Shimano Di2 Triple
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 156
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
7 Posts
Shimano Di2 Triple
Shimano has announced XTR Di2 for mountain bikes, including triple front chainrings. Will this work for tandems?
Shimano XTR Di2 - Electronic shifting comes to mountain bikes - BikeRadar
Shimano XTR Di2 - Electronic shifting comes to mountain bikes - BikeRadar
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
With an available 11-40 cassette, who needs a triple? Use a DA Di2 double up front and an XTR rear to get a 2x11 with a really wide but evenly stepped gear range.
https://www.gear-calculator.com/#KB=3...5&UF=2130&SL=2
https://www.gear-calculator.com/#KB=3...5&UF=2130&SL=2
#3
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mid Michigan
Posts: 345
Bikes: Erickson Signature, Paketa D2R
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You beat me to it Goldrush! I saw a different news report, however:
Shimano Unveils XTR Di2 M9050, Mountain Bikes Go Digital, Lose a Shifter
As an Ultegra Di2 user, with K-edge modified rear derailleur, I can say this is VERY attractive. I think this can transform tandem gearing and shifting. Imagine an 11-40 cassette and a triple crank! Only limitation I can think of is the higher gearing, where I always loved my 54 X 11. I did not see if there is a limit for chainring sizes. 54-42-30 might be nice...
Shimano Unveils XTR Di2 M9050, Mountain Bikes Go Digital, Lose a Shifter
As an Ultegra Di2 user, with K-edge modified rear derailleur, I can say this is VERY attractive. I think this can transform tandem gearing and shifting. Imagine an 11-40 cassette and a triple crank! Only limitation I can think of is the higher gearing, where I always loved my 54 X 11. I did not see if there is a limit for chainring sizes. 54-42-30 might be nice...
#4
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mid Michigan
Posts: 345
Bikes: Erickson Signature, Paketa D2R
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Custom 650B tandem by Bob Brown, 650B tandem converted from Santana Arriva, Santana Noventa, Boulder Bicycle 700C, Gunnar Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Great to see what appears to be a triple FD in the electronic shifting area. I hope that the system can be adapted to the road triple used by most tandem teams.
#6
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mid Michigan
Posts: 345
Bikes: Erickson Signature, Paketa D2R
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The idea of one shifter with synchronized shifting has possibilities but on rolling terrain like ours I think it also has some downsides. Sometimes I intentionally like to cross chain a little more or less depending on upcoming terrain. For example I may cross chain in the small ring on a double a little bit more at the bottom of a hill when I can see the hill up ahead will mean leaving the big ring just after shifting up to it. As long as you have multiple rings up front there will be some advantage to the rider anticipating upcoming terrain and planning ahead.
Great to see what appears to be a triple FD in the electronic shifting area. I hope that the system can be adapted to the road triple used by most tandem teams.
Great to see what appears to be a triple FD in the electronic shifting area. I hope that the system can be adapted to the road triple used by most tandem teams.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 103
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The idea of one shifter with synchronized shifting has possibilities but on rolling terrain like ours I think it also has some downsides. Sometimes I intentionally like to cross chain a little more or less depending on upcoming terrain. For example I may cross chain in the small ring on a double a little bit more at the bottom of a hill when I can see the hill up ahead will mean leaving the big ring just after shifting up to it. As long as you have multiple rings up front there will be some advantage to the rider anticipating upcoming terrain and planning ahead.
Great to see what appears to be a triple FD in the electronic shifting area. I hope that the system can be adapted to the road triple used by most tandem teams.
Great to see what appears to be a triple FD in the electronic shifting area. I hope that the system can be adapted to the road triple used by most tandem teams.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 156
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
7 Posts
[QUOTE=mstyer;16805921]With an available 11-40 cassette, who needs a triple? Use a DA Di2 double up front and an XTR rear to get a 2x11 with a really wide but evenly stepped gear range.
After over a year of trying, I haven't been to get the XTR rear shifter to work trouble free on my 11-34 10 speed. 11-40, no thanks.
After over a year of trying, I haven't been to get the XTR rear shifter to work trouble free on my 11-34 10 speed. 11-40, no thanks.
#9
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mid Michigan
Posts: 345
Bikes: Erickson Signature, Paketa D2R
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I used mechanical XTR for a long time with 11-34 and 12-34 9 speed with absolutely no issues. I just installed 11-36 with the Ki2, and it shifts flawlessly. If Shimano sells it for 11-40, I'd put money on it working extremely well.
Last edited by 2frmMI; 05-30-14 at 12:45 PM. Reason: messed up quote
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 156
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
7 Posts
[QUOTE=2frmMI;16806182]
I'm glad you have a trouble free system, but Shimano sold the parts on my bike also and several "ace" mechanics haven't been able to get it to work without endless trimming. The first problem was someone unknowingly installing one Shimano's "great idea" of a directional chain backwards. After correcting that the bike shifted very well on an 11-28 cassette this winter. Now as I return to the hilly midwest and install the 11-34, my problems start all over. I'm currently awaiting the arrival of a mid cage Ultegra rear shifter and an 11-32 cassette.
I might note that my previous tandem had your same setup (9 speed) and worked perfectly. I believe part the problem is the with the 10 speed system.
I might note that my previous tandem had your same setup (9 speed) and worked perfectly. I believe part the problem is the with the 10 speed system.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Did you replace the chain at the same time as the cassette?
[QUOTE=Goldrush;16806217]
I'm glad you have a trouble free system, but Shimano sold the parts on my bike also and several "ace" mechanics haven't been able to get it to work without endless trimming. The first problem was someone unknowingly installing one Shimano's "great idea" of a directional chain backwards. After correcting that the bike shifted very well on an 11-28 cassette this winter. Now as I return to the hilly midwest and install the 11-34, my problems start all over. I'm currently awaiting the arrival of a mid cage Ultegra rear shifter and an 11-32 cassette.
I might note that my previous tandem had your same setup (9 speed) and worked perfectly. I believe part the problem is the with the 10 speed system.
[QUOTE=Goldrush;16806217]
I'm glad you have a trouble free system, but Shimano sold the parts on my bike also and several "ace" mechanics haven't been able to get it to work without endless trimming. The first problem was someone unknowingly installing one Shimano's "great idea" of a directional chain backwards. After correcting that the bike shifted very well on an 11-28 cassette this winter. Now as I return to the hilly midwest and install the 11-34, my problems start all over. I'm currently awaiting the arrival of a mid cage Ultegra rear shifter and an 11-32 cassette.
I might note that my previous tandem had your same setup (9 speed) and worked perfectly. I believe part the problem is the with the 10 speed system.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Custom 650B tandem by Bob Brown, 650B tandem converted from Santana Arriva, Santana Noventa, Boulder Bicycle 700C, Gunnar Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I don't recall if you are currently running Di2. I would have had this same opinion before our new Di2 bike. Shifting is SO precise and reliable, that I don't need the kind of pre-planning I used to apply. I'm guessing the electronic synchro will work so well that your only consideration will be "time to shift?". All speculation right now, of course.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Wind Tunnels of Cheyenne
Posts: 361
Bikes: Burley Duet [of some unknown year] (the guinea pig); 2001 Ventana ECDM (the project); And always one less than I think I really need.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
So, who has Shimano Cycling's number and the savy to get out of them whether the XTR FD will work in the road setup?
(The only number I can find now is the fishing division, and they didn't transfer me to cycling after two attempts)
(The only number I can find now is the fishing division, and they didn't transfer me to cycling after two attempts)
#14
Clipless in Coeur d'Alene
Shimano has announced XTR Di2 for mountain bikes, including triple front chainrings. Will this work for tandems?
Shimano XTR Di2 - Electronic shifting comes to mountain bikes - BikeRadar
Shimano XTR Di2 - Electronic shifting comes to mountain bikes - BikeRadar
#1 - 11 spd only.
#2 - FD cage arc issue?
Mtn bike chainrings are very small and the FD is designed around the arcs of these. The largest XTR configuration is the 40/30/22 rings.
#3 - Will these 9050 components work with current Di2 E-Tube road shifters or only the new single 9050 Syncro shifter?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 272
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
BTW Mid-2015 release is planned.
Last edited by Bad1; 05-30-14 at 05:25 PM. Reason: Info
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Wind Tunnels of Cheyenne
Posts: 361
Bikes: Burley Duet [of some unknown year] (the guinea pig); 2001 Ventana ECDM (the project); And always one less than I think I really need.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
With some caveats:
#1 - 11 spd only.
#2 - FD cage arc issue?
Mtn bike chainrings are very small and the FD is designed around the arcs of these. The largest XTR configuration is the 40/30/22 rings.
#3 - Will these 9050 components work with current Di2 E-Tube road shifters or only the new single 9050 Syncro shifter?
#1 - 11 spd only.
#2 - FD cage arc issue?
Mtn bike chainrings are very small and the FD is designed around the arcs of these. The largest XTR configuration is the 40/30/22 rings.
#3 - Will these 9050 components work with current Di2 E-Tube road shifters or only the new single 9050 Syncro shifter?
1. Provided the road and mountain components are interchangeable, switching to the ten speed should be (the way I understand it) a simple matter of using a 6770 RD... In the road versions, the RD swap is all that is needed to switch the electronics between 10 and 11 speed.
2. True... Wonder how long it will take for someone to rip the XTR apart and fit a road cage? The swap on the rear seems simple enough. Probably beyond my blind fingers capabilities, and my bike and both FDs are currently at the LBS so I can't check it...
3. The way I've read it, you can go either the syncro/single shifter option or reprogram it for a conventional 2-shifter setup. Wonder if the syncro could be programmed into a road setup with XTR derailleurs, maybe even into a climbing shifter?
So Twocicle, are you considering a left-side timing set up? Of course this new option comes out as so many of us have fought through the double front set up, but fortunately before my new bike build...
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Wind Tunnels of Cheyenne
Posts: 361
Bikes: Burley Duet [of some unknown year] (the guinea pig); 2001 Ventana ECDM (the project); And always one less than I think I really need.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Is there a typo herein, or is there really a 11-40 cassette?
Never mind, found it.
Also read that while the 11spd road cassette requires an 11spd compatible hub, the new XTR 11spd fits a 10spd rear hub... Guessing the spacing between cogs is different which may raise road/off-road compatability issues if mixing RDs and cassettes. New cassette is supposed to be designed for roughly 10rpm cadence changes between gears, but the first 7 cogs are the same as on the 11-36 and I don't have the same experience on my set up.
The new XTR FD does have an insanely small cage, and 40T may be about the largest ring.
Wonder what the wrap is on the new RDs... 40-30-22 chainrings (18T) and 11-40 cassette (29T)... 47T?
Never mind, found it.
Also read that while the 11spd road cassette requires an 11spd compatible hub, the new XTR 11spd fits a 10spd rear hub... Guessing the spacing between cogs is different which may raise road/off-road compatability issues if mixing RDs and cassettes. New cassette is supposed to be designed for roughly 10rpm cadence changes between gears, but the first 7 cogs are the same as on the 11-36 and I don't have the same experience on my set up.
The new XTR FD does have an insanely small cage, and 40T may be about the largest ring.
Wonder what the wrap is on the new RDs... 40-30-22 chainrings (18T) and 11-40 cassette (29T)... 47T?
Last edited by LastKraftWagen; 05-31-14 at 03:37 AM. Reason: Update
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Is there a typo herein, or is there really a 11-40 cassette?
Never mind, found it.
Also read that while the 11spd road cassette requires an 11spd compatible hub, the new XTR 11spd fits a 10spd rear hub... Guessing the spacing between cogs is different which may raise road/off-road compatability issues if mixing RDs and cassettes. New cassette is supposed to be designed for roughly 10rpm cadence changes between gears, but the first 7 cogs are the same as on the 11-36 and I don't have the same experience on my set up.
The new XTR FD does have an insanely small cage, and 40T may be about the largest ring.
Wonder what the wrap is on the new RDs... 40-30-22 chainrings (18T) and 11-40 cassette (29T)... 47T?
Never mind, found it.
Also read that while the 11spd road cassette requires an 11spd compatible hub, the new XTR 11spd fits a 10spd rear hub... Guessing the spacing between cogs is different which may raise road/off-road compatability issues if mixing RDs and cassettes. New cassette is supposed to be designed for roughly 10rpm cadence changes between gears, but the first 7 cogs are the same as on the 11-36 and I don't have the same experience on my set up.
The new XTR FD does have an insanely small cage, and 40T may be about the largest ring.
Wonder what the wrap is on the new RDs... 40-30-22 chainrings (18T) and 11-40 cassette (29T)... 47T?
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Anchorage, Ak
Posts: 620
Bikes: 2015 Calfee Tetra tandem,2016 Calfee Tetra Adventure Tandem, Ventana ECDM 26 mtn tandem, Ventana ECDM 29r full suspension Mtn tandem ,Ventana Fat tire tandem, Calfee Dragon Fly, Santa Cruz Carbon 5010, 907 Whiteout fat tire
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
I will be a early adopter of the new cassette. As we run DI2 now with compact cranks 50/34 and a 11-36 cassette I will move up to a mid compact chainring 11 speed set 52/36 and use the new cassette and expand our range a bit and go to 11 speed this way. I have not moved to 11 speed at this point is because I can't get free hub bodies from Chris King to fit our hubs and I have two sets of 10 sped wheels. I will try an Ultegra 11 speed rear derailluer with my K-edge modified cage and see if it works if not get the XTR derailleur. The shifters don't matter as they are only switches. I just completed the DI2 conversion of my wives Cervelo tri bike today and it is always amazing how well everyone of the DI2 bikes shifts with almost no effort to dial it in and then it just stays that way. I have now done 4 internal conversions and don't think I will ever go back to mechanical and would certainly consider it for our mountain bikes in the future. By doing everything internal it sure makes the bikes very clean looking.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Custom 650B tandem by Bob Brown, 650B tandem converted from Santana Arriva, Santana Noventa, Boulder Bicycle 700C, Gunnar Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
If I wanted 11speed on my 10 speed tandem wheels it seems the spoke angle is sharp enough that grinding a 1-2mm off the aluminum cassette spider would allow enough room for a road cassette to slide inward and still work.
#22
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Marcos, CA
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We are using mid-compact 52-36 chainrings with the Ultegra 11-speed mid cage derailleur and the 11x32 cassette. We are quite happy with this gearing on our bike which is a lightweight carbon road tandem. On the steepest climbs around our Boulder, Colorado home we are working pretty hard to spin up, but are able to spin. The only challenge is that the internal battery needed to be updated to the latest firmware to work with the internal battery. We were using DA before "upgrading" to the Ultegra derailleur.
#23
Senior Member
The idea of one shifter with synchronized shifting has possibilities but on rolling terrain like ours I think it also has some downsides. Sometimes I intentionally like to cross chain a little more or less depending on upcoming terrain. For example I may cross chain in the small ring on a double a little bit more at the bottom of a hill when I can see the hill up ahead will mean leaving the big ring just after shifting up to it. As long as you have multiple rings up front there will be some advantage to the rider anticipating upcoming terrain and planning ahead.
For example, approaching a hill, downshift until you shift into the smallest front ring, then upshift 2-3 times, until you're in the same gear ratio you were before, now with the chainring where you want it.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Custom 650B tandem by Bob Brown, 650B tandem converted from Santana Arriva, Santana Noventa, Boulder Bicycle 700C, Gunnar Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Looking at Zinn's comments, the sequential shifting allows a fair amount cross-chaining. The shift points are asymmetric depending on if you're upshifting or downshifting, this should make it very easy to accomplish what you want.
For example, approaching a hill, downshift until you shift into the smallest front ring, then upshift 2-3 times, until you're in the same gear ratio you were before, now with the chainring where you want it.
For example, approaching a hill, downshift until you shift into the smallest front ring, then upshift 2-3 times, until you're in the same gear ratio you were before, now with the chainring where you want it.
On the other hand doing what you mention would annoy me. Having to over shift down a couple gears (stoker complains of high cadence here) just to get it in the small front ring then shift back up to get to the original ratio is really working way to hard to get technology to do what can more easily be done with a the existing Di2 or a mechanical system that is shift the FD alone.
I guess this is like an automatic vs standard in a car. It depends what you like to drive. I can see sequential full auto bike shifting keeping it in a set cadence range in the near future. Pretty neat but I don't know if I want to give up picking my own gears.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Anchorage, Ak
Posts: 620
Bikes: 2015 Calfee Tetra tandem,2016 Calfee Tetra Adventure Tandem, Ventana ECDM 26 mtn tandem, Ventana ECDM 29r full suspension Mtn tandem ,Ventana Fat tire tandem, Calfee Dragon Fly, Santa Cruz Carbon 5010, 907 Whiteout fat tire
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Looking at Zinn's comments, the sequential shifting allows a fair amount cross-chaining. The shift points are asymmetric depending on if you're upshifting or downshifting, this should make it very easy to accomplish what you want.
For example, approaching a hill, downshift until you shift into the smallest front ring, then upshift 2-3 times, until you're in the same gear ratio you were before, now with the chainring where you want it.
For example, approaching a hill, downshift until you shift into the smallest front ring, then upshift 2-3 times, until you're in the same gear ratio you were before, now with the chainring where you want it.