Pure carbon
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Pure carbon
Hi Folks: AS you can tell, I am new to the forum. My question is simple and please pardon me if this question has been addressed before ( please direct me to that thread): What's the best carbon hybrid out there for 2016? I just got back into riding and presently have a Trex 8.3 DS that I have been riding for 2 months now . I am riding to get and stay into shape. But becasue I am an older rider I can't adjust to the rough roads here in So Cal. I have tried lowering the tire pressure to 60psi ( the most noticable adjustment), changing the seat, using s suspension post, but still feel the roughness in the roads. So I was about to upgrade my tire to something wider but am concerned about loosing speed and dexterity. (Those road bike boys like to pass me with a grin on their faces as it is). So I thought I would just upgrade to a carbon BUT don't want to upgrade every year so I want to buy the best possible that would last me a while. I have read some reviews like Trek 7.9 fx and the Sirrus Pro but am more interetsed in user reviews. Thanks in advance.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Indiana
Posts: 478
Bikes: 2015 Trek 7.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Carbon is more effective than aluminium or steel, yes, but if you're buying a full carbon bike expecting comfort to be the primary benefit I think you're going to be dissapointed. Wider tires and a front suspension fork give you more comfort than a carbon frame will, many of which are built to accept much skinnier tires than what your 8.3 DS currently has. Honestly if you're uncomfortable on the 8.3 which has all of those things I don't know what to recommend, I just know that a full carbon Sirrus with a rigid fork and skinny tires would be a step in the opposite direction.
I don't know if you can have total comfort and speed, maybe you should be looking at something like a cruiser or city bike with bigger tires and a bigger saddle.
I don't know if you can have total comfort and speed, maybe you should be looking at something like a cruiser or city bike with bigger tires and a bigger saddle.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Carbon is more effective than aluminium or steel, yes, but if you're buying a full carbon bike expecting comfort to be the primary benefit I think you're going to be dissapointed. Wider tires and a front suspension fork give you more comfort than a carbon frame will, many of which are built to accept much skinnier tires than what your 8.3 DS currently has. Honestly if you're uncomfortable on the 8.3 which has all of those things I don't know what to recommend, I just know that a full carbon Sirrus with a rigid fork and skinny tires would be a step in the opposite direction.
I don't know if you can have total comfort and speed, maybe you should be looking at something like a cruiser or city bike with bigger tires and a bigger saddle.
I don't know if you can have total comfort and speed, maybe you should be looking at something like a cruiser or city bike with bigger tires and a bigger saddle.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Indiana
Posts: 478
Bikes: 2015 Trek 7.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've got no experience with the Slate (never seen one much less ridden one) but looking at the product page it dosen't appear all that dissimilar to your 8.3. Much better components of course, but strip it down and it's an aluminium frame with a front suspension fork just like your current bike. Interesting fork design though, could offer more travel than what your 8.3 has. All I can say is find a local dealer and try one, Cannondale makes nice bikes.
You might not find the kind of balance you're after in a bike straight off the rack.
You might not find the kind of balance you're after in a bike straight off the rack.
#5
Banned
Taiwan Makes most below and even some at the Professional User Level..
Trek upper end Hybrids are Carbon framed ..You like the DS ?
you can get an FX instead made around Not using a Suspension fork. so It's Lighter
7.9 FX | FX | Fitness bikes | City bikes | Bikes | Trek Bikes
Search the Blogs for user revues of that ^^ not every one reads this forum to revue things for your convenience.
For 'Keepers' I buy steel framed Bikes , I bought a Cane creek Thudbuster seat Post .
My drivetrain choice Is The Rohloff Hub , Unlike the one-ups-manship in the derailleur parts manufacturers
it was well designed in the 1st place.. and has a 10+ year reliability track record.
Trek upper end Hybrids are Carbon framed ..You like the DS ?
you can get an FX instead made around Not using a Suspension fork. so It's Lighter
7.9 FX | FX | Fitness bikes | City bikes | Bikes | Trek Bikes
Search the Blogs for user revues of that ^^ not every one reads this forum to revue things for your convenience.
For 'Keepers' I buy steel framed Bikes , I bought a Cane creek Thudbuster seat Post .
My drivetrain choice Is The Rohloff Hub , Unlike the one-ups-manship in the derailleur parts manufacturers
it was well designed in the 1st place.. and has a 10+ year reliability track record.
Last edited by fietsbob; 03-07-16 at 12:52 PM.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: still above ground
Posts: 1,066
Bikes: 2016 Specialized crosstrail comp disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I would take exception with this statement. Carbon is lighter than steel yes, but as with all things there are trade offs.
IMHO unless you are a weight weenie or a competitive racer a steel or aluminum bike will probably be better
IMHO unless you are a weight weenie or a competitive racer a steel or aluminum bike will probably be better
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,612
Bikes: Corvid Sojourner, Surly Ice Cream Truck, Co-Motion Divide, Co-Motion Java Tandem, Salsa Warbird, Salsa Beargrease, Carver Tandem
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 533 Post(s)
Liked 435 Times
in
227 Posts
The tangible differences of a hybrid bike between steel/aluminium or carbon are so slight that they are not worth the consideration when it comes to comfort. Don't.
Seems that a recumbent bike is worth trying in this instance.
Seems that a recumbent bike is worth trying in this instance.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Indiana
Posts: 478
Bikes: 2015 Trek 7.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Carbon is more effective at damping road vibrations but the primary benefit is weight. I don't mind if you disagree with me but please quote my sentence in its entirety if you're going to.
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am going to jump....I am going to probably go with the Sirrus Pro Carbon 2016 as it seems to have the most innovation for comfort. Unless you guys can suggest a better bike. I need to step up my fitness game and get a faster bike. I am getting hammered on the hills with my 8.3 DS. Does anybody know where I can find a good butt implant surgeon?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Indiana
Posts: 478
Bikes: 2015 Trek 7.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The Pro Carbon is an awesome bike, just don't expect it to be as "soft" as your 8.3 and you won't be dissapointed. You could to look into padded bike shorts, maybe do a search in the General Cycling forum or start a new thread. Also make sure you get fitted for your bike so you're getting the correct frame size and seat/stem adjustment.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Skien Norway
Posts: 425
Bikes: Specialized Sirrus Comp Carbon Disc '14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Speeder 5000 - Road & Fitness - Merida Bikes International
full carbon with ultegra. Same type off bike like the sirrus.
full carbon with ultegra. Same type off bike like the sirrus.
#12
Senior Member
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,621
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,180 Times
in
770 Posts
Diamondback Bicycles - Interval Carbon
Weighs 20 lbs which is 3 lbs lighter than the Specialized Sirrus Carbon.
Weighs 20 lbs which is 3 lbs lighter than the Specialized Sirrus Carbon.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Indiana
Posts: 478
Bikes: 2015 Trek 7.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Diamondback Bicycles - Interval Carbon
Weighs 20 lbs which is 3 lbs lighter than the Specialized Sirrus Carbon.
Weighs 20 lbs which is 3 lbs lighter than the Specialized Sirrus Carbon.
Good question.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,621
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,180 Times
in
770 Posts
REI website says the Diamondback weighs 20lbs 8 oz.
https://www.rei.com/product/896420/d...l-carbon-mens#
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Indiana
Posts: 478
Bikes: 2015 Trek 7.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
He's interested in the Pro Carbon, not the regular Carbon. I'd be surprised if the Diamondback weighs less, but I don't have any personal experience with it.
#18
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Diamondback Bicycles - Interval Carbon
Weighs 20 lbs which is 3 lbs lighter than the Specialized Sirrus Carbon.
Weighs 20 lbs which is 3 lbs lighter than the Specialized Sirrus Carbon.
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If you think about it quickly then yes but then ask yourself the question would I become more fit ( increase my heart rate more by) lifting 50lbs 10 times or 500lbs once or 100lbs or 5 times? Fitness is built through repetition. So if I have a lighter bike I can "spin" the crank faster, complete more repetitions which will increase my heart rate which by definition would increase my fitness. That's what the "spin classes" at the gym are predicated on.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,612
Bikes: Corvid Sojourner, Surly Ice Cream Truck, Co-Motion Divide, Co-Motion Java Tandem, Salsa Warbird, Salsa Beargrease, Carver Tandem
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 533 Post(s)
Liked 435 Times
in
227 Posts
LAwor - are you absorbing the facts here ? Everyone is explaining to you that going 'pure carbon' will not give you the comfort you seek.
FWIW - my 2015 Sirrus Pro Carbon with tubeless setup, carbon rims, carbon handlebars and carbon stem is a a bit under 19 lbs. Stock when I bought it was about 20 lbs - I think I posted the weight here somewhere when I bought it.
FWIW - my 2015 Sirrus Pro Carbon with tubeless setup, carbon rims, carbon handlebars and carbon stem is a a bit under 19 lbs. Stock when I bought it was about 20 lbs - I think I posted the weight here somewhere when I bought it.
#21
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
LAwor - are you absorbing the facts here ? Everyone is explaining to you that going 'pure carbon' will not give you the comfort you seek.
FWIW - my 2015 Sirrus Pro Carbon with tubeless setup, carbon rims, carbon handlebars and carbon stem is a a bit under 19 lbs. Stock when I bought it was about 20 lbs - I think I posted the weight here somewhere when I bought it.
FWIW - my 2015 Sirrus Pro Carbon with tubeless setup, carbon rims, carbon handlebars and carbon stem is a a bit under 19 lbs. Stock when I bought it was about 20 lbs - I think I posted the weight here somewhere when I bought it.
#22
Senior Member
If you think about it quickly then yes but then ask yourself the question would I become more fit ( increase my heart rate more by) lifting 50lbs 10 times or 500lbs once or 100lbs or 5 times? Fitness is built through repetition. So if I have a lighter bike I can "spin" the crank faster, complete more repetitions which will increase my heart rate which by definition would increase my fitness. That's what the "spin classes" at the gym are predicated on.
Here's why I say that. If we carry it (the idea that repetition is the only thing that matters) out to its logical extent, then we should remove all resistance from the equation because that would allow for the maximum number of repetitions. It seems to me that the time the bike's weight would hold back the spin rate would be when climbing hills. And I see climbing as an excellent time to build muscle strength (another aspect of fitness in my opinion). In my experience, I've never had trouble elevating my heart rate while climbing.
Not looking to start a debate or anything. Just explaining my thinking. More than any of this, I think people should get the bike that makes them enjoy riding, as they are more likely to keep riding it.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Indiana
Posts: 478
Bikes: 2015 Trek 7.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Did you ride it around a smooth parking lot, or on the rough roads you described in your first post? I mean, my bike is all aluminium (typically described as the most unforgiving material to use) and yet I regularly do ~25 miles in total comfort, because we have nicely paved trails here. It's all relative.
#24
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Did you ride it around a smooth parking lot, or on the rough roads you described in your first post? I mean, my bike is all aluminium (typically described as the most unforgiving material to use) and yet I regularly do ~25 miles in total comfort, because we have nicely paved trails here. It's all relative.
#25
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would guess there is a limit to that line of thinking, though, but in all fairness I am not a physiologist.
Here's why I say that. If we carry it (the idea that repetition is the only thing that matters) out to its logical extent, then we should remove all resistance from the equation because that would allow for the maximum number of repetitions. It seems to me that the time the bike's weight would hold back the spin rate would be when climbing hills. And I see climbing as an excellent time to build muscle strength (another aspect of fitness in my opinion). In my experience, I've never had trouble elevating my heart rate while climbing.
Not looking to start a debate or anything. Just explaining my thinking. More than any of this, I think people should get the bike that makes them enjoy riding, as they are more likely to keep riding it.
Here's why I say that. If we carry it (the idea that repetition is the only thing that matters) out to its logical extent, then we should remove all resistance from the equation because that would allow for the maximum number of repetitions. It seems to me that the time the bike's weight would hold back the spin rate would be when climbing hills. And I see climbing as an excellent time to build muscle strength (another aspect of fitness in my opinion). In my experience, I've never had trouble elevating my heart rate while climbing.
Not looking to start a debate or anything. Just explaining my thinking. More than any of this, I think people should get the bike that makes them enjoy riding, as they are more likely to keep riding it.