Earning Something with Touring Photography? Sensor Size?
#1
eternalvoyage
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,256
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Earning Something with Touring Photography? Sensor Size?
Any hints on earning a little through photography while touring? Has anyone done this?
Also, how important is sensor size here? Do magazines (or other potential clients) have a preference for images that come from larger sensors? How often would one be seriously disadvantaged with images from a compact camera having a smaller sensor (1/2.5" or 1/1.7")? Is micro 4/3 large enough, or might there be some preference at time for larger (APS-C or larger) sensors?
Also, how important is sensor size here? Do magazines (or other potential clients) have a preference for images that come from larger sensors? How often would one be seriously disadvantaged with images from a compact camera having a smaller sensor (1/2.5" or 1/1.7")? Is micro 4/3 large enough, or might there be some preference at time for larger (APS-C or larger) sensors?
#2
aka: Mike J.
If you like Canon equipment then I've been finding a lot of good and informative info at photography-on-the.net
I've thought about this as well, but I suspect you'll need to have some success prior to photo-cycle-touring, I'm not too sure how financially lucrative the bulk photo sites are these days.
I've thought about this as well, but I suspect you'll need to have some success prior to photo-cycle-touring, I'm not too sure how financially lucrative the bulk photo sites are these days.
__________________
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Life happens, don't be a spectator.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Life happens, don't be a spectator.
#3
Fred-ish
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
You can sell photos taken on a phone camera - if they're of bigfoot or aliens.
If you're trying to compete with stock photo's of landmarks and landscapes taken with medium format film, great glass, tripods, and a butt load of knowledge and talent, you'll be under-gunned with almost anything that you can take on a bike.
If you've been commissioned to write an article and get photos, consult with the photo editor of the publication.
If you're trying to compete with stock photo's of landmarks and landscapes taken with medium format film, great glass, tripods, and a butt load of knowledge and talent, you'll be under-gunned with almost anything that you can take on a bike.
If you've been commissioned to write an article and get photos, consult with the photo editor of the publication.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The First State.
Posts: 1,168
Bikes: Schwinn Continental, Schwinn Paramount, Schwinn High Plains, Schwinn World Sport, Trek 420, Trek 930,Trek 660, Novara X-R, Giant Iguana. Fuji Sagres mixte.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times
in
10 Posts
You will need a low noise-hi rez sensor camera, a dSLR or a mirrorless camera with an APS-C sensor, or possibly a micro 4/3rd camera. This will not fit in a shirt pocket, or be inexpensive. Check the camera reviews at the Luminous Landscape site to see if any of the smaller mirrorless micro 4/3rds or APS-C camera have sufficient image quality. Sony has a line of mirrorless APS-C sensor cams, the NEX line but the lenses are not really any smaller than for dSLRs, this increases the bulk.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,334
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's not so much about sensor size as dpi (dots per inch )of the image you produce. You will need 300dpi for a magazine. THe confusion is, you can produce a 300 dpi image from a camera phone, in Photoshop, only it will look terrible. Personally, I'd go for anything over 5 or 6 megapixels, anything under and you'd struggle. That said, I used to be able to print A4s off a 3 megapixel camera, but, and it's a big but, it had a great lens.
Pixelcount is a bit of a myth in this respect, as you could have a 15 megapixel camera with a terrible lens, and get big images, but which have no clarity. For me, over about 5 megapixels, and then the lens starts becoming the important thing.
Pixelcount is a bit of a myth in this respect, as you could have a 15 megapixel camera with a terrible lens, and get big images, but which have no clarity. For me, over about 5 megapixels, and then the lens starts becoming the important thing.
#6
Senior Member
Have things changed recently? The last time I talked to a magazine about digital photography, I think they said 300dpi was overkill and they only needed 150-200dpi...
That said, if you're trying to sell to a major publication, you'll probably be competing against professionals who have expensive high-quality lenses and expensive high-resolution digital SLRs. If this doesn't deter you then, as rogerstg mentioned, it's not a bad idea to contact some of the people you think you might sell to and ask them what they want. If they regularly deal with freelance submissions, they'll likely have a canned response that tells you exactly what they need in terms of image size, file formats, etc.
That said, if you're trying to sell to a major publication, you'll probably be competing against professionals who have expensive high-quality lenses and expensive high-resolution digital SLRs. If this doesn't deter you then, as rogerstg mentioned, it's not a bad idea to contact some of the people you think you might sell to and ask them what they want. If they regularly deal with freelance submissions, they'll likely have a canned response that tells you exactly what they need in terms of image size, file formats, etc.
#7
Bike touring webrarian
Check out this article over at travellingtwo.com called Make Money While Travelling: Stock Photography. It will point you in the right direction.
Ray
Ray
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,334
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's not so much about sensor size as dpi (dots per inch )of the image you produce. You will need 300dpi for a magazine. THe confusion is, you can produce a 300 dpi image from a camera phone, in Photoshop, only it will look terrible. Personally, I'd go for anything over 5 or 6 megapixels, anything under and you'd struggle. That said, I used to be able to print A4s off a 3 megapixel camera, but, and it's a big but, it had a great lens.
Pixelcount is a bit of a myth in this respect, as you could have a 15 megapixel camera with a terrible lens, and get big images, but which have no clarity. For me, over about 5 megapixels, and then the lens starts becoming the important thing.
Pixelcount is a bit of a myth in this respect, as you could have a 15 megapixel camera with a terrible lens, and get big images, but which have no clarity. For me, over about 5 megapixels, and then the lens starts becoming the important thing.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 437
Bikes: 2007 Raleigh Rx 1.0, 1990 Cannondale ST400, 1981 Fredy Rüegg, 1984 Miyata One-Thousand
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 100 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
From what I've read, image quality depends a lot less on sensor size and DPI than on lens quality. Micro 4/3 should be okay--I really enjoy my Canon 40D, as it includes many pro features and can be had for around $500 gently used. Definitely a noticeable upgrade from the Rebel XTi, though either body fitted with L glass will produce print-quality photos.
#10
Senior Member
folks, 300dpi doesnt mean anything on its own. Its like saying my bike has really high gearing, its top gear is with a 53 tooth...so is it 53/11 or 53/14
A by B inches @300dpi is what you need to know.
I can send you a photo at 300dpi that is 1/2inch X 1/2inch @ 300dpi, or 11x14@300dpi.
my cameras are about 9x12@300, but then you get into lens quality, how the shot is processed by the camera, so in the end, its not just about the numbers of pixels and file size, but all kinds of factors, including but not ending with "is it a crappy photo" at whatever resolution?
A by B inches @300dpi is what you need to know.
I can send you a photo at 300dpi that is 1/2inch X 1/2inch @ 300dpi, or 11x14@300dpi.
my cameras are about 9x12@300, but then you get into lens quality, how the shot is processed by the camera, so in the end, its not just about the numbers of pixels and file size, but all kinds of factors, including but not ending with "is it a crappy photo" at whatever resolution?
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Note that dpi is a printer capacity and printing is done by the magazine not you. As long as you have sufficient pixels for the required size, that is good enough. You should look at the quality of the pixels.
Capture the picture in RAW if you can, you keep more of the dynamic range than jpg. There is some debate as to whether 14bit RAW is any better than 12bit. The consensus is the that dynamic range is the same for both but you can extract a bit more underexposed detail with 14bit.
Modern sensors are good enough that lens quality makes a difference. Try and use the pro grade lenses or the better std ones rather than cheap kit zoom lenses. A decent macro and a wide aperture wideangle for interiors are handy. Unless you are seriously into wildlife, taking a big telephoto is a waste of space. Wildlife photography takes a trip all to itself. A good tripod, cable release and a flash that you can use off camera are all useful.
If you are going to take commercial photographs you have to start thinking commercially. Will this picture sell? You will have to adopt some commercial photographic cliches but avoid some of the arty amateur photographer cliches. Being original is really hard but the bike can get you to original points of view and give you the time to stop where a car-based photographer might not.
Good photography can take planning and time. You may want to stay at a location to catch the right light, or be at a public event at a particular time and place to capture action, eg closeups of a marching band getting kitted up rather than the usual distance shots of them marching past.
I've taken nice portraits of people I have met but have never sold them. There might be a market for creative portraits outside the studio, esp with things people value, eg craftsman working, farmers with their horses or tractors, family shots showing the house. You will need a mechanism to get good mounted prints to the client within a short time.
Capture the picture in RAW if you can, you keep more of the dynamic range than jpg. There is some debate as to whether 14bit RAW is any better than 12bit. The consensus is the that dynamic range is the same for both but you can extract a bit more underexposed detail with 14bit.
Modern sensors are good enough that lens quality makes a difference. Try and use the pro grade lenses or the better std ones rather than cheap kit zoom lenses. A decent macro and a wide aperture wideangle for interiors are handy. Unless you are seriously into wildlife, taking a big telephoto is a waste of space. Wildlife photography takes a trip all to itself. A good tripod, cable release and a flash that you can use off camera are all useful.
If you are going to take commercial photographs you have to start thinking commercially. Will this picture sell? You will have to adopt some commercial photographic cliches but avoid some of the arty amateur photographer cliches. Being original is really hard but the bike can get you to original points of view and give you the time to stop where a car-based photographer might not.
Good photography can take planning and time. You may want to stay at a location to catch the right light, or be at a public event at a particular time and place to capture action, eg closeups of a marching band getting kitted up rather than the usual distance shots of them marching past.
I've taken nice portraits of people I have met but have never sold them. There might be a market for creative portraits outside the studio, esp with things people value, eg craftsman working, farmers with their horses or tractors, family shots showing the house. You will need a mechanism to get good mounted prints to the client within a short time.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,238
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18415 Post(s)
Liked 15,545 Times
in
7,329 Posts
Good photography can take planning and time. You may want to stay at a location to catch the right light, or be at a public event at a particular time and place to capture action, eg closeups of a marching band getting kitted up rather than the usual distance shots of them marching past.
I've taken nice portraits of people I have met but have never sold them. There might be a market for creative portraits outside the studio, esp with things people value, eg craftsman working, farmers with their horses or tractors, family shots showing the house. You will need a mechanism to get good mounted prints to the client within a short time.
I've taken nice portraits of people I have met but have never sold them. There might be a market for creative portraits outside the studio, esp with things people value, eg craftsman working, farmers with their horses or tractors, family shots showing the house. You will need a mechanism to get good mounted prints to the client within a short time.
As noted, there are already so many scenery photos out there taken by pros with great equipment that it that would difficult to compete unless you happen to capture something unique. I think you would have a better chance with out-of-studio portraits.