Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Triathlon
Reload this Page >

Cross Chaining???

Search
Notices
Triathlon Swim / Bike / Run your thing? Drop in our new triathlon forum for the latest in training & gear. From beginner to expert, and sprint to ironman.

Cross Chaining???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-06, 09:32 AM
  #1  
bdc1234
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cross Chaining???

I own a 2005 LiteSpeed Saber with Dura-Ace and a FSA SLK Carbon crank (10 speed).
I have chain drag on my big crank ring when IM in my small crank ring and I use the small cog/cassette gear.
Iv been told by the LBS to avoid doing this because your stretcing your chain.
I say thats crazy all of my other bikes don't/didnt do this plus I want that gear selection without jumping to the big ring.
Example: when riding down a short hill with an up hill coming I want to take full advantage of the down without moving to my big ring up front so Ill stay small front and drop to the smallest in the rear, if I move to the big ring then its just a lot of extra shifting for no reason other than trying to avoid stretching my chain (who Cares if the chain stretches, Ill replace it!) plus I say the chain shouldn't rub against the big crank ring anyway. Does this make any sense? Ant thoughts on this?

Thanks for your time
bdc1234 is offline  
Old 08-17-06, 10:32 AM
  #2  
Triguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've heard that its bad for chain/cog wear. I usually do shift in the front, but I have dropped my chain maybe once this year shifting up front.

I do believe the chain rubbing is inevitable. Two points connected by a strait line, the big chain ring intersects that line slightly, no two ways about it.
Triguy is offline  
Old 08-17-06, 11:02 AM
  #3  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,311

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1458 Post(s)
Liked 735 Times in 376 Posts
your other bikes may have the chain line adjusted just a little different, or you may have different sized chain rings on your other bikes. Regardless, the little/little combo is not preferred. You are getting more friction on the chain because of the angle, increasing wear, and because of the slack in the chain, a little more likely to have the chain fall off.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 08-17-06, 11:11 AM
  #4  
rknj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 326
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It puts a lot of stress on the drivetrain, and wastes a bit of energy to boot. It almost sounds like you should be looking further ahead and when you hit the midpoint in your cassette, change chainrings and shift your cassette to a gearing similar to what you'd be looking for if you just went linearly. I'll usually shift from small->big and drop down one or two depending on whether I'm going downhill or on a flat.
rknj is offline  
Old 08-17-06, 11:34 AM
  #5  
bdc1234
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I just took a look at a friend bike with Dura-Ace cranks and all (10 speed) and he has zero drag from small ring to small cog. If the B.B. Spindle is just a bit longer making the cranks a bit wider than the drag would not exist as with his Dura-Ace cranks. I think the B.B. for the FSA SLK cranks is just a bit to narrow for the 10 speed cassette.
bdc1234 is offline  
Old 08-17-06, 11:36 AM
  #6  
bdc1234
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I hear what your saying but does your chain rub against your big crank ring when in your smallest cassette gear?
bdc1234 is offline  
Old 08-17-06, 04:22 PM
  #7  
Gonzo Bob
cycles per second
 
Gonzo Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,930

Bikes: Early 1980's Ishiwata 022 steel sport/touring, 1986 Vitus 979, 1988 DiamondBack Apex, 1997 Softride PowerWing 700, 2001 Trek OCLV 110

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times in 48 Posts
Tri-bikes usually have shorter chain stays than road bikes and this means the chain deflection angle is slightly greater in the small-small combo leading to greater chance of chain rub. Also, the bigger the difference in your chain rings, the more likely you are to get some chain rub in small-small - e.g. a 53x42 combo might not rub but 53x39 might.

Some of my bikes get chain rub, others don't. In general, I stay out of small-small and big-big but like you, I may use them for short periods.
Gonzo Bob is offline  
Old 08-18-06, 07:47 AM
  #8  
Jstyle
Go big or go home
 
Jstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gainesville, VA
Posts: 269

Bikes: Cannondale Ironman 800

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rknj
wastes a bit of energy to boot.
That is the only part that matters to me when it comes to cross training.
Jstyle is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.