Prostate Exam
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 233
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Not sure if your reply was a , the 3TmpMRI is now considered FAR SUPERIOR to the antiquated TRUS and covered by most insurances. Some require a TRUS first but the issue there is that a TRUS biopsy samples a very little segment of the prostate and many times totally misses the cancer.
If the urologist will not prescribe a 3TmpMRI, bike quickly to another doctor who will. It could mean the difference between death or life.
If the urologist will not prescribe a 3TmpMRI, bike quickly to another doctor who will. It could mean the difference between death or life.
It's not a matter of finding a doctor to order it...most won't care. The accuracy has been pretty much proven but MRI's value as a prostate cancer screening tool has not been demonstrated yet.
Regardless of the accuracy of the testing, with the vast majority of insurance companies, MRI's and CT's have to be pre-authorized. A doctor can order it but whether or not the patient gets it is entirely up to the insurance carrier. It would be very, very unusual that any insurance company would authorize an MRI of the prostate for screening, and even more rare that they'd authorize it without a DRE and PSA first.
ETA: ....I should add...if/when the screening MRI is denied, the patient has the ability to pay for the MRI himself....somewhere between $500 and $1500, typically. After an insurance company denies it, usually the bottom line appeal would require a peer-to-peer conversation between the ordering physician and a Medical Director at the insurance carrier. Those are hard to schedule and time consuming, and successful about 50% of the time at best. Trying to argue for an MRI for screening will end up being pretty fruitless in most cases and something most doctors are unlikely to be willing to take the time for just because the patient wants it. In the case of Medicare...they don't cover it unless is can be proven to be medically necessary. With Medicare itself...there is no pre-authorization possible...they just deny the charges for it after-the-fact. Since Medicare participants can't bill for the balance, the MRI provider is out the money. Very unlikely that they would provide the screening MRI and take that kind of chance on getting paid.
..
Last edited by Cuyuna; 11-25-18 at 09:08 AM.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,619
Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1068 Post(s)
Liked 786 Times
in
504 Posts
Online Prostate Cancer Support Community - Ustoo IMO, every man and SO would benefit greatly accessing this site.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 233
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
As I mentioned, a TRUS might be required before approval the MRI and often the TRUS follows a PSA test but not necessarily a DRE since some doctors will biopsy on elevated PSA alone. The use of the 3TmpMRI is becoming the standard since unlike a TRUS, the actual condition of the entire prostate and surrounding areas can be viewed to determine if a biopsy is needed and where sampling must be done. The use of the 3TmpMRI is essential for proper Active Surveillance Treatment.
Online Prostate Cancer Support Community - Ustoo IMO, every man and SO would benefit greatly accessing this site.
Online Prostate Cancer Support Community - Ustoo IMO, every man and SO would benefit greatly accessing this site.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,619
Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1068 Post(s)
Liked 786 Times
in
504 Posts
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 233
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
https://www.diagnosticimaging.com/mri...ly-restrictive
"The results showed that overall, 11.1 percent of payers covered prostate MRI in biopsy-naïve patients with suspected prostate cancer; 88.9 percent required a prior negative biopsy. Nearly all payers also require either a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE). Rarely, a planned future MRI-targeted biopsy serves as a basis for MRI coverage."
....
Last edited by Cuyuna; 11-25-18 at 11:17 AM.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,619
Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1068 Post(s)
Liked 786 Times
in
504 Posts
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 233
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Appreciate the link. Do you have first hand experience using the 3TmpMRI regarding PCa scanning? At issue is since a urologist can not perform a MRI in her/his office their TRUS services takes precedent. IMO and others, this has to change since the MRI SCAN can show if a biopsy needs to be performed. Those using it are finding missed GL7 and higher after a TRUS has been used. The TRUS found GL9 in my case with Dr. Onik's saturation transperineal 3D Prostate Mapping Biopsy yielding GL10 that was missed by the TRUS. A MRI would have revealed the greater extent of my cancer but of course not the fact that it was GL10. Are not some scanning and treatments being used for years in Europe and proving to be successful finally receiving FDA and insurance approval?
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 1,673
Bikes: '06 Bianchi Pista; '57 Maclean; '10 Scott CR1 Pro; 2005 Trek 2000 Tandem; '09 Comotion Macchiato Tandem; 199? Novara Road; '17 Circe Helios e-tandem:1994 Trek 2300
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Liked 93 Times
in
61 Posts
Appreciate the link. Do you have first hand experience using the 3TmpMRI regarding PCa scanning? At issue is since a urologist can not perform a MRI in her/his office their TRUS services takes precedent. IMO and others, this has to change since the MRI SCAN can show if a biopsy needs to be performed. Those using it are finding missed GL7 and higher after a TRUS has been used. The TRUS found GL9 in my case with Dr. Onik's saturation transperineal 3D Prostate Mapping Biopsy yielding GL10 that was missed by the TRUS. A MRI would have revealed the greater extent of my cancer but of course not the fact that it was GL10. Are not some scanning and treatments being used for years in Europe and proving to be successful finally receiving FDA and insurance approval?
So, once diagnosed, I recommend getting at least a second opinion on treatment.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,619
Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1068 Post(s)
Liked 786 Times
in
504 Posts
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,619
Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1068 Post(s)
Liked 786 Times
in
504 Posts
Don't quite understand what you mean by Gleason 5 since the Gleason Score is based on 2 numbers. I can only assume you mean that the 4 was found to be a 5 appearance because to misinterpret a 5 sample to be a 3 would be an egregious error. HUGE DIFFERENCE between a 5+4 and a 3+4 or 3+5.
Continued good luck.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 1,673
Bikes: '06 Bianchi Pista; '57 Maclean; '10 Scott CR1 Pro; 2005 Trek 2000 Tandem; '09 Comotion Macchiato Tandem; 199? Novara Road; '17 Circe Helios e-tandem:1994 Trek 2300
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Liked 93 Times
in
61 Posts
Don't quite understand what you mean by Gleason 5 since the Gleason Score is based on 2 numbers. I can only assume you mean that the 4 was found to be a 5 appearance because to misinterpret a 5 sample to be a 3 would be an egregious error. HUGE DIFFERENCE between a 5+4 and a 3+4 or 3+5.
Continued good luck.
Continued good luck.
I omitted to mention, that we also discussed the Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score, which, as you probably already know, allows a determination of one's personal risk of the cancer spreading. As we had decided to go with radiation, this was not pursued.
#38
Senior Member
Ugh, I see my doc on Wednesday for an exam. I’d forgotten about (or blocked out) the DRE procedure. Oh well, I’ve survived it before, I’ll survive it again!
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northeastern MA, USA
Posts: 1,678
Bikes: Garmin/Tacx Bike Smart
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
191 Posts
Just had my exam last week. Don't be stupid, get the DRE. No, I don't like it either, but it only lasts five seconds and provides the doctor another data point of insight to your health.
#41
Senior Member
#42
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Artmo, the doc is a friend of mine. I went to school with him and another doc in the office. Just have a mental block of someone snooping around back there. The doc knows it, and let me slide this time. Next week is colonoscopy time and my guess is they likely do the same thing before shoving the scope in. Getting old ain't easy, and honestly, it sucks.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 233
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Artmo, the doc is a friend of mine. I went to school with him and another doc in the office. Just have a mental block of someone snooping around back there. The doc knows it, and let me slide this time. Next week is colonoscopy time and my guess is they likely do the same thing before shoving the scope in. Getting old ain't easy, and honestly, it sucks.
#44
Senior Member
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 233
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
In the event that the endoscopist didn't do a DRE (shame on him/her), or it it wasn't documented, then you'd be wise to ask your doctor to do it. When you see him.
Last edited by Cuyuna; 11-28-18 at 08:03 AM.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,619
Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1068 Post(s)
Liked 786 Times
in
504 Posts
"If you can't say something nice, keep your mouth closed." Anybody remember those parental words of wisdom? Well, this is a typed response so I am technically abiding by my parents instructions......
IMO, the quoted response is one of ignorance of the lifesaving abilities of a simple procedure that should be included in a man's wellness checkup.
First off, I did not have a PSA performed prior to seeing my PCP, a very good female friend, who I was seeing about some groin swelling. Out of the blue she said, "Haven't done a DRE in a while so take the position." NOT A BIG DEAL I do so and while she is checking she says a lump is felt. Advice is to see the urologist but I have another IRONMAN Florida coming up and didn't want to stop training following a biopsy that I felt would be needed. So I delayed then finally made the appointment some months later and low and behold eventual BIOPSY RESULTS revealed Gleason 10 Prostate Cancer. My cancer is the aggressive PCa cancer that only 8% of the more than 160,000 https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/...cer/statistics in the USA per year diagnosed will have. My PSA was not extremely high and truth is that the MOST DEADLY/AGGRESSIVE PCa can produce little PSA so we don't rely on those numbers. My cancer was contained within the prostate capsule so a stroke of dumb luck since it hadn't yet metastasized. Treatments done, a return of the cancer, treatment done again and just waiting for another recurrence that will happen and hopefully not in my bones somewhere in my body.
My advice is to have a DRE, it could help save your life.
Last edited by OldTryGuy; 11-28-18 at 05:51 AM.
#47
☢
After my father died from prostate cancer a few years ago, now I wouldn't object to any test the doctor recommended.
Besides, after years in the military, amateur boxing and working in health care, I'd pretty much lost all my shy bones by the time I was 20. For some reason every full and part time job I applied for years ago required a prostate exam despite the low risk for younger men. Covering their insurance bases, I suppose.
I never noticed anything unusual while urinating until this year, but I've begun to do that pee-pause-pee-pause-pee-some-more thing. So while I'm recover from my recent thyroid surgery I'll schedule an appointment to check the prostate. Hadn't had any prostate exam in more than 20 years. I'm 61 now, way overdue.
Prostate cancer is generally considered to be a bit lower in risk for metastasizing but there are no guarantees. Dad spent several years with catheters, even while commuting to work by train in his 70s. I can't imagine how uncomfortable that must have been. And after about 10 years of having it under control it flared up and metastasized, killing him in only a month.
Same reason I wanted to have my thyroid tumor taken care of pronto after it was diagnosed earlier this year. The risk for metastasis is low with thyroid cancer, but I didn't want to take any chances after my dad's experience. Besides, the thyroid was no longer functional and it was so swollen it was interfering with my esophagus and trachea, so it was painful to swallow and occasionally worsened my asthma constriction. It's been less than a week since surgery and it's already easier to swallow.
Besides, after years in the military, amateur boxing and working in health care, I'd pretty much lost all my shy bones by the time I was 20. For some reason every full and part time job I applied for years ago required a prostate exam despite the low risk for younger men. Covering their insurance bases, I suppose.
I never noticed anything unusual while urinating until this year, but I've begun to do that pee-pause-pee-pause-pee-some-more thing. So while I'm recover from my recent thyroid surgery I'll schedule an appointment to check the prostate. Hadn't had any prostate exam in more than 20 years. I'm 61 now, way overdue.
Prostate cancer is generally considered to be a bit lower in risk for metastasizing but there are no guarantees. Dad spent several years with catheters, even while commuting to work by train in his 70s. I can't imagine how uncomfortable that must have been. And after about 10 years of having it under control it flared up and metastasized, killing him in only a month.
Same reason I wanted to have my thyroid tumor taken care of pronto after it was diagnosed earlier this year. The risk for metastasis is low with thyroid cancer, but I didn't want to take any chances after my dad's experience. Besides, the thyroid was no longer functional and it was so swollen it was interfering with my esophagus and trachea, so it was painful to swallow and occasionally worsened my asthma constriction. It's been less than a week since surgery and it's already easier to swallow.
Yep. The digital exam is a must. They can detect lumps and the like that are a good indication that something is amiss.
I had a female doc do it once. I think she was more embarrassed than I. While she was digging around, she said:
"At least my finger is smaller."
Ah, but those fingernails!
I had a female doc do it once. I think she was more embarrassed than I. While she was digging around, she said:
"At least my finger is smaller."
Ah, but those fingernails!
#48
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
You can't make an informed decision about your health care without information to guide those decisions. DRE is a simple, minimally invasive procedure to gather information on which to base future health care. It may not be entirely pleasant, but neither is ignorance.
#49
Senior Member
DREs and PSA tests both have their places. In 2011, my PCa was found as a result of my yearly PSA test at age 52.
Historically, my PSA was 1.1 or 1.2 for years and years. Then in just one year, out of the blue, it had doubled to 2.4 -- still at the low-normal range for a person of my age, but that RATE of increase from one year to the next twigged my Primary Care Physician. He suggested a re-test in six weeks to verify that higher number or just a fluke. Retest came back with a PSA of 3.0. Doctor says to me "You! Biopsy, NOW!" So two weeks later, I was at a Urology clinic for the needle biopsy. Yeowch! Thirty 'grabs and sticks' through the intestinal wall into the prostate.
A week goes by, and I get a phone call at work. "Mr Cougrrcj, you have cancer". No 'Please come in so we can discuss your results', no sugar coating. Just a cold, heartless call while I was at work. I called the Wife, and we made an appointment to see the doctor. An aside here. My Wife loves to research things. We showed up for the appointment with a written list of questions for the doctor. Cancer was found in one lobe half of the prostate. When discussing possible avenues of treatment, he was pushing his latest (and somewhat unproven) method of cryo-freezing the prostate. He pushed us to schedule it ASAP -- Then when the wife brought out her list of questions, his attitude was 'Who are you to question my professional opinion?' Not in so many words, but he clearly didn't like to be asked questions. We were not impressed. We decided to get a second opinion.
Wife does more research to find the top doc in Cleveland, and makes an appointment for a consultation. Talk about a 180° from the first doc. 'Any questions, feel free to call at any time. My assisting NP should be able to answer any questions, but if she can't, she will contact me - even if I'm in surgery - and you'll have an answer in less than a half hour'.. We discussed options. Wife and my concern was with the rapid increase in PSA, this might be extremely serious, so we opted for total removal of the prostate. Surgery was scheduled at the first available -- in six weeks!
In that six weeks, when talking to my mother, I discovered that my maternal grandfather died of Prostate Cancer at age 74 in 1962 (before treatment of PCa was widespread), and all of the males on my mother's side of the family (her sister's four boys) ALL have been diagnosed with Prostate Cancer. That's quite a familial connection that I had never known about!
Post surgical biopsy of the prostate revealed that the Cancer had spread to the entire gland, and was on the verge of metastasizing, Gleason score 9. I count myself as lucky to be alive.
A former co-worker of my wife - same age as me - was also diagnosed with PCa at the same time I was - but he was already symptomatic. His had already metastasized, and he developed tumors all along his spinal cord, and finally in the brain. He's been dead for two years now...
Historically, my PSA was 1.1 or 1.2 for years and years. Then in just one year, out of the blue, it had doubled to 2.4 -- still at the low-normal range for a person of my age, but that RATE of increase from one year to the next twigged my Primary Care Physician. He suggested a re-test in six weeks to verify that higher number or just a fluke. Retest came back with a PSA of 3.0. Doctor says to me "You! Biopsy, NOW!" So two weeks later, I was at a Urology clinic for the needle biopsy. Yeowch! Thirty 'grabs and sticks' through the intestinal wall into the prostate.
A week goes by, and I get a phone call at work. "Mr Cougrrcj, you have cancer". No 'Please come in so we can discuss your results', no sugar coating. Just a cold, heartless call while I was at work. I called the Wife, and we made an appointment to see the doctor. An aside here. My Wife loves to research things. We showed up for the appointment with a written list of questions for the doctor. Cancer was found in one lobe half of the prostate. When discussing possible avenues of treatment, he was pushing his latest (and somewhat unproven) method of cryo-freezing the prostate. He pushed us to schedule it ASAP -- Then when the wife brought out her list of questions, his attitude was 'Who are you to question my professional opinion?' Not in so many words, but he clearly didn't like to be asked questions. We were not impressed. We decided to get a second opinion.
Wife does more research to find the top doc in Cleveland, and makes an appointment for a consultation. Talk about a 180° from the first doc. 'Any questions, feel free to call at any time. My assisting NP should be able to answer any questions, but if she can't, she will contact me - even if I'm in surgery - and you'll have an answer in less than a half hour'.. We discussed options. Wife and my concern was with the rapid increase in PSA, this might be extremely serious, so we opted for total removal of the prostate. Surgery was scheduled at the first available -- in six weeks!
In that six weeks, when talking to my mother, I discovered that my maternal grandfather died of Prostate Cancer at age 74 in 1962 (before treatment of PCa was widespread), and all of the males on my mother's side of the family (her sister's four boys) ALL have been diagnosed with Prostate Cancer. That's quite a familial connection that I had never known about!
Post surgical biopsy of the prostate revealed that the Cancer had spread to the entire gland, and was on the verge of metastasizing, Gleason score 9. I count myself as lucky to be alive.
A former co-worker of my wife - same age as me - was also diagnosed with PCa at the same time I was - but he was already symptomatic. His had already metastasized, and he developed tumors all along his spinal cord, and finally in the brain. He's been dead for two years now...
#50
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: BlackForest, CO
Posts: 17
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Specialized Diverge
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I can relate to this discussion - I'm currently in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer after having a 18 needle biopsy last March based on a PSA of 4.1 ng/ml and a DRE where Dr. FingerLove thought he felt something. My most recent PSA in December came back as a 5.0 ng/ml (after a previous PSA of 3.7 in September) so I got a call to come in for a saturation biopsy next month. I had been biking a lot before the PSA, and only took two days off before getting blood drawn. I had taken 7 days off the bike for my PSA in September which had come back as 3.7 (dropping from 4.1), so I told the Urologists PA that I think we should do the PSA again, this time with a 7 day break from biking.
She said that she didn't think the Insurance Company would cover it as I had done one 3 weeks earlier (the one that came back as a 5.0 ng/ml). I then asked why aren't we doing an MRI fused biopsy, and she also thought that Insurance wouldn't cover the MRI portion. I asked her to submit a MRI request anyway, as no way I was doing another biopsy without imaging. I then went to my GP for an unrelated reason this week, told him about my situation, and he did a PSA for me which came back at 3.7! (I was off the bike a week).
Meanwhile, the MRI got approved by the Insurance Company...
So long story short, you can't just blindly go along with what the Urologist's practice thinks may be covered, you really have to advocate for yourself. It will be funny if the Insurance Company denies my 'good' PSA test but spends big bucks on a MRI which may have actually been unnecessary because I had PSA that was bogus.
She said that she didn't think the Insurance Company would cover it as I had done one 3 weeks earlier (the one that came back as a 5.0 ng/ml). I then asked why aren't we doing an MRI fused biopsy, and she also thought that Insurance wouldn't cover the MRI portion. I asked her to submit a MRI request anyway, as no way I was doing another biopsy without imaging. I then went to my GP for an unrelated reason this week, told him about my situation, and he did a PSA for me which came back at 3.7! (I was off the bike a week).
Meanwhile, the MRI got approved by the Insurance Company...
So long story short, you can't just blindly go along with what the Urologist's practice thinks may be covered, you really have to advocate for yourself. It will be funny if the Insurance Company denies my 'good' PSA test but spends big bucks on a MRI which may have actually been unnecessary because I had PSA that was bogus.