MHL’s
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
MHL’s
I left this discussion 10 years ago so was a little curious as to what has happened since.
24 years ago my province instituted an all ages mandatory bicycle helmet law. It followed Australia and New Zealand laws and shortly after our law passed, Canada’s 3 Martime provinces followed suit. I know the US has a different way of enacting laws than Canada but I believe there were a number of states that added mhl’s as well.
It seems to me that the push for mhl’s has decreased. They haven’t increased in Canada and only 19 of the 50 states have them.
I was also surprised to find that the enforcement of our law has significantly declined. Vancouver Police used to issue about 1800 tickets a year for no helmet, nowadays, they average only 18 per year. Our shared bike system has stopped providing helmets whereas previously, they had been supplied with each bike.
Am I right in thinking that the bloom is off the rose for mhl’s? That most people think they aren’t a good idea?
24 years ago my province instituted an all ages mandatory bicycle helmet law. It followed Australia and New Zealand laws and shortly after our law passed, Canada’s 3 Martime provinces followed suit. I know the US has a different way of enacting laws than Canada but I believe there were a number of states that added mhl’s as well.
It seems to me that the push for mhl’s has decreased. They haven’t increased in Canada and only 19 of the 50 states have them.
I was also surprised to find that the enforcement of our law has significantly declined. Vancouver Police used to issue about 1800 tickets a year for no helmet, nowadays, they average only 18 per year. Our shared bike system has stopped providing helmets whereas previously, they had been supplied with each bike.
Am I right in thinking that the bloom is off the rose for mhl’s? That most people think they aren’t a good idea?
Last edited by closetbiker; 08-26-20 at 12:56 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,529
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2111 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
In practice, MHL's are grossly unevenly enforced. (That's putting it in a way that won't punt this to P&R.)
Discuss bicycle helmets with your doctor, not your police officer.
-mr. bill
Discuss bicycle helmets with your doctor, not your police officer.
-mr. bill
Likes For mr_bill:
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#4
Half way there
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,955
Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 879 Times
in
526 Posts
The current resistance to anti-Covid measures should give a clue about enforcement of M-Anything-Ls.
Likes For Moe Zhoost:
#5
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times
in
3,262 Posts
I wouldn't equate the drop with more people thinking it's not a good idea. Probably more that when first implemented, there was a request to the authorities to act on it.
However, like many laws, there really isn't much tooth to it and law enforcement officers just hate getting chewed up and down for writing a helmet ticket that probably the violator will get out of without penalty.
I see quite a few with helmets hanging on their handle bars. I guess they are going to put them on just before they have an accident. <grin>
However, like many laws, there really isn't much tooth to it and law enforcement officers just hate getting chewed up and down for writing a helmet ticket that probably the violator will get out of without penalty.
I see quite a few with helmets hanging on their handle bars. I guess they are going to put them on just before they have an accident. <grin>
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
From what I’ve seen after my absence is that there hasn’t been an increase in the laws. There hasn’t been a mhl passed in Canada in over 20 years and it seems there hasn’t been many passed elsewhere either.
Maybe they were “the flavour of the day” back then. It seems, separated bike lanes and encouraging more to ride have taken over as a more effective way to cycling safety
Maybe they were “the flavour of the day” back then. It seems, separated bike lanes and encouraging more to ride have taken over as a more effective way to cycling safety
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,457
Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 314 Times
in
241 Posts
Good riddance to MHLs. I never will wear a stupid helmet. I do always wear a baseball cap and glasses.
In 2018 I rode 3,900 miles thru AB, BC, WA, OR and ID. I rode the last 90 miles to Vancouver on the Trans Can highway all the way to the Port Mann bridge, on a Saturday.
WA is making a concerted effort to rid bikes off of any divided highway, Jerks.
If it makes you happy, they are still gung ho in OZ and NZ I hear.
From what I have seen, over 80% wear the useless things all over, anyway.
In 2018 I rode 3,900 miles thru AB, BC, WA, OR and ID. I rode the last 90 miles to Vancouver on the Trans Can highway all the way to the Port Mann bridge, on a Saturday.
WA is making a concerted effort to rid bikes off of any divided highway, Jerks.
If it makes you happy, they are still gung ho in OZ and NZ I hear.
From what I have seen, over 80% wear the useless things all over, anyway.
Last edited by GamblerGORD53; 08-26-20 at 12:12 PM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,655
Bikes: iele Latina, Miele Suprema, Miele Uno LS, Miele Miele Beta, MMTB, Bianchi Model Unknown, Fiori Venezia, Fiori Napoli, VeloSport Adamas AX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1324 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
640 Posts
Should make helmets mandatory for automobile drivers too since far more of them per miles driven sustain traumatic brain injuries than do bicyclists. I think that helmet use should be left up to the individual.
Cheers
Cheers
#9
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times
in
3,262 Posts
It's pretty certain that I'd be dead if I didn't have a helmet on last year. First cycling accident that ever caused more than a scrape in way over 50 years of cycling. I used to think I was invincible. Now I'm just almost invincible.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
its probably not a small factor in enforcements experience that despite the purpose of our legislation being explicitly stated that it was to reduce cycling deaths, and despite the fact that helmet usage dramatically increased, the death rate did not decrease.
Last edited by closetbiker; 08-26-20 at 12:50 PM.
Likes For Mr. 66:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,970
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2475 Post(s)
Liked 723 Times
in
514 Posts
I don't know, I can't imagine myself willingly returning to a discussion I left 10 years ago, to try and stir up passion again, in a new cohort, unless I was really bored out of my mind. Probably not even then.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
lol. Just looking back with a bit of perspective, seeing if much has changed. Seems it has. It’s not the issue it once was. Progress, I suppose.
Last edited by closetbiker; 08-26-20 at 12:51 PM.
#14
Junior Member
No MHL’s in AZ. Some local ordinances for kids under 18 is about it.
i don’t think it should be mandated - I don’t wear one when riding out to the mailbox or over to the grocery store but, one of those little styrofoam lids saved my life so, I’ll keep wearing one while training either way.
i don’t think it should be mandated - I don’t wear one when riding out to the mailbox or over to the grocery store but, one of those little styrofoam lids saved my life so, I’ll keep wearing one while training either way.
#15
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times
in
5,053 Posts
At this point, I don't think it's an open controversy whether helmet wearing provides an increased margin for safety, it clearly does. What's lacking is any evidence whatsoever that mandatory helmet laws increase helmet wearing.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 626 Post(s)
Liked 701 Times
in
418 Posts
I like to tell people I'd wear my full motorcycle leathers if I could do it and not have heat stroke.....
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Most assuredly, the platform on which our law was passed (to reduce serious injury and death) didn’t happen.
Ive often thought one of the primary reasons why mhl’s stalled was because of this result
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I don't think there's ever been a time where most people in the US thought that MHL for adults were a good idea. From a mathematical standpoint, the reasoning that it would save a lot of lives is incoherent and most people realize that.
Likes For wphamilton:
#19
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times
in
5,053 Posts
It’s been some time since I checked other jurisdictions but I do know in mine it’s been quite the opposite, helmet use had been confirmed to increase dramatically yet injury reduction wasn’t confirmed.
Most assuredly, the platform on which our law was passed (to reduce serious injury and death) didn’t happen.
Ive often thought one of the primary reasons why mhl’s stalled was because of this result
Most assuredly, the platform on which our law was passed (to reduce serious injury and death) didn’t happen.
Ive often thought one of the primary reasons why mhl’s stalled was because of this result
To be clear, the only effect of helmet usage is to reduce the risk of death and/or limit the damage from head injuries and no other cause. Even a drastic increase in the use of helmets is not likely to result in massive changes to death and injury rates as head injuries are only one category of potentially fatal injuries out of many.
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
yes, and an oft quoted and misunderstood stat used here to convince people to use helmets is that over 3/4 of cyclist deaths are due to head injuries and helmets prevent these. Of course even when there are other injuries that cause death in addition to a head injury that causes death, it will be the head injury that is cited as cause of death. Deaths by head injury alone is a far more accurate indication. This is a far smaller number (most often less than 19% of all deaths, a far cry from 75%). Couple that with lack of coverage and limits of effectiveness and it’s no wonder even with huge increases of usage, death rates do not decrease after mhl’s pass
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#23
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times
in
5,053 Posts
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,529
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2111 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
Otherwise, let's see.
Cuomo suggested mandatory helmets for some e-bike users at the end of January. But he opposed increasing increasing the age covered by New York State helmet laws from 14 to 18. Then something happened March 7.
Here in Massachusetts, legislation covering e-bike users (current law on e-bikes in Massachusetts is completely broken) passed the Senate. And legistlation for reduction of traffic fatalities passed the Senate again, and is now dieing in the House Ways and Means Committee. Again. This time the obstacle isn't Jeffrey Sánchez, former chair of the committee, but something else that happened on March 10.
But bicycle services were added to a list of essential services.
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 08-27-20 at 11:44 AM.
#25
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times
in
5,053 Posts
NTSB recommendation was met with outrage then crickets.
Otherwise, let's see.
Cuomo suggested mandatory helmets for some e-bike users at the end of January. But he opposed increasing increasing the age covered by New York State helmet laws from 14 to 18. Then something happened March 7.
Here in Massachusetts, legislation covering e-bike users (current law on e-bikes in Massachusetts is completely broken) passed the Senate. And legistlation for reduction of traffic fatalities passed the Senate again, and is now dieing in the House Ways and Means Committee. Again. This time the obstacle isn't Jeffrey Sánchez, former chair of the committee, but something else that happened on March 10.
But bicycle services were added to a list of essential services.
-mr. bill
Otherwise, let's see.
Cuomo suggested mandatory helmets for some e-bike users at the end of January. But he opposed increasing increasing the age covered by New York State helmet laws from 14 to 18. Then something happened March 7.
Here in Massachusetts, legislation covering e-bike users (current law on e-bikes in Massachusetts is completely broken) passed the Senate. And legistlation for reduction of traffic fatalities passed the Senate again, and is now dieing in the House Ways and Means Committee. Again. This time the obstacle isn't Jeffrey Sánchez, former chair of the committee, but something else that happened on March 10.
But bicycle services were added to a list of essential services.
-mr. bill
I think it was probably destined for die with a whimper status regardless of something happening on March 10. The whole idea of getting NTSB involved seemed a bit off to me a) because it was off their usual beat, and b) because there was no carrot or stick they could use to get states to go along.
I didn't agree with the recommendation, I just ended up arguing in the thread about it because I was so sick of people going on about some sort of evil, financial motivation of the NTSB on the issue. For some reason, that same assertion of corrupt bias didn't seem to apply to the other bike safety recommendations they made.
Last edited by livedarklions; 08-27-20 at 12:10 PM.