External ”Hollowtech” bearings or square tapered cartridges?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
External ”Hollowtech” bearings or square tapered cartridges?
Hi everyone!
As the title says, but I’m thinking about the durability factor.
A crankset/bottom bracket similar to my actual ones (currently SunRace FCM918 with Shimano UN-BB26, looking for a Shimano FC-T4060 with Shimano BB-SM52) is about 2.5x more expensive here in Brazil. Is it at least as durable as it costs?
As the title says, but I’m thinking about the durability factor.
A crankset/bottom bracket similar to my actual ones (currently SunRace FCM918 with Shimano UN-BB26, looking for a Shimano FC-T4060 with Shimano BB-SM52) is about 2.5x more expensive here in Brazil. Is it at least as durable as it costs?
#3
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,516
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2731 Post(s)
Liked 3,361 Times
in
2,034 Posts
Well, I've replaced a cheap cartridge (Chin Heur) after a few K miles with a UN55 that probably has 5K miles on it and running fine. I probably have 10K on an 105 BB5600 HTII bottom bracket that is running fine.
Either one should give years/miles of trouble free service unless you're riding in very extreme conditions.
I would forget the UN 26 and step up to a UN 55 for a few more $$
Either one should give years/miles of trouble free service unless you're riding in very extreme conditions.
I would forget the UN 26 and step up to a UN 55 for a few more $$
Likes For dedhed:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Llano Estacado
Posts: 3,702
Bikes: old clunker
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 684 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 104 Times
in
82 Posts
Hi everyone!
As the title says, but I’m thinking about the durability factor.
A crankset/bottom bracket similar to my actual ones (currently SunRace FCM918 with Shimano UN-BB26, looking for a Shimano FC-T4060 with Shimano BB-SM52) is about 2.5x more expensive here in Brazil. Is it at least as durable as it costs?
As the title says, but I’m thinking about the durability factor.
A crankset/bottom bracket similar to my actual ones (currently SunRace FCM918 with Shimano UN-BB26, looking for a Shimano FC-T4060 with Shimano BB-SM52) is about 2.5x more expensive here in Brazil. Is it at least as durable as it costs?
Likes For AnkleWork:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,003
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4172 Post(s)
Liked 3,792 Times
in
2,271 Posts
For the numbers of external to shell bearings (Hollowtech) sold and their relative mid to better grades (as they are on more expensive bikes typically) I will say that we replace a lot. For the most part these are not really rebuildable and are regarded as disposable by the industry.
The tapered square BBs seem to be of better sealing in general and don't wear as rapidly. Especially since they are so much more common at the lower cost levels one might think their longevity should be less then external units. But our experience doesn't prove this assumption out.
I'm sure others will have their opinions, perhaps they can offer some ideas as to how many they see a year so we know the foundation their opinions are based on. Andy
The tapered square BBs seem to be of better sealing in general and don't wear as rapidly. Especially since they are so much more common at the lower cost levels one might think their longevity should be less then external units. But our experience doesn't prove this assumption out.
I'm sure others will have their opinions, perhaps they can offer some ideas as to how many they see a year so we know the foundation their opinions are based on. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#6
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,516
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2731 Post(s)
Liked 3,361 Times
in
2,034 Posts
Likes For dedhed:
#7
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
After faffing around with a White Industries square taper BB (a good, but rather expensive one) for a couple of years, I went back to the $18 Shimano Ultegra BB, and it felt the way it does when I stop hitting myself in the head with a hammer.
@Andrew R Stewart: sample size = 1.0
Edit: I just remembered my Crampy square taper BB survived about 35 years of malignant neglect.
@Andrew R Stewart: sample size = 1.0
Edit: I just remembered my Crampy square taper BB survived about 35 years of malignant neglect.
Last edited by Cyclist0108; 12-01-19 at 07:36 PM.
Likes For Cyclist0108:
#8
Non omnino gravis
Likes For DrIsotope:
#9
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times
in
1,574 Posts
Not sure what your problem is, but everyone else understood it just fine.
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,826
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3185 Post(s)
Liked 2,020 Times
in
1,158 Posts
I’ve multiple thousands of miles on Ultegra and 105 level HollowTech b-brackets. They are easy to install, the spacing is dead on with the matched derailer so the shifting is easier to setup and are generally a ton easier to install and/or service than a square taper.
Likes For Steve B.:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: se MIch.
Posts: 2,917
Bikes: 1938 claud butler,1983 Basso,teledyne titan,teocali super,nrs,1993 stumpjumper fsr,Paramountain,Paramount Buell(sold),4 banger,Zaskar LE,Colnago Master Ibex MTB,1987ish,.etc....
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 787 Post(s)
Liked 2,910 Times
in
1,472 Posts
Likes For '02 nrs:
#12
aged to perfection
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PacNW
Posts: 1,773
Bikes: Dinucci Allez 2.0, Richard Sachs, Alex Singer, Serotta, Masi GC, Raleigh Pro Mk.1, Hetchins, etc
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 819 Post(s)
Liked 1,219 Times
in
643 Posts
I'm with Andrew the external bearings, while they brace the BB spindle better, seem to have a shorter life.
It may be because they are not as well protected, particularly from front wheel splash in wet conditions.
Mark Petry
Bainbridge Island, WA USA
It may be because they are not as well protected, particularly from front wheel splash in wet conditions.
Mark Petry
Bainbridge Island, WA USA
Likes For mpetry912:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
My experience with Shimano HTII external bottom brackets has been very good. I have two BB6700 (Ultegra level) bottom brackets mounting FC-5703 (105 level) triple cranks with over 25,000 miles each and still in excellent operating condition. These bikes aren't ridden in rain or snow if I can help it but they have gotten wet and splashed a number of times with no apparent problems.
Sample size = 2 but success = 100%
Sample size = 2 but success = 100%
Likes For HillRider:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times
in
723 Posts
To make a fair comparison you would have to include the weight of the spindle, which the BBR60 does not have but which is part of the BB-UN26.
Likes For dsbrantjr:
#15
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
After faffing around with a White Industries square taper BB (a good, but rather expensive one) for a couple of years, I went back to the $18 Shimano Ultegra BB, and it felt the way it does when I stop hitting myself in the head with a hammer.
@Andrew R Stewart: sample size = 1.0
Edit: I just remembered my Crampy square taper BB survived about 35 years of malignant neglect.
@Andrew R Stewart: sample size = 1.0
Edit: I just remembered my Crampy square taper BB survived about 35 years of malignant neglect.
Likes For Marcus_Ti:
#16
Non omnino gravis
Even an economy crankset today will be at or under 800g, which with a ~80g BB is still lighter than a higher-end square taper crankset from 20 years ago.
Likes For DrIsotope:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times
in
972 Posts
Hambini says a poorly aligned BB shell will cause premature bearing wear. Does a square taper cartridge unit isolate from those imperfections?
Likes For tyrion:
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,003
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4172 Post(s)
Liked 3,792 Times
in
2,271 Posts
To a degree yes. However the shell faces are also about getting the BB (whatever type) securely tightened. A shell with cockeyed faces won't allow the BB RH (usually the RH) side to fully snug up and thus might loosen during use more readily. The other possibility with really off faces is that if the BB cartridge is fully torqued down before the LH locating ring (what most will call a cup even though it's a cylinder) the LH end can drift off center and make installing that LH ring rather hard. This is one reason why I'll not tighten the RH side completely before the LH side is installed. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
The reason I’m replacing it is because it’s got some play and misalignment. As I’m still overweight, with 114kg (down from 157kg, all 43kg lost on this BB), I’d thought about upgrading to Hollowtech, if the durability factor worth it.
#21
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Well, I've replaced a cheap cartridge (Chin Heur) after a few K miles with a UN55 that probably has 5K miles on it and running fine. I probably have 10K on an 105 BB5600 HTII bottom bracket that is running fine.
Either one should give years/miles of trouble free service unless you're riding in very extreme conditions.
I would forget the UN 26 and step up to a UN 55 for a few more $$
Either one should give years/miles of trouble free service unless you're riding in very extreme conditions.
I would forget the UN 26 and step up to a UN 55 for a few more $$
I don’t ride extreme, but I guess my weight still makes it kinda “extreme-y”, so to speak...
#22
Junior Member
Thread Starter
BikeForums’s users have my respect on this regard, as I always got useful answers. That’s probably due to a broader audience, and to reach everyone the common ground is English, so be it.
Please, don’t read that in a rough tone, that’s not my intention. I just couldn’t think of a better way to write it.
Likes For dwsmartins:
#23
Junior Member
Thread Starter
For the numbers of external to shell bearings (Hollowtech) sold and their relative mid to better grades (as they are on more expensive bikes typically) I will say that we replace a lot. For the most part these are not really rebuildable and are regarded as disposable by the industry.
The tapered square BBs seem to be of better sealing in general and don't wear as rapidly. Especially since they are so much more common at the lower cost levels one might think their longevity should be less then external units. But our experience doesn't prove this assumption out.
I'm sure others will have their opinions, perhaps they can offer some ideas as to how many they see a year so we know the foundation their opinions are based on. Andy
The tapered square BBs seem to be of better sealing in general and don't wear as rapidly. Especially since they are so much more common at the lower cost levels one might think their longevity should be less then external units. But our experience doesn't prove this assumption out.
I'm sure others will have their opinions, perhaps they can offer some ideas as to how many they see a year so we know the foundation their opinions are based on. Andy
#24
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Likes For dwsmartins:
#25
Junior Member
Thread Starter
After faffing around with a White Industries square taper BB (a good, but rather expensive one) for a couple of years, I went back to the $18 Shimano Ultegra BB, and it felt the way it does when I stop hitting myself in the head with a hammer.
@Andrew R Stewart: sample size = 1.0
Edit: I just remembered my Crampy square taper BB survived about 35 years of malignant neglect.
@Andrew R Stewart: sample size = 1.0
Edit: I just remembered my Crampy square taper BB survived about 35 years of malignant neglect.