Dinotte Tail Light Alternative
#27
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
#28
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
And, honestly, even Dinottes aren't prohibitively expensive. It's like what I said elsewhere about getting a good bike lock -- if it got to the point where I worried about being able to afford something like that, I'd be more worried about being able to buy food.
#29
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
(I keep thinking of stuff after I hit the "post" button)
If someone's stupid enough to completely rely on a light to keep them safe, there isn't ANYTHING that will keep them safe.
That's why the "false sense of security" statement is simple bull****.
If someone's stupid enough to completely rely on a light to keep them safe, there isn't ANYTHING that will keep them safe.
That's why the "false sense of security" statement is simple bull****.
#30
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
One exception would be the 500 lumen tail light; in an urban environment it runs a danger of seriously blinding drivers.
Last edited by Cyclist0383; 05-13-08 at 10:25 AM.
#31
Just a geek
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 537
Bikes: LHT, Pacer
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The TL-LD1100 is great, I just replaced my last Mars 3.0 with it (Mars was bright, but after breaking/losing my 3rd one I was done with them). I keep a superflash as a backup light.
While the superflash might blind you a little more when it's in your hand, the sheer size of the 1100 helps it to be better in my experience. This goes triple when it's wet out.
Better yet, get one of each and put them at different heights. I have been running just the 1100 in light to moderate traffic, adding the superflash to my backpack when desired.
While the superflash might blind you a little more when it's in your hand, the sheer size of the 1100 helps it to be better in my experience. This goes triple when it's wet out.
Better yet, get one of each and put them at different heights. I have been running just the 1100 in light to moderate traffic, adding the superflash to my backpack when desired.
Last edited by tdister; 05-13-08 at 10:22 PM.
#32
Senior Member
Why don't you calm down and read those posts again; they imply nothing about dimmer lights being safer. What they do say is that just because a light is brighter doesn't mean that it is safer.
One exception would be the 500 lumen tail light; in an urban environment it runs a danger of seriously blinding drivers.
One exception would be the 500 lumen tail light; in an urban environment it runs a danger of seriously blinding drivers.
#33
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
#35
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
#36
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
You clearly don't want any kind of constructive dialog as you repeatedly and intentionally misstate what I write. Enjoy all your lights and your smug sense of thinking that your are riding the only right way.....
#37
?
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,775
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Dinotte is an overkill. PBSF is adequate. PBSF can be seen over 500m, that's plenty enough time for a driver to react. If your rear light is getting the attention of cops, it's an overkill, I had that happen to me with my DIY that's half of what Dinotte is.
More light isn't better. It's the same dumbass argument as "Is 10 speed enough? Should we go 11 speed?."
More light isn't better. It's the same dumbass argument as "Is 10 speed enough? Should we go 11 speed?."
#38
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
#39
2-Cyl, 1/2 HP @ 90 RPM
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,762
Bikes: 04' Specialized Hardrock Sport, 03' Giant OCR2 (SOLD!), 04' Litespeed Firenze, 04' Giant OCR Touring, 07' Specialized Langster Comp
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I believe he's true. At some point, as long as your rear light is reasonably bright enough that the driver can see you from say, 500-1000ft back, you're fine. Is there any reason why a driver needs to see you from 20,000ft back?
I'm gonna pull off a wildassed example of "less is more". I did an investigation for a steel manufacturer. It turned out, they were copying some design properties from another manufacturer. The 2 of them kept reverse engineering each other's products. As one company adjusted their formulation of carbon to get more carbides into their steel, so did the other. One day I got this sample that showed ridiculous amounts of carbides under the electron microscope and it performed really poorly in the notch impact testing. What happened was that they kept borrowing each other's "more is better" mentality and dumping way too much carbide in it. Eventually, it brought the toughness of the steel way down in the saw blade and the thing kept breaking its tips off.
Just saying, the goal is to be visible at a reasonable angle at a reasonable distance from the driver. Not be visible within the next 10 miles of air space and land 747's along our route.
I'm gonna pull off a wildassed example of "less is more". I did an investigation for a steel manufacturer. It turned out, they were copying some design properties from another manufacturer. The 2 of them kept reverse engineering each other's products. As one company adjusted their formulation of carbon to get more carbides into their steel, so did the other. One day I got this sample that showed ridiculous amounts of carbides under the electron microscope and it performed really poorly in the notch impact testing. What happened was that they kept borrowing each other's "more is better" mentality and dumping way too much carbide in it. Eventually, it brought the toughness of the steel way down in the saw blade and the thing kept breaking its tips off.
Just saying, the goal is to be visible at a reasonable angle at a reasonable distance from the driver. Not be visible within the next 10 miles of air space and land 747's along our route.
#40
Galveston County Texas
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Posts: 33,221
Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1350 Post(s)
Liked 1,243 Times
in
621 Posts
I ride the shoulder on four highways where the posted speed is 55 mph.
The Dinotte is not overkill on these highways.
The Dinotte is not overkill on these highways.
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"
Fred "The Real Fred"
#41
You need a new bike
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Anyone ride in a group with someone having a high intensity tail light aimed slightly upward? It's not a fun experience. Try following one of these for a few hours on a brevet and you'll agree that more is not always better. Of course, if you only ride alone at night, or just don't care about the others in your group...
#42
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
I believe he's true. At some point, as long as your rear light is reasonably bright enough that the driver can see you from say, 500-1000ft back, you're fine. Is there any reason why a driver needs to see you from 20,000ft back?
I'm gonna pull off a wildassed example of "less is more".
I'm gonna pull off a wildassed example of "less is more".
Anyway, just as a greater distance helps (cars close the gap in a remarkably short time, if you remember), so does getting noticed among the dozens of other bright lights on a busy street. Car taillights, as long as they're not broken, are always brighter than most bicycle blinkies. If you want to compete with those, and be noticed because you're unusual and more likely to be overlooked, you're going to need something at least as bright. As neat as the Superflash is, it's still not enough.
Anyone ride in a group with someone having a high intensity tail light aimed slightly upward? It's not a fun experience. Try following one of these for a few hours on a brevet and you'll agree that more is not always better. Of course, if you only ride alone at night, or just don't care about the others in your group...
#43
2-Cyl, 1/2 HP @ 90 RPM
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,762
Bikes: 04' Specialized Hardrock Sport, 03' Giant OCR2 (SOLD!), 04' Litespeed Firenze, 04' Giant OCR Touring, 07' Specialized Langster Comp
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
That example has no application here. I can think of many examples of "less is more" as a good thing, but this isn't one of them.
Anyway, just as a greater distance helps (cars close the gap in a remarkably short time, if you remember), so does getting noticed among the dozens of other bright lights on a busy street. Car taillights, as long as they're not broken, are always brighter than most bicycle blinkies. If you want to compete with those, and be noticed because you're unusual and more likely to be overlooked, you're going to need something at least as bright. As neat as the Superflash is, it's still not enough.
Anyway, just as a greater distance helps (cars close the gap in a remarkably short time, if you remember), so does getting noticed among the dozens of other bright lights on a busy street. Car taillights, as long as they're not broken, are always brighter than most bicycle blinkies. If you want to compete with those, and be noticed because you're unusual and more likely to be overlooked, you're going to need something at least as bright. As neat as the Superflash is, it's still not enough.
#44
?
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,775
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Dinotte diehards just can't be reasoned with.
Dinotte already came out with something like that. For less than $50, I can make a taillight equivalent to three Dinotte 140L, doesn't mean I should.
Dinotte already came out with something like that. For less than $50, I can make a taillight equivalent to three Dinotte 140L, doesn't mean I should.
#45
?
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,775
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is futile, but I'll argue anyways.
Depends on the blinkie. PBSF is bright as most cars's taillight.
One Superflash is adequate, two is better. A Dinotte taillight is stupid. You are pretty much saying "You're going to get hit by a car if you don't have a Dinotte." I wonder how all those bicycle commuters survived at night before Dinotte came into market. BTW, the Dinotte taillight is illegal to operate in Germany and Netherlands, does that say anything to you?
One Superflash is adequate, two is better. A Dinotte taillight is stupid. You are pretty much saying "You're going to get hit by a car if you don't have a Dinotte." I wonder how all those bicycle commuters survived at night before Dinotte came into market. BTW, the Dinotte taillight is illegal to operate in Germany and Netherlands, does that say anything to you?
#46
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
I give up. I really do. Too many of you have forgotten what the world is like outside your own two wheels.
#47
?
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,775
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There's nothing wrong with having a really bright taillight, even a 4x equivalent of Dinotte 140R, for fun. Just don't go preaching to everyone that Dinotte is the **** (pretty much every Dinotte fanboys are doing this, you people even downplay the ****ty mounting system on the 140R).
While Dinotte do seem to make great products, they are hardly ahead of the competition.
Plenty of people survived commuting at night for years without the need of Dinotte. Not everyone is going out there to buy a Superflash either (most can't even fathom of spending $15CDN (Price of PBSF at MEC) on a taillight).
While Dinotte do seem to make great products, they are hardly ahead of the competition.
Plenty of people survived commuting at night for years without the need of Dinotte. Not everyone is going out there to buy a Superflash either (most can't even fathom of spending $15CDN (Price of PBSF at MEC) on a taillight).
#48
Senior Member
55 mph = approx. 81 feet per second. The farther away they can see me, the better for me.
The PBSF is a great tail light. If I had a very limited budget, that's what I'd get. Also, if I were touring I'd probably use a SF because the batteries last significantly longer. However, I picked up my DiNotte for $100 on sale, and I use it for commuting, so battery life is insignificant. For what I use it for, it is worth every penny!
#49
2-Cyl, 1/2 HP @ 90 RPM
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,762
Bikes: 04' Specialized Hardrock Sport, 03' Giant OCR2 (SOLD!), 04' Litespeed Firenze, 04' Giant OCR Touring, 07' Specialized Langster Comp
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
#50
well hello there
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Posts: 15,430
Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times
in
206 Posts
There's nothing wrong with having a really bright taillight, even a 4x equivalent of Dinotte 140R, for fun. Just don't go preaching to everyone that Dinotte is the **** (pretty much every Dinotte fanboys are doing this, you people even downplay the ****ty mounting system on the 140R).
While Dinotte do seem to make great products, they are hardly ahead of the competition.
Plenty of people survived commuting at night for years without the need of Dinotte. Not everyone is going out there to buy a Superflash either (most can't even fathom of spending $15CDN (Price of PBSF at MEC) on a taillight).
While Dinotte do seem to make great products, they are hardly ahead of the competition.
Plenty of people survived commuting at night for years without the need of Dinotte. Not everyone is going out there to buy a Superflash either (most can't even fathom of spending $15CDN (Price of PBSF at MEC) on a taillight).
__________________
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.