Rear Rack
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Rear Rack
It seems like the trend is to big saddle bags away from rear racks and panniers. A rack doesn't add much weight, and adds capacity and flexibility. About to buy a rear rack for my bike and now I'm second guessing.
#2
Senior Member
If you are referring to the under saddle bike backing, they are intended for road bikes that cannot fit racks or off-road touring where the cargo needs to be very secure. Of course, some people do it, because it's the latest "thing".
If you are riding your bike on finished surfaces and your bike can fit racks; go with the racks.
If you are riding your bike on finished surfaces and your bike can fit racks; go with the racks.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,092
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4208 Post(s)
Liked 3,874 Times
in
2,314 Posts
It depends on how much you want to pack, mostly. Us kitchen sinkers tend to need 4 panniers and a rack top for out tent, bag, pad, stove, water, food, riding clothing, off bike clothing, tools and spares...… I know minimalists who think any rain gear is too much. For me I prefer to be able to sit up in my tent and not have to pack it into a pannier when wet.
Have you test collected all your gear then packed it into a known size bag? Doesn't need to be a bike bag for this volume test.
Will you be camping, cooking your own food, be able to fix your bike (or just smart phone the problem away) Will you only ride and won't care how you smell to others? Will you sight see for a day+? Andy
Have you test collected all your gear then packed it into a known size bag? Doesn't need to be a bike bag for this volume test.
Will you be camping, cooking your own food, be able to fix your bike (or just smart phone the problem away) Will you only ride and won't care how you smell to others? Will you sight see for a day+? Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#4
Senior Member
i prefer the ability to pick up awkward sized packages to carry back to camp...
Last edited by saddlesores; 11-29-18 at 03:16 AM.
#5
☢
It depends on how much you want to pack, mostly. Us kitchen sinkers tend to need 4 panniers and a rack top for out tent, bag, pad, stove, water, food, riding clothing, off bike clothing, tools and spares...… I know minimalists who think any rain gear is too much. For me I prefer to be able to sit up in my tent and not have to pack it into a pannier when wet.
Have you test collected all your gear then packed it into a known size bag? Doesn't need to be a bike bag for this volume test.
Will you be camping, cooking your own food, be able to fix your bike (or just smart phone the problem away) Will you only ride and won't care how you smell to others? Will you sight see for a day+? Andy
Have you test collected all your gear then packed it into a known size bag? Doesn't need to be a bike bag for this volume test.
Will you be camping, cooking your own food, be able to fix your bike (or just smart phone the problem away) Will you only ride and won't care how you smell to others? Will you sight see for a day+? Andy
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,243
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18419 Post(s)
Liked 15,560 Times
in
7,332 Posts
I am actually a disciplined packer. My large panniers have ample room left even when I tour in places where I need to be prepared for cold, wet weather. I have always been that way. Never been one of those "I'm taking it because I have room for it" people.
#7
Senior Member
One has to learn from the mistake and those who dont will moan and groan about hard it is, but generally if someone is a "you can lead a horse to water, but can't make it drink" sort of person, its in their hands.
but yes, to the question posed here, for regular road riding and such, panniers offer a flexibility and ease of use (more space, spare space for extra food at end of day etc, easy on and off) that is a no brainer.
Top off that it encourages the use of the bike for regular commuting and whatnot in everyday life, which is a good habit for a healthy lifestyle and reducing the number of cars in our urban settings.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
51 Posts
Outside of researching what others are doing to see if there is any usefulness in what they are doing for my use cases, what others are doing has never been a rational for any of my decisions.
If you like racks and panniers, use racks and panniers.
If you like racks and panniers, use racks and panniers.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,243
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18419 Post(s)
Liked 15,560 Times
in
7,332 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,092
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4208 Post(s)
Liked 3,874 Times
in
2,314 Posts
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
51 Posts
I've never understood this logic. There are times I've had to pare my load down to fit into my available baggage, but I've never added to my packing list because I have spare room in my bags or planned to use all my available capacity. It is quite easy to take off with unused space.
#12
Senior Member
I've never understood this logic. There are times I've had to pare my load down to fit into my available baggage, but I've never added to my packing list because I have spare room in my bags or planned to use all my available capacity. It is quite easy to take off with unused space.
#15
Crawler
Simple. Pack your stuff and see if you need the space for the two rear panniers or you can get away with a seat bag. Pick the best one you can afford and you are set.
#16
Banned
1st weekend in June , the trans-america tour route racers arrive,
most use bikepacking bags .. and race & tri bikes,
Though, as I understand, last years winner used a velomobile ..
seems superior aerodynamics beats light weight.
....
most use bikepacking bags .. and race & tri bikes,
Though, as I understand, last years winner used a velomobile ..
seems superior aerodynamics beats light weight.
....
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 163
Bikes: Two. One daily rider. One with detachment issues.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
As others have stated, and you argued yourself. Racks/panniers work very well on roads (even rough dirt roads). Pick what works.
#18
Senior Member
I've never understood this logic. There are times I've had to pare my load down to fit into my available baggage, but I've never added to my packing list because I have spare room in my bags or planned to use all my available capacity. It is quite easy to take off with unused space.
Gas fills available space
Gases expand spontaneously to fill any container
and because of this law, this means that husbands then have to pick up and load both bikes up the steep steps into French trains one after another with very little time before the doors close.
It is known.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,092
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4208 Post(s)
Liked 3,874 Times
in
2,314 Posts
as per google....
Gas fills available space
Gases expand spontaneously to fill any container
and because of this law, this means that husbands then have to pick up and load both bikes up the steep steps into French trains one after another with very little time before the doors close.
It is known.
Gas fills available space
Gases expand spontaneously to fill any container
and because of this law, this means that husbands then have to pick up and load both bikes up the steep steps into French trains one after another with very little time before the doors close.
It is known.
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
51 Posts
#21
Senior Member
all kidding aside, I still its pretty common for a lot of people to fill up large panniers perhaps with too much weight, but unless one is disciplined in terms of observing cause/effect in terms of how hard it can translate to biking in hilly terrain, or carrying your bike up stairs, you'll only change how much you carry if it affects you too much in a negative way.
That said, I have another dear friend who tends to carry too much in her panniers, and struggles mightily on hills. Part of it is her gearing, which just isnt low enough but wont change it more despite my attempts over the years (Ive brought it down a bit) but part of it seems to just be stubborness or something, yet she suffers so much on hills when we've biked together and I always am surprised how bloody heavy her panniers are (U lock, tons of spare food etc) --which comes back to the "you can lead a horse to water..." comment.
That said, I have another dear friend who tends to carry too much in her panniers, and struggles mightily on hills. Part of it is her gearing, which just isnt low enough but wont change it more despite my attempts over the years (Ive brought it down a bit) but part of it seems to just be stubborness or something, yet she suffers so much on hills when we've biked together and I always am surprised how bloody heavy her panniers are (U lock, tons of spare food etc) --which comes back to the "you can lead a horse to water..." comment.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,207
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3461 Post(s)
Liked 1,467 Times
in
1,144 Posts
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My first overnight trip will be on the Erie canal trail from Buffalo to Syracuse camping either 2 or 3 nights. Panniers on a rear rack should do the trick. Also going to do a front handlebar bag or roll. Maybe a Wald 137 with a Swift Sugarloaf basket bag. The possibilities seem to be endless... .
#24
cyclotourist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: calgary, canada
Posts: 1,470
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Liked 205 Times
in
130 Posts
I was listening to a podcast and this woman was talking about cycling the Peru Divide, using bikepacking gear and then complaining that she didnt have enough room in her bags for the food they needed, their bags were limited in capacity and there were long distances between re supply points. I thought "there is a solution for that problem".
This idea that panniers will catch on bushes and cactus and stuff is a bit weird, I've never experienced it on off road touring. I can see that front low riders could be a liability but I'm not sure hanging all that stuff on the handlebars is much better.
At the rear there are two main kinds of saddle bags, the football shaped bikepacking bags and the old British style transverse saddle bags, like Carradice make. A rear rack helps stabilize the transverse type, but it isn't strictly necessary, you can get attachments that will support the bag.
The main advantage of bike packing gear is the small bags force you to cut weight, and apparently they are more aerodynamic than panniers. Also much trendier. If you are doing the Divide and you see people with panniers, they are either over 50 or from Europe. Probably both.
Personally I'd go for the rack, it enables you to carry a flat of beer back to camp
This idea that panniers will catch on bushes and cactus and stuff is a bit weird, I've never experienced it on off road touring. I can see that front low riders could be a liability but I'm not sure hanging all that stuff on the handlebars is much better.
At the rear there are two main kinds of saddle bags, the football shaped bikepacking bags and the old British style transverse saddle bags, like Carradice make. A rear rack helps stabilize the transverse type, but it isn't strictly necessary, you can get attachments that will support the bag.
The main advantage of bike packing gear is the small bags force you to cut weight, and apparently they are more aerodynamic than panniers. Also much trendier. If you are doing the Divide and you see people with panniers, they are either over 50 or from Europe. Probably both.
Personally I'd go for the rack, it enables you to carry a flat of beer back to camp
Last edited by skookum; 11-29-18 at 09:09 PM. Reason: spacing
#25
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,363
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6219 Post(s)
Liked 4,218 Times
in
2,365 Posts
If you are referring to the under saddle bike backing, they are intended for road bikes that cannot fit racks or off-road touring where the cargo needs to be very secure. Of course, some people do it, because it's the latest "thing".
If you are riding your bike on finished surfaces and your bike can fit racks; go with the racks.
If you are riding your bike on finished surfaces and your bike can fit racks; go with the racks.
2015-05-03 11.38.54 by Stuart Black, on Flickr
than this bike
DSCN1197 by Stuart Black, on Flickr
The weight on the mountain bike is too high and too far forward for good handling but panniers are just too vulnerable for off-road touring.
For any touring, I would much prefer panniers. The load is lower and easier to control. But when trails are narrow and there are rocks along the way, panniers become a liability. The bikepacking gear is compromise but it is inferior, in my opinion, for anything but the purpose it was desisgned for, in other words, off-road touring.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!