To the Wrongway Cyclist on Freeport Blvd.
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 4,665
Bikes: 2012 Trek Madone 6.2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Better get use to it as its the trend now. I've been mouthed at for pointing to the right lane that the wrong way rider should have been it. Its now on the bikepaths and people will start dieing. They walk,ride,skate and push there baby's going the wrong way. Its just the way it is now because when it started getting bad,the police did not ticket and now just like talking on cells while you drive,its out of control and to hard to pull back in.
#27
Bent_Rider
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 1,248
Bikes: Bacchetta Aero, BikeE, Bruce Gordon Rock n Road
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by closetbiker
If he rides head-on into you on your bike, both of you will go down.
#28
more ape than man
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,091
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by caloso
I guess I'd like to know why people think this is safer. Maybe some of our wrongway forum members could educate us. I promise not to be a condescending and we'll all promise not to flame him.
Seriously, why do you think it's safer to ride against traffic? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller...?
Seriously, why do you think it's safer to ride against traffic? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller...?
#30
Bent_Rider
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 1,248
Bikes: Bacchetta Aero, BikeE, Bruce Gordon Rock n Road
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by shokhead
Dumb.
#31
more ape than man
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,091
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by scarry
People who can't make complete sentences are dumb.
#32
Bent_Rider
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 1,248
Bikes: Bacchetta Aero, BikeE, Bruce Gordon Rock n Road
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by timmhaan
it's okay - you can't expect much from an internet forum. i was just trying to offer an explanation on why some people might think riding on the opposite side of the road is better. that was when i was a kid. but obviously adults do it too, so there must be a reason why they think it's better.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Watching all of you on O.B.I.T.
Posts: 2,023
Bikes: Bridgestone RB-1. Nicely restored
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
6 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
I guess I'd like to know why people think this is safer. Maybe some of our wrongway forum members could educate us. I promise not to be a condescending and we'll all promise not to flame him.
Seriously, why do you think it's safer to ride against traffic? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller...?
Seriously, why do you think it's safer to ride against traffic? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller...?
Why I tossed in scout leaders: Two reasons. First, a co-worker once told me that his son's boy scout leader had taken the troop on a bike ride, and that they did the entire ride (around ten miles, from the sound of it) against traffic. I told him this was wrong, and that they were lucky there had been no injuries or accidents. I pointed him toward John Allen's "Street Smarts" booklet, and the bike statutes of the state.
He was totally dumbfounded, with the "I never knew about any of this" response, but refused to pass this information along to Mr. Scout Master. "He's a real nice guy, a football coach and everything", I was told. Amen.
Second: One fine spring day two years ago, I am riding on Route 62, from Concord center toward Bedford. Boston area riders will know this stretch, as it is quite popular among area cyclists. Quite nice, and lots of riders on weekends. So, I'm riding along, almost to the Bedford line, and spot a group of riders coming toward me, on the wrong side.
They get closer, and I realize it is an adult woman, being followed by a collection of girls, ranging in age from very young to teenaged. The woman is wearing some of the accoutrements of a girl scout leader. The girls are dressed likewise. A few had helmets, most didn't.
Now, understand this: Route 62 is a wide stretch of two-lane, well-travelled. Motor vehicle traffic is not bad at all on weekend days, but it tends to move fast. There are some curves. The shoulders are not particularly wide. And here were these girl scouts, being led by someone who should have known better.
These girls will grow up, have kids, and teach them to ride against traffic, "so the cars can see you!!" Thus, the cycle of entrenched misinformation continues.
There are logical solutions to this problem, but any answer put on the table is going to cheese someone off, not matter how logical it may be.
#35
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by trackhub
A lot of it seems to come from well-meaning, but sadly misinformed parents and other authority figures from childhood. Toss in some other random family members (like that strange uncle or oddball aunt that every suburban family seems to have) along with scout leaders, and the list gets rather long. I call this "the cycle of entrenched misinformation". This cycle is damn near impossible to break.
.
.
All comes from the basic rule to walk/hike against the flow of traffic... these folks are just projecting their walking rules to cycling, as they see cycling as a form of "pedestrianism."
One might think that arrows on BL would solve this... but apparently some folks even ignore arrows. One might think that constantly approaching road signs on the wrong side of the road might be a hint... But apparently road signs are not meant for cyclists. Oh well.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 89
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
All comes from the basic rule to walk/hike against the flow of traffic... these folks are just projecting their walking rules to cycling, as they see cycling as a form of "pedestrianism."
One might think that arrows on BL would solve this... but apparently some folks even ignore arrows. One might think that constantly approaching road signs on the wrong side of the road might be a hint... But apparently road signs are not meant for cyclists. Oh well.
One might think that arrows on BL would solve this... but apparently some folks even ignore arrows. One might think that constantly approaching road signs on the wrong side of the road might be a hint... But apparently road signs are not meant for cyclists. Oh well.
#39
Senior Member
Common sense tells these people that there are two things on the road, motor vehicles and pedestrians. They're not motor vehicles, so guess which group they've placed themselves in? These same people either want a very large and heavy vehicle surrounding them while they are on the road, or reinforcing side beams on all sides, with air bags everywhere if in a smaller vehicle.
#40
Senior Member
Originally Posted by trackhub
A lot of it seems to come from well-meaning, but sadly misinformed parents and other authority figures from childhood. Toss in some other random family members (like that strange uncle or oddball aunt that every suburban family seems to have) along with scout leaders, and the list gets rather long. I call this "the cycle of entrenched misinformation". This cycle is damn near impossible to break...A few had helmets, most didn't.
Last edited by closetbiker; 10-25-05 at 09:21 AM.
#41
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
There have been a couple of posts that indicated that they wanted to see the driver's eyes.
(Of course, this is impossible in all but the best light and weather conditions. And even if you could see the maniacal look in the driver's eye as he mouths "I'm going to kill you!," if you've got a closing rate of 60-80mph, I doubt you could react quickly enough to dump it in the ditch.)
If this is the reason you ride against traffic, I'd like to hear your take on it.
(Of course, this is impossible in all but the best light and weather conditions. And even if you could see the maniacal look in the driver's eye as he mouths "I'm going to kill you!," if you've got a closing rate of 60-80mph, I doubt you could react quickly enough to dump it in the ditch.)
If this is the reason you ride against traffic, I'd like to hear your take on it.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 4,665
Bikes: 2012 Trek Madone 6.2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You read it so its good enough. Bottom line,ride the wrong way or walk in the street the wrong way is,well dumb. Anyone trying to justify it is wrong also. Dont worry about writing skills,worry about getting the point across. For all you know,i'm armless typing with a stick in my mouth.
#43
more ape than man
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,091
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
you can talk about something and not justify it at the same time. when police talk about crimes, are they trying to justify them? when an investigator tries to reconstruct an accident to understand it, are they justifying it?? of course not. some people just like to know how the world works and why people do what they do.
#45
No Rocket Surgeon
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Corona and S. El Monte, CA
Posts: 1,648
Bikes: Cannondale D600, Dahon Speed T7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by caloso
I guess I'd like to know why people think this is safer. Maybe some of our wrongway forum members could educate us. I promise not to be a condescending and we'll all promise not to flame him.
Seriously, why do you think it's safer to ride against traffic? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller...?
Seriously, why do you think it's safer to ride against traffic? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller...?
Originally Posted by trackhub
Why I tossed in scout leaders: Two reasons. First, a co-worker once told me that his son's boy scout leader had taken the troop on a bike ride, and that they did the entire ride (around ten miles, from the sound of it) against traffic. I told him this was wrong, and that they were lucky there had been no injuries or accidents. I pointed him toward John Allen's "Street Smarts" booklet, and the bike statutes of the state.
He was totally dumbfounded, with the "I never knew about any of this" response, but refused to pass this information along to Mr. Scout Master. "He's a real nice guy, a football coach and everything", I was told. Amen.
He was totally dumbfounded, with the "I never knew about any of this" response, but refused to pass this information along to Mr. Scout Master. "He's a real nice guy, a football coach and everything", I was told. Amen.
During the pre-ride briefing last week, many Scouts were amazed that cyclists actually had rights (and responsibilities) while riding on the road. Hopefully we will have a few more young people that are a bit better educated and less likely to become a statistic.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 89
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by shokhead
Well it seems everyone going the wrong way IS justifing it some how.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Watching all of you on O.B.I.T.
Posts: 2,023
Bikes: Bridgestone RB-1. Nicely restored
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
6 Posts
Originally Posted by eubi
I am a Scoutmaster and teach cycling to Scouts and adults. I guarantee you that when we ride this weekend, we will be riding with traffic, and everyone will have helmets, per the CA vehicle code. Safety considerations for Scout outings are often maddening (dare I say too safe?), but we don't lose very many Scouts. The Scoutmaster you mentioned obviously had no clue, and should not have lead a Scout cycling outing. Unfortunately he's not alone.
During the pre-ride briefing last week, many Scouts were amazed that cyclists actually had rights (and responsibilities) while riding on the road. Hopefully we will have a few more young people that are a bit better educated and less likely to become a statistic.
During the pre-ride briefing last week, many Scouts were amazed that cyclists actually had rights (and responsibilities) while riding on the road. Hopefully we will have a few more young people that are a bit better educated and less likely to become a statistic.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 4,665
Bikes: 2012 Trek Madone 6.2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dan828
Just like the people with poor spelling and grammar.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 260
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by scarry
People who can't make complete sentences are dumb.
Okay then I guess if you are cyclist you cannot complain about drivers doing stupid and dangerous things.
And scarry reading your own reply to me in yelling at cyclists forum, I guess the people who write smart ar** comments especially in not checking their facts before writing the comments are not dumb?