Protected bike lane critique (fresh meat!!)
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,261
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4246 Post(s)
Liked 1,351 Times
in
937 Posts
Protected bike lane critique (fresh meat!!)
And it comes with its own application of "Godwin's Law"!!
https://janheine.wordpress.com/
Some of the criticisim is of protected bike lanes hidden by parked cars (maybe, it's the parked cars that are the problem).
Let the feeding frenzy begin!!
https://janheine.wordpress.com/
Some of the criticisim is of protected bike lanes hidden by parked cars (maybe, it's the parked cars that are the problem).
Let the feeding frenzy begin!!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Naptown
Posts: 1,133
Bikes: NWT 24sp DD; Brompton M6R
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
And it comes with its own application of "Godwin's Law"!!
https://janheine.wordpress.com/
Some of the criticisim is of protected bike lanes hidden by parked cars (maybe, it's the parked cars that are the problem).
Let the feeding frenzy begin!!
https://janheine.wordpress.com/
Some of the criticisim is of protected bike lanes hidden by parked cars (maybe, it's the parked cars that are the problem).
Let the feeding frenzy begin!!
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,261
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4246 Post(s)
Liked 1,351 Times
in
937 Posts
(Note that Heine is not being critical of all protected bicycle paths.)
Last edited by njkayaker; 05-15-13 at 12:49 PM.
#4
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
The biggest flaw in the critique is this:
Motorists, as the author pointed out, look for cars... regardless of whether cyclists ride in the street, right next to a motorist or in a protected bikeway, motorists are looking for cars, tend to only see cars and even if a cyclist is right in front of a motorist, drivers still decry "I didn't see the cyclist."
Now granted a protected bikeway (as shown in the pics) is NOT helping at the place where cyclists are still most vulnerable... at intersections.
Frankly I had to laugh at these bikeway installations (yes, I am the quintessential "strong rider"), these types of low volume, low speed streets hardly need much more than perhaps a sharrow or two, if even that. These are residential areas. No doubt the speed limits in these areas is something like 35MPH or lower.
Honestly, I have to agree with this critique. There are places where protected bikeways should exist... such as where high speed high volume multi-lane virtual freeways dominate the landscape (as is the case in many areas in So Cal), but I can't say any of the locations shown in the critique is one of them.
In all cases, the driver did not notice the cyclist. This is the greatest danger for cyclists: being overlooked in traffic. Since drivers usually scan the road for cars, cyclists are safest if they ride where drivers look for cars. To be safe, cyclists must be an equal part of traffic.
Now granted a protected bikeway (as shown in the pics) is NOT helping at the place where cyclists are still most vulnerable... at intersections.
Frankly I had to laugh at these bikeway installations (yes, I am the quintessential "strong rider"), these types of low volume, low speed streets hardly need much more than perhaps a sharrow or two, if even that. These are residential areas. No doubt the speed limits in these areas is something like 35MPH or lower.
Honestly, I have to agree with this critique. There are places where protected bikeways should exist... such as where high speed high volume multi-lane virtual freeways dominate the landscape (as is the case in many areas in So Cal), but I can't say any of the locations shown in the critique is one of them.
#5
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
one problem NOT addressed by Jan is that if seattle doesnt make its streets more friendly to ride, less people will ride there. Jan surely remembers Dexter Ave N. prior to the development of the bikeway there.
It took the installation of a fairly ample bike lane NS along a key commuting route in Seattle for massive numbers of cyclists to choose to bike to downtown. prior to the bikeway network, very few people dared to bike in the city amidst the car traffic. this is still the case on ANY major commuting route into and out of seattle. without bikeways, people simply won't bike.
In the absence of bike facilities, even on streets that Jan and other experienced riders regard as no problem whatsoever, less people will bike.
Another issue is the fearmongering. Jan WON'T be 'pushed' onto a separated bikeway. Thanks to the efforts of a few dedicated bike advocates, who bucked the state bike advocacy organization, mandatory sidepath/bikelane/shoulder laws were effectively defeated in Washington state just a few years ago. if he and other riders keep vigilant to the legislation, he and other riders in washington won't have to ride a comfortable separated path otherwise known as the interurban trail between seattle and everett.
Jan can also always choose side streets or simply ride aurora ave north amidst hundreds of thousands of cars a day, if he'd rather pretend he's more like a car than an old lady on a bicycle.
He captures the own futility in his dream for bike transport, when he cautions about standard bikelanes adjacent to car traffic
It's not just novice cyclists. its less abled, young, families, elderly, my parents and girlfriend and just about everyone EXCEPT the extreme minority of riders characterized as the few and the fearless, like Jan - probably the most well known randonneur in North America.
It took the installation of a fairly ample bike lane NS along a key commuting route in Seattle for massive numbers of cyclists to choose to bike to downtown. prior to the bikeway network, very few people dared to bike in the city amidst the car traffic. this is still the case on ANY major commuting route into and out of seattle. without bikeways, people simply won't bike.
In the absence of bike facilities, even on streets that Jan and other experienced riders regard as no problem whatsoever, less people will bike.
Another issue is the fearmongering. Jan WON'T be 'pushed' onto a separated bikeway. Thanks to the efforts of a few dedicated bike advocates, who bucked the state bike advocacy organization, mandatory sidepath/bikelane/shoulder laws were effectively defeated in Washington state just a few years ago. if he and other riders keep vigilant to the legislation, he and other riders in washington won't have to ride a comfortable separated path otherwise known as the interurban trail between seattle and everett.
Jan can also always choose side streets or simply ride aurora ave north amidst hundreds of thousands of cars a day, if he'd rather pretend he's more like a car than an old lady on a bicycle.
He captures the own futility in his dream for bike transport, when he cautions about standard bikelanes adjacent to car traffic
Originally Posted by jan heine
"To novice cyclists, it may be disconcerting to be passed by fast-moving cars".
Last edited by Bekologist; 05-15-13 at 01:14 PM.
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
a big thank you to jan heine for writing that. it should be noted that german cycling federation studies of separated infrastructure also looked at dutch statistics and found a much higher rate of injury accidents on dutch paths than on dutch bike lanes.
the copenhagenize crowd has made this their mantra but actual data shows that increases in mode share in denmark and holland (most of which occurred in the 70s and 80s) were not correlated with build out of separated infrastructure. moreover, cycling in germany has grown explosively even though bike lanes are preferred over segregated infrastructure.
if seattle doesnt make its streets more friendly to ride, less people will ride there
Last edited by spare_wheel; 05-15-13 at 01:38 PM.
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
interesting comment on the jan heine's blog post:
I agree completely. I live in Berlin (D) and the city is slowly but surely getting rid of separate bike lanes wherever they can, and either doing nothing on the road or adding a full cyclists-only lane, even if it’s at the expense of a motorist’s lane (which it usually is )
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
That is also why I am concerned to see new facilities being put in that seem like a retrograde step. It seems like we are trying to emulate Europe, without realizing that in many ways, we were ahead of them already.
I am watching mikael colville andersen's twitter feed closely.
#9
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
a big thank you to jan heine for writing that. it should be noted that german cycling federation studies of separated infrastructure also looked at dutch statistics and found a much higher rate of injury accidents on dutch paths than on dutch bike lanes.
the copenhagenize crowd has made this their mantra but actual data shows that increases in mode share in denmark and holland (most of which occurred in the 70s and 80s) were not correlated with build out of separated infrastructure. moreover, cycling in germany has grown explosively even though bike lanes are preferred over segregated infrastructure.
the copenhagenize crowd has made this their mantra but actual data shows that increases in mode share in denmark and holland (most of which occurred in the 70s and 80s) were not correlated with build out of separated infrastructure. moreover, cycling in germany has grown explosively even though bike lanes are preferred over segregated infrastructure.
You do conflate separate with cycletrack, and it muddles your argument. the die-hard VC and most traffic planners would suggest bike lanes, the plain jane AASHTO ones or the full lane German ones, 'separate' traffic. I bet the german ones make generous use of bollards too.
Jan is mousing about completing a major section of the interurban trail, a major, mostly separated path that runs for miles N/S out of the N Seattle neighborhood all the way to Everett. This already IS a major path corridor; the city is attempting to complete it.
i am, perhaps, as critical of unnecessary bike infrastucture as the jan, but there are places around seattle a separated path 'cycletrack' can work. I am confident it WILL work, on Seattle's interurban bike path route he's grousing about here. I recognize those photo's locations, and know the type of infrastructure that's trying to be brought to that part of seattle.
Even Jan recognizes this type of path system can work well with limited intersection conflict. I could identify a half dozen streets in seattle proper this type of infrastructure would work well.
Jan can also always simply ride aurora ave north or another main seattle arterial amidst hundreds of thousands of cars a day, if he'd rather pretend he's more like a car than an old lady on a bicycle.
Last edited by Bekologist; 05-15-13 at 02:54 PM.
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
jan heine is not criticizing bike lanes.
a line of paint is quite the barrier.
nope.
plain jane AASHTO ones or the full lane German ones, 'separate' traffic.
I bet the german ones make generous use of bollards too.
#11
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
There is no sense engaging in a discussion with a person who thinks US and German bike lanes don't separate bike and car traffic by class of vehicle.
the ones in your state you are required to use, and the motorists cannot.
Absurd. As is Jan Heine's pissing and moaning about Seattle completing sections of the interurban trail. what a tool.
the ones in your state you are required to use, and the motorists cannot.
Absurd. As is Jan Heine's pissing and moaning about Seattle completing sections of the interurban trail. what a tool.
#12
Mmm hm!
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,164
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
spare_wheel, if you've ridden on NE Multnomah lately, what is your opinion of the new protected bike lane?
I do agree with Jan. My experience with NE multnomah is terrible. Cars park right up to the intersection and it is very easy to get right hooked. Since the new installation, I've ridden on the protected bike path ~5 times. 3 of those times I came very close to being wiped out at the intersection. Now I just take the whole car lane through Multnomah. You'll never see me ride the protected bike lane again. I have noticed a significant increase of bike traffic in the protected bike lane since installation.
I do agree with Jan. My experience with NE multnomah is terrible. Cars park right up to the intersection and it is very easy to get right hooked. Since the new installation, I've ridden on the protected bike path ~5 times. 3 of those times I came very close to being wiped out at the intersection. Now I just take the whole car lane through Multnomah. You'll never see me ride the protected bike lane again. I have noticed a significant increase of bike traffic in the protected bike lane since installation.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,842
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2337 Post(s)
Liked 2,821 Times
in
1,540 Posts
There is no sense engaging in a discussion with a person who thinks US and German bike lanes don't separate bike and car traffic by class of vehicle.
the ones in your state you are required to use, and the motorists cannot.
Absurd. As is Jan Heine's pissing and moaning about Seattle completing sections of the interurban trail. what a tool.
the ones in your state you are required to use, and the motorists cannot.
Absurd. As is Jan Heine's pissing and moaning about Seattle completing sections of the interurban trail. what a tool.
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#14
The Left Coast, USA
"cyclists were required by law to use the bike path, whether it was well-designed or not. Other European countries quickly followed this “innovation.” It spread to yet more countries when Germany invaded much of Europe during World War II."
As I've said before, I think there is a very good chance my children's children will not be able to ride on the street in urban areas in many US States, bike riding will be regulated and allowed in lanes and paths only. Once the infrastructure is built, the regulation will follow. The A&S community is making a big mistake by overstating the need for "special" improvements for bicycle riders.
As I've said before, I think there is a very good chance my children's children will not be able to ride on the street in urban areas in many US States, bike riding will be regulated and allowed in lanes and paths only. Once the infrastructure is built, the regulation will follow. The A&S community is making a big mistake by overstating the need for "special" improvements for bicycle riders.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,043
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
more cyclist -> more money, more legislation, more infrastructure (i.e. separate/painted lanes)
separate lanes -> more cyclist
Separate lanes -> win
separate lanes -> more cyclist
Separate lanes -> win
#17
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Sorry that you find 'absurd' the widespread, international acceptance of bike lanes as separated, preferential facilities for bicyclists. This reality is not my fault, but the world we live in.
Sparewheels opinion that even 2-3 meter wide bikelanes adjacent to a main travel lane doesn't separate traffic by class of vehicle IS absurd.
I'm not sating anything of the sort that you're imagining, sorry. Yes, there are differing degrees of traffic separation, from none at all to fully separated. a gamut of varieties of interplay between the differing modes of traffic.
The risks of drivers 'crossing over' at will is one of the inescapable weaknesses of standard bikelanes and simple, plain jane riding on the road - motorists can
cross over, right hook, and left cross cyclists at each and every intersection, particularly on non-protected infrastructure routes.
Yes, intersections need to be carefully considered. On both sides of the atlantic, the original implementation of intersection treatments are frequently modified and improved, if operational flaws are discovered... This is the reiterative process of facilities design improvement that Jan could genuinely contribute to, and be productive in finding improvements along the interrurban trail.
Suggesting sharrows or standard bikelanes isn't going to cut it for this (and a few key other) traffic corridor(s), however. Seattle is trying to create a well considered and protected connection of a significant trail network leading out of the city, as part of an overall larger network of some, select, protected routes.
Last edited by Bekologist; 05-16-13 at 09:59 AM.
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
unfortunately "separate lane" has become a code word for poorly-designed segregated infrastructure that endangers cyclists, sucks up limited funding, and does little to improve connectivity.
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Sparewheels opinion that even 2-3 meter wide bikelanes adjacent to a main travel lane doesn't separate traffic by class of vehicle IS absurd.
#20
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
it only separates bicycles by class if there is a mandatory sidepath law. moreover, its telling how upset some "advocates" get when they see cyclists in an arterial when there is a bike facility nearby. in pdx traffic planners have even taken to ranting in the media and putting up signs directing cyclists away from commercial areas.
To suggest otherwise, to suggest two meter wide bikelanes in germany aren't intended to provide separate lanes for bikes and car traffic, is absurd.
US 4 foot or the german, much wider bikelanes are less robustly separated from traffic than a curb or barrier separated bikelane, which are less robustly separated than a parking protected bikelane, which are in turn less robustly separated than a fully separated path network.
Each variety has its own nuance of safety issues at intersections, as does mixing bike and car traffic at regular intersections. Each intersection will have unique, context specific traffic dynamics, that change depending on time of day, that need to be addressed.
if you don't grasp these core, crucial details about traffic management, all hope is lost. You simply are unable to accurately explain, or understand the fundamentals of traffic management and preferred class lanes.
But, Honk Honk! look, you're a car like Jan!
Last edited by Bekologist; 05-16-13 at 12:01 PM.
#21
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Some other countries have a more enlightened attitude.
Oh I should have mentioned that the above bike path is representative of similar bike paths all over the country of Finland, and that said bicycle infrastructure is fairly recently installed... and is NOT as a result of some medieval roadway situation as some may think.
************************************************************
America is the land of the huge car and very little respect for any other road user.
Play the game at the end of this sentence and take notice that you can nearly always guess when the location is in America, due to the size of the cars... https://geoguessr.com/
Last edited by genec; 05-16-13 at 12:44 PM.
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
when i cross a bike lane mid block to park near a shop/restaurant/cafe/bar i don't feel "separated". one of the advantages of being a cyclists is that we can ride in a bike lane, a motor vehicle lane, or even (on occasion) a ped facility. many, if not most, segregationists want to eliminate this freedom.
#23
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
when i cross a bike lane mid block to park near a shop/restaurant/cafe/bar i don't feel "separated". one of the advantages of being a cyclists is that we can ride in a bike lane, a motor vehicle lane, or even (on occasion) a ped facility. many, if not most, segregationists want to eliminate this freedom.
Sharing the roads is fine as long as everyone is on board and is fully aware and responsible for the control of their vehicle and respects the other road users.
#24
absent
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: DC
Posts: 621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Where I live there are plenty of examples of both separated and painted side lanes. One major issue with the latter is how they're often occupied by parked cars, taxis, delivery vans. They're also swerved into by cars surging towards a right turn and drivers simply not paying attention.
The separated lanes have their flaws, but they seem to be the better choice in this automobile crazed district.
The Dutch cyclist, conversely, has some of the best thought-out infrastructure at her disposal. But if none of it existed, she'd probably still be safer than her counterparts over here. That's because the vast majority of Dutch drivers are well trained and aware of other road users. She can thank proper driver education and strict liability for that.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 231
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
When I first started riding several months ago I was thinking that bike lanes are a great thing. Now that I have quite a bit more experience riding in traffic both with and without bike lanes, I'm all for riding with the traffic. The bike lanes are much more dangerous than the lane for several reasons. Wide shoulders were parking isn't allowed seems best so far to me but where parking is allowed - gotta get in the lane.