Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Tubular tire info & recommendation needed

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Tubular tire info & recommendation needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-19, 12:07 PM
  #1  
Yokosawa1
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3

Bikes: 1972 Galmozzi criterium frame, Campy equipped, Weinman wood-filled rims

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Tubular tire info & recommendation needed

I'm in the process of readying my Galmozzi criterium race bike (I last raced it in 1976) for casual training/possible sale and refreshing my memory on what I have and need. After reviewing Sheldon Brown's website, I am just not confident in making an educated decision. I'm interested in reconfirming what I have and need in terms wheel size and tires, respectively. I have Weinman wood-filled tubular wheels from a 1968 Schwinn Paramount which are advertised in the 1968 catalog as having 27" x 1 1/4 road racing tires, but Sheldon states "THERE IS ACTUALLY NO SUCH THING AS A "27 INCH" TUBULAR" and "All full-size tubulars fit all full-size tubular rims", thus the confusion. Since the Schwinn ad is not specific, it could be referring to a clincher tire, but who knows.

My questions:
1) What is my wheel size?
2) What diameter tubular tires am I searching for?
3) What exact terminology should I look for and avoid in terms of sizing?
3) If intending to spend $100 or less per tire, what recommendations, and why, should I be considering for casual training/riding?
4) What rim cement should I be considering? In the past I used Clement over Tubasti since Tubasti didn't seem to hold in corners as well.
Yokosawa1 is offline  
Old 02-13-19, 08:36 PM
  #2  
woodcraft
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
Originally Posted by Yokosawa1
I'm in the process of readying my Galmozzi criterium race bike (I last raced it in 1976) for casual training/possible sale and refreshing my memory on what I have and need. After reviewing Sheldon Brown's website, I am just not confident in making an educated decision. I'm interested in reconfirming what I have and need in terms wheel size and tires, respectively. I have Weinman wood-filled tubular wheels from a 1968 Schwinn Paramount which are advertised in the 1968 catalog as having 27" x 1 1/4 road racing tires, but Sheldon states "THERE IS ACTUALLY NO SUCH THING AS A "27 INCH" TUBULAR" and "All full-size tubulars fit all full-size tubular rims", thus the confusion. Since the Schwinn ad is not specific, it could be referring to a clincher tire, but who knows.

My questions:
1) What is my wheel size?
2) What diameter tubular tires am I searching for?
3) What exact terminology should I look for and avoid in terms of sizing?
3) If intending to spend $100 or less per tire, what recommendations, and why, should I be considering for casual training/riding?
4) What rim cement should I be considering? In the past I used Clement over Tubasti since Tubasti didn't seem to hold in corners as well.


Tubulars/ rims are " 28" " but frequently mislabeled by sellers. They haven't changed size so whatever tubular will fit your rims (aside from 650b).

For low commitment, I'd go with these (three so you'll have a spare)

tubular tire sewup tire Servizio Corse $19.95 tubular tires at Yellow Jersey; possibly the Best Value Tubular In America for 2018!

I like Continental Sprinter for sturdyness & reasonable performance. > $40 if you shop.

This is the popular rim cement but whatever you come across will be fine. You'll of course have to scrape the old glue off.

https://www.biketiresdirect.com/prod...ement-30g-tube

Post a pic when you get it running!
woodcraft is offline  
Old 02-14-19, 03:41 AM
  #3  
dabac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times in 222 Posts
You need to be aware of what the numbers refer to.
Most of the old rim and tire markings refer to the "working" diameter of the wheel - the diameter of the mounted and inflated tire.
So a skinny tubular might well end up at about 27" x 1 1/4, even if it's sitting on a supposedly 28" or 700C rim.
This confusing sizing system is still being upheld today, with 29ers and 27.5".
Even the 700 in 700C, originally referred to the diameter of the mounted and inflated tire in millimeters.
A clearer method is to refer to the rim and tire size separately.
As with 700C and (some) 28" and the 29ers having a 622 mm Bead Seat Diameter.
Ignoring the extremes of wide/narrow, all rims that are 622 mm BSD can take all tires that are 622 BSD.
Note that "can take" does not guarantee that they're a good match.
And yeah, admitttedly I'm not the most frequent tubular user.
But all I have handled have interchanged with 700C wheels with no or very minor adjustments of brake pads.
A "true" 27" x 1 1/4 or 27" x 1 1/8 would have a 630 mm BSD, and would require an obvious reset of brake pads when interchanged with a 700C wheel.

As a side note, it's possible to fit a 700C tubular to a 27" x 1 1/4 or 27" x 1 1/8 (630) mm clincher if so desired.
I used it some to be able to run high pressures on a hookless rim.
Apart from that, I can't really see where it'd make sense.
dabac is offline  
Old 02-14-19, 07:50 AM
  #4  
63rickert
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,068
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1090 Post(s)
Liked 329 Times in 245 Posts
The tubular standard was created in July 1892 by John Palmer and B.F. Goodrich. It has never varied. Oldest standard in the sport. Still known in Italy as 28" Palmer.

Do not pay $100 for a tubular. Consistent low prices for better quality tubulars from probikekit and Merlin Cycles(UK). I just scored 4 silk tubulars for $100. That was an unusual buy, with patience you can do well too.

The Weinmann wood fills were made in 1966 at what had been the Scheeren workshop in Berlin. Basically a heavier Scheeren. Simply one of the best rims ever. Enjoy.
63rickert is offline  
Old 02-14-19, 08:20 AM
  #5  
Robert A
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 752

Bikes: 2019 CAAD12, 2015 Specialized Sirrus Comp

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 559 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 63 Times in 45 Posts
Can I ask for your impressions of riding on these silk tubulars? I used to ride on them in the '70s and it was like riding on air.
Originally Posted by 63rickert
I just scored 4 silk tubulars for $100. .
Robert A is offline  
Old 02-14-19, 08:59 AM
  #6  
Psimet2001 
I eat carbide.
 
Psimet2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627

Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times in 560 Posts
Modern casings and compounds bring advantages that far exceed the life of silk casings.... but yeah I still rode silk on the track until last year.

There’s a ton of options for tires out there and while people are less at ease with riding and using tubulars the technology is stellar. You can go the cheap ass route and ride cheap ass tubulars or you can ride something decent that you can find for around the same price as most popular clinchers and have the ability to run sealant in them and have it work. Maxxis, Donnelly come to mind.

Wider widths are also now commonplace across the board.

Yes all road tubulars are “28” “ but there were some other standards along the way. I have been called many times for oddball rim standards or tires for obscure kids track from back in the day. *shrug*
Psimet2001 is offline  
Old 02-14-19, 09:53 AM
  #7  
63rickert
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,068
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1090 Post(s)
Liked 329 Times in 245 Posts
Originally Posted by Robert A
Can I ask for your impressions of riding on these silk tubulars? I used to ride on them in the '70s and it was like riding on air.
It is dead of winter in Chicago. I am looking forward to mounting them, but even when weather warms first I must flat or wear out the tires mounted now.

All I can tell you is they are Vittorias special ordered for Trek-Segafredo (or that is what seller told me) and they arrived too wide for team to want them. Looking at them and holding them they feel much more like tubulars of the past than current production. Will find out if they flat like tubulars of past or survive like the new ones do. I've not been on silk for 35 years.

The most usual non-28" tubular sizes are 26" Palmer, brake track equivalent to 571 clinchers, and 24" Palmer, equivalent to 520 clinchers. Neither of these would ever be confused for normal standard tires. There have been others. It is basically cutting and stitching, no need for a tire mold, so when someone wants a special it can be done.
63rickert is offline  
Old 02-14-19, 10:55 AM
  #8  
woodcraft
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
Originally Posted by dabac
You need to be aware of what the numbers refer to.
Most of the old rim and tire markings refer to the "working" diameter of the wheel - the diameter of the mounted and inflated tire.
So a skinny tubular might well end up at about 27" x 1 1/4, even if it's sitting on a supposedly 28" or 700C rim.
This confusing sizing system is still being upheld today, with 29ers and 27.5".
Even the 700 in 700C, originally referred to the diameter of the mounted and inflated tire in millimeters.
A clearer method is to refer to the rim and tire size separately.
As with 700C and (some) 28" and the 29ers having a 622 mm Bead Seat Diameter.
Ignoring the extremes of wide/narrow, all rims that are 622 mm BSD can take all tires that are 622 BSD.
Note that "can take" does not guarantee that they're a good match.
And yeah, admitttedly I'm not the most frequent tubular user.
But all I have handled have interchanged with 700C wheels with no or very minor adjustments of brake pads.
A "true" 27" x 1 1/4 or 27" x 1 1/8 would have a 630 mm BSD, and would require an obvious reset of brake pads when interchanged with a 700C wheel.

As a side note, it's possible to fit a 700C tubular to a 27" x 1 1/4 or 27" x 1 1/8 (630) mm clincher if so desired.
I used it some to be able to run high pressures on a hookless rim.
Apart from that, I can't really see where it'd make sense.



Your post muddies the waters in an all too common way.

700c refers to a certain bead seat diameter. Since tubulars do not have a bead, tubular rims do not have a bead seat and cannot be 700c.

It's true that a tubular tire can be put on a clincher rim- why it's good to have a tubular rider in your group, as their spare tire can get you home if your tire is slashed,

but even I would not start a ride like that.
woodcraft is offline  
Old 02-15-19, 06:59 AM
  #9  
Yokosawa1
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3

Bikes: 1972 Galmozzi criterium frame, Campy equipped, Weinman wood-filled rims

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Thank you!

Thank you so much for the quick and concise response!
Yokosawa1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cadman101
Classic & Vintage
29
12-04-15 06:01 PM
jyl
Bicycle Mechanics
19
06-10-15 12:41 PM
Ancient Mariner
Classic & Vintage
24
11-01-12 06:52 PM
tara drake
Classic & Vintage
15
07-18-12 07:26 PM
ken_matthews
Classic & Vintage
4
10-29-10 06:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.