Garmin calories counting
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Garmin calories counting
I recently purchased a second hand Garmin Edge .+ 520 bike computer. I have previously used Strava on iPhone to record my rides. When counting calories Garmin Connect app seem to count 30-40 -% more than Strava. Others out there who find calories in Garmin to be very over-exaggerated?
#2
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,002
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6199 Post(s)
Liked 4,816 Times
in
3,323 Posts
Pick one of those places or things to be your Calorie count reference and use it. Don't worry about whether it's the correct number or not and don't worry about what other say. Just as long as it's consistent it's usable. Otherwise you'll be in a state of panic wondering why one say one thing and another says something else. Don't try to use Calories to come up with the effort you did on a ride to attempt to do training by power. Get a power meter for that.
#3
Pennylane Splitter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 1,879
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1807 Post(s)
Liked 1,448 Times
in
995 Posts
I recently purchased a second hand Garmin Edge .+ 520 bike computer. I have previously used Strava on iPhone to record my rides. When counting calories Garmin Connect app seem to count 30-40 -% more than Strava. Others out there who find calories in Garmin to be very over-exaggerated?
Likes For skidder:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 982
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 506 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 639 Times
in
357 Posts
Pick one of those places or things to be your Calorie count reference and use it. Don't worry about whether it's the correct number or not and don't worry about what other say. Just as long as it's consistent it's usable. Otherwise you'll be in a state of panic wondering why one say one thing and another says something else. Don't try to use Calories to come up with the effort you did on a ride to attempt to do training by power. Get a power meter for that.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 707
Bikes: Specialized Diverge E5 Comp, Specialized AWOL Comp, Scott Solace 10
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times
in
20 Posts
I found that my Garmin 520 Edge tended to overestimate by a similar percentage as you noted. I do find that my Apple Watch seems to be much more accurate, but it should be as its tracking heart rate in addition to monitoring moving statistics. All that said, I agree with Iride01 that consistency matters more than accuracy unless you have a very specific reason for tracking that requires some degree of accuracy
#6
Newbie
Huh, I upload my Garmin .fit files to Strava and don't see any difference in calorie numbers. Is this because Strava's just using Garmin's data? I've heard that the most direct way to measure calorie expendature is to use a power meter. I do have one...not sure if that also affects the accuracy. But yeah, picking one to standardize on and sticking with it is probably a good bet.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,904
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,933 Times
in
1,213 Posts
Applying a fudge factor to any calculated calorie count is a good idea, as long as it's less than 1.0.
I'd add, DO NOT!! use the calorie counter to figure out how much you can eat if you're trying to maintain or lose weight. Without (expensive) lab tests, power meter results, and a few months of weighing everything you'll eat to calibrate the system, you'll gain weight if you take that calculated value as permission to have 2 Tbs of ice cream.
I'd add, DO NOT!! use the calorie counter to figure out how much you can eat if you're trying to maintain or lose weight. Without (expensive) lab tests, power meter results, and a few months of weighing everything you'll eat to calibrate the system, you'll gain weight if you take that calculated value as permission to have 2 Tbs of ice cream.
Likes For pdlamb:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 707
Bikes: Specialized Diverge E5 Comp, Specialized AWOL Comp, Scott Solace 10
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times
in
20 Posts
Applying a fudge factor to any calculated calorie count is a good idea, as long as it's less than 1.0.
I'd add, DO NOT!! use the calorie counter to figure out how much you can eat if you're trying to maintain or lose weight. Without (expensive) lab tests, power meter results, and a few months of weighing everything you'll eat to calibrate the system, you'll gain weight if you take that calculated value as permission to have 2 Tbs of ice cream.
I'd add, DO NOT!! use the calorie counter to figure out how much you can eat if you're trying to maintain or lose weight. Without (expensive) lab tests, power meter results, and a few months of weighing everything you'll eat to calibrate the system, you'll gain weight if you take that calculated value as permission to have 2 Tbs of ice cream.
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 96
Bikes: 2011 Cannondale SuperSix 3, 1987 Raleigh Technium 440
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times
in
16 Posts
If you are not using an HR monitor it will do that. I have an Edge 510, and my old HR crapped out on me this year. Ride to work said 1025 calories without. I knew that was wrong, its only 11.5 miles. Got a new dual HR monitor, about 600 calories, right in line with previous rides.
#10
Senior Member
Any estimated power or calorie number during a bike ride that is not measuring power directly can be off by say up to 50%, and that is if everything is set up correctly. Your tool might not know about inclination, wind, speed, weight.
Then if in the settings something is really wrong, like weight or if speed is not correctly measured it can be off by any factor.
On the other hand if you have a feel for what these numbers mean you can make a rough estimate yourself.
For example if you ever ride on a flat road with no wind for a little bit, then remember the effort it takes to go 22 mph on a road bike, if you can keep that up for the entire ride that gives you about 1000 Cal/hour. For other speeds that is about:
20 mph -> 800 Cal / hour
18 mph -> 600 Cal / hour
16 mph -> 400 Cal / hour
This should get you to say within 20% of the actual numbers.
For a regular ride with wind and inclination, the speed is less of an indication for calories burned, but you can still compare the effort it is taking you to get an estimate.
Then if in the settings something is really wrong, like weight or if speed is not correctly measured it can be off by any factor.
On the other hand if you have a feel for what these numbers mean you can make a rough estimate yourself.
For example if you ever ride on a flat road with no wind for a little bit, then remember the effort it takes to go 22 mph on a road bike, if you can keep that up for the entire ride that gives you about 1000 Cal/hour. For other speeds that is about:
20 mph -> 800 Cal / hour
18 mph -> 600 Cal / hour
16 mph -> 400 Cal / hour
This should get you to say within 20% of the actual numbers.
For a regular ride with wind and inclination, the speed is less of an indication for calories burned, but you can still compare the effort it is taking you to get an estimate.
Last edited by mr_pedro; 07-25-23 at 01:55 AM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
740 Posts
Outside of a research lab you are not going to find an accurate calorie counter. There are online charts and formulas that you can use as long as you realize these are gross estimates.