The same with slightly larger tubes.

You don't want to use a tube that's too large...you'll have too much material being stuffed into too small of a space, and the rubber will get creases and folds in it, trying to fit under a lot of pressure. Those folds will turn into stressed weak points that can fail for no good reason other than they're stressed and weak. The same thing can happen with a right-sized tube that hasn't been lubricated with talc.

Typically, though, a given tube is made to fit a range of sizes that will be specified on the box. It's okay to go outside of the stated range a little bit...the ranges aren't hard numbers that you dare not exceed.

Sorry to ramble...it's early and I'm still working on coffee.

Last edited by arex; 12-27-23 at 05:35 AM.
arex is offline  
Likes For arex:
Old 12-27-23, 05:36 AM
  #3  
Trakhak
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,383
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2490 Post(s)
Liked 2,958 Times in 1,681 Posts
Originally Posted by arex
27x1-1/8 should be fine. 1-1/4 might be okay...someone else could confirm or deny that. You can also consider 700x25 or 28 tubes, too.
Agreed. The tires (700c and 27") are not interchangeable. The tubes (25 mm, 28 mm, and 32 mm, corresponding to 1", 1 1/8", and 1 1/4", respectively) are interchangeable.

For the OP: very few tires were sold as 27" x 1 1/16". I can't remember ever seeing a tire marked with that designation, and I worked in bike stores in the '70's and '80s, which were the only decades when such tires would have been offered.

Fortunately, any tube that includes 700 x 23 among the listed sizes will fit perfectly.
Trakhak is online now  
Likes For Trakhak:
Old 12-27-23, 07:15 AM
  #4  
pastorbobnlnh 
Freewheel Medic
 
pastorbobnlnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: An Island on the Coast of GA!
Posts: 12,886

Bikes: Snazzy* Schwinns, Classy Cannondales & a Super Pro Aero Lotus (* Ed.)

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1455 Post(s)
Liked 2,197 Times in 963 Posts
At some point since 2001, I came across a set of 27 X 1" tires. But I'm pretty certain they are long gone. You should be fine with either the 1/8" or 1/4" variant. Are there any labels on the rims which identify and specify their size?

And welcome to C&V. We look forward to hearing more about you and your Moto.
__________________
Bob
Enjoying the GA coast all year long!

Thanks for visiting my website: www.freewheelspa.com





pastorbobnlnh is offline  
Old 12-27-23, 07:42 AM
  #5  
Kabuki12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,453
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 878 Post(s)
Liked 2,296 Times in 1,283 Posts
I have a couple of sets of 27” x 1” tires . They are Panaracers and I got them on eBay not too long ago. I think they are still available , not certain. I would go with 27” x 1 1/8” for a replacement if you want a slightly wider tire on your Motobecane. Tubes , depending on Schrader or Presta , can be 700 x 23-28 range . I get them on eBay as well with short Presta stems (33mm) for a very reasonable price .
Kabuki12 is offline  
Old 12-27-23, 09:51 AM
  #6  
Pompiere
Senior Member
 
Pompiere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 3,422

Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 2011 Jamis Quest, 1980 Peugeot TH8 Tandem, 1992 Performance Parabola, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-S LTD, 197? FW Evans

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 533 Post(s)
Liked 1,007 Times in 516 Posts
Panaracer Pasela are still available in 27 x 1 inch. I have them on a couple of my bikes. https://carsoncitybikeshop.com/pasel...-w-tire-27x-1/

BITD Avocet had a 27 x 7/8 inch tire. I don't recall ever seeing anything marked in 1/16" inch increments. That's only 0.62 mm, so hardly enough to worry about. There is enough variation in manufacturing tolerances that the designation probably had more to do with marketing than a change in the actual dimensions of the tire carcass. When marketing was all about "skinnier is faster", they could say "our new tire is faster than last years tire", even though the only difference was the label on the sidewall. You can mount three different tires, that are all labeled as the same size, on identical rims and get three different measurements.
Pompiere is offline  
Likes For Pompiere:
Old 12-27-23, 10:31 AM
  #7  
USAZorro
Señor Member
 
USAZorro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,926

Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1492 Post(s)
Liked 1,096 Times in 642 Posts
The number that matters most when fitting tire to rim is the ISO number. I would expect that your tire should have the number 630 on it somewhere. This is the technical value for what is commonly described as 27". If you do not see 630, but rather some other number (like 622), you will need something different. If your ISO is 630, I would expect 1-1/4 would be fine, and 1-1/4 might actually feel like an improvement as long as it doesn't come too close to rubbing the fork, frame, brakes or fenders (if you have those).
__________________
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline  
Old 12-27-23, 04:25 PM
  #8  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by USAZorro
The number that matters most when fitting tire to rim is the ISO number. I would expect that your tire should have the number 630 on it somewhere. This is the technical value for what is commonly described as 27". If you do not see 630, but rather some other number (like 622), you will need something different. If your ISO is 630, I would expect 1-1/4 would be fine, and 1-1/4 might actually feel like an improvement as long as it doesn't come too close to rubbing the fork, frame, brakes or fenders (if you have those).
Whether or not it should have ISO-labelling depends first, on whether the ISO standard was in International Standard (IS) status (i.e. released) at the appropriate time, among other arcanities of the International Standards process. Did the standard contain a classification to which 27 x ⅞" could be correctly aligned, or was it made into an orphan by an oversight? Such things can happen, though I don't know the story here. Were enough of these made to warrant incorporation into the Standard? It could be it was intended to coordinate referencing highly manufacture products, not all possible variants. Don't get me wrong, I loved working on international standards, but a lot of folks assume they mean more than they actually are intended to.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 12-27-23, 04:45 PM
  #9  
USAZorro
Señor Member
 
USAZorro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,926

Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1492 Post(s)
Liked 1,096 Times in 642 Posts
Originally Posted by Road Fan
Whether or not it should have ISO-labelling depends first, on whether the ISO standard was in International Standard (IS) status (i.e. released) at the appropriate time, among other arcanities of the International Standards process. Did the standard contain a classification to which 27 x ⅞" could be correctly aligned, or was it made into an orphan by an oversight? Such things can happen, though I don't know the story here. Were enough of these made to warrant incorporation into the Standard? It could be it was intended to coordinate referencing highly manufacture products, not all possible variants. Don't get me wrong, I loved working on international standards, but a lot of folks assume they mean more than they actually are intended to.
St. Sheldon left a couple pennies.

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tire-sizing.html
__________________
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline  
Old 12-27-23, 07:26 PM
  #10  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by USAZorro
St. Sheldon left a couple pennies.

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tire-sizing.html
Thanks, I guess.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 02-25-24, 09:57 AM
  #11  
The Golden Boy 
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,649

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,703 Times in 937 Posts
From your other thread:
Originally Posted by shkwak
Hi. From my previous thread, I could get a 27-1/8 tire & a 1/4 tube. Thanks to all the people who replied to my thread. And I've encountered a couple of other issues...
Q1. It's a Panaracer tire. My previous tires would be at least several times thicker than this(I'm not sure the brand). The bike shop near my home said it's because the panaracer tire has a better quality, but I'm not convinced.
Q2. I didn't realize the tube is Schrader type. The previous one was Presta type, and the hole of the rim for air inlet is too small to use a Schrader type tube. It seems like many people enlarge the hole to fit a Schrader tube. But if I do that, will I still be able to use a Presta tube?
So here's a brief thing about tires.
Thicker tires may be more durable and long lived, but the quality of your ride suffers- as the more pliable the tire is, the better it can absorb vibration and bumps.
Wider tires give you more air volume to serve as cushion. Unless you're racing and counting grams, I'd suggest using the widest tire you can-
If your bike is from 1970, it should fit 27 x 1 1/8". It'll probably fit 1 1/4" tires-
Unless you live in an area with lots of goat's head thorns or lots of broken glass, you most likely don't need thick, heavy 'puncture protection' tires.
Heavy tires are just weight you have to not only get and keep going, but also to turn and stop. Even if you have a relatively heavy bike, having lighter and responsive tires make a huge difference.
Panaracers are good tires. Panaracer is a division of Panasonic. IMO- Panaracer makes some of the very best bicycle tires- not only branded as Panaracer products, but also for more "boutique" brands like Rene Herse, SOMA, Swift and Jack Brown.

If your rims are presta, get presta tubes- don't drill out the rim.



In my experience- I went from using $10 Cheng Shin tires to forking out the money for Panaracer Paselas, then to the different iterations of the 'puncture proof' Paselas, then to using Sand Canyon tires (made by Panaracer) and then to using Rene Herse tires (made by Panaracer). To use the Herse tires, I had to change from 27" wheels to 700c, and the price was significant for me. But after riding them- it immediately made me a believer.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Likes For The Golden Boy:
Old 02-25-24, 10:20 AM
  #12  
52telecaster
ambulatory senior
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998

Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1956 Post(s)
Liked 3,662 Times in 1,680 Posts
Golden boy is right! If your worried about flats get whatever extra protection the current paselas advertises. Protite I think is the latest. The tires still feel great but you have some extra protection.
52telecaster is offline  
Likes For 52telecaster:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.