Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Affordable and scalable solution to bar motor(cycles|scooters)?

Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Affordable and scalable solution to bar motor(cycles|scooters)?

Old 02-29-16, 07:38 AM
  #1  
Winfried
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Winfried's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,497
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 573 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times in 99 Posts
Affordable and scalable solution to bar motor(cycles|scooters)?

Hello

Motorcycles and motor scooters are a major PITA where I live.

It gets to the point where authorities deploy this type of infrastructure to prevent them from riding in pedestrian areas (where bicycles are allowed):



This type of equipement has numerous issues:
  • Cyclists must stop, and lose all their speed, a.k.a. kinetic energy; NOK for commuters
  • Cyclists riding either cargo bikes or pulling a trailer can't go through
  • Parents carrying a wide/long child stroller can't go through either
  • People on wheelchairs have a hard time going through


Is there an affordable and scalable solution? Hiring millions of cops just to stand there 24/7 isn't an option.

Thank you.
Attached Images
Winfried is offline  
Old 02-29-16, 09:16 AM
  #2  
highrpm
Senior Member
 
highrpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Bruce Twp, MI
Posts: 305

Bikes: Huffy Sienna Cruiser

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
There's no way that scooters on the sidewalk can be legal in Paris. Very unsafe.

I don't know how to go about doing this, but I would prefer to have a police stationed in the area for a while, handing out expensive tickets to these scooter riders. It will get them off the sidewalks and generate revenue for the city. And it won't have a negative impact on the regular sidewalk users.
highrpm is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 03:57 PM
  #3  
Winfried
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Winfried's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,497
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 573 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times in 99 Posts
$€24,000/year (sales tax excluded) just for that single camera that can tell if a car did or didn't stop at a STOP sign:

Mise En Service Du Premier Radar De Franchissement De STOP à Yerres? | Valdyerres.com

Is there really no cheaper, open-source solution?
Winfried is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 04:08 PM
  #4  
CrankyOne
Senior Member
 
CrankyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,403
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 358 Post(s)
Liked 48 Times in 35 Posts
Netherlands uses rattle bumps and chicanes to slow people down. Similar to above they impact bicycle riders as well though not nearly as badly. Fortunately they are rarely needed and are indeed quite rare.

I'd think enforcement with expensive tickets the only viable option. Need to make sure a clear line is drawn on what is and isn't allowed. Bicycles allowed. All e-bikes allowed? Only pedelecs under 150 watts and no throttle allowed?
CrankyOne is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 04:50 PM
  #5  
1989Pre 
Standard Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 4,252

Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1293 Post(s)
Liked 933 Times in 486 Posts
This is probably the best cost-effective solution.
A Two-wide stroller should be able to get through there with no problem.
If cyclists have to slow down, they were going too fast for a pedestrian path to begin with.
Cyclists with panniers can get through. Cyclists with trailers may have to get off and walk it through the barricade, just to be safe.
This kind of barricade is meant as a prompt to slow anyone who isn't walking, down. It keeps out all forms of motorized traffic. I am speaking from experience with the East Coast Greenway.
__________________
Unless you climb the rungs strategically, you’re not going to build the muscle you need to stay at the top.
1989Pre is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 05:41 PM
  #6  
Leisesturm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,988
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2493 Post(s)
Liked 737 Times in 521 Posts
This kind of barricade is meant as a prompt to slow anyone who isn't walking, down. It keeps out all forms of vehicle traffic. I am speaking from experience with the East Coast Greenway.
Fify. I'm not sure why the o.p. thinks that the chicanes are intended only for motorcycles and scooters. They are for anything that isn't a pedestrian. So... if it slows a cyclist down... erm... that was the intention! What, only motorcycles go 20mph on the MUP? A cyclist on a sidewalk or MUP should be moving at or below the speed of any pedestrians that are in front. Better yet, they should be in the street. I doubt there are ANY motorcyclists, and few scooterists that actually try to go any real distance on a sidewalk. The freeway is another matter. What makes scooterists think that it is a good idea to be on OR 26? The structures are there to control cyclists.
Leisesturm is offline  
Old 03-11-16, 01:13 PM
  #7  
ColaJacket
Senior Member
 
ColaJacket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,892

Bikes: Fuji Sportif 1.3 C - 2014

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Leisesturm
Fify. I'm not sure why the o.p. thinks that the chicanes are intended only for motorcycles and scooters. They are for anything that isn't a pedestrian. So... if it slows a cyclist down... erm... that was the intention! What, only motorcycles go 20mph on the MUP? A cyclist on a sidewalk or MUP should be moving at or below the speed of any pedestrians that are in front. Better yet, they should be in the street. I doubt there are ANY motorcyclists, and few scooterists that actually try to go any real distance on a sidewalk. The freeway is another matter. What makes scooterists think that it is a good idea to be on OR 26? The structures are there to control cyclists.
A really good cyclist could bunny hop over that low obstacle.

GH
ColaJacket is offline  
Old 03-11-16, 03:13 PM
  #8  
SloButWide 
Heck on Wheels
 
SloButWide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: USA Midwest
Posts: 1,055

Bikes: In Signature

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Winfried
$€24,000/year (sales tax excluded) just for that single camera that can tell if a car did or didn't stop at a STOP sign:
Sadly, in the states, those cameras are revenue generators. The vendor gets a portion of the revenue generated. When automatic cameras were banned in my state, several cities bought handheld ones and sent cops out to to use them. If you figure a $200 - 500 fine, and $100 in court costs the breakeven point is pretty low.
__________________
"I had a great ride this morning, except for that part about winding up at work."

Bikes so far: 2011 Felt Z85, 80's Raleigh Sovereign (USA), 91 Bianchi Peregrine, 91 Austro-Daimler Pathfinder, 90's Trek 730 Multitrack, STOLEN: 80 Schwinn Voyageur (Japan)

SloButWide is offline  
Old 03-11-16, 03:42 PM
  #9  
Winfried
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Winfried's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,497
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 573 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times in 99 Posts
Originally Posted by Leisesturm
I'm not sure why the o.p. thinks that the chicanes are intended only for motorcycles and scooters. They are for anything that isn't a pedestrian.
No, they're meant specifically to stop motor (scooters|cycles) and quads. I know, I live here. They're everywhere, and are a major PITA.

But the collateral damage is that it makes cycling needlessly difficult (have to stop, bow, pass through, and resume), and near impossible if you have a cargo bike or a trailer with kids.

Hence my question about cheap solutions to let peds/cyclists through but keep motorized traffic away.
Winfried is offline  
Old 03-11-16, 09:20 PM
  #10  
kickstart
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
That stinks, it's certainly not even remotely an issue in my area, I've only seen it a few times in several decades.

The only realistic and non invasive solution seems to be impounding the vehicle, with significant fines, bureaucratic hurdles, and criminal charges for those who attempt to evade authorities.
kickstart is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johndeere
Vehicular Cycling (VC)
33
12-15-16 12:06 PM
nemeseri
Northern California
18
06-22-15 01:04 AM
genec
Advocacy & Safety
7
12-10-14 11:24 AM
Sooner Rider
Advocacy & Safety
168
10-24-12 06:25 PM
Seattle Forrest
Advocacy & Safety
137
09-20-10 06:24 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.