crank length and bike weight in track sprinting
#1
commu*ist spy
Thread Starter
crank length and bike weight in track sprinting
two questions
why do track sprinters generally use shorter crank lengths while road sprinters generally prefer a longer crank length?
my understanding is that track sprinters value aero and stiffness over weight. it's not uncommon for them to weigh 20 lbs, is that right? is weight really that insignificant?
why do track sprinters generally use shorter crank lengths while road sprinters generally prefer a longer crank length?
my understanding is that track sprinters value aero and stiffness over weight. it's not uncommon for them to weigh 20 lbs, is that right? is weight really that insignificant?
#2
Senior Member
Because track sprinters use one gear that results in a very high cadence. Short cranks facilitate this.
Road sprinters can upshift to a higher gear when they are already at speed so high cadence is less important.
#3
commu*ist spy
Thread Starter
what about bike weight?
#4
Senior Member
There's a lot of research lately that points to better results on shorter cranks regardless of discipline.
#5
commu*ist spy
Thread Starter
#7
Senior Member
Are shorter cranks better? - Cycling Weekly
But it's been known for some time that there is virtually no advantage in power in changing your cranks to anything from the 165mm-175mm range that is typical. The conclusion then, is that shorter is better as it allows you to get a more aerodynamic position on the bike with equivalent hip angle. Or allows you to have the same position with a more open hip angle. Pretty easy. I'd like to try 160's myself.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,902
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4802 Post(s)
Liked 3,922 Times
in
2,551 Posts
Bike weights matter very little on the track. They never go uphill except to gain height on the banking and much of the reason they do that is to either place themselves where that weight will be used to advantage accelerating as they come off the banking or the rider wants to slow down sharply to force the rider behind to take the lead, again being about to recoup that speed for free coming back down behind the rider he has just forced to pass. Sprinters esp value both stiffness and strength a lot and in general, more of either adds weight. (Track sprinters are the heavyweight wrestlers of the bike world. I've known some whose thighs matched my waist.)
Ben
Ben
#9
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
two questions
why do track sprinters generally use shorter crank lengths while road sprinters generally prefer a longer crank length?
my understanding is that track sprinters value aero and stiffness over weight. it's not uncommon for them to weigh 20 lbs, is that right? is weight really that insignificant?
why do track sprinters generally use shorter crank lengths while road sprinters generally prefer a longer crank length?
my understanding is that track sprinters value aero and stiffness over weight. it's not uncommon for them to weigh 20 lbs, is that right? is weight really that insignificant?
Longer crank arms are great for climbing. Roadies climb. There are no hills on the track.
Roadies usually grind at lower RPMs than the cruising cadences that track racers hold. Cruising RPMs in a peloton are like 80-100 RPM. In a track points race, the cruising RPMs are like 100-110 RPM and sprints are 120-130 RPM.
Most importantly:
Roadies have gears, so they shift their way into maintaining the right amount of torque for a given effort as they increase speed. Trackies don't have gears, so they have to regulate speed with cadence. It's easier to regulate cadence (and spin faster) with shorter cranks than longer cranks.
It's not a weight or stiffness thing at all.
#10
commu*ist spy
Thread Starter
Bike weights matter very little on the track. They never go uphill except to gain height on the banking and much of the reason they do that is to either place themselves where that weight will be used to advantage accelerating as they come off the banking or the rider wants to slow down sharply to force the rider behind to take the lead, again being about to recoup that speed for free coming back down behind the rider he has just forced to pass. Sprinters esp value both stiffness and strength a lot and in general, more of either adds weight. (Track sprinters are the heavyweight wrestlers of the bike world. I've known some whose thighs matched my waist.)
Ben
Ben
#11
Lapped 3x
Look at the differences between climbing and acceleration and that will answer your questions.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 97
Bikes: LOOK 675, Dolan DF4, Casati Gold Line, Litespeed Classic, Felt TR2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My fitter is super into the "shorter cranks = better" for most people. For me it was a matter of lessening deadspots. I am short and have short legs but OLD roadie habits had me riding 172.5s on the road. Once I started racing track w 165s, the differences were noticeable once he got my fit sorted on both bikes. Much earlier engagement in the pedal stroke with shorter cranks for me.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,522
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1422 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
5 Posts
All the other "reasons" about short cranks making your faster or whatever are speculative hooey.
#14
aka mattio
And, since shorter cranks can accommodate a more aerodynamic position with a hip angle sufficient to generate power, I don't know if you can call increasing your power:cda relationship 'speculative hooey.'
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 3,215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#17
Full Member
I actually think tapping the track with a pedal should be a mandatory drill for newbies. When I rode Giordana last year, I tapped the track with 170's to get a feel for the steepness and felt comfortable with riding 172.5's after that.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 3,215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
. Maybe certain tracks , but I wouldn't want to be the person getting new riders to tap something as step steep as cleveland , because there's just not much main margin for error . I also don't think you even could do this still drill at a lot of wood tracks , yu slide before you arrive strike .
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 97
Bikes: LOOK 675, Dolan DF4, Casati Gold Line, Litespeed Classic, Felt TR2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I rode Giordana with 165s in March to recon for Nats and had ZERO issues then at Nats I tapped twice in my match sprint rounds. DOH.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 97
Bikes: LOOK 675, Dolan DF4, Casati Gold Line, Litespeed Classic, Felt TR2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Also RE shorter cranks I will second what QP says as my fitter could quantify to a degree the watt delta between short cranks vs long cranks. Not hooey at all.
#21
commu*ist spy
Thread Starter
My fitter is super into the "shorter cranks = better" for most people. For me it was a matter of lessening deadspots. I am short and have short legs but OLD roadie habits had me riding 172.5s on the road. Once I started racing track w 165s, the differences were noticeable once he got my fit sorted on both bikes. Much earlier engagement in the pedal stroke with shorter cranks for me.
#22
commu*ist spy
Thread Starter
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 97
Bikes: LOOK 675, Dolan DF4, Casati Gold Line, Litespeed Classic, Felt TR2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nothing massive... 10 watts or so.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 97
Bikes: LOOK 675, Dolan DF4, Casati Gold Line, Litespeed Classic, Felt TR2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Also, to your other question. Inseam = 28" and height is 5'6" so I for sure fall into the having a lot to gain using shorter cranks perhaps.
#25
Senior Member
I have reason to believe the GB sprinters have been using cranks shorter than 165 for some time. And some of them are pretty tall. But as with all this stuff, use what you like. It's just for fun.