Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Suggestions for high-quality, fast 32 or 35 mm tires and rims?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Suggestions for high-quality, fast 32 or 35 mm tires and rims?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-18, 02:11 PM
  #51  
Kapusta
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times in 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by honcho
Repeatable, Objective, quantitative data is, in my experience, a reasonable starting point. There are so many variables involved with tires on bicycles that even the the "best" tire in testing may not be the best on the road for every cyclist in every situation. If flying by the seat of your pants with your tyre choices makes you happy, more power to you.
If you consider researching what other people find to be fast rolling tires in real world conditions “flying by the seat of my pants”, then yeah, that’s me.


Kapusta is offline  
Old 11-18-18, 02:13 PM
  #52  
Kapusta
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times in 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by honcho
Repeatable, Objective, quantitative data is, in my experience, a reasonable starting point.
IF, the experiment is relevant to what you want to know.

I will grant that if you want to know what tires roll fastest on your indoor rollers, I think these tests are quite valid.
Kapusta is offline  
Old 11-18-18, 02:16 PM
  #53  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times in 4,189 Posts
Originally Posted by Kapusta


Precision does not equal accuracy.
right, but the other options are to-
- take suggestions from here- a place with countless examples of hardly being precise or accurate.
- take manufacturer's advertising as truth, which is just obviously a bad idea.
- spend a bunch of money on multiple tires and swap em out ride after ride to figure out what feels faster while keeping recent memory in mind(frequent swaps).


while a drum test isnt the be all end all, it's a great place to start when looking at options. I can use the results to reduce 10 tires I am considering based on price to 5 tires and it makes the research that much faster.
what is inaccurate about the drum testing? Are you saying its inaccurate compared to road testing or are you saying its inaccurate due to a repeated error in the testing?
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 11-18-18, 02:17 PM
  #54  
honcho
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 196
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Kapusta


If you consider researching what other people find to be fast rolling tires in real world conditions “flying by the seat of my pants”, then yeah, that’s me.
So which is it :

A. Personally, I’ll go with my subjective impressions in the real world conditions I ride in over relaible, repeatable, and quantifiable results in conditions completely unlike those I ride in.
or
B. If you consider researching what other people find to be fast rolling tires in real world conditions “flying by the seat of my pants”, then yeah, that’s me.

Your subjective impressions or the subjective impressions of others?
Your bike, your time, your money, your ride, your choices.......mostly just giving you a hard time. Have fun!
honcho is offline  
Old 11-18-18, 02:20 PM
  #55  
ogmtb
Banned.
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
The OP asked for for "high-quality" rim/tire recommendations. I guess it's understandable that so many folks would ignore that and just recommend whatever clunky stock tire they are riding or the best bargains that they have found on their preferred tire.

Here's another tire/rim to throw into the "high-quality, fast" mix:

WTB Exposure 32s.

ogmtb is offline  
Old 11-18-18, 02:45 PM
  #56  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Compass tires ?
fietsbob is offline  
Old 11-18-18, 03:20 PM
  #57  
Mark Manner
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 185
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have ENVE SES 4.5AR rims (about 31mm wide) with Schwalbe Pro One 700x28mm tubeless (which measure out on that rim at right at 32mm). I ride them at 50-52psi on pavement and smoothish gravel/dirt and they ride great. [I weigh 145lbs] I am about to set up a more gravel oriented bike with ENVE G23 rims (same width but much more shallow) and Schwalbe G-One Speed 700x35mm. I hear good things about them, but haven't ridden them yet. I know they are expensive, but your high quality question means maybe worth mentioning.
Mark

Last edited by Mark Manner; 11-18-18 at 03:52 PM.
Mark Manner is offline  
Old 11-18-18, 05:21 PM
  #58  
HTupolev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,269
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1978 Post(s)
Liked 1,298 Times in 630 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
what is inaccurate about the drum testing?
Most oft-mentioned is the issue of a flat versus a cylindrical rolling surface. Small drums dig into the tread area of a tire and cause it to flex inward in a way that roads don't, and probably create more tread flex relative to sidewall flex than a road does.

The Compass Bon Jon Pass might be a good test case for seeing who's right. It seemed to do alright in Tour's flat-surface rocker test (and I've heard people claim that they've coast-down tested their BJPs to be pretty fast, although I haven't actually seen data), poor on BRR's large drum, and downright abysmal on Tom Anhalt's small rollers.
The drum testers seem confident that this is a result of inconsistent manufacturing across the different tire samples. The folks on the other side of the fence think it's due to the varying degrees to which the test methods represent roads.
HTupolev is offline  
Old 11-18-18, 05:31 PM
  #59  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times in 4,189 Posts
Originally Posted by HTupolev
Most oft-mentioned is the issue of a flat versus a cylindrical rolling surface. Small drums dig into the tread area of a tire and cause it to flex inward in a way that roads don't, and probably create more tread flex relative to sidewall flex than a road does.

The Compass Bon Jon Pass might be a good test case for seeing who's right. It seemed to do alright in Tour's flat-surface rocker test (and I've heard people claim that they've coast-down tested their BJPs to be pretty fast, although I haven't actually seen data), poor on BRR's large drum, and downright abysmal on Tom Anhalt's small rollers.
The drum testers seem confident that this is a result of inconsistent manufacturing across the different tire samples. The folks on the other side of the fence think it's due to the varying degrees to which the test methods represent roads.
ok, thanks. This is actually interesting. Wouldn't the tread flex be consistent across all tires though, so it would make all tires show 'poorly'?
or does tread flex theoretically hurt wider tires like compass more?
and with compass being a softer casing, the sidewalls flex more on a bike compared to some other tires, but that flex isnt seen on rolling tests?

just guessing at why it would matter. If all tests have the same issue, the results are still telling...no?
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 11-18-18, 06:34 PM
  #60  
HTupolev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,269
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1978 Post(s)
Liked 1,298 Times in 630 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
Wouldn't the tread flex be consistent across all tires though, so it would make all tires show 'poorly'?
This is the position of the drum testers.

The fact that the drum digs into the tread would be consistent across all tires, but the concern is that this might affect some tires differently from others.
For instance, suppose Tire A has beefy sidewalls and a supple tread, and Tire B has supple sidewalls and beefy tread, and they perform the same on the road. If the drum puts more emphasis on tread hysteresis relative to sidewall hysteresis than the road does, Tire B would look worse than Tire A when they're tested on the drum.

or does tread flex theoretically hurt wider tires like compass more?
I'm not sure I've seen that brought up, but it's an interesting point. I'm not familiar enough with the particulars to give a good answer.
HTupolev is offline  
Old 11-18-18, 07:18 PM
  #61  
Doctor Morbius
Interocitor Command
 
Doctor Morbius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The adult video section
Posts: 3,375

Bikes: 3 Road Bikes, 2 Hybrids

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 596 Post(s)
Liked 64 Times in 40 Posts
Perhaps some tire manufacturers are designing their tires to do well with drum tests giving them more marketing appeal to those who value rolling resistance?
Doctor Morbius is offline  
Old 11-18-18, 07:28 PM
  #62  
Kapusta
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times in 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by HTupolev
Most oft-mentioned is the issue of a flat versus a cylindrical rolling surface. Small drums dig into the tread area of a tire and cause it to flex inward in a way that roads don't, and probably create more tread flex relative to sidewall flex than a road does.

The Compass Bon Jon Pass might be a good test case for seeing who's right. It seemed to do alright in Tour's flat-surface rocker test (and I've heard people claim that they've coast-down tested their BJPs to be pretty fast, although I haven't actually seen data), poor on BRR's large drum, and downright abysmal on Tom Anhalt's small rollers.
The drum testers seem confident that this is a result of inconsistent manufacturing across the different tire samples. The folks on the other side of the fence think it's due to the varying degrees to which the test methods represent roads.
I have long had reservations about trusting roller drum tests as a way to simulate real world conditions for two reasons: First is the fact that the roller drum is very smooth. Roads are not, and the fact that a roller drum test ignores that makes them very compromised, IMO. The other issue is the shape of the deflection that the roller drum causes in the tire. Does it make a difference? I don't know, but it is a valid concern.

While I have had these doubts in the back of my head for a while, it was the results of the Bon Jon Pass that really confirmed my doubts. I have ridden a lot of tires in my time, and none have been faster. I am sure there are faster tires, but it is definitely ridiculously fast.

So, when it comes down to it, I am going to take my own (admittedly unscientific) experience in real world conditions over results from a test that are far from it.

BTW, in regards to the Tour test, I believe they show that the BJP was the 4th fasted tire they have tested. Though without knowing how many other tires there were, it is hard to say how impressive that is.
Kapusta is offline  
Old 11-19-18, 02:29 AM
  #63  
el forestero
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Japan
Posts: 106

Bikes: 2020 Trek Domane AL 3, 2019 Giant Escape RX Disc

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by katsup
Just use the tubes you have. 28 tube would be better in a 32 tire....
Originally Posted by seamuis
both sizes would work just fine. The 28’s will save you a small amount of weight. ...
Cool, I'll just use my 28 mm tubes. Thanks!
el forestero is offline  
Old 11-19-18, 05:15 AM
  #64  
jwalther
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Lexington KY
Posts: 385

Bikes: Litespeed T3, Felt Breed 30, Co-Motion Supremo Tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked 62 Times in 29 Posts
Anyone running their Gravelkings tubeless? Curious about your experience.
jwalther is offline  
Old 11-19-18, 08:47 AM
  #65  
Craptacular8
Senior Member
 
Craptacular8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 185 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times in 31 Posts
WTB Exposure 32's

Originally Posted by ogmtb
The OP asked for for "high-quality" rim/tire recommendations. I guess it's understandable that so many folks would ignore that and just recommend whatever clunky stock tire they are riding or the best bargains that they have found on their preferred tire.

Here's another tire/rim to throw into the "high-quality, fast" mix:

WTB Exposure 32s.

I've been curious about these. What is their real life measurement? I've still got a lot of miles left in some Compass 32's that measure out at 32.7 and 33.7 on the same 20m internal width rims, but would like to find something about that same size to run tubeless. I think I've only run across one review, where they were critical of them for fast wear, though if I got over a 1,000, I'm okay with that lifespan. Thanks.
Craptacular8 is offline  
Old 11-19-18, 12:08 PM
  #66  
ogmtb
Banned.
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Craptacular8
I think I've only run across one review, where they were critical of them for fast wear, though if I got over a 1,000, I'm okay with that lifespan. Thanks.
I have over 1,000 miles on this set. 60/40 off-road/pavement mix. Probably have at least another 500 or so before I have to switch them out.
ogmtb is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Piperflyer
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
22
10-15-18 08:08 AM
corrado33
General Cycling Discussion
21
05-18-16 06:58 AM
KCnoobie
Hybrid Bicycles
10
03-15-12 01:52 AM
AlphaDogg
Hybrid Bicycles
20
01-28-12 04:33 PM
cheungupdt
Road Cycling
4
08-23-10 10:36 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.