Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Can someone school me on Wheelset selection?

Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like :The Dirty Kanza". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Can someone school me on Wheelset selection?

Old 12-05-19, 12:57 PM
  #1  
dpicare26
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
dpicare26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 446

Bikes: '15 BMC Granfondo '15 Stevens Team CX, '09 Specialized Tricross Comp, '74 Schwinn Paramount, '85 Trek 600, '89 Schwinn Circuit

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Can someone school me on Wheelset selection?

I've spent most of my time on these forums in the C&V section, so I'm a bit of a noob with CX/gravel.

What exactly sets apart a road wheelset from a gravel/cx set? In other words, what's the 'minimum' rim requirements to accommodate gravel tires (32mm+)? I've seen some marketed that had an inside width of 21mm, some as large as 25, etc, etc.

I'd like 700c clincher wheelset with rim braking surface.

I bought a used cx bike that has a tubular wheelset (I hadn't realized there was a difference between tubular and tubeless.. rookie) and I don't love the idea of not being able to easily fix a flat tire if I intend on doing some serious gravel riding. I've done hundreds of miles on a clincher wheelset on gravel, with rarely a pinch flat, so I'm totally good with clincer (or tubeless ready).
dpicare26 is offline  
Old 12-05-19, 01:12 PM
  #2  
caloso
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 38,938

Bikes: Ridley Excalibur, Gazelle Champion Mondial, On-One Pompino, Specialized Rock Hopper

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2205 Post(s)
Liked 848 Times in 445 Posts
The trend is wider for wider rims, but people have been putting 33mm + tires on road rims forever. I have been racing this season two sets of road clinchers: Mavic Ksyrium SSC and Shimano R-500. These are both under 20mm internal width. I even set up the Shimanos as tubeless with a WTB 37mm Riddler tire and they've worked flawlessly.
caloso is offline  
Old 12-05-19, 01:21 PM
  #3  
dpicare26
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
dpicare26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 446

Bikes: '15 BMC Granfondo '15 Stevens Team CX, '09 Specialized Tricross Comp, '74 Schwinn Paramount, '85 Trek 600, '89 Schwinn Circuit

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso View Post
The trend is wider for wider rims, but people have been putting 33mm + tires on road rims forever. I have been racing this season two sets of road clinchers: Mavic Ksyrium SSC and Shimano R-500. These are both under 20mm internal width. I even set up the Shimanos as tubeless with a WTB 37mm Riddler tire and they've worked flawlessly.
I tired to put a 32mm CX tire on an older rim this year, and it just seemed too "tight" trying to squeeze the tube and the tire beads into the rim. Is that just perhaps because it was older (90's) and the internal rim was likely narrower? Would I be able to put the same 32mm tire on this wheelset, for example?
dpicare26 is offline  
Likes For dpicare26:
Old 12-05-19, 01:26 PM
  #4  
ThermionicScott 
7-speed cultist
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 20,010

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers)

Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2769 Post(s)
Liked 678 Times in 473 Posts
Originally Posted by dpicare26 View Post
I tired to put a 32mm CX tire on an older rim this year, and it just seemed too "tight" trying to squeeze the tube and the tire beads into the rim. Is that just perhaps because it was older (90's) and the internal rim was likely narrower? Would I be able to put the same 32mm tire on this wheelset, for example?
Tubeless-compatible tires* are known to fit a little tighter. You might try thinner tubeless tape in your older rims, and make sure the tube has a little bit of air in it when installing. That helps it to get out of the way.

*I'm making an assumption there, but it seems like most CX clinchers are tubeless these days.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp View Post
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Likes For ThermionicScott:
Old 12-05-19, 01:44 PM
  #5  
caloso
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 38,938

Bikes: Ridley Excalibur, Gazelle Champion Mondial, On-One Pompino, Specialized Rock Hopper

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2205 Post(s)
Liked 848 Times in 445 Posts
Originally Posted by dpicare26 View Post
I tired to put a 32mm CX tire on an older rim this year, and it just seemed too "tight" trying to squeeze the tube and the tire beads into the rim. Is that just perhaps because it was older (90's) and the internal rim was likely narrower? Would I be able to put the same 32mm tire on this wheelset, for example?
I'm sure it would be fine. I will note that if you're trying to mount tubeless ready tires, they tend to be a lot stiffer at the bead and can be tougher to mount. Warming the tire and lubing the rim with some soapy water can help.
caloso is offline  
Old 12-05-19, 02:30 PM
  #6  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 10,262

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '87 Schwinn Prelude, Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo, '18 Diamondback Syncr

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3998 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times in 617 Posts
I think my rims are 19mm internal. My old ones were 17.5mm and they handled a true 40mm tire perfectly fine.

A modern rim thats 23mm - 25mm external will be good.
mstateglfr is offline  
Likes For mstateglfr:
Old 12-05-19, 03:01 PM
  #7  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,526
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 822 Post(s)
Liked 620 Times in 331 Posts
OP, where are you in Pennsylvania? If you are a gravel noob, and want a new wheelset, it might be best to go to a good shop and get some advice - and maybe get a custom-built wheelset. (Unless you build your own.)

The best wheelsets I've owned have all been handbuilt. Costs a little more, but worth it.
Koyote is offline  
Old 12-05-19, 03:19 PM
  #8  
dpicare26
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
dpicare26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 446

Bikes: '15 BMC Granfondo '15 Stevens Team CX, '09 Specialized Tricross Comp, '74 Schwinn Paramount, '85 Trek 600, '89 Schwinn Circuit

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote View Post
OP, where are you in Pennsylvania? If you are a gravel noob, and want a new wheelset, it might be best to go to a good shop and get some advice - and maybe get a custom-built wheelset. (Unless you build your own.)

The best wheelsets I've owned have all been handbuilt. Costs a little more, but worth it.
are you familiar with Bucknell University? Right around there. It's home to an event called UnPAved, which, attending this year piqued my interests a bit in the gravel realm.

not sure I want to shell out the dough for a custom built set, having upgraded my roadie this spring and the new purchase of a gravel bike. I've got a decent set of Rovals on my Tricross, which I had considered swapping over, but I plan to re-sell the tricross to a friend, and don't think they'd like the tubulars.
dpicare26 is offline  
Old 12-05-19, 03:48 PM
  #9  
dpicare26
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
dpicare26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 446

Bikes: '15 BMC Granfondo '15 Stevens Team CX, '09 Specialized Tricross Comp, '74 Schwinn Paramount, '85 Trek 600, '89 Schwinn Circuit

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
ok,so this chart has been useful to me. Not sure why I didn't just check with Sheldon Brown first, anyway..



I suppose that still begs the question, is there anything else that distinguishes a CX wheelset from a road wheelset? Spoke count, etc
dpicare26 is offline  
Old 12-05-19, 04:08 PM
  #10  
caloso
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 38,938

Bikes: Ridley Excalibur, Gazelle Champion Mondial, On-One Pompino, Specialized Rock Hopper

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2205 Post(s)
Liked 848 Times in 445 Posts
Originally Posted by dpicare26 View Post
ok,so this chart has been useful to me. Not sure why I didn't just check with Sheldon Brown first, anyway..



I suppose that still begs the question, is there anything else that distinguishes a CX wheelset from a road wheelset? Spoke count, etc
None that I can see.
caloso is offline  
Old 12-05-19, 04:13 PM
  #11  
CarloM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 494

Bikes: 2019 TCR Advanced SL1 Disc; 2018 Cervelo S3 SRAM eTap HRD; 2020 Giant Revolt Advanced

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times in 96 Posts
That chart looks a little off to me. For example, Bontrager (Trek) released the Aeolus Pro 3V which is aimed at the "high volume road and gravel tire" market (not MTB) and it's a 25mm internal width. If that chart is accurate it says 44c-57c...but most gravel frames max out around 45c or 50c for 700c tires. I just chatted with Trek CSR (because seeing that chart made me nervous since I just bought the 3V) and their official tire size support for the 3V is 32c - 64c.
CarloM is offline  
Old 12-05-19, 05:00 PM
  #12  
caloso
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 38,938

Bikes: Ridley Excalibur, Gazelle Champion Mondial, On-One Pompino, Specialized Rock Hopper

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2205 Post(s)
Liked 848 Times in 445 Posts
The chart is just about what width tire is safe to use on a given width rim. It doesn't take into account frame or fork clearances. That's a separate consideration.
caloso is offline  
Old 12-05-19, 05:56 PM
  #13  
ThermionicScott 
7-speed cultist
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 20,010

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers)

Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2769 Post(s)
Liked 678 Times in 473 Posts
Originally Posted by CarloM View Post
That chart looks a little off to me. For example, Bontrager (Trek) released the Aeolus Pro 3V which is aimed at the "high volume road and gravel tire" market (not MTB) and it's a 25mm internal width. If that chart is accurate it says 44c-57c...but most gravel frames max out around 45c or 50c for 700c tires. I just chatted with Trek CSR (because seeing that chart made me nervous since I just bought the 3V) and their official tire size support for the 3V is 32c - 64c.
The chart is at least 12 years old, and represents older thinking on rim and tire recommendations. That people would someday run relatively skinny tires on really wide rims didn't occur to them, because the wide rims of the day tended to be much heavier.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp View Post
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 12-05-19, 06:27 PM
  #14  
CarloM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 494

Bikes: 2019 TCR Advanced SL1 Disc; 2018 Cervelo S3 SRAM eTap HRD; 2020 Giant Revolt Advanced

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times in 96 Posts
Yeah it's misleading as well as old. Because it's implying "safety" issues and so in my case, on a 25mm internal rim, Trek says I can run a 32c on it, but according to that it's "unsafe" to run anything less than 44c! That's such a huge discrepancy.
CarloM is offline  
Old 12-05-19, 07:09 PM
  #15  
loheiman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 62
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
I had a 700c wheelset custom built for me by Colorado Cyclist. I choose the DT470 rim because it has a 20mm inner width which I think is versatile to run 30-45mm tires. CX wheelsets may be on the narrower side as they're primary designed to run 33mm tires AFAIK. WTB has a chart that represents what combinations of tires/rim width they recommend: https://www.wtb.com/pages/tire-rim-fit-chart#

Beyond width CX wheelsets may have fewer spokes in order to maximize performance/weight rather than durability. There are many opinions on this but i think most all agree that you'll be unlikely to have issues with a well built 28 or 32 spoke wheelset.
loheiman is offline  
Old 12-05-19, 07:30 PM
  #16  
Steve B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 4,305

Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1587 Post(s)
Liked 301 Times in 212 Posts
We were running 2.5” mt. bike tires on what are now considered really narrow rims, maybe 19-20 mm wide ? and at 35 psi.

Did that for a few decades with nobody thinking it was not a good idea, cause it was fine.
Steve B. is offline  
Likes For Steve B.:
Old 12-05-19, 07:53 PM
  #17  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 10,262

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '87 Schwinn Prelude, Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo, '18 Diamondback Syncr

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3998 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times in 617 Posts
Originally Posted by dpicare26 View Post
ok,so this chart has been useful to me. Not sure why I didn't just check with Sheldon Brown first, anyway..



I suppose that still begs the question, is there anything else that distinguishes a CX wheelset from a road wheelset? Spoke count, etc
A cx wheelset will usually be 135mm or 142mm in the back.
A road wheelset will usually be 130mm or 142mm in the back.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 12-09-19, 03:18 PM
  #18  
dpicare26
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
dpicare26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 446

Bikes: '15 BMC Granfondo '15 Stevens Team CX, '09 Specialized Tricross Comp, '74 Schwinn Paramount, '85 Trek 600, '89 Schwinn Circuit

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks all for the info. I was able to put a 32mm cx tire on my road wheelset rims, no problem. I think the tube I used prior was too much (32-42mm). Tried a 28/32 today, fit just fine.
dpicare26 is offline  
Old 12-11-19, 11:05 PM
  #19  
dwmckee
Senior Member
 
dwmckee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,833

Bikes: Co-Motion Cappuccino Tandem,'88 Bob Jackson Touring, Co-Motion Cascadia Touring, Open U.P., Ritchie Titanium Breakaway, Frances Cycles SmallHaul cargo bike. Those are the permanent ones; others wander in and out of the stable occasionally as well.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 177 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 66 Times in 40 Posts
Gererally for gravel, most folks want at least 19 mm internal width and the closer to 25mm internal the better for a 700c rim. Even wider if riding 650bs.

The new Shimano GRX wheelset is excellent with 21.6mm internal width, 1625 grams weight for the set and cost $419. They have CUP AND CONE bearings too (thank goodness!). The new FSA gravel wheelset is pretty goood too at about the same price as the Shimano and just a few grams heavier but a bit wider and has sealed bearings. HuntMason X is comparable to the FSA set. Hunt is newer but good, about the same price though they ship from England unless you find a local shop like SweetWater Bikes in PA that stocks Hunt in the shop. Sometimes you can get hit with the new import Tarriff though when you import Hunt wheels from UK so be wary if you go that route.

Between these three I'd buy the Shimano myself as they are excellent quality and as light as many $1,000+ carbon wheelsets. As a matter of fact I am buying a set of Shimano wheels this week! The Shimano wheels do not get much attention with all of the botique wheelsets available out there, but if anything like the road wheels they build they should be outstanding, they have been building wheelsets for decades and do not put out any sub standard stuff. Shimano has great warranty backing and are easily serviceable by anyone without need for special sealed bearings.

I currently own a set of the FSAs and two sets of the Hunts mentioned above by the way so I can speak with firsthand experience with each.
dwmckee is offline  
Old 12-12-19, 02:06 PM
  #20  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 10,262

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '87 Schwinn Prelude, Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo, '18 Diamondback Syncr

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3998 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times in 617 Posts
Originally Posted by dwmckee View Post
The new Shimano GRX wheelset is excellent with 21.6mm internal width, 1625 grams weight for the set and cost $419.
That is a neat wheelset. I looked at it a few months ago when reading about the group and considering a wheelset for the frame I was building up at the time.
The weight was reported as 1720g to 1800g though, at least from what I read on Shimano's site and one of the larger online reviews.
Its a good price for sure. 24h rims simply scare me away due to not wanting to chance breaking and spending more money, even if the profile is designed to support me.

Does your shop have them in stock?...vendors online seem to be out for the most part.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 12-12-19, 03:16 PM
  #21  
redlude97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,656
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1924 Post(s)
Liked 177 Times in 129 Posts
FWIW running 21mm internal width Stans Crest with 33m tubeless for cyclocross and they've been fine. The rim is more likely to impact roots and ruts etc, mine have quite a bit of superficial damage and require semifrequent truing run at ~25psi with a 180lb rider. They handle the 36-40mm gravel tires much better in the summer when I switch modes
redlude97 is offline  
Old 12-12-19, 03:27 PM
  #22  
gravelED
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by dwmckee View Post
Gererally for gravel, most folks want at least 19 mm internal width and the closer to 25mm internal the better for a 700c rim. Even wider if riding 650bs.

The new Shimano GRX wheelset is excellent with 21.6mm internal width, 1625 grams weight for the set and cost $419. They have CUP AND CONE bearings too (thank goodness!). The new FSA gravel wheelset is pretty goood too at about the same price as the Shimano and just a few grams heavier but a bit wider and has sealed bearings. HuntMason X is comparable to the FSA set. Hunt is newer but good, about the same price though they ship from England unless you find a local shop like SweetWater Bikes in PA that stocks Hunt in the shop. Sometimes you can get hit with the new import Tarriff though when you import Hunt wheels from UK so be wary if you go that route.

Between these three I'd buy the Shimano myself as they are excellent quality and as light as many $1,000+ carbon wheelsets. As a matter of fact I am buying a set of Shimano wheels this week! The Shimano wheels do not get much attention with all of the botique wheelsets available out there, but if anything like the road wheels they build they should be outstanding, they have been building wheelsets for decades and do not put out any sub standard stuff. Shimano has great warranty backing and are easily serviceable by anyone without need for special sealed bearings.

I currently own a set of the FSAs and two sets of the Hunts mentioned above by the way so I can speak with firsthand experience with each.

Are you sure about the 1625 gram weight on the GRX wheels? Performance bike has them listed at 1815 grams, Shimano says 951 for the rear and 769 for the front, making it 1720 for the set.

Last edited by gravelED; 12-12-19 at 03:39 PM.
gravelED is offline  
Old 12-12-19, 09:41 PM
  #23  
dwmckee
Senior Member
 
dwmckee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,833

Bikes: Co-Motion Cappuccino Tandem,'88 Bob Jackson Touring, Co-Motion Cascadia Touring, Open U.P., Ritchie Titanium Breakaway, Frances Cycles SmallHaul cargo bike. Those are the permanent ones; others wander in and out of the stable occasionally as well.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 177 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 66 Times in 40 Posts
The last review I read has them at 1650 g, sorry, not 1625. I was off a bit. Still a great value however. Be sure you are loking at the GRX RX570 set. https://www.cxmagazine.com/shimano-g...10-rx812-rx570 Will be placing an order in a few days... Funny that the weights are seeming to vary so much from source to source... Will have to weigh them myself when they come in...
dwmckee is offline  
Old 12-12-19, 10:49 PM
  #24  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 10,262

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '87 Schwinn Prelude, Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo, '18 Diamondback Syncr

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3998 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times in 617 Posts
Originally Posted by dwmckee View Post
The last review I read has them at 1650 g, sorry, not 1625. I was off a bit. Still a great value however. Be sure you are loking at the GRX RX570 set. https://www.cxmagazine.com/shimano-g...10-rx812-rx570 Will be placing an order in a few days... Funny that the weights are seeming to vary so much from source to source... Will have to weigh them myself when they come in...
thatd be good to see actual weights. Shimano's website shows them as 1720g.
agreed that it's odd how much they vary online.
mstateglfr is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.