Which Gear Ratio is Better?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Which Gear Ratio is Better?
Old 52/39/30T + 12-25T or New 50/39/30T + 11-28T
Edit: Thanks for all the input and questioning my ignorant question, learnt quite a bit.
Edit: Thanks for all the input and questioning my ignorant question, learnt quite a bit.
Last edited by M.Roshi; 05-22-24 at 08:57 PM.
#2
Banned
New
Likes For bboy314:
#5
The new wider cassette, gains you more gear range, than the slightly more narrow triple, loses range. And with 16T max drop on most front derailleurs now, you can go wider still, or go 11-36T and get by with a 50/34 or 52/36 wide double.
Each tooth at the high end of the cassette, makes way more difference than at any of the chainrings. And on 20" wheels like my folder, that 11T makes all the difference in the world in having a sufficient high, without needing an internal gear hub for an overdrive.
Each tooth at the high end of the cassette, makes way more difference than at any of the chainrings. And on 20" wheels like my folder, that 11T makes all the difference in the world in having a sufficient high, without needing an internal gear hub for an overdrive.
Likes For Duragrouch:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,321
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Liked 4,331 Times
in
2,788 Posts
My question is - what are you trying to do? Ride fast in flattish country with the occasional hill, hence to 30 tooth or ride into the Sierras, the Rockies, Oregon's coast range or the east coast's plenty of short steep hills? There's a place for both those gear setups. What's best depends on where and how you ride, your strength, your climbing style, how important closely spaced middle and high gears are for you ...
Tell us more about the above and we can be much more constructive.
Tell us more about the above and we can be much more constructive.
#8
Newbie
Thread Starter
Didn't know this would be complicated. I have a 2006 LeMond Alpe D'Huez road bike and the chainring is quite worn out and I looking to change some parts out. Saw some components at decent price with this gear ratio.
I like to know would the new gear ratio be an overall improvement over the old one, would I be faster on flat and easier on climbs? I'm from SF,CA so plenty of varying elevations.
I like to know would the new gear ratio be an overall improvement over the old one, would I be faster on flat and easier on climbs? I'm from SF,CA so plenty of varying elevations.
#9
Didn't know this would be complicated. I have a 2006 LeMond Alpe D'Huez road bike and the chainring is quite worn out and I looking to change some parts out. Saw some components at decent price with this gear ratio.
I like to know would the new gear ratio be an overall improvement over the old one, would I be faster on flat and easier on climbs? I'm from SF,CA so plenty of varying elevations.
I like to know would the new gear ratio be an overall improvement over the old one, would I be faster on flat and easier on climbs? I'm from SF,CA so plenty of varying elevations.
Second, how my cogs on your cassette? That makes a big difference in gear steps.
Third, are you looking to just change chainrings, or entire crank? There are amazing deals on new hollow spindle two-piece cranks (similar to shimano hollowtech II), and I love the external bearing system versus taper spindle bottom brackets. However it is a lot easier to find 50/34 or 52/36 doubles, than triples in hollow spindle, at least with 5-arm spiders, which, for aesthetics and standardization, I prefer. 34 is as small as you can go on 110mm BCD, you'll need 74mm or other to use a 30.
Fourth, do you want a lower-low, riding in SF? Me, riding in Seattle, I need a 21 gear inch low, and may need lower if heavy touring. On 700Cx25(?) you may want a lower low than 30 x 28, which is 28 gear inches. Do you always climb standing, or do you want to be able to spin up while sitting as well?
Last edited by Duragrouch; 05-20-24 at 02:35 AM.
#10
Newbie
Thread Starter
Like I said, the going down a tooth on the high cog will make more of a difference in (higher) speed than dropping down a couple teeth on the high chainring. That said, do you need a higher high? Most folks don't on 700c wheels. My bike has 20"/406 wheels so I need all the high I can get, I need that 11T bad.
Second, how my cogs on your cassette? That makes a big difference in gear steps.
Third, are you looking to just change chainrings, or entire crank? There are amazing deals on new hollow spindle two-piece cranks (similar to shimano hollowtech II), and I love the external bearing system versus taper spindle bottom brackets. However it is a lot easier to find 50/34 or 52/36 doubles, than triples in hollow spindle, at least with 5-arm spiders, which, for aesthetics and standardization, I prefer. 34 is as small as you can go on 110mm BCD, you'll need 74mm or other to use a 30.
Fourth, do you want a lower-low, riding in SF? Me, riding in Seattle, I need a 21 gear inch low, and may need lower if heavy touring. On 700Cx25(?) you may want a lower low than 30 x 28, which is 28 gear inches. Do you always climb standing, or do you want to be able to spin up while sitting as well?
Second, how my cogs on your cassette? That makes a big difference in gear steps.
Third, are you looking to just change chainrings, or entire crank? There are amazing deals on new hollow spindle two-piece cranks (similar to shimano hollowtech II), and I love the external bearing system versus taper spindle bottom brackets. However it is a lot easier to find 50/34 or 52/36 doubles, than triples in hollow spindle, at least with 5-arm spiders, which, for aesthetics and standardization, I prefer. 34 is as small as you can go on 110mm BCD, you'll need 74mm or other to use a 30.
Fourth, do you want a lower-low, riding in SF? Me, riding in Seattle, I need a 21 gear inch low, and may need lower if heavy touring. On 700Cx25(?) you may want a lower low than 30 x 28, which is 28 gear inches. Do you always climb standing, or do you want to be able to spin up while sitting as well?
Front derailleur is a Shimano Ultegra Triple, Rear derailleur is a Shimano 105.
Old: Bontrager GXP 170mm 9spd 52/39/30T, Shimano 10spd CS-5600 12-25T
New: Shimano 105 FC-5603 170mm 10spd 50/39/30T, Shimano Ultegra 10 spd CS-6700 11-28T
On this bike we can climb without getting out of the saddle, my brother could power through almost any hills and not change gears, I'm weaker and like to play with the gears a bit more. Also trying to match parts for aesthetics too, haha...
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 6,006
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Liked 2,277 Times
in
1,393 Posts
50/39/30 with the 11-28 is better.
John
John
#12
Wheelman
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Putney, London UK
Posts: 1,018
Bikes: 1982 Holdsworth Avanti (531), 1961 Holdsworth Cyclone
Liked 844 Times
in
416 Posts
Gear calculator is made for this situation:
https://www.gear-calculator.com/?GR=...11,28&UF2=2125
Old at top, new lower.
You can fill in your middle sprockets.
https://www.gear-calculator.com/?GR=...11,28&UF2=2125
Old at top, new lower.
You can fill in your middle sprockets.
Likes For Aardwolf:
#13
Welp, I guess what I'm trying to say is, the newer setup you mention is better than the old. But if you haven't already bought parts, you should evaluate if that will get you everything you want, because even wider range gearing than that is available.
Aesthetics matter to me too. I'm not yet a fan of pie-plate low cogs, and I like 5 arm crank spiders, which seem to be getting as scarce as lugged frames.
Aesthetics matter to me too. I'm not yet a fan of pie-plate low cogs, and I like 5 arm crank spiders, which seem to be getting as scarce as lugged frames.
Likes For Duragrouch:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,198
Bikes: Columbine, Paramount Track Bike, Colnago Super, Santana Tandems (1995 & 2007), Gary Fisher Piranha, Trek Wahoo, Bianchi Track Bike, a couple of Honda mountain bikes
Liked 431 Times
in
265 Posts
The Bike have mixed match components.... wheel is 700x25c can't go any higher, maybe max at 700x26c but my brother and I are sticking to 700x25c.
Front derailleur is a Shimano Ultegra Triple, Rear derailleur is a Shimano 105.
Old: Bontrager GXP 170mm 9spd 52/39/30T, Shimano 10spd CS-5600 12-25T
New: Shimano 105 FC-5603 170mm 10spd 50/39/30T, Shimano Ultegra 10 spd CS-6700 11-28T
On this bike we can climb without getting out of the saddle, my brother could power through almost any hills and not change gears, I'm weaker and like to play with the gears a bit more. Also trying to match parts for aesthetics too, haha...
Front derailleur is a Shimano Ultegra Triple, Rear derailleur is a Shimano 105.
Old: Bontrager GXP 170mm 9spd 52/39/30T, Shimano 10spd CS-5600 12-25T
New: Shimano 105 FC-5603 170mm 10spd 50/39/30T, Shimano Ultegra 10 spd CS-6700 11-28T
On this bike we can climb without getting out of the saddle, my brother could power through almost any hills and not change gears, I'm weaker and like to play with the gears a bit more. Also trying to match parts for aesthetics too, haha...
__________________
Cheers, Mike
-Stupid hurts....ride safe
Cheers, Mike
-Stupid hurts....ride safe
Likes For PromptCritical:
#17
#18
Commuter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: SE Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 742
Bikes: Main Bikes: 2023 Trek Domane AL3, 2022 Aventon Level.2 eBike, 1972 Schwinn Varsity, 2024 Priority Apollo 11
Liked 519 Times
in
278 Posts
Well, for me it's new. I like a LOW low gear, so when my legs and lungs are spent, I can still climb on the bike instead of on foot.
I did a 60 mile gravel ride a couple weekends ago with non-stop hills. By the 50 mile mark, I just couldn't climb the steepest hills in the lowest gear any more.
I like a low gear that's below 0.8:1. Lower if possible, even if it means walking speed.
On the flipside, having higher high gears means you can descend faster, but for me, when I'm going over 30 mph, the worst is that I don't go faster, which is better than pushing the bike.
I did a 60 mile gravel ride a couple weekends ago with non-stop hills. By the 50 mile mark, I just couldn't climb the steepest hills in the lowest gear any more.
I like a low gear that's below 0.8:1. Lower if possible, even if it means walking speed.
On the flipside, having higher high gears means you can descend faster, but for me, when I'm going over 30 mph, the worst is that I don't go faster, which is better than pushing the bike.
Likes For Smaug1:
#19
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 14,619
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Liked 4,552 Times
in
3,049 Posts
Didn't know this would be complicated. I have a 2006 LeMond Alpe D'Huez road bike and the chainring is quite worn out and I looking to change some parts out. Saw some components at decent price with this gear ratio.
I like to know would the new gear ratio be an overall improvement over the old one, would I be faster on flat and easier on climbs? I'm from SF,CA so plenty of varying elevations.
I like to know would the new gear ratio be an overall improvement over the old one, would I be faster on flat and easier on climbs? I'm from SF,CA so plenty of varying elevations.
In terms of weakness, switching gears is not at all "weakness" don't feel that way. The whole point of gears is to change them not to just sit in one gear and try and power through just to seem hard to yourself. If your brother wants to be super strong tell him to get a fixed gear and HTFU but in reality gears exist for a good reason and you should use them especially when climbing hills.
#20
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,510
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Liked 4,058 Times
in
1,999 Posts
I just went through this process on an old bike. I ended up just buying a full Tiagra 10-speed groupset with 50-34 double cranks, and an 11-34 cassette. Gear ratios from 1:1 to 4.5:1.
Aliexpress has full Tiagra sets for sale.
Edit: Triple chainrings are the work of the devil, made somewhat necessary when wide range cassettes were not common. But today I say "be gone devil!"
Aliexpress has full Tiagra sets for sale.
Edit: Triple chainrings are the work of the devil, made somewhat necessary when wide range cassettes were not common. But today I say "be gone devil!"
Last edited by terrymorse; 05-20-24 at 12:34 PM. Reason: spelling
#21
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 4,140
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Liked 1,699 Times
in
1,166 Posts
This is not complicated. You should consider, with respect to your old drivetrain, two issues: (1) do you run out of gears at either the top end (52T chain ring with 12T cog) and/or the low end (30T chain ring with 25T cog; and (2) are there situations where you keep shifting back and forth between two adjacent cogs because neither feels quite right, even though the riding environment (terrain and wind) is not changing much? The latter may indicate a gap in your gearing.
The old drivetrain has a top end of (A) 52/12=4.333; the new drive train has a top end of (B) 50/11=4.545. If you have sufficient power to maintain the same cadence (i.e., pedaling RPM) at both A and B, then B will let you go faster at the top end. But the gaps between cogs are wider in the new drivetrain which may make you slower in situations where your ideal gearing is in such a gap. It really depends on the gear combination you usually ride "on the flat", which you have not identified. On the flats, most cyclists are not riding at the top end of their gearing, which is more for going downhill.
The new drivetrain has a lower low end which will make it easier on climbs.
The new drivetrain has a lower low end which will make it easier on climbs.
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
#22
Full Member
Didn't know this would be complicated. I have a 2006 LeMond Alpe D'Huez road bike and the chainring is quite worn out and I looking to change some parts out. Saw some components at decent price with this gear ratio.
I like to know would the new gear ratio be an overall improvement over the old one, would I be faster on flat and easier on climbs? I'm from SF,CA so plenty of varying elevations.
I like to know would the new gear ratio be an overall improvement over the old one, would I be faster on flat and easier on climbs? I'm from SF,CA so plenty of varying elevations.
Don't expect this gearing change to make a drastic change to your riding. The engine is still the primary driver of your performance on the bike and new slightly different gears aren't going to change that, especially with a triple that already had a lot of ratios available to you.
Likes For NumbersGuy:
#23
Senior Member
Didn't know this would be complicated. I have a 2006 LeMond Alpe D'Huez road bike and the chainring is quite worn out and I looking to change some parts out. Saw some components at decent price with this gear ratio.
I like to know would the new gear ratio be an overall improvement over the old one, would I be faster on flat and easier on climbs? I'm from SF,CA so plenty of varying elevations.
I like to know would the new gear ratio be an overall improvement over the old one, would I be faster on flat and easier on climbs? I'm from SF,CA so plenty of varying elevations.
#24
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,142
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Liked 5,404 Times
in
3,729 Posts
If you climb a lot. Then between those two choices you gave, a lighter bike will do more for you than either of those gearing choices.
#25
Hack
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,299
Bikes: TrueNorth CX bike, 88 Bianchi Strada (currently Sturmey'd), Yess World Cup race BMX, Pure Cruiser race BMX, RSD Mayor v3 Fatbike
Liked 208 Times
in
144 Posts
. I run ~53.5 gear inches. Even the pros won't run much more, they just train to spin faster.