Does weight really matter on flat roads?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Does weight really matter on flat roads?
How about a 10.9 KG total bike if only using it on relatively flat roads?
Is that weight a major downer?
Is that weight a major downer?
#3
Senior Member
After that I believe it comes down to how a frame responds to your style of riding.
I had 20lbs steel frame bicycle that felt like it was made out of lead. Super stiff and unforgiving; obviously I wasn't putting out the power this frame needed.
On the other hand, I had a vintage Specialized Rockhopper that was over 25lbs with rack and trunk. That bicycle road like a dream; I'd still be riding it but it got stolen.
Sometimes too much emphasis is put on weight when there are other factors that make a good ride.
As long as when I step on the gas I can feel the bicycle moving forward, all is good.
Response.
Likes For jideta:
#5
Seńor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
215 Posts
If not accelerating or climbing, the weight makes practically zero difference.
Furthermore, 10.9kg is only slightly heavier (less than a kg) than 1970s and early '80s pro tour bikes. In 1993, Miguel Indurain won the Tour de France on a 10.3kg bike.
Furthermore, 10.9kg is only slightly heavier (less than a kg) than 1970s and early '80s pro tour bikes. In 1993, Miguel Indurain won the Tour de France on a 10.3kg bike.
#7
Senior Member
Really no. Even on hills there are more important factors that weight alone. And as Wilfred said, 10.9kg isn't that heavy.
#8
Senior Member
Road bike vs. road bike, probably not so much as Wilfred said.
Comparing different bike types? Well, I can say that my aluminum mtn bike at some 20 lbs takes substantially more effort on flat road to keep any kind of speed up. Just staying at ~13 mph is a constant chore where my aluminum road bikes I can cruise at 15 no problem.
IMO, bike type / weight, wind, aerodynamics, tire type, and rider position (sitting mostly up on the mtn versus down on a road bike) all factor in my ability to ride a sustained speed.
Comparing different bike types? Well, I can say that my aluminum mtn bike at some 20 lbs takes substantially more effort on flat road to keep any kind of speed up. Just staying at ~13 mph is a constant chore where my aluminum road bikes I can cruise at 15 no problem.
IMO, bike type / weight, wind, aerodynamics, tire type, and rider position (sitting mostly up on the mtn versus down on a road bike) all factor in my ability to ride a sustained speed.
Likes For gnappi:
#9
Sophomore Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,531
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,059 Times
in
633 Posts
Even on the flats, there are numerous minor slow-downs, requiring some degree of acceleration to get back up to speed. There might be hundreds of these during a typical 50 mile ride, and they certainly add up. But subjectively, I've ridden 16lb bikes on flat rides, and not noticed any advantage to losing 4-5 lbs, compared to a typical 21 lb road bike. If the OP had a 20 kg bike on the flats, he might notice a difference, but @10.9 kilos I don't think a few pound less would be of any help.
Pros often have a bike they use on regular stages, and a much lighter "climbing bike" for use in the mountains. Why don't they just ride the light bike all the time? I'm sure there must be some very good reasons behind this, but I could only guess at what they are (durability? different geometry for a climbing bike?).
Pros often have a bike they use on regular stages, and a much lighter "climbing bike" for use in the mountains. Why don't they just ride the light bike all the time? I'm sure there must be some very good reasons behind this, but I could only guess at what they are (durability? different geometry for a climbing bike?).
Likes For bruce19:
Likes For Kevin R:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
BUT every ride starts at 0 MPH and you have to accelerate to however fast you ride. It might not make an overall difference in a 25 mile ride, but the psychological memory of that sluggish initial acceleration remains.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
Likes For Retro Grouch:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,893
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1062 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times
in
421 Posts
In my view, yes it matters. Will it make me go faster? Probably not. But a nice bike is more fun to ride. Weight is one of the factors that go into a nice bike -- not the only one and possibly not the most important one. But it's still a factor. I'm saying this as a relatively casual cyclist, certainly not a racer.
Up to a point, the lighter components are where the designers focus their effort on things like performance and comfort. Also, a lighter bike might just mean that you've left some things at home that are not absolute necessities, so you're focusing more on the ride. Since I got back into cycling after a hiatus, I've completely ditched many of the things that I once considered necessary, such as complete rain gear just in case. Leaving that stuff at home reflects my confidence that I can manage situations such as a minor change in the weather.
Up to a point, the lighter components are where the designers focus their effort on things like performance and comfort. Also, a lighter bike might just mean that you've left some things at home that are not absolute necessities, so you're focusing more on the ride. Since I got back into cycling after a hiatus, I've completely ditched many of the things that I once considered necessary, such as complete rain gear just in case. Leaving that stuff at home reflects my confidence that I can manage situations such as a minor change in the weather.
#15
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
Also, a lighter bike might just mean that you've left some things at home that are not absolute necessities, so you're focusing more on the ride. Since I got back into cycling after a hiatus, I've completely ditched many of the things that I once considered necessary, such as complete rain gear just in case. Leaving that stuff at home reflects my confidence that I can manage situations such as a minor change in the weather.
Likes For AlmostTrick:
#16
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
Everyone here seems to be making a blanket statement but the the world isn't a perfect lab environment and weight does matter more for less powerful riders.
-Tim-
Likes For TimothyH:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 289
Bikes: Masi Giramondo, Trek 830 monstercross build, Raleigh Gran Sport, Lemond Tourmalet
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times
in
12 Posts
Weight does not matter. It makes you stronger, and the extra momentum helps you bomb over obstacles, making acceleration less of an issue.
#18
Full Member
Weight never matters anywhere. Except when you live from winning races.
Likes For Kovkov:
#19
Senior Member
On topic, I'd say there obviously is some difference in accelerating (and to a lesser degree, in decelerating), but that doesn't mean much on flats if you're not racing. I have done over 90 km on an old 20+ kg army bike that was built like a tank, and was fine. The weight actually helped to keep momentum when cruising; it took some more time to get up to speed, but it rolled very nicely.
#20
Newbie
Lighter bike is often more fragile to component and frame failures.
#21
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
Lighter bikes matter more for lighter riders, since the bike is a greater percentage of their weight than it is for heavy riders.
#22
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
The question is basically unanswerable without more info--"does it matter" and "major downer" are relative terms. It really depends what you're using the bike for, but on the whole, there's many factors that will affect the speed of the bike more than a couple pounds of bike weight.
#23
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I'm not sure that's true--it's too much of a blanket statement itself. If someone lacks power, a small change in the weight of the bicycle may not have an effect on the ratio of power to weight big enough to be noticed. In other words, that person's acceleration on the lighter bike is still going to be weak. I don't have the math to prove this, but I suspect the stronger rider would actually be more likely to get a noticeable benefit from reducing the weight.
Likes For fietsbob:
#25
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 154
Bikes: 1996 Cannondale R900, 2016 Trek Boone, 2005 Giant Yukon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 584 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times
in
54 Posts
Physics says absolutely. Obviously no terrain is perfectly flat. So you'd have losses there. You will also have losses due to deformation of the tire. More weight equals more deformation. But still when comparing relatively small differences in weight. Most would be hard pressed to notice.