Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Red Bike Rides Again; a Centurion Story

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Red Bike Rides Again; a Centurion Story

Old 05-06-20, 09:03 PM
  #1  
tgot 
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SF Peninsula
Posts: 443

Bikes: 1986 Centurion Ironman, 1997 Trek 2120, Trek T1000

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 116 Posts
Red Bike Rides Again; a Centurion Story

I took my 1986 Dave Scott Ironman out for rides this weekend, 10-mile and 15-mile close-to-home test runs. This is the first time in years, and the first time since doing some maintenance and updates, and the rear wheel was apart for months.

Ready to ride in the attached picture.

I formulated the update plan, and bought the parts, to address a shifting problem and the fact that I couldn't push a 42-24 low gear up the hills of the SF Peninsula. That was in 2011, and RobbieTunes was kind enough to weigh in: https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...date-plan.html

The story of how the bike chose me is also in that post.

I've been re-motivated lately. In part, because I rode with a visiting friend who had moved away, for the first time in many years, and he rented a modern CF + compact + brifter bike. And afterwards, declared it just not that different than the steel bike he had been riding since we rode together in the 90s. And also, because of the https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...challenge.html, to finish a bike/project that has been sitting around and to do it with parts that you already had on hand!

From that plan, I:
+ Took apart, cleaned, and re-packed the rear hub with new ballbearings.
+ Put on the 7-speed freewheel.
+ Put on a mountain derailleur (more later)
+ Swapped out downtube shifters for SunRace units (thanks for all who helped, here: https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...p-request.html)
+ Washed the bike well.
+ Lubed front derailleur and brake pivots while stripped down.
+ Adjusted shifters and etc.
+ Buffed the saddle with some boot wax.

Tires, brake pads, and bar tape had been replaced in the 20-noughts, so I thought that those were fine!

The ride was fun! I definitely had a few stand-up-and-crank where I really enjoyed the lively ride, very different than my newer bike. The downtube shifters definitely had me making more decisions as to whether to shift or just power-along, too. Its a more aggressive position, with bars lower than the seat, than I use on my other bike too, but I've been riding enough that it was fine for these shorter rides. Time will tell if it works for longer.

The cockpit photo is an attempt to capture my sight-line when I'm on the hoods; the hub is pretty much hidden by the bars.

From the first ride, I also learned that the seat is too narrow and/or crowned for my comfort. And that the braking is really poor; it feels pretty easy to move the calipers from the levers (tried with wheels out), so I'm going to put on new pads and hope that addresses it.

I'll follow-up with more posts and pictures. I expect to have more ongoing efforts and adjustments, and so I thought the bike deserved its own thread.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
MVIMG_20200502_140259.jpg (944.9 KB, 285 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20200418_210828.jpg (517.0 KB, 278 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20200422_185244.jpg (649.6 KB, 279 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20200502_150358.jpg (739.7 KB, 275 views)
tgot is offline  
Likes For tgot:
Old 05-06-20, 09:21 PM
  #2  
tgot 
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SF Peninsula
Posts: 443

Bikes: 1986 Centurion Ironman, 1997 Trek 2120, Trek T1000

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 116 Posts
More photos

A few in-progress photos.

The rear cones and races were perfectly smooth, much to my relief. The brightly polished line could not be felt by fingertip or ballpoint test.

I felt as if the freewheel should screw on to sit closer to the spokes and dork disc, but I was really careful to thread it on properly and get many turns by fingertip before tightening. Not sure there.

At this most-disassembled, chainwheels off. Ooh, forgot to mention the 42-biopace to 39-tooth change to the chainrings.

Partially re-assembled.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_20180909_175957.jpg (734.7 KB, 275 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20180909_175927.jpg (1.03 MB, 274 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20200427_200033.jpg (683.7 KB, 267 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20200418_153938.jpg (1.01 MB, 267 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20200418_163725.jpg (1.10 MB, 272 views)
tgot is offline  
Likes For tgot:
Old 05-06-20, 09:35 PM
  #3  
tgot 
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SF Peninsula
Posts: 443

Bikes: 1986 Centurion Ironman, 1997 Trek 2120, Trek T1000

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 116 Posts
Next Steps:

New pads arrived and will go on.

Ride #2 was with a saddle swap, to my second-favorite (and more racy) saddle. Much better!

Also on ride #2 I had a problem in the 39-32 bailout gear. There'd be a chain clunk and the cranks would jerk forward, under load. My understanding is that this happens when the chain starts to climb up onto the teeth, and then drops into place. It did not drop out of the 32-cog when doing this. I'll try re-adjusting limit screws and cable tension, but of course I couldn't tell whether it was climbing to the inside or outside, and it didn't do this on the stand.

My knees felt more strain, and it felt like a rotation limit. I'm not sure whether it was the clipless pedals I was using, or not. They're a pair of Specialized that haven't been on a bike in a while. But also, the 600 crankset seems to have a lower Q factor, not flaring out to where the pedals attach. So what felt like a normal foot position had my heel scraping the crankset. I may flip on the pedals that have been my everyday ones, and see how those feel.

Finally (for tonight), RobbieTunes in my planning thread, and others at various times, have talked about getting wheels tuned and tensioned appropriately for rider weight. Is there anywhere near San Mateo, CA that does such a thing? The last times I got wheels trued, they looked at me like I was crazy when I offered my weight. "We set them to the right tightness." And, in both cases the wheels didn't stay true. I touched up the Ironman wheels well enough to spin without hitting the brakes, but based on what folks have said it sounds worthwhile to get them done properly, if I can.
tgot is offline  
Old 05-06-20, 09:46 PM
  #4  
Piff 
Senior Member
 
Piff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,626
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 780 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times in 401 Posts
Dunno about high quality wheel builders in San Mateo, but that's a great looking Ironman. One of my favorite color patterns.
Piff is offline  
Old 05-06-20, 10:52 PM
  #5  
squirtdad
Senior Member
 
squirtdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,854

Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque

Mentioned: 104 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2304 Post(s)
Liked 2,740 Times in 1,498 Posts
if pads don get you where you want, I am pretty sure i have a set of dual pivot brakes that would not look out of place on that nice ironman in the mess (er carefully curated parts collection) you can have....am in san jose. Being in san jose my go to place for wheels is Tahn at silva cycles https://www.silvacycles.com/.
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)



squirtdad is offline  
Old 05-07-20, 06:13 AM
  #6  
Classtime 
Senior Member
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,672

Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1924 Post(s)
Liked 1,954 Times in 1,086 Posts
The 86 IM is Classic. Shifting onto that 32 cog is not going to be as smooth as the others. Find some quiet flat road and shift through the gears while riding and watch what is going on back there. Your first pic shows an add on derailleur hanger while a later one does not??

Even spoke tension is important for durability and, in my mind, ride quality. Adjusting spokes to center the rim without taking into consideration the tension usually makes the tension more uneven. Read up on that. And regarding rider weight and wheel building, I believe heavier riders need stronger rims and more spokes -- not more tension.

oh, here's a picture of mine.


1986 Ironman
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.

Last edited by Classtime; 05-07-20 at 06:19 AM.
Classtime is offline  
Old 05-07-20, 06:47 AM
  #7  
Mr. 66
Senior Member
 
Mr. 66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,440
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1124 Post(s)
Liked 1,704 Times in 941 Posts
Are you sure you have enough chain clearance for gear #7 at the dropout? It looks very tight.
Mr. 66 is offline  
Old 05-07-20, 07:55 PM
  #8  
tgot 
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SF Peninsula
Posts: 443

Bikes: 1986 Centurion Ironman, 1997 Trek 2120, Trek T1000

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 116 Posts
Derailleur and clearance

The rear derailleur is very tight, even with the extra hangar extender. The in progress photo without it was when I realized it wasn't going to clear.

Maybe that is the problem. I think I may have a little more B-screw margin.

Or, maybe move the wheel further back in the dropouts. My reading suggested that would increase clearance, but experimenting (before the hangar extender) didn't seem to really help.

At the current position, I could definitely take out one chain link pair. That would keep the derailleur more extended. I didn't do so because it's a more destructive adjustment, and because I wasn't sure if the wheel was where I wanted it.

I'll do pads, adjust B screw, do H,L barrel of rear derailleur, and try again. If it's glitchy I'll try to watch while riding, as suggested.

Thank you to all for the comments!
tgot is offline  
Old 05-07-20, 07:58 PM
  #9  
tgot 
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SF Peninsula
Posts: 443

Bikes: 1986 Centurion Ironman, 1997 Trek 2120, Trek T1000

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 116 Posts
Originally Posted by Classtime
oh, here's a picture of mine.

1986 Ironman
Beautiful!

I like that black bar tape with it, and I also like frame pumps.

Eric
tgot is offline  
Old 05-07-20, 09:13 PM
  #10  
3speedslow
Senior Member
 
3speedslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 9,339

Bikes: A few

Mentioned: 117 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1937 Post(s)
Liked 1,043 Times in 627 Posts
My 86, made in 85, which has lost everything which makes it an Ironman is going through a big change.
3speedslow is offline  
Old 05-07-20, 10:09 PM
  #11  
madpogue 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,876
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2350 Post(s)
Liked 1,728 Times in 1,180 Posts
Originally Posted by tgot
and I also like frame pumps.
OP should be careful of mounting a frame pump in that position, esp one with a hard edge like a Zefal. I bought a clone of the OP's bike (red/white '86), and it must've carried a Zefal or similar pump for many years, which caused this:

Maybe a wee bit of old innertube rubber or the like would prevent this.

And +1 on the spoke count reference above. This might be a case for swapping in a set of 36-ers. Someone might even be interested in a trade on the WTB/trade thread.

Last edited by madpogue; 05-07-20 at 10:15 PM.
madpogue is offline  
Old 05-08-20, 07:10 AM
  #12  
PugRider
Full Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Worcester, Massachusetts
Posts: 314

Bikes: Fuji Sportif 1.7C, Shogun Metro AT, Jamis Durango SX, Miyata Alumicross, Fuji Special Road Racer, Mongoose ATB, Fuji SST 1.0 Team, Gitane (?), Specialized Rockhopper SS, Univega Gran Turismo, Univega Supra Sport Mixte, Nishiki Tri-A, Diamondback Coil

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 82 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times in 78 Posts
Kinda stumbled across one earlier this year; initially thought it was going to be a flip but I fell in love. Just took it out yesterday in fact.
Untitled by Eat More Plants1, on Flickr
FWIW I have a brand-new 28t 6-speed on there (brand new chain too) and experience some similar symptoms. I have fiddled with the b-screw, the low gear stop, and I even checked the derailleur hanger alignment, can't quite figure it out. At least for the time being I'm chalking it up to one of two things: the Shimano 600 derailleur is a bit more finicky about tooth count than the conventional wisdom suggests (I had the original 600 freewheel but it was like a 24t or 25t or something, which was a tough slog on hills with a 52-42 up front), or it's simply frame flex under load that's tweaking the alignment down there. I say that because it's way more noticeable when I'm standing, trying to get up a really steep hill. Sit-and-spin sort of stuff doesn't seem to trigger it. Let us know if you figure it out!

Last edited by PugRider; 05-08-20 at 07:13 AM. Reason: gearing correction
PugRider is offline  
Old 05-08-20, 04:45 PM
  #13  
RobbieTunes
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,297
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,407 Times in 908 Posts
Perhaps I can be of some assistance. Driving now. I will consult with the cult and create a spate of smileable mileable options amenable to your abilities.

Above all, proud of you.
RobbieTunes is offline  
Old 05-08-20, 04:59 PM
  #14  
texaspandj
Senior Member
 
texaspandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Heart Of Texas
Posts: 4,238

Bikes: '85, '86 , '87 , '88 , '89 Centurion Dave Scott Ironman.

Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1605 Post(s)
Liked 582 Times in 379 Posts
Originally Posted by PugRider
Kinda stumbled across one earlier this year; initially thought it was going to be a flip but I fell in love. Just took it out yesterday in fact.
Untitled by Eat More Plants1, on Flickr
FWIW I have a brand-new 28t 6-speed on there (brand new chain too) and experience some similar symptoms. I have fiddled with the b-screw, the low gear stop, and I even checked the derailleur hanger alignment, can't quite figure it out. At least for the time being I'm chalking it up to one of two things: the Shimano 600 derailleur is a bit more finicky about tooth count than the conventional wisdom suggests (I had the original 600 freewheel but it was like a 24t or 25t or something, which was a tough slog on hills with a 52-42 up front), or it's simply frame flex under load that's tweaking the alignment down there. I say that because it's way more noticeable when I'm standing, trying to get up a really steep hill. Sit-and-spin sort of stuff doesn't seem to trigger it. Let us know if you figure it out!
Try moving your rear wheel further back in the dropouts.
texaspandj is offline  
Likes For texaspandj:
Old 05-09-20, 06:36 AM
  #15  
PugRider
Full Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Worcester, Massachusetts
Posts: 314

Bikes: Fuji Sportif 1.7C, Shogun Metro AT, Jamis Durango SX, Miyata Alumicross, Fuji Special Road Racer, Mongoose ATB, Fuji SST 1.0 Team, Gitane (?), Specialized Rockhopper SS, Univega Gran Turismo, Univega Supra Sport Mixte, Nishiki Tri-A, Diamondback Coil

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 82 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times in 78 Posts
Originally Posted by texaspandj
Try moving your rear wheel further back in the dropouts.
Will give it a shot, thanks. Was pleasantly surprised during the refurb that the dropout screws were fully functional.
PugRider is offline  
Old 05-10-20, 05:43 PM
  #16  
tgot 
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SF Peninsula
Posts: 443

Bikes: 1986 Centurion Ironman, 1997 Trek 2120, Trek T1000

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 116 Posts
Originally Posted by PugRider
Kinda stumbled across one earlier this year; initially thought it was going to be a flip but I fell in love. Just took it out yesterday in fact.
Untitled by Eat More Plants1, on Flickr
FWIW I have a brand-new 28t 6-speed on there (brand new chain too) and experience some similar symptoms. I have fiddled with the b-screw, the low gear stop, and I even checked the derailleur hanger alignment, can't quite figure it out. At least for the time being I'm chalking it up to one of two things: the Shimano 600 derailleur is a bit more finicky about tooth count than the conventional wisdom suggests (I had the original 600 freewheel but it was like a 24t or 25t or something, which was a tough slog on hills with a 52-42 up front), or it's simply frame flex under load that's tweaking the alignment down there. I say that because it's way more noticeable when I'm standing, trying to get up a really steep hill. Sit-and-spin sort of stuff doesn't seem to trigger it. Let us know if you figure it out!
That's great photo. My saddle had that dusty look (unless that's glare), and the wax that gives boots a flat finish and some water protection really helped, without going to a gloss like a shoe polish would. I'm not sure what recommended treatment is, the Ironman is the only bike I've done anything to the saddle.
tgot is offline  
Old 05-10-20, 05:53 PM
  #17  
tgot 
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SF Peninsula
Posts: 443

Bikes: 1986 Centurion Ironman, 1997 Trek 2120, Trek T1000

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 116 Posts
Progress

Quick update.

B screw, and moving the wheel further back in the dropouts, got me to the ~5mm gap, tooth to tooth, between cog and sprocket that I read was recommended. Went through the derailleur adjustment procedure again.

It definitely seemed better on today's 17.5 mile ride. But today was with kids (14, 12 & 10), slow and flatter. I'll need a more aggressive ride to tell if it's good enough.

Pads were definitely an improvement. Installing the Kool stop shoes was a challenge, as the brake arms hadn't really had the slot finished over its whole length. It needed a little file work before the barrel could move up and down to adjust shoe position.

And, as I was putting the bike away, I realized that I think the left and right shoes are wrong! The part that sticks out to toe-in is towards the front of the bike, not facing the direction that the wheel will be coming from. Any idea if that matters, other than cosmetically?
tgot is offline  
Likes For tgot:
Old 05-11-20, 06:25 AM
  #18  
PugRider
Full Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Worcester, Massachusetts
Posts: 314

Bikes: Fuji Sportif 1.7C, Shogun Metro AT, Jamis Durango SX, Miyata Alumicross, Fuji Special Road Racer, Mongoose ATB, Fuji SST 1.0 Team, Gitane (?), Specialized Rockhopper SS, Univega Gran Turismo, Univega Supra Sport Mixte, Nishiki Tri-A, Diamondback Coil

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 82 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times in 78 Posts
Originally Posted by tgot
That's great photo. My saddle had that dusty look (unless that's glare), and the wax that gives boots a flat finish and some water protection really helped, without going to a gloss like a shoe polish would. I'm not sure what recommended treatment is, the Ironman is the only bike I've done anything to the saddle.
Thanks! Yeah the saddle needs some work, I had plans to buy a "suede brush" as I've seen that recommendation around, but haven't gotten around to it yet. Have also seen people using waxes like you mentioned, I will address it at some point. Cheers!
PugRider is offline  
Old 05-23-20, 11:03 PM
  #19  
tgot 
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SF Peninsula
Posts: 443

Bikes: 1986 Centurion Ironman, 1997 Trek 2120, Trek T1000

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 116 Posts
Originally Posted by madpogue
OP should be careful of mounting a frame pump in that position, esp one with a hard edge like a Zefal. I bought a clone of the OP's bike (red/white '86), and it must've carried a Zefal or similar pump for many years, which caused this:
I did have some visible wear there! Thank you for the warning. I've wrapped that part of the seattube with white electrical tape as a protective layer. Hardly noticable.
tgot is offline  
Old 05-23-20, 11:25 PM
  #20  
tgot 
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SF Peninsula
Posts: 443

Bikes: 1986 Centurion Ironman, 1997 Trek 2120, Trek T1000

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 116 Posts
Ride update

Since last update, I had the wheels retensioned, flipped the brake shoes so the pads are facing the right way, and took it our today for a near-40 mile ride.

I'm really enjoying it.

Gears are barely low enough 39f, 32r, but manageable. Climbed Alpine road to the end, 1000ft at only 4% average grade but heavily.back-loaded, and was OK. I think the key is not letting myself get too tired, the hills on the last 5 home I couldn't power over, and trying to sit at the low cadence was hurting the knees.

Photo below with pump and seat bag and saddle swap, at top of of the climb. I need to bring both my red and white bottles; the green clashes.

Both joyous speed and loving the nimble feel, and missing the higher bars of my other bike at the three hour mark.

About 100 miles on it now, since the gearing changes.

As of today this would be my go-to for anything under 30ish miles and not heavy climbing. If I was doing the metric century with 6kft of climb, I'd still want my other bike.

This being why I need both!
tgot is offline  
Likes For tgot:
Old 05-23-20, 11:33 PM
  #21  
tgot 
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SF Peninsula
Posts: 443

Bikes: 1986 Centurion Ironman, 1997 Trek 2120, Trek T1000

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 116 Posts
To -Do list

Still to do are:
  • Paint touch up, with Testors red. That will be fun and I'll post pictures.
  • Headset rebuild and adjust. There's play, not noticable when just riding along. But I can move the fork, and on a firm braking can feel a clunk reposition happen.
  • Bottom bracket. Small amount of play, and has probably never been done.
  • Front hub? No play, rear races looked good, and the wheel spins a long time. I'm not sure if this is a priority.
The problem is that I don't really want to take the bike out of service these days. Any opinions on which of those are more important, and on which are medium wrench-difficulty?
tgot is offline  
Old 05-23-20, 11:42 PM
  #22  
noobinsf 
Senior Member
 
noobinsf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,291

Bikes: '82 Univega Competizione, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '83 Mercian KOM Touring, '85 Univega Alpina Uno, '76 Eisentraut Limited

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,204 Times in 700 Posts
Originally Posted by tgot
Still to do are:
  • Paint touch up, with Testors red. That will be fun and I'll post pictures.
  • Headset rebuild and adjust. There's play, not noticable when just riding along. But I can move the fork, and on a firm braking can feel a clunk reposition happen.
  • Bottom bracket. Small amount of play, and has probably never been done.
  • Front hub? No play, rear races looked good, and the wheel spins a long time. I'm not sure if this is a priority.
The problem is that I don't really want to take the bike out of service these days. Any opinions on which of those are more important, and on which are medium wrench-difficulty?
If you're planning to ride more in the immediate future, the headset is #1 priority. The bottom bracket is a very close second. Both should be done before riding again any significant distance. Youtube is your friend here -- both are pretty straightforward, and you could really speed up the wear and/or damage of the headset if you leave it with enough play that there is a perceptible clunk.

Beautiful bike, btw.
noobinsf is offline  
Old 05-24-20, 09:16 AM
  #23  
Classtime 
Senior Member
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,672

Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1924 Post(s)
Liked 1,954 Times in 1,086 Posts
Very Nice. Your Saddle to bar drop does not look excessive. I bet your body will get accustomed to it if you increase your ride frequency and duration slowly. You could rotate the bars back a few degrees to help if you are most often on the hoods. For sure, follow noobinsf advice and rebuild the headset and bottom bracket.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Classtime is offline  
Old 05-26-20, 11:41 PM
  #24  
tgot 
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SF Peninsula
Posts: 443

Bikes: 1986 Centurion Ironman, 1997 Trek 2120, Trek T1000

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 116 Posts
Headset rebuild; 1 of ??

Started the headset rebuild today.

I have the 5/32" loose ball bearings from the 2011 Niagara order back when I first planned the rehab. I'm not sure that my vernier skills are enough to establish that the caged balls that had been used were 5/32", but they seemed smaller than the 3/16".

I use the plastic egg tray to keep track of parts in the order they come off. First picture was after disassembly, second was after cleaning the locknut, top race, and washers.

(Side note: Thanks to bikeforums C&V for threads about safely removing the funny star-nut thing, that it's compatible with a 32mm. I put some painter's tape on there to protect the finish.)

All the contact surfaces look smooth, no sign of fretting ("brinelling").

One oddity was the fork steerer tube having lost some paint. Looks like a section flaked off. My thinking was that any attempt at touch-up might just also fall off and into the lower bearing. I was going to just make sure it had a grease smear on the unpainted area when I reassembled. Does that seem reasonable?


I definitely feel more confident working on the bike. My pre- and post-work are getting smoother, too, things like: put on music, take out stand, open stand, unhang bike, get on bike tools, etc. are getting such that 45 minutes of light are enough to make progress. "Hey, if I put the stand here instead, I can open the toolset there and it's only 1 step away..."
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_20200526_195528.jpg (600.9 KB, 59 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20200526_195557.jpg (887.8 KB, 59 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20200526_200230.jpg (858.6 KB, 59 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20200526_200640.jpg (664.3 KB, 59 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20200526_200707.jpg (528.2 KB, 59 views)
tgot is offline  
Likes For tgot:
Old 06-15-20, 03:16 PM
  #25  
tgot 
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SF Peninsula
Posts: 443

Bikes: 1986 Centurion Ironman, 1997 Trek 2120, Trek T1000

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 116 Posts
I've got a 1985.9 model year

Hi.

Finished the headset, with new balls and grease, and it's nice not to have that moving.

Also did the bottom bracket Saturday, and took it for a ride on Sunday. That also feels good, and checking post ride I didn't have any play in the cranks the way I previously had.

Is there some trick for getting the fixed cup really clean without removing it? I felt pretty good about how it ended up, before regreasing and reassembly, but it was a pain.

And, I don't know how common it is to the Ironman family, but my bike with an N6... Serial number, and SIS shifters, has the Tange bottom bracket listed for 1985 models. As far as I can tell, everything else lines up with the 1986 components in the Ironman spreadsheet.
tgot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.