Are all indo trainers virtual power
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Providence
Posts: 732
Bikes: Specialized tarmac sl2 giant tcx zero
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 319 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Are all indo trainers virtual power
I was wondering , if you use the best indo or the most basic , if the power function is not based on the flex-o-meter or similar tradional on bike pro level kit power meters , are you just running virtual power ?
Im kinda frustrated with tacx , there basic trainers seem to be waste of time and money , at this point im seeing the most cost effective option for non tradtion power data , or virtual based data is a speed / cadence sensor and any trainer you want. At least for me i cant seem to get my tacx to give any sort or accurate reading , but i know the wahoo sensors work and can do the exact same thing as my basic smart trainer . right ? Or no ?
Im kinda frustrated with tacx , there basic trainers seem to be waste of time and money , at this point im seeing the most cost effective option for non tradtion power data , or virtual based data is a speed / cadence sensor and any trainer you want. At least for me i cant seem to get my tacx to give any sort or accurate reading , but i know the wahoo sensors work and can do the exact same thing as my basic smart trainer . right ? Or no ?
#2
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,650
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3089 Post(s)
Liked 6,593 Times
in
3,781 Posts
indo?
#3
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
#4
I don’t live in Tampa
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 447
Bikes: 2014 Jamis Ventura Race, 2014 Cervelo P2, 2017 Raleigh Tamland 1, 2015 Jamis Trail X
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times
in
31 Posts
I was wondering , if you use the best indo or the most basic , if the power function is not based on the flex-o-meter or similar tradional on bike pro level kit power meters , are you just running virtual power ?
Im kinda frustrated with tacx , there basic trainers seem to be waste of time and money , at this point im seeing the most cost effective option for non tradtion power data , or virtual based data is a speed / cadence sensor and any trainer you want. At least for me i cant seem to get my tacx to give any sort or accurate reading , but i know the wahoo sensors work and can do the exact same thing as my basic smart trainer . right ? Or no ?
Im kinda frustrated with tacx , there basic trainers seem to be waste of time and money , at this point im seeing the most cost effective option for non tradtion power data , or virtual based data is a speed / cadence sensor and any trainer you want. At least for me i cant seem to get my tacx to give any sort or accurate reading , but i know the wahoo sensors work and can do the exact same thing as my basic smart trainer . right ? Or no ?
#5
Senior Member
I used to train on indo, but the munchies made it counterproductive.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 246
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
Allowing the software/app (Tacx, Kinetic, Zwift, etc..) to calculate a virtual power based on trainer-resist/cadence/wheel-RPM isn't going to be as accurate as using an actual power meter that's known to provide accurate data. How accurate do you want to be? Search YT for shane miller's reviews on power meters and you'll get all the info you'll ever need regarding power meters and accuracy.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Boston Roads
Posts: 975
Bikes: 2012 Canondale Synapse 105, 2017 REI Co-Op ADV 3.1
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 507 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
133 Posts
I was wondering , if you use the best indo or the most basic , if the power function is not based on the flex-o-meter or similar tradional on bike pro level kit power meters , are you just running virtual power ?
Im kinda frustrated with tacx , there basic trainers seem to be waste of time and money , at this point im seeing the most cost effective option for non tradtion power data , or virtual based data is a speed / cadence sensor and any trainer you want. At least for me i cant seem to get my tacx to give any sort or accurate reading , but i know the wahoo sensors work and can do the exact same thing as my basic smart trainer . right ? Or no ?
Im kinda frustrated with tacx , there basic trainers seem to be waste of time and money , at this point im seeing the most cost effective option for non tradtion power data , or virtual based data is a speed / cadence sensor and any trainer you want. At least for me i cant seem to get my tacx to give any sort or accurate reading , but i know the wahoo sensors work and can do the exact same thing as my basic smart trainer . right ? Or no ?
On the other hand, one of my friends who rides on TrainerRoad a lot and has a smart wheel-off trainer produces strange graphs. They show that given a constant cadence, he maintains the same speed even during intervals where his power output is halved. Not sure why that is.
#9
Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 32
Bikes: Specialized Diverge
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No, not all indoor trainers use computed virtual power. The Tacx Neo 2 Smart is one such example. You'll see on the Tacx website that it is listed as accurate to less than 1% error. I'm pretty sure that you can only get that level of accuracy with real strain gauges measuring torque.
You don't say what model of Tacx trainer you have. Knowing that would let us help you better. You also don't describe your problem in any detail or why you think your power readings are inaccurate. More info is needed to be able to help you.
Mark
You don't say what model of Tacx trainer you have. Knowing that would let us help you better. You also don't describe your problem in any detail or why you think your power readings are inaccurate. More info is needed to be able to help you.
Mark
#10
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Can OP shop for a stick of gum without starting a thread?
#11
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Providence
Posts: 732
Bikes: Specialized tarmac sl2 giant tcx zero
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 319 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I have the basic smart trainer , im just wondering of a speed cadence sensor would be better , i was thinking wahoo.
the issues i have are hard to explain. So sometimes all the numbers seems acurate sometimes its up a few mph or off a few rpms , but its far from real time . the tacx apo i use is mo
the issues i have are hard to explain. So sometimes all the numbers seems acurate sometimes its up a few mph or off a few rpms , but its far from real time . the tacx apo i use is mo
#12
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Providence
Posts: 732
Bikes: Specialized tarmac sl2 giant tcx zero
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 319 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
The tacx app i use is more accurate with the trainer i have ( tacx satori ) but the wahoo app saves better and can upload to strava once internet is connected and never looses my activity
.
I only have a mobile hotspot but even when connected the tacx app glitches and doesnt upload or takes a day or two or a phone restart.
Its really messing up my winter training . i dont want to have to spend another 500 to 1000 just for a trainer . so i figure investing in a wahoo sesnor kit at 40 to 100 usd is the best option . im not sure if it does v power or if the app could do v power . maybe there is a" best way" to get the most data saved and exported to strava so i can have a record of my efforts .
right now both apps seem to only export speed and distance .
i tried a virtual live session in the tacx app but i think its more for the neo or very smart trainers with sim modes but it did post to strava with a route and koms which is cool.
.
I only have a mobile hotspot but even when connected the tacx app glitches and doesnt upload or takes a day or two or a phone restart.
Its really messing up my winter training . i dont want to have to spend another 500 to 1000 just for a trainer . so i figure investing in a wahoo sesnor kit at 40 to 100 usd is the best option . im not sure if it does v power or if the app could do v power . maybe there is a" best way" to get the most data saved and exported to strava so i can have a record of my efforts .
right now both apps seem to only export speed and distance .
i tried a virtual live session in the tacx app but i think its more for the neo or very smart trainers with sim modes but it did post to strava with a route and koms which is cool.
#13
Senior Member
I switched from a Travel Trac Fluid Comp (dumb trainer) to this one: https://www.kurtkinetic.com/products...rt-refurbished
I have no experience with smart trainers that adjust resistance automatically, so my comparison will be limited. There is night and day difference between a cheap fluid trainer and the road feel you get from Kurt Kinetic. Best part is the InRide sensor, which gives you power output rather accurately (see: https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2012/12/...th-review.html) after a spindown calibration. It is hands down the cheapest way you can get power numbers that are consistent between rides and are within +-5% of power meters.
I have no experience with smart trainers that adjust resistance automatically, so my comparison will be limited. There is night and day difference between a cheap fluid trainer and the road feel you get from Kurt Kinetic. Best part is the InRide sensor, which gives you power output rather accurately (see: https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2012/12/...th-review.html) after a spindown calibration. It is hands down the cheapest way you can get power numbers that are consistent between rides and are within +-5% of power meters.
#14
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,506
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4349 Post(s)
Liked 3,986 Times
in
2,661 Posts
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
204 Posts
I switched from a Travel Trac Fluid Comp (dumb trainer) to this one: https://www.kurtkinetic.com/products...rt-refurbished
I have no experience with smart trainers that adjust resistance automatically, so my comparison will be limited. There is night and day difference between a cheap fluid trainer and the road feel you get from Kurt Kinetic. Best part is the InRide sensor, which gives you power output rather accurately (see: https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2012/12/...th-review.html) after a spindown calibration. It is hands down the cheapest way you can get power numbers that are consistent between rides and are within +-5% of power meters.
I have no experience with smart trainers that adjust resistance automatically, so my comparison will be limited. There is night and day difference between a cheap fluid trainer and the road feel you get from Kurt Kinetic. Best part is the InRide sensor, which gives you power output rather accurately (see: https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2012/12/...th-review.html) after a spindown calibration. It is hands down the cheapest way you can get power numbers that are consistent between rides and are within +-5% of power meters.
#16
Senior Member
Mine is the black sensor with Bluetooth Smart only and it just works. I use the companion app to connect my sensors anyways, don't really need ANT+.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
204 Posts
I'm bluetooth only too. That probably is all you really need, but ant+ can be nice in that you could connect directly to a bike computer (or your computer with an ant+ dongle) and not need to use the companion app.
#18
Senior Member
I should have added that I only use it on zwift with the zwift companion app But yeah, if you want to connect the inRide sensor to head units without BLE (Hello Garmin!), then you need that ANT+ compatibility.
#19
Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 32
Bikes: Specialized Diverge
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I’ve chosen to use a single sided crack arm based power meter from 4iii for my bike. Its accurate to plus/minus 1%. Prices have come down to the point its worth it to me. I get the same exact power reading now for riding outdoors and well as indoors on a dumb trainer. Its worked well for me with my Garmin head unit which interfaces very well to Strava and other similar sites. Have never lost any data or seen any glitches. This avoids all the inaccuracies that occur with virtual power. You might want to consider a similar setup if you’re seriously into power training.
Mark
Mark
#20
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Providence
Posts: 732
Bikes: Specialized tarmac sl2 giant tcx zero
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 319 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I guess mine would be considered a " with sensors " built into the unit .
It gives me numbers, im not super onto power training its just nice to know what im doing . i can see my growth and progress and it makes me happy which gives me the mental boost to keep doing good and just snow ball the energy into progress .
The numbers are innaurate mostly due to tire pressure . i definatey need some on bike sensors . there are so many options .
I like the tacx app set up but the uploads are killing me its so glitched for me i cant tell when it will upload .
I was looking at the iq2 power meters but i dunno if they are any good . ?
But i do think it would be more cost effective to train heart rate first from a pure numbers point .?
It gives me numbers, im not super onto power training its just nice to know what im doing . i can see my growth and progress and it makes me happy which gives me the mental boost to keep doing good and just snow ball the energy into progress .
The numbers are innaurate mostly due to tire pressure . i definatey need some on bike sensors . there are so many options .
I like the tacx app set up but the uploads are killing me its so glitched for me i cant tell when it will upload .
I was looking at the iq2 power meters but i dunno if they are any good . ?
But i do think it would be more cost effective to train heart rate first from a pure numbers point .?
#21
Senior Member
B
Unless you are going to train outdoors or race, on-the-bike power meters won’t serve you much. You can get pretty consistent power readings from an indoor trainer that’s well calibrated if your only training is indoors. Spending $500+ for a strain gauge power meter just to “see how you are doing” is IMHO a waste of money. I am not here to judge your decisions, but you are saying that you “need” a strain gauge power meter. What you are actually meaning is that you “want” one. Completely different things.
I guess mine would be considered a " with sensors " built into the unit .
It gives me numbers, im not super onto power training its just nice to know what im doing . i can see my growth and progress and it makes me happy which gives me the mental boost to keep doing good and just snow ball the energy into progress .
The numbers are innaurate mostly due to tire pressure . i definatey need some on bike sensors . there are so many options .
I like the tacx app set up but the uploads are killing me its so glitched for me i cant tell when it will upload .
I was looking at the iq2 power meters but i dunno if they are any good . ?
But i do think it would be more cost effective to train heart rate first from a pure numbers point .?
It gives me numbers, im not super onto power training its just nice to know what im doing . i can see my growth and progress and it makes me happy which gives me the mental boost to keep doing good and just snow ball the energy into progress .
The numbers are innaurate mostly due to tire pressure . i definatey need some on bike sensors . there are so many options .
I like the tacx app set up but the uploads are killing me its so glitched for me i cant tell when it will upload .
I was looking at the iq2 power meters but i dunno if they are any good . ?
But i do think it would be more cost effective to train heart rate first from a pure numbers point .?
Last edited by Brofessor; 11-09-18 at 12:30 PM.
#22
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
612 Posts
Back when I cared about power, I bought a cheapo "dumb" trainer ($89~), and a used Powertap wheel & bits for about $150.
Benefit is I could also use the Powertap outside.
Benefit is I could also use the Powertap outside.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html