Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

advice comparing gear ratios: shimano 105 and GRX

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

advice comparing gear ratios: shimano 105 and GRX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-21, 07:25 AM
  #1  
wilson_smyth
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 106
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 20 Posts
advice comparing gear ratios: shimano 105 and GRX

looking for a general commuter bike. Not going to be a master of anything but will hopefully be reasonable in a few areas.
Commuting, with weekend leisure cycles, some being on trails. This narrows choices down to gravel and cross bikes.

The gravel/cx bikes i have access to come with these choices:

Shimano 105: Front 50 x 34t, Rear 11 - 34 x 11 (22 gears)
Shimano GRX: Front 40t, Rear 11 - 42t (11 gears)
Shimano GRX: Front 46-30t, Rear 11-34t (22 gears)

Im familiar with the gearing on the 22 gear 105, and spend most of my time on the big front cog and in the smallest 5 rear cogs.

For a reasonable spin (3-4 hours) how do the GRX compare to the 105, which is pretty good as a commuter as it has( in my opinion) a good range.
wilson_smyth is offline  
Old 01-04-21, 09:13 AM
  #2  
Kapusta
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times in 1,433 Posts
Compared the 105 50/34:

The GRX has a hair lower low gear... but so close it is not much different. Significantly lower high gear. Also bigger gaps between gear ratios.

Shimano 46/30 setup: lower high, lower low, similar gear ratio spacing.

As far as what will work best for you, you may as well be asking what shoe size to wear.

If you spend all your time in your 5 highest gears on a 50/34 x 11-34 setup, I can’t see why you would switch to a setup with lower range. Unless you plan to be riding different terrain. In which case you are going to need to look at the above comparisons and decide for yourself.
Kapusta is offline  
Old 01-04-21, 09:35 AM
  #3  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,481

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7648 Post(s)
Liked 3,465 Times in 1,831 Posts
People will no doubt post gear-inch calculators .... or you could google them.

We have no idea what cassette you have, but you can find out, and figure out what the gear rations (or gear inches, whichever) are for the combos you most use, and then see what the 46-30 offers with the 11-34 cassette.

I'd imagine,. but it would be a completely wild guess, that you would be riding the top half of the cassette with the 46 ring. I have a 48-38-28 triple with a 14-34 on my old Cannondale, and spend almost all my time in the top couple cogs on the big ring on the flats ... it is just slightly undergeared for my preferences (unloaded. Loaded, it is great.) The 46-30 rings might be a bit too small for you ... but run them through a calculator and see.
Maelochs is offline  
Old 01-05-21, 09:19 AM
  #4  
TeakAsh
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Pottsville PA
Posts: 18

Bikes: 1996 Co-Motion Co-Pilot Tandem, 2005 Look 585

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 5 Posts
If you are unfamiliar with what works well for you, I would suggest going with the 46-30 GRX. In my opinion its better to have a bike that's under-geared, but you can climb almost anything, to a bike that's over-geared that forces you to walk.
TeakAsh is offline  
Old 01-05-21, 11:11 AM
  #5  
subgrade
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Saulkrasti, Latvia
Posts: 898

Bikes: Focus Crater Lake

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 391 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times in 204 Posts
I've found that a comfortable cruising gear matters more than the high and low gears, at least on flat terrain. It may change with your fitness though. Of course, it's les of a problem on a a closely spaced 'corncob' casette.
subgrade is offline  
Old 01-05-21, 11:24 AM
  #6  
Cyclist0108
Occam's Rotor
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times in 1,164 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelochs
People will no doubt post gear-inch calculators
Bicycle Gear Calculator
Cyclist0108 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.