Crank Size Question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Milton Velodrome/Escarpment
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Crank Size Question
Guys, I've been riding a 170 mm Ultegra 6800 on my road bike for a couple of years now. And I ride a 165mm on my track bike. I don't have problems with both.
I love high cadence, can spin 100 average for hours, and reaching 145 in fast rides (Don't call them sprints, as I'm just not fast enough to be one ).
My in-seam is 29.5", so yes, I'm on the shorter side of things.
I love riding the local short hills, that have some 'walls' climbing at 12-15%. But they're short hills - so no long endless climbs that I would've loved. The longest continuous climb locally is about 1 km long stretch.
Now I just found a deal on a Dura Ace 9000 172.5 mm crankset.
The questions is, going from Ultegra to Dura Ace, how much gain there is?
And, going from 170mm to 172.5mm, for a short guy who likes high cadence, is it going to affect my performance/comfort levels?
Please let me know soon. I'm meeting this guy for his DA9000 FD + RD today anyways. And I already have the DA shifters. So, the DA crankset will complete the groupset, but I'm unsure of the 170 to 172.5 mm jump.
I love high cadence, can spin 100 average for hours, and reaching 145 in fast rides (Don't call them sprints, as I'm just not fast enough to be one ).
My in-seam is 29.5", so yes, I'm on the shorter side of things.
I love riding the local short hills, that have some 'walls' climbing at 12-15%. But they're short hills - so no long endless climbs that I would've loved. The longest continuous climb locally is about 1 km long stretch.
Now I just found a deal on a Dura Ace 9000 172.5 mm crankset.
The questions is, going from Ultegra to Dura Ace, how much gain there is?
And, going from 170mm to 172.5mm, for a short guy who likes high cadence, is it going to affect my performance/comfort levels?
Please let me know soon. I'm meeting this guy for his DA9000 FD + RD today anyways. And I already have the DA shifters. So, the DA crankset will complete the groupset, but I'm unsure of the 170 to 172.5 mm jump.
#2
Senior Member
The only way that you're going to find out is to spend the money or borrow a bike with 172.5 cranks. The difference it only 5 mm ( 2.5 down + 2.5 up) which isn't much math-wise, but may make a difference to your pedaling and cadence. I'm of the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" camp. I sounds to me like 170's work well for you.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times
in
289 Posts
My two bobs worth is that 165mm cranks are already the longest that I would recommend for you based on your inseam and that going longer is going to loose you more than you could possibly gain for a bit of bling.
Longer cranks will be harder to spin at high cadences and longer cranks will make getting into an aerodynamic tuck more difficult. If you are going to change anything I would be selling the 170mm cranks and finding another 165mm set.
Anthony
Longer cranks will be harder to spin at high cadences and longer cranks will make getting into an aerodynamic tuck more difficult. If you are going to change anything I would be selling the 170mm cranks and finding another 165mm set.
Anthony
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Milton Velodrome/Escarpment
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
friday1970
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
53
12-17-21 03:19 PM
cooleric1234
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
6
07-04-10 04:45 PM