Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

27 inch vs 700c Wheelset of High Quality Comparison

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

27 inch vs 700c Wheelset of High Quality Comparison

Old 02-23-19, 12:49 AM
  #1  
BikeWonder
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Calgary
Posts: 327
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Liked 75 Times in 52 Posts
27 inch vs 700c Wheelset of High Quality Comparison

Hello everyone.

I was wondering which wheelset would have better rolling ability if:

- same spoke brand and quality
- same rims and spoke count
- same hub set
- same bearings
- same tires

etc. Basically, everything between the two wheelsets would be identical in terms of quality and finish. My question is, which,in theory, would have better rolling ability and speed?

I see the comparison between 29 vs 650b/27.5 vs 26 inch in MTB culture where many feel that a better wheel set provides better rolling ability.

I wonder what would be the case for 700c vs 27inch (assuming again that they both have the highest quality of identical parts to them). Set aside risk factors or availability.

Totally open ended and I am aware there are various factors at play. Cheers!
BikeWonder is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 01:33 AM
  #2  
cannonride15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Hampton Roads
Posts: 143

Bikes: Cannondales: '85 ST400, '86 SR800, '87 SM600

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Realistically and measurably no difference, why do you ask?
cannonride15 is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 02:14 AM
  #3  
Kuromori
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 528
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 83 Times in 64 Posts
700c is basically for access to good tires. If you're just going to run 32mm Paselas there's no particular reason to convert. The difference in diameter is only 8mm.
Kuromori is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 02:48 AM
  #4  
Piff 
Senior Member
 
Piff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,626
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 780 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times in 401 Posts
The only way I could see this being significant is for craziness like Race across America where every second counts.
Piff is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 03:07 AM
  #5  
SurferRosa
señor miembro
 
SurferRosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 8,149

Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3846 Post(s)
Liked 6,437 Times in 3,183 Posts
It's sorta relevant in terms of the 700c conversion conundrum: being able to (a) still acquire tires in the width you want and (b) also to use a vintage brake like the originals.
SurferRosa is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 07:17 AM
  #6  
due ruote 
Senior Member
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,707
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 903 Post(s)
Liked 524 Times in 318 Posts
Gearing will also be marginally higher for 27” for a given setup. Just brainstorming differences;!that has nothing to do with the speed of the wheels themselves.
You can still find plenty of decent 27” tires but afaik you can’t find what most would consider truly fast tires. So if speed is a big concern you probably will go with 700c regardless of which wheel size is faster on paper.
due ruote is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 07:26 AM
  #7  
Bianchigirll 
Bianchi Goddess
 
Bianchigirll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 29,725

Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.

Mentioned: 191 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2912 Post(s)
Liked 2,837 Times in 1,461 Posts
I agree with Kuromori, if all things equal with the wheel the only difference is the tire. If you shod both with a good basic tire like say a Panaracer Pasela which is great for most all riding then there is no noticeable difference. The big difference would be if you put some super fancy tire$ on the 700c wheels you might feel a difference in the handling and overall ride quality.

However there is simply a better selection of higher quality 700 wheels and rims simply because the industry turned that way in the mid to late '80s. More and more 'racing' bikes came with 700c wheels and when hybrids were introduced they also had 700c wheels. As lower end "10 speeds" left the market place the OEM market for 27" wheels dried up so did the aftermarket eventually.

Does anyone even make a high quality 27" rim these days?
__________________
One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"

Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
Bianchigirll is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 07:59 AM
  #8  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,853

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 654 Times in 498 Posts
The engineering side says, a wheel (tire plus rim) with a larger diameter will roll more smoothly over a normal road surface, especially in this case where we stipulate everything else is the same. That's not the imagination of Road Fan the engineer, but I read it in Archibald Sharp's book on bicycle engineering where he collected everything that was already known as of about 1897. But the difference in diameter is 8 mm, so the difference in radius is only 4 mm, less than 1/4 inch. Practically it won't make a difference, in my opinion. And if the 32 mm tire on the 700 is very high quality and the one on the 630 is your generic 27 x 1 1/4 tire available today, the 700 could even have better performance.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 08:03 AM
  #9  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,853

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 654 Times in 498 Posts
Originally Posted by Bianchigirll
I agree with Kuromori, if all things equal with the wheel the only difference is the tire. If you shod both with a good basic tire like say a Panaracer Pasela which is great for most all riding then there is no noticeable difference. The big difference would be if you put some super fancy tire$ on the 700c wheels you might feel a difference in the handling and overall ride quality.

However there is simply a better selection of higher quality 700 wheels and rims simply because the industry turned that way in the mid to late '80s. More and more 'racing' bikes came with 700c wheels and when hybrids were introduced they also had 700c wheels. As lower end "10 speeds" left the market place the OEM market for 27" wheels dried up so did the aftermarket eventually.

Does anyone even make a high quality 27" rim these days?
Sun CR18?
Road Fan is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 08:04 AM
  #10  
DiegoFrogs
Senior Member
 
DiegoFrogs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Scranton, PA, USA
Posts: 2,570

Bikes: '77 Centurion "Pro Tour"; '67 Carlton "The Flyer"; 1984 Ross MTB (stored at parents' house)

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Liked 93 Times in 61 Posts
I think the real issue is that the 27" rims that came on the types of sport-touring bikes that I like were always single-walled without eyelets. I would never buy a new rim or wheel with a single wall today.
DiegoFrogs is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 10:01 AM
  #11  
Salamandrine 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,287

Bikes: 78 Masi Criterium, 68 PX10, 2016 Mercian King of Mercia, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr

Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2317 Post(s)
Liked 597 Times in 430 Posts
Originally Posted by DiegoFrogs
I think the real issue is that the 27" rims that came on the types of sport-touring bikes that I like were always single-walled without eyelets. I would never buy a new rim or wheel with a single wall today.
For the most part yes, but for high end bikes both Rigida and Super Champion Gentlemens came in 27", because the size was so dominant once. Both are double wall rims. Rigida had only single eyelets. Also, the better single wall rims weren't actually single wall. They were only single wall in the very center of the extruded profile, and had double hollow tubular sections in the corners. They could be very strong.

Besides the CR-18, Sun sells the M13 in 27", and if you peel the sticker off if looks just like the old Rigida. Perfect replacement for a 70's Motobecane Grand Touring/Jubilee etc.
Salamandrine is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 10:43 AM
  #12  
RobbieTunes
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,297
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,407 Times in 908 Posts
Not a theory guy....

...but the 27" bikes I've had were silky smooth, and my reptilian brain attributed it to that out of an urge to understand.
RobbieTunes is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 10:45 AM
  #13  
TenGrainBread 
Senior Member
 
TenGrainBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,742
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 649 Times in 336 Posts
There will be no discernable difference between 700c and 27" on the road. It matters more for offroad because wheel diameter affects handling over rough terrain more than pavement or gravel.
TenGrainBread is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 11:14 AM
  #14  
machinist42
mycocyclist
 
machinist42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Monkey Junction, Wilmington, NC
Posts: 2,239

Bikes: 1964 Schwinn Paramount P-13 DeLuxe, 1964 Schwinn Sport Super Sport, 1972 Falcon San Remo, 1974 Maserati MT-1, 1974 Raleigh International, 1984 Lotus Odyssey, 198? Rossin Ghibli, 1990 LeMond Le Vanquer (sic), 1991 Specialized Allez Transition Pro, +

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 901 Post(s)
Liked 802 Times in 441 Posts
African or European swallow?
machinist42 is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 11:38 AM
  #15  
Darth Lefty 
Disco Infiltrator
 
Darth Lefty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,775

Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem

Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,102 Times in 1,366 Posts
The biggest difference is that if you buy tires for the wrong one you will be annoyed and frustrated
Darth Lefty is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 11:42 AM
  #16  
The Golden Boy 
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,640

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2597 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times in 926 Posts
Originally Posted by Bianchigirll

Does anyone even make a high quality 27" rim these days?
Velocity makes the Synergy in 27"

Velocity - Rims, Touring, 27"
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 11:56 AM
  #17  
The Golden Boy 
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,640

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2597 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times in 926 Posts
Most of my bikes are still rolling with 27" wheels- mostly because that's what they came with, and I happen to have some pretty nice 27" wheels.

For a long time I didn't really understand the advantage of 700C. The advantage is more options for tires- while I was absolutely fine with either Paselas, TG/PT Paselas or Sand Canyon tires- More or less because I didn't have any other point of reference- I didn't know what I was missing.

Getting a set of the Compass tires was more awesome than the cushiest tires (Specialized Expedition) tires I'd experienced.

While I do have a whole lot of nice 27" wheels, I think I may, at some time- or little by little- switch the fleet over to 700C.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 11:57 AM
  #18  
3alarmer 
Friendship is Magic
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,933

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26254 Post(s)
Liked 10,234 Times in 7,103 Posts
Originally Posted by Bianchigirll

Does anyone even make a high quality 27" rim these days?
...people smirk and belittle me when I say this, but the Sun CR-18's in 27" build up a perfectly acceptable wheel if you put Pasela tyres on them. One of the issues I see a lot is that they end up clad with some god awful, heavy assed tyre.
3alarmer is online now  
Old 02-23-19, 11:59 AM
  #19  
mpetry912 
aged to perfection
 
mpetry912's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PacNW
Posts: 1,773

Bikes: Dinucci Allez 2.0, Richard Sachs, Alex Singer, Serotta, Masi GC, Raleigh Pro Mk.1, Hetchins, etc

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 819 Post(s)
Liked 1,220 Times in 643 Posts
700c (ETRTO / ISO 622) wheel is marginally quicker and as several have pointed out you have a much wider tire selection.

27 is a leftover standard from the 50s/60s for US made "10 speed" bikes (Schwinn Varsity etc).

For me the 27 is a dead standard because the range of brake adjustment on most bikes is set up for 700 size rims.

I do have a Mark 1 white Raleigh Pro that has huge clearance with the brake blocks at the bottom of the slots. I suspect these Raleighs (like the international / competition etc) were set up to accommodate 27 size wheels.

700 for me. It's not a close thing.

Mark Petry
Bainbridge Island, WA USA

mpetry912 is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 12:24 PM
  #20  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times in 1,574 Posts
Originally Posted by The Golden Boy
Velocity makes the Synergy in 27"

Velocity - Rims, Touring, 27"
Looks like they also make the Dyad in 27": Velocity Wheels - Hand Made in USA

The Synergy and Twin Hollow are completely gone from their main product page, so I wonder if they are discontinued and selling whatever leftover stock they have.

More generally, there is no technical reason why a rim with a 630mm BSD would roll any better or worse than a rim with 622mm BSD, if they had the same construction otherwise. 27" simply lost the "format war" in the long run, as it were.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 02:24 PM
  #21  
Chr0m0ly 
Senior Member
 
Chr0m0ly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,683

Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 364 Times in 218 Posts
I ascribe to the notion that wheel size aught to be optimized for the frame size so you can keep frame geometry the same. 700c wheels on a 46cm road bike is dumb, and you can see how the frame has to be butchered to accommodate it with stubby head tubes that won't let the minimal insuring mark on a string stem get covered, and then look at a 67cm bikes seat stays and how a larger wheel could take advantage of all that space.
Japanese bikes in the 80's saw the scaling of top tube length match the frame size, when will we see wheel sizes scaled to match bike frames? We already have so many sizes in use how hard would it be to mate frame and wheel size?
Chr0m0ly is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 04:19 PM
  #22  
Salamandrine 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,287

Bikes: 78 Masi Criterium, 68 PX10, 2016 Mercian King of Mercia, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr

Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2317 Post(s)
Liked 597 Times in 430 Posts
Originally Posted by mpetry912

27 is a leftover standard from the 50s/60s for US made "10 speed" bikes (Schwinn Varsity etc).

For me the 27 is a dead standard because the range of brake adjustment on most bikes is set up for 700 size rims.
27" is a British standard, introduced by Dunlop in the 1930s. It became the US standard lightweight/10 speed size in the 50s, 60s and 70s. It remained a standard size on touring bikes through the mid 80s, because it was easier to find replacement tires in small towns. 700c was still exotic and European.

Is it a dead standard? Sure, but not long dead, and if an older bike was set up for it in most cases best to keep the original size.
Salamandrine is offline  
Old 02-23-19, 04:47 PM
  #23  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18321 Post(s)
Liked 4,490 Times in 3,338 Posts
Originally Posted by Bianchigirll
Does anyone even make a high quality 27" rim these days?
Velo Orange also has a narrow 27" rim.
https://velo-orange.com/products/vo-pbp-27inch-rims

I can't say if it is any better than the narrow Rigida or Wolber or similar rims from yester-year.

It looks like it is only offered in 36h.

There also appears to be a Sun CR18 in both 32h and 36h.
https://www.amazon.com/SunRingle-Sun.../dp/B0028N0Z2A

But, as others have mentioned, the selection of rims is very limited.

The selection of tires, especially narrower sizes are also very limited. I think I found a 27x1 Panaracer.

There is also a wider 27x1 1/4 Gatorskin.

In theory, your contact patch would be slightly better for 27", but I have no idea how much overall difference that would make. Probably minimal considering that one is missing out on all the high-end tires. Vittoria Corsa Speed? Various tubeless? Tubulars? Open Tubulars, etc.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 02-24-19, 10:55 AM
  #24  
randyjawa 
Senior Member
 
randyjawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,672

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1370 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,743 Times in 934 Posts
All things being absolutely equal, other that the defined difference, 27" vs 700c, the 700c will, without doubt, offer a more lively ride quality. Why? Simply because the 27" set will have a greater diameter than the 700c set. The further the rolling weight is away from the axle, the greater the negative impact on ride feel. Want to prove it, easily, to yourself..?

Get a wheel, any wheel. Hold it, snugly, by the axle and tip the wheel this from side to side. Very little, if any, resistance, right? Now, holding the axle tight, give the wheel a gentle spin and try tipping it side to side. Feel the resistance? You bet you do. Now, spin the wheel faster and try tipping it again. Even more resistance!

So, the larger diameter will negatively impact ride feel. Heavy rims, tires, inner tubes and the like will also negatively impact the ride feel.

Of course, I am old and might well be wrong
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
randyjawa is offline  
Old 02-24-19, 01:15 PM
  #25  
due ruote 
Senior Member
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,707
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 903 Post(s)
Liked 524 Times in 318 Posts
Originally Posted by randyjawa
All things being absolutely equal, other that the defined difference, 27" vs 700c, the 700c will, without doubt, offer a more lively ride quality. Why? Simply because the 27" set will have a greater diameter than the 700c set. The further the rolling weight is away from the axle, the greater the negative impact on ride feel. Want to prove it, easily, to yourself..?

Get a wheel, any wheel. Hold it, snugly, by the axle and tip the wheel this from side to side. Very little, if any, resistance, right? Now, holding the axle tight, give the wheel a gentle spin and try tipping it side to side. Feel the resistance? You bet you do. Now, spin the wheel faster and try tipping it again. Even more resistance!

So, the larger diameter will negatively impact ride feel. Heavy rims, tires, inner tubes and the like will also negatively impact the ride feel.

Of course, I am old and might well be wrong
But why stop at 700c? Should we all be riding on 24” wheels? 20”? 16”? Just saying there are other factors, some of them pretty important ones. I don’t claim to understand the physics of arriving at the “ideal” wheel size. Some would say 650b. I have never ridden a pair so I have no opinion.
Btw does anyone know the history of 27” wheels? That was the standard for sport and touring when I started riding. Anyone who cared mostly about speed rode 700c tubulars, at least until around 1980 or so when we started seeing low profile high pressure 700c clinchers. But I don’t know when 27” wheels became common, or what the standard was before that.
due ruote is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.