Opinions - Schwinn Central
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Opinions - Schwinn Central
I'm looking for a reasonable priced beater bike for winter commutes. I am not sure if this is something I will make a habit out of or not. Because of my uncertainty & the conditions that I will be riding in, I am looking to keep the price as low as possible. I have been looking for a used bike, knowing that I will have to add fenders and a rack. The Schwinn Central seems like it may be a decent option for my needs. It looks like I may be able to add some studded tires and start riding. Does anyone have any opinions or knowledge on this bike?
Schwinn Central | Schwinn Bicycles
Schwinn Central | Schwinn Bicycles
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,973
Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1364 Post(s)
Liked 1,677 Times
in
827 Posts
I have no knowledge of this particular bike, but based on the photo I would say it should work well. It looks like it has "rapid fire" or "trigger" style shifters, which my winter bike has, and work with heavy gloves, but not so well with mittens. The disc brakes should work well when wet. My winter bike has rim brakes, and the original cantilever brakes were just okay in the wet. I went to V-brakes a couple of years ago and they are even better than my disc-brake bike.
While the fenders look to provide good, full-ish coverage I do notice they are not adjustable. The struts/supports curve around the rear of the fender, and hook over the mounting screw with no provision for adjustment. So if a pair of studded tires end up being bigger than the original tires, there my not be clearance. On the other hand, my studded snow tires are 26x1.65 and fit the fenders fine when I had them adjusted for 26x1.5 road tires. But when I went to 26x1.85 summer tires I had to "let out" the fenders a small bit. Of course now the 1.65 snow tires have plenty of fender clearance.
Worst case scenario, you end up taking off the fenders until you can buy new ones, or fashion some sort of strut extender.
While the fenders look to provide good, full-ish coverage I do notice they are not adjustable. The struts/supports curve around the rear of the fender, and hook over the mounting screw with no provision for adjustment. So if a pair of studded tires end up being bigger than the original tires, there my not be clearance. On the other hand, my studded snow tires are 26x1.65 and fit the fenders fine when I had them adjusted for 26x1.5 road tires. But when I went to 26x1.85 summer tires I had to "let out" the fenders a small bit. Of course now the 1.65 snow tires have plenty of fender clearance.
Worst case scenario, you end up taking off the fenders until you can buy new ones, or fashion some sort of strut extender.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times
in
2,342 Posts
how many miles are we talking about? do you have any bike now?
#4
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,470 Times
in
1,435 Posts
I like the look. I like the bolted on headlight. But you still get a better value when you buy used, especially if you are mechanically inclined and can spend some time setting up the bike the way you want it.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks. To answer some questions - my commute is very short, less than 2 miles, and varies depending on the route I decide to take that day. I have been commuting most of the summer and really enjoy it - and get depressed when I am forced to drive. Winter commuting will be uncharted territory. I know that I do not want to take my bike out into the salt and grime of winter roads. I have been looking for used, but I haven't had much luck. Doing the math, a decent used bike (if I can find one) + rack + fenders will be at least $200, if not more. I can buy this Schwinn for $210. Yes, it is not sized for me, but I'm hoping that won't matter much on my short commute. It is attractive to me because of the fenders, rack, & disc brakes for just over $210. I know this bike will be abused by the elements, but considering what it is, no big loss.
A big thanks to BobbyG for pointing out the potential fender clearance issue. I will have to do some measuring before heading to the LBS for tires.
A big thanks to BobbyG for pointing out the potential fender clearance issue. I will have to do some measuring before heading to the LBS for tires.
#6
Banned
It's good. Looks like a cheap European commuter from LIDL, ALDI, NETTO or REMA 500 (which is a win.)
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I went ahead and broke the unwritten rules, buying the bike from walmart. I spent about 20 minutes assembling it last night and an additional 30 minutes trying to adjust the brakes. They still aren't to my liking, but they work. I may be expecting too much considering that I have been riding a bike with Shimano Ultegra brifters & hydraulic brakes. I did a quick run through the gears last night and the Shimano Tourney derailleur seemed good with no need for adjustment, but the maiden voyage this morning resulted in some ghost shifting & signs of obvious need of adjustment. When assembling this bike it was obvious that I was dealing with a cheap big box store bike. At the same time, the quality of the low end and generic components seems decent. I just need to keep reminding myself that this was 1/6 the cost of my daily rider. The Innova 700x40 tires are clearly more in the 35mm range. These will soon be replaced with studded tires anyway - once I figure out what size I can fit under the fenders. The wheels appear to be double wall aluminum. Finally, being a 1 size fits all bike and me being 6'0", the seat post is fully extended and I could probably use another centimeter or 2 to get it properly set up for me. I had plans to remove the Schwinn stickers, but to my surprise, the decals are painted on the frame. The wheel decals will be removed.
Overall, I think at $218, this bike is a decent investment and should serve its intended purpose well.
Overall, I think at $218, this bike is a decent investment and should serve its intended purpose well.
#8
Banned
I must admit that this is an excellent looking bicycle.
I purchased a so-called BSO with relatively low level components and find that's all that is really needed for commuting on my short and flat runs. Also, mine often gets left outside as space is really at a premium here.
A few questions about that new and trustworthy steed:
1. Is that CENTRAL or CENTAAL? I'd like the sound of CENTAAL better as it sounds more Dutch.
2. Is that a dynamo powered light?
I'd just give it a one over from as it's been assembled at Wally World and otherwise it should be good to go.
Nice purchase overall.
I purchased a so-called BSO with relatively low level components and find that's all that is really needed for commuting on my short and flat runs. Also, mine often gets left outside as space is really at a premium here.
A few questions about that new and trustworthy steed:
1. Is that CENTRAL or CENTAAL? I'd like the sound of CENTAAL better as it sounds more Dutch.
2. Is that a dynamo powered light?
I'd just give it a one over from as it's been assembled at Wally World and otherwise it should be good to go.
Nice purchase overall.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times
in
2,342 Posts
that's a lot of work!
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
2. It is not dynamo. It is just a cheap plastic LED light that take three AAA batteries. It has only two modes - off/on. No rear light was included.
3. This bike was sealed in the box when I got it. I assembled it myself. I have seen the (in)abilities of Walmart employees when it comes to assembling bikes, so I completely understand and thank you for your concern.
#11
Banned
1. It is CENTRAL, sorry to bust your bubble
2. It is not dynamo. It is just a cheap plastic LED light that take three AAA batteries. It has only two modes - off/on. No rear light was included.
3. This bike was sealed in the box when I got it. I assembled it myself. I have seen the (in)abilities of Walmart employees when it comes to assembling bikes, so I completely understand and thank you for your concern.
2. It is not dynamo. It is just a cheap plastic LED light that take three AAA batteries. It has only two modes - off/on. No rear light was included.
3. This bike was sealed in the box when I got it. I assembled it myself. I have seen the (in)abilities of Walmart employees when it comes to assembling bikes, so I completely understand and thank you for your concern.
I would gladly leave that bicycle outside at Norreport after popping in some Ree lights.
It's the closest thing to a European commuter that I've seen in a while around these parts, so job well done!
Have a nice day and commute.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,094
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 1,290 Times
in
743 Posts
I went ahead and broke the unwritten rules, buying the bike from walmart. I spent about 20 minutes assembling it last night and an additional 30 minutes trying to adjust the brakes. They still aren't to my liking, but they work. I may be expecting too much considering that I have been riding a bike with Shimano Ultegra brifters & hydraulic brakes. I did a quick run through the gears last night and the Shimano Tourney derailleur seemed good with no need for adjustment, but the maiden voyage this morning resulted in some ghost shifting & signs of obvious need of adjustment. When assembling this bike it was obvious that I was dealing with a cheap big box store bike. At the same time, the quality of the low end and generic components seems decent. I just need to keep reminding myself that this was 1/6 the cost of my daily rider. The Innova 700x40 tires are clearly more in the 35mm range. These will soon be replaced with studded tires anyway - once I figure out what size I can fit under the fenders. The wheels appear to be double wall aluminum. Finally, being a 1 size fits all bike and me being 6'0", the seat post is fully extended and I could probably use another centimeter or 2 to get it properly set up for me. I had plans to remove the Schwinn stickers, but to my surprise, the decals are painted on the frame. The wheel decals will be removed.
Overall, I think at $218, this bike is a decent investment and should serve its intended purpose well.
Overall, I think at $218, this bike is a decent investment and should serve its intended purpose well.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
You can ride that a lot for $218. On a ride from Pittsburgh to Washington DC, I met up with a man who was finishing a cross country. He flew to San Fransisco with his seat, pedals, shoes, and gear, and bought a Schwinn from Walmart, and also added a Burley trailer, and went on his way. He thought he might have to replace the bike partway through the ride, but it lasted the trip, though he replaced the cranks in Ohio, adding a triple. When he was finished, he gave the bike to someone who needed one. I think that bike will work perfectly for your commute.
#14
Banned
I like the synopsis of the bike.
Is the 29/28/700c commentary a joke? Maybe I missed something but aren't they all 622 tyres in most non-English languages?
Have a nice evening.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 582
Bikes: 1951 Sun Wasp, 1953 Armstrong Consort, 1975 Raleigh Competition, 1980 Apollo Gran Sport, 1988 Schwinn Voyageur, Mystery MTB
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 360 Post(s)
Liked 469 Times
in
192 Posts
I have ridden it two days now. I really miss my drop bars and don't like the short cockpit, but accept that this setup is ideal for winter commuting. After some minor adjusting, I believe I have everything dialed in to my liking. The brakes still need some work (or upgraded calipers), but the shifting is now perfect, though not as smooth as I am used to. My next stop to the LBS will consist of adding a mirror and ordering some studded tires. I think I am leaning toward Schwalbe Marathons. Just today I educated myself on the difference between 29 inch, 28 inch, & 700c tires.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I had never looked into 28 inch tires before. I had always assumed they were an obsolete size for older bikes. In my recent life I had always dealt with 700, which I knew were 622, and 26 inch tires. I never had reason to investigate further. I find it comical that we have a whole bunch of 622 tires with different size listings.
#17
Banned
I had never looked into 28 inch tires before. I had always assumed they were an obsolete size for older bikes. In my recent life I had always dealt with 700, which I knew were 622, and 26 inch tires. I never had reason to investigate further. I find it comical that we have a whole bunch of 622 tires with different size listings.
I ran into this when I moved to Germany and they started using 700c wheels on MTBs and called them a "29er", whereas regular trekking bikes are referred to as a "28er."
I was instructed to just look for the "-622", which honestly makes much more sense than the obsolete 700c and 650b and matches up with how car tyres are sized.
Good luck with selection of tyres, there's a lot of **** out there, I even had Schwalbe tyres fail on me quite quickly (Duranos are garbage).
#18
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,470 Times
in
1,435 Posts
Tire sizing is very confusing. The best explanation is here on Sheldon Brown's site, though it doesn't make a complex system simple, because it can't.
Briefly, even Europe used inches to describe tire sizes. The stupidity started when the size referred to the outside diameter of the inflated tire rather than the rim size. On a given rim, you can switch tires and get a much different diameter, so that's really dumb. Then eventually, the sizes we had referred to what USED TO BE the size of the tire.
700c and 29er both refer to rims with a bead seat diameter (BSD) of 622mm. That's weird because 700c is slightly smaller than 27" wheels with have a BSD of 630mm. And Europeans refer to 700c as 28", which, again, is smaller in actual size than 27".
In England, there was a so-called 28" size whose BSD is 735mm, only slightly larger than 27" (630mm), and 5mm is nowhere near an inch.
700mm is kinda-sorta close to 27", so we have 700c, but 700a, 700b, and 700d are never used as designations.
650mm is kinda-sorta close to 26", and there are lots of 26" tires, some of which use a 650 designation, and this does not help! 650a has a BSD of 590mm, and this is what English 3-speed and many other bikes use. It's often called 26x1-3/8". Some other sizes are also called 26x1-3/8" which is enough to drive people mad. 650b is 584mm. 650c (with 571mm BSD) came into style a few years ago as narrow-tired racing bikes for shorter people. It was a good idea, but bike makers found it too expensive to have different sizes, so now shorter people have to go back to racing bikes with 700c wheels, even though the fit is not optimal. Then there is the MTB style 26" which is much smaller than all of the 650 designations, as the BSD is 559mm.
Also, some inch sizes are expressed with decimal fractions and some with simple fractions. Do not interchange these with numeric equivalents, because types of fractions IMPLIES the BSD. So you can have 26x1.375" but that is not 26x1-3/8.
Are you crazy yet?
Briefly, even Europe used inches to describe tire sizes. The stupidity started when the size referred to the outside diameter of the inflated tire rather than the rim size. On a given rim, you can switch tires and get a much different diameter, so that's really dumb. Then eventually, the sizes we had referred to what USED TO BE the size of the tire.
700c and 29er both refer to rims with a bead seat diameter (BSD) of 622mm. That's weird because 700c is slightly smaller than 27" wheels with have a BSD of 630mm. And Europeans refer to 700c as 28", which, again, is smaller in actual size than 27".
In England, there was a so-called 28" size whose BSD is 735mm, only slightly larger than 27" (630mm), and 5mm is nowhere near an inch.
700mm is kinda-sorta close to 27", so we have 700c, but 700a, 700b, and 700d are never used as designations.
650mm is kinda-sorta close to 26", and there are lots of 26" tires, some of which use a 650 designation, and this does not help! 650a has a BSD of 590mm, and this is what English 3-speed and many other bikes use. It's often called 26x1-3/8". Some other sizes are also called 26x1-3/8" which is enough to drive people mad. 650b is 584mm. 650c (with 571mm BSD) came into style a few years ago as narrow-tired racing bikes for shorter people. It was a good idea, but bike makers found it too expensive to have different sizes, so now shorter people have to go back to racing bikes with 700c wheels, even though the fit is not optimal. Then there is the MTB style 26" which is much smaller than all of the 650 designations, as the BSD is 559mm.
Also, some inch sizes are expressed with decimal fractions and some with simple fractions. Do not interchange these with numeric equivalents, because types of fractions IMPLIES the BSD. So you can have 26x1.375" but that is not 26x1-3/8.
Are you crazy yet?
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Last edited by noglider; 11-01-18 at 08:22 AM.
#19
Full Member
Tire sizing is very confusing. The best explanation is here on Sheldon Brown's site, though it doesn't make a complex system simple, because it can't.
Briefly, even Europe used inches to describe tire sizes. The stupidity started when the size referred to the outside diameter of the inflated tire rather than the rim size. On a given rim, you can switch tires and get a much different diameter, so that's really dumb. Then eventually, the sizes we had referred to what USED TO BE the size of the tire.
700c and 29er both refer to rims with a bead seat diameter (BSD) of 622mm. That's weird because 700c is slightly smaller than 27" wheels with have a BSD of 630mm. And Europeans refer to 700c as 28", which, again, is smaller in actual size than 27".
In England, there was a so-called 28" size whose BSD is 735mm, only slightly larger than 27" (630mm), and 5mm is nowhere near an inch.
700mm is kinda-sorta close to 27", so we have 700c, but 700a, 700b, and 700d are never used as designations.
650mm is kinda-sorta close to 26", and there are lots of 26" tires, some of which use a 650 designation, and this does not help! 650a has a BSD of 590mm, and this is what English 3-speed and many other bikes use. It's often called 26x1-3/8". Some other sizes are also called 26x1-3/8" which is enough to drive people mad. 650b is 584mm. 650c (with 571mm BSD) came into style a few years ago as narrow-tired racing bikes for shorter people. It was a good idea, but bike makers found it too expensive to have different sizes, so now shorter people have to go back to racing bikes with 700c wheels, even though the fit is not optimal. Then there is the MTB style 26" which is much smaller than all of the 650 designations, as the BSD is 559mm.
Also, some inch sizes are expressed with decimal fractions and some with simple fractions. Do not interchange these with numeric equivalents, because types of fractions IMPLIES the BSD. So you can have 26x1.375" but that is not 26x1-3/8.
Are you crazy yet?
Briefly, even Europe used inches to describe tire sizes. The stupidity started when the size referred to the outside diameter of the inflated tire rather than the rim size. On a given rim, you can switch tires and get a much different diameter, so that's really dumb. Then eventually, the sizes we had referred to what USED TO BE the size of the tire.
700c and 29er both refer to rims with a bead seat diameter (BSD) of 622mm. That's weird because 700c is slightly smaller than 27" wheels with have a BSD of 630mm. And Europeans refer to 700c as 28", which, again, is smaller in actual size than 27".
In England, there was a so-called 28" size whose BSD is 735mm, only slightly larger than 27" (630mm), and 5mm is nowhere near an inch.
700mm is kinda-sorta close to 27", so we have 700c, but 700a, 700b, and 700d are never used as designations.
650mm is kinda-sorta close to 26", and there are lots of 26" tires, some of which use a 650 designation, and this does not help! 650a has a BSD of 590mm, and this is what English 3-speed and many other bikes use. It's often called 26x1-3/8". Some other sizes are also called 26x1-3/8" which is enough to drive people mad. 650b is 584mm. 650c (with 571mm BSD) came into style a few years ago as narrow-tired racing bikes for shorter people. It was a good idea, but bike makers found it too expensive to have different sizes, so now shorter people have to go back to racing bikes with 700c wheels, even though the fit is not optimal. Then there is the MTB style 26" which is much smaller than all of the 650 designations, as the BSD is 559mm.
Also, some inch sizes are expressed with decimal fractions and some with simple fractions. Do not interchange these with numeric equivalents, because types of fractions IMPLIES the BSD. So you can have 26x1.375" but that is not 26x1-3/8.
Are you crazy yet?
#20
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,470 Times
in
1,435 Posts
Some people see sidewall markers such as 700x32c and think that 'c' is the unit of measurement for tire width. Well, that's understandable. It sounds so funny to hear people say, "I prefer a 32c tire, because 28c is too narrow for me," when the 'c' really refers to the a-b-c-d series among all the various 700 series (serieses?), of which there is only one. Oy!
Then people absentmindedly remember that cc is a unit of measurement, so I sometimes hear "700cc tire." Oh but cc is cubic centimeters, and we don't measure tires that way at all, nor should we.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,511 Times
in
3,353 Posts
Good luck with the bike.
Too bad it didn't come with a generator. I bet Schwinn could add a decent hub generator and front+rear lights for < $300, if they wanted.
I do like used bikes, but I wonder if some of the bike flippers really know how cheap the bikes they're flipping actually are.
Still, there should be good hybrids out there around $100 (needing a tuneup).
Too bad it didn't come with a generator. I bet Schwinn could add a decent hub generator and front+rear lights for < $300, if they wanted.
I do like used bikes, but I wonder if some of the bike flippers really know how cheap the bikes they're flipping actually are.
Still, there should be good hybrids out there around $100 (needing a tuneup).
#22
Virgo
Tire sizing is very confusing. The best explanation is here on Sheldon Brown's site, though it doesn't make a complex system simple, because it can't.
Briefly, even Europe used inches to describe tire sizes. The stupidity started when the size referred to the outside diameter of the inflated tire rather than the rim size. On a given rim, you can switch tires and get a much different diameter, so that's really dumb. Then eventually, the sizes we had referred to what USED TO BE the size of the tire.
700c and 29er both refer to rims with a bead seat diameter (BSD) of 622mm. That's weird because 700c is slightly smaller than 27" wheels with have a BSD of 630mm. And Europeans refer to 700c as 28", which, again, is smaller in actual size than 27".
In England, there was a so-called 28" size whose BSD is 735mm, only slightly larger than 27" (630mm), and 5mm is nowhere near an inch.
700mm is kinda-sorta close to 27", so we have 700c, but 700a, 700b, and 700d are never used as designations.
650mm is kinda-sorta close to 26", and there are lots of 26" tires, some of which use a 650 designation, and this does not help! 650a has a BSD of 590mm, and this is what English 3-speed and many other bikes use. It's often called 26x1-3/8". Some other sizes are also called 26x1-3/8" which is enough to drive people mad. 650b is 584mm. 650c (with 571mm BSD) came into style a few years ago as narrow-tired racing bikes for shorter people. It was a good idea, but bike makers found it too expensive to have different sizes, so now shorter people have to go back to racing bikes with 700c wheels, even though the fit is not optimal. Then there is the MTB style 26" which is much smaller than all of the 650 designations, as the BSD is 559mm.
Also, some inch sizes are expressed with decimal fractions and some with simple fractions. Do not interchange these with numeric equivalents, because types of fractions IMPLIES the BSD. So you can have 26x1.375" but that is not 26x1-3/8.
Are you crazy yet?
Briefly, even Europe used inches to describe tire sizes. The stupidity started when the size referred to the outside diameter of the inflated tire rather than the rim size. On a given rim, you can switch tires and get a much different diameter, so that's really dumb. Then eventually, the sizes we had referred to what USED TO BE the size of the tire.
700c and 29er both refer to rims with a bead seat diameter (BSD) of 622mm. That's weird because 700c is slightly smaller than 27" wheels with have a BSD of 630mm. And Europeans refer to 700c as 28", which, again, is smaller in actual size than 27".
In England, there was a so-called 28" size whose BSD is 735mm, only slightly larger than 27" (630mm), and 5mm is nowhere near an inch.
700mm is kinda-sorta close to 27", so we have 700c, but 700a, 700b, and 700d are never used as designations.
650mm is kinda-sorta close to 26", and there are lots of 26" tires, some of which use a 650 designation, and this does not help! 650a has a BSD of 590mm, and this is what English 3-speed and many other bikes use. It's often called 26x1-3/8". Some other sizes are also called 26x1-3/8" which is enough to drive people mad. 650b is 584mm. 650c (with 571mm BSD) came into style a few years ago as narrow-tired racing bikes for shorter people. It was a good idea, but bike makers found it too expensive to have different sizes, so now shorter people have to go back to racing bikes with 700c wheels, even though the fit is not optimal. Then there is the MTB style 26" which is much smaller than all of the 650 designations, as the BSD is 559mm.
Also, some inch sizes are expressed with decimal fractions and some with simple fractions. Do not interchange these with numeric equivalents, because types of fractions IMPLIES the BSD. So you can have 26x1.375" but that is not 26x1-3/8.
Are you crazy yet?
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Wow! I thought I had it all figured out assuming three basic sizes with different names.
I knew the following:
1. 700 = c = 29"
2. 650 = b = 27.5"
3. 600 = a = 26"
Then I found out about 28" being the same as 29" as well as adding 622 into the mix. I didn't understand, but accepted it. Now I read your post and am scratching my head again. To answer your question, I think the people who are responsible for this mess are the people who are crazy
I knew the following:
1. 700 = c = 29"
2. 650 = b = 27.5"
3. 600 = a = 26"
Then I found out about 28" being the same as 29" as well as adding 622 into the mix. I didn't understand, but accepted it. Now I read your post and am scratching my head again. To answer your question, I think the people who are responsible for this mess are the people who are crazy
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Now that winter is almost over and the Schwinn Commuter will soon be going into storage, I figured I would update everyone. Overall, this bike performed its intended purpose without any mishaps. I did my best to keep it maintained, but the chain & cogs are a bit rusty. Everything has been coated in salt laden slush multiple times throughout the season. My biggest concern is the crank having some play in it. The LBS was closed for the season and I don't have the tools to address it, so I won't know the cause for a few more weeks.
With this being said, I got my gravel bike out yesterday for the commute to work. It was likely the most blissful ride I can remember. While commuting through the winter was more of a rewarding challenge, being on a decent quality bike in nice weather is a euphoric feeling that I had forgotten existed. IMO the Schwinn is worth exactly what I paid for it. I consider it to be a cheap tool for a specialized job. When it becomes more expensive to fix than it is worth, I will have no issue retiring it.
With this being said, I got my gravel bike out yesterday for the commute to work. It was likely the most blissful ride I can remember. While commuting through the winter was more of a rewarding challenge, being on a decent quality bike in nice weather is a euphoric feeling that I had forgotten existed. IMO the Schwinn is worth exactly what I paid for it. I consider it to be a cheap tool for a specialized job. When it becomes more expensive to fix than it is worth, I will have no issue retiring it.
#25
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,470 Times
in
1,435 Posts
How did the brakes work out, @medic75? And play in the crank is bad. It causes worn out bearings. The sooner you fix it, the lower the chance that you've damaged the cups or axle or both.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.