GCN does bike geometry
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
740 Posts
GCN does bike geometry
Thought this was interesting.....
#2
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
thanks for that Bruce. Awesome. Love GCN and Simon is my fav. The bike guru really knew his stuff. Simon really knows cycling and what a great personality he is.
Much was stated in the video and will only add, I prefer the handling of the Emonda to the Canyon. If there is a Goldilocks bike for handling its the Emonda. Honorable mention to my new Cervelo R3 which has very similar angles to the Emonda...between pure race bike and endurance bike. Goldilocks.
Then there is rider position on the bike. Simon is a fascination to me because we are exactly the same size. 6'1" with 77cm saddle height. We ride in a completely different position. Simon is young-ish and I am old-ish. Simon sizes down for his size...he rides a medium in most brands...a 56 and I ride a 58 which is pretty typical of guys our size.
Simon rides with 12cm of saddle to bar drop and I ride with much less drop. Simon likes a standard length stem on a shortish bike for his height and I like a longish stem on a 58.
So, too identically sized guys seeking two totaling different fits and of course Simon has more weight on his hands which affects the handling of the bikes as well.
Simon likes shorter bikes and I prefer to be up more higher and more stretched out...more like how Lance rode throughout his career. Same size riders.
Bike handling preferences and even frame size and fit are largely 'elective'. Personal choice. Not based upon an equation in a book.
Nexus of head tube angle, fork rake, trail, BB drop and chainstay length is an interesting and complicated interaction.
Much was stated in the video and will only add, I prefer the handling of the Emonda to the Canyon. If there is a Goldilocks bike for handling its the Emonda. Honorable mention to my new Cervelo R3 which has very similar angles to the Emonda...between pure race bike and endurance bike. Goldilocks.
Then there is rider position on the bike. Simon is a fascination to me because we are exactly the same size. 6'1" with 77cm saddle height. We ride in a completely different position. Simon is young-ish and I am old-ish. Simon sizes down for his size...he rides a medium in most brands...a 56 and I ride a 58 which is pretty typical of guys our size.
Simon rides with 12cm of saddle to bar drop and I ride with much less drop. Simon likes a standard length stem on a shortish bike for his height and I like a longish stem on a 58.
So, too identically sized guys seeking two totaling different fits and of course Simon has more weight on his hands which affects the handling of the bikes as well.
Simon likes shorter bikes and I prefer to be up more higher and more stretched out...more like how Lance rode throughout his career. Same size riders.
Bike handling preferences and even frame size and fit are largely 'elective'. Personal choice. Not based upon an equation in a book.
Nexus of head tube angle, fork rake, trail, BB drop and chainstay length is an interesting and complicated interaction.
Last edited by Campag4life; 01-20-19 at 08:22 AM.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
740 Posts
I prefer the totally racer position on my bike. But, my 72 year old body says otherwise. I really like my 55 Guru Sidero but I have little to compare it to since I really don't ride other bikes much. I think my position on the Guru is kind of middle of the road. I measured the chain stays and got 40.64 cm (C of BB to axle). Not sure if that's actually how they're measured. And, now that I'm doing this, I got 73.7 cm saddle to C of BB. I've never understood the value of that measurement since crank arm length varies. I usually measure saddle to pedal spindle. In my case that's 90.5 cm. I could make myself crazy with measuring.
#4
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
I prefer the totally racer position on my bike. But, my 72 year old body says otherwise. I really like my 55 Guru Sidero but I have little to compare it to since I really don't ride other bikes much. I think my position on the Guru is kind of middle of the road. I measured the chain stays and got 40.64 cm (C of BB to axle). Not sure if that's actually how they're measured. And, now that I'm doing this, I got 73.7 cm saddle to C of BB. I've never understood the value of that measurement since crank arm length varies. I usually measure saddle to pedal spindle. In my case that's 90.5 cm. I could make myself crazy with measuring.
But there is a range that likely works best for each of us. I am the same size as Simon and his position would hurt my body over the miles. I know because I have ridden it and every combination to see what works best.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 2,397
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 1,825 Times
in
878 Posts
Great post.
The thing I found interesting was that if the rider "thinks" the bike is responsive it will be (to a degree). I know there have been times where I've beaten someone up a climb or in a sprint, mainly because I believed I was riding better/lighter equipment. Moreover, I believe that on some of those occasions my fellow competitors "gave up" because they believed it too.
The thing I found interesting was that if the rider "thinks" the bike is responsive it will be (to a degree). I know there have been times where I've beaten someone up a climb or in a sprint, mainly because I believed I was riding better/lighter equipment. Moreover, I believe that on some of those occasions my fellow competitors "gave up" because they believed it too.
__________________
#6
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Great post.
The thing I found interesting was that if the rider "thinks" the bike is responsive it will be (to a degree). I know there have been times where I've beaten someone up a climb or in a sprint, mainly because I believed I was riding better/lighter equipment. Moreover, I believe that on some of those occasions my fellow competitors "gave up" because they believed it too.
The thing I found interesting was that if the rider "thinks" the bike is responsive it will be (to a degree). I know there have been times where I've beaten someone up a climb or in a sprint, mainly because I believed I was riding better/lighter equipment. Moreover, I believe that on some of those occasions my fellow competitors "gave up" because they believed it too.
I had a real good correspondence with Sheldon Brown before the great bicycle sage passed away too young. He said humans are highly adaptive. He said he owned bicycles with vastly different geometries that handled completely different. He said within a half hour or so of riding any one he would adjust to this 'new norm' and it would feel little different than the others until he hopped on another and become acquainted with that 'new norm'...paraphrasing.
#7
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,056
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22600 Post(s)
Liked 8,928 Times
in
4,160 Posts
No question this dynamic exists...interaction between mind and body. A Tarmac feels faster than a Roubaix whether it is or not. Shorter wheelbase, less trail, more upright headtube angle...a Tarmac is more responsive and feels faster.
I had a real good correspondence with Sheldon Brown before the great bicycle sage passed away too young. He said humans are highly adaptive. He said he owned bicycles with vastly different geometries that handled completely different. He said within a half hour or so of riding any one he would adjust to this 'new norm' and it would feel little different than the others until he hopped on another and become acquainted with that 'new norm'...paraphrasing.
I had a real good correspondence with Sheldon Brown before the great bicycle sage passed away too young. He said humans are highly adaptive. He said he owned bicycles with vastly different geometries that handled completely different. He said within a half hour or so of riding any one he would adjust to this 'new norm' and it would feel little different than the others until he hopped on another and become acquainted with that 'new norm'...paraphrasing.
Think what 60MPH fees like in a Porsche vs a Cadillac. Similar concept.
#8
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
But...because of the mind/bike interaction, it could be conjectured a fast feeling bike is intoxicating to ride pushing a rider to ride faster.
#9
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,056
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22600 Post(s)
Liked 8,928 Times
in
4,160 Posts
Completely agree. Certainly true of my bikes. Some feel faster. They aren't really...or more noise in terms of weather and personal energy any given day.
But...because of the mind/bike interaction, it could be conjectured a fast feeling bike is intoxicating to ride pushing a rider to ride faster.
But...because of the mind/bike interaction, it could be conjectured a fast feeling bike is intoxicating to ride pushing a rider to ride faster.