Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

VO2 Max/FTP Tests: Indoor Trainer or Outdoors?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

VO2 Max/FTP Tests: Indoor Trainer or Outdoors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-10, 09:57 AM
  #1  
FlashBazbo
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
 
FlashBazbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,288
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 983 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times in 94 Posts
VO2 Max/FTP Tests: Indoor Trainer or Outdoors?

I'm comng up on my first serious FTP and VO2 Max power tests. I've been thinking about where to do these, and the following come to mind:

1. Indoor trainer -- Very easy to repeat all the conditions of the test every time you re-test. But, probably pretty difficult to get and keep the effort at VO2 Max for the duration of the test. (Am I right there?)

2. Outdoors -- Find a big hill and the VO2 Max effort will be easy to attain and maintain. But, very difficult -- maybe impossible --to get good repeatability of testing conditions (wind, temperature, traffic, dogs, sun/cloud/radiant heat, etc.).

For those who train with power and who are serious about getting good test data -- how do the plusses and minusses balance out? I like riding outdoors better, but "like" doesn't necessarily get you the best data. If you have a choice, what do you do?
FlashBazbo is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 10:04 AM
  #2  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,304

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 728 Times in 373 Posts
Personally, I prefer to test outdoors. You're trainging to ride outdoors, so the test should replicate what you're trianing for.

Also for me, my FTP is always higher testing outdoors than in.

Find a good course without traffic control devices, and low traffic, and the various confounders shouldn't be a big issue.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 10:47 AM
  #3  
grwoolf
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,272
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I test indoors on my rollers because for me it's more critical to get a good comparison between tests. If my ftp shows a little low compared to outside, that is fine as long as it's consistent.
grwoolf is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 10:51 AM
  #4  
kleinboogie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,606
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I did both and my trainer FTP was higher. Don't know why. Maybe because it was easier to focus on my technique whereas outside I also had to pay attention to the environment. GL
kleinboogie is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 10:53 AM
  #5  
RC5AL Rider
Member
 
RC5AL Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
how you gonna measure it outdoors? or indoors for that matter?
RC5AL Rider is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 11:08 AM
  #6  
jrobe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,501
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times in 22 Posts
I bought the Carmichael Training System (CTS) progressive Power DVD series to do on the trainer in the winters and he uses an indoor 8 minute FTP test (instead of a 20 min test) to establish the different training zones and to measure progress. This works much better for me on the trainer. It is torture to do a 20 min test on the trainer but 8 minutes is pretty doable.

I have easy to access to very quiet country roads but it still is difficult to find a 20 minute outdoor section of roads without interuptions (stop signs, intersections, wind, no downhill sections, etc.). There are definitely advantages to indoor testing.
jrobe is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 11:22 AM
  #7  
gregf83 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Outdoors. Who wants to sit inside in the summer sweating buckets? As long as you use the same course every time it's accurate enough for an FTP test. 5 or 10 Watts either way is not going to make a significant difference in how you train anyways.

As far as a VO2Max test, I always assumed you needed to do that in a lab.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 11:30 AM
  #8  
colombo357
Senior Member
 
colombo357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Murica
Posts: 2,284
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 12 Posts
Stationary trainer on the back of a pickup truck. Best of both worlds.
colombo357 is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 11:48 AM
  #9  
thump55
I got 99 problems....
 
thump55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Does anyone know where the love of God goes, when the waves turn the minutes to hours?
Posts: 2,087
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by colombo357
Stationary trainer on the back of a pickup truck. Best of both worlds.
Pure awesome.
thump55 is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 12:19 PM
  #10  
aggro_jo
sittin' in
 
aggro_jo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 518
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
As far as a VO2Max test, I always assumed you needed to do that in a lab.
yup.
aggro_jo is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 12:59 PM
  #11  
FlashBazbo
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
 
FlashBazbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,288
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 983 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times in 94 Posts
To get closer to accurate, you do the VO2 Max test in a lab.

To get an approximation, you do a 5-minute puke-your-guts-out, maximum effort test.
FlashBazbo is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 01:00 PM
  #12  
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
MAP tests on the trainer for me (you need a very controlled environment where training partners can yell at you and tell you when to ramp).

For 20' tests, or any duration tests, it's outside for me. I get consistent results regardless of wind and hills. You should learn to hold power on a descent as long as it's less than ~3%. The only outdoor factor that will really impact results is temperature. God help my power meter if it's raining though, I always fly in the rain.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 01:00 PM
  #13  
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
MAP tests on the trainer for me (you need a very controlled environment where training partners can yell at you and tell you when to ramp).

For 20' tests, or any duration tests, it's outside for me. I get consistent results regardless of wind and hills. You should learn to hold power on a descent as long as it's less than ~3%. The only outdoor factor that will really impact results is temperature. God help my power meter if it's raining though, I always fly in the rain.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 01:00 PM
  #14  
grwoolf
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,272
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
Outdoors. Who wants to sit inside in the summer sweating buckets?
Here in TX, it's hitting 95 and humid every day outside vs. 75 in the house with a huge fan blowing on me. Sweating hapening either way, but it's much easier to keep a consistent body temp indoors test to test.

Originally Posted by gregf83
As long as you use the same course every time it's accurate enough for an FTP test. 5 or 10 Watts either way is not going to make a significant difference in how you train anyways.
My struggle is with traffic lights. I can do a 20 minute ftp test and not hit a single light, or I might hit 5+ of them. All that time at zero watts plus the starting and stopping screw me up. I'd argue it could skew results of a 20' test by more than 10 watts (zeros add up quickly). If you have a nice open road, it's probably easier to be consistent.

Originally Posted by gregf83

As far as a VO2Max test, I always assumed you needed to do that in a lab.
I think OP is referring to VO2 level efforts/intervals, not an actual scientific VO2 test.


The only downside I see to doing tests on a trainer/rollers is that time on my rollers is less fun and mentally harder for me. I'd much rather be riding outside. Also, I can't do effective 1' or 5" tests on my rollers, so I do those outside.
grwoolf is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 02:55 PM
  #15  
bismillah
Senior Member
 
bismillah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
Personally, I prefer to test outdoors. You're trainging to ride outdoors, so the test should replicate what you're trianing for.

Also for me, my FTP is always higher testing outdoors than in.

Find a good course without traffic control devices, and low traffic, and the various confounders shouldn't be a big issue.
+1
bismillah is offline  
Old 06-02-10, 09:29 PM
  #16  
RC5AL Rider
Member
 
RC5AL Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
wingate is a good test of cycling power.

for vo2max the protocol is simple. If you are fit start at 100 watts and increase the workload by 50 watts every 3 minutes.


100, 150, 200, 250, 300, ... If you are in shape and a large person you may go higher. If you are less fit or a small person start at 50 watts and go up 50 every 3 minutes. I am assuming you have an electronic ergometer that will allow you to just set the watts and not worry about rpm.


Last edited by RC5AL Rider; 06-02-10 at 09:32 PM. Reason: typo
RC5AL Rider is offline  
Old 06-04-10, 12:24 PM
  #17  
echappist
fuggitivo solitario
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 9,107
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
is your power higher or lower when you do the test outside?
echappist is offline  
Old 06-06-10, 05:14 PM
  #18  
FlashBazbo
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
 
FlashBazbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,288
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 983 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times in 94 Posts
Now that I've done my first real tests (outdoors), I think doing the test outdoors was a mistake. Here's why:

1. By looking at my previous power files, I was able to estimate my ftp within one (1) watt of what the test revealed. (In other words, all I gained from my test was a sense of certainty about my estimate, plus some fitness.)

2. Outdoor tests aren't repeatable. For that reason, the amount of valuable information you can gain is very limited. Trends mean little, if anything, from one outdoor test to another -- especially as temperatures, winds, clothing, etc. changes. Indoor, on a trainer, I could control time, temperature, wind direction . . . just about everything. Trends revealed on an indoor trainer mean something. The greatest value in trends shown by outdoor tests would seem to be to reveal how temperature and wind impact my power output. I don't need a test to tell me that.

If I want to know trends with any precision, I will do my ftp tests indoors from now on. I'm pretty certain I can estimate my ftp from power files good enough to avoid doing any more outdoor tests.
FlashBazbo is offline  
Old 06-06-10, 05:39 PM
  #19  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,304

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 728 Times in 373 Posts
Originally Posted by FlashBazbo
2. Outdoor tests aren't repeatable. For that reason, the amount of valuable information you can gain is very limited. Trends mean little, if anything, from one outdoor test to another -- especially as temperatures, winds, clothing, etc. changes. Indoor, on a trainer, I could control time, temperature, wind direction . . . just about everything. Trends revealed on an indoor trainer mean something. The greatest value in trends shown by outdoor tests would seem to be to reveal how temperature and wind impact my power output. I don't need a test to tell me that.
The reason to train with a power meter is that it takes most of this out of the equation. All those variable, other than temperature will affect speed, but they shouldn't affect power significantly. If all the variables were consistent, we could just use speed and wouldn't need a power meter. So forget about trends in your speed or time, and look for trends in your power.

I guess I'm fortunate in that I have a loop slightly over a mile with no traffic and essentially flat, so it makes a good place to test.

Assuming you don't have stop for traffic, orr traffic control devices, I do not see abig problem with testing outside.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 06-06-10, 05:43 PM
  #20  
Dubbayoo
Senior Member
 
Dubbayoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,681

Bikes: Pedal Force QS3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I test indoors because I do my power training indoors.
Dubbayoo is offline  
Old 06-06-10, 07:38 PM
  #21  
aham23
grilled cheesus
 
aham23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 8675309
Posts: 6,957

Bikes: 2010 CAAD9 Custom, 06 Giant TCR C2 & 05 Specialized Hardrock Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
The reason to train with a power meter is that it takes most of this out of the equation. All those variable, other than temperature will affect speed, but they shouldn't affect power significantly. If all the variables were consistent, we could just use speed and wouldn't need a power meter. So forget about trends in your speed or time, and look for trends in your power.

I guess I'm fortunate in that I have a loop slightly over a mile with no traffic and essentially flat, so it makes a good place to test.

Assuming you don't have stop for traffic, orr traffic control devices, I do not see abig problem with testing outside.
this is good advice. later.
__________________
aham23 is offline  
Old 06-06-10, 07:57 PM
  #22  
FlashBazbo
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
 
FlashBazbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,288
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 983 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times in 94 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
The reason to train with a power meter is that it takes most of this out of the equation. All those variable, other than temperature will affect speed, but they shouldn't affect power significantly. If all the variables were consistent, we could just use speed and wouldn't need a power meter. So forget about trends in your speed or time, and look for trends in your power.

I guess I'm fortunate in that I have a loop slightly over a mile with no traffic and essentially flat, so it makes a good place to test.

Assuming you don't have stop for traffic, orr traffic control devices, I do not see abig problem with testing outside.
Merlin, I mean no offense, but you need to study your power readouts more closely. All of the named variables have an impact on power -- and you'd obviously be surprised how much they can impact your power levels on a given ride. There is a big difference between generating power against a 20 mph wind and generating power with a 20 mph wind. It's not just about speed. Temperature and clothing impact your body and, hence, your power level, too. Check it out.
FlashBazbo is offline  
Old 06-06-10, 08:02 PM
  #23  
nitropowered
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Athens, Ohio
Posts: 5,104

Bikes: Custom Custom Custom

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
If you have a mobile VO2 max testing rig that is awesome. I'm sure you don't so best bet is to do your stuff out doors.

Find a road that you can get 20 minutes in uninterrupted. use that, make sure everything is the same, food you eat the morning of, warmup protocol, etc
nitropowered is offline  
Old 06-06-10, 08:22 PM
  #24  
aham23
grilled cheesus
 
aham23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 8675309
Posts: 6,957

Bikes: 2010 CAAD9 Custom, 06 Giant TCR C2 & 05 Specialized Hardrock Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by FlashBazbo
Merlin, I mean no offense, but you need to study your power readouts more closely. All of the named variables have an impact on power -- and you'd obviously be surprised how much they can impact your power levels on a given ride. There is a big difference between generating power against a 20 mph wind and generating power with a 20 mph wind. It's not just about speed. Temperature and clothing impact your body and, hence, your power level, too. Check it out.
you swung and missed. the point that is. power is power. you can test outside no matter the conditions. wind nor rain nor heat nor hill nor mountain, nor whatever.

400 watts is 400 watts. it doesnt matter if you do it into a 20 mph head wind or with the same mph tail wind.

the first time i tested my FTP outside i did it into a head wind. i picked a pretty open and straight stretch section of road and hammered it into a 22 mph head wind. before i knew it the 20 minutes were over and i had a new 20 minute high. avg speed was super low though.

20 minutes inside never goes by fast. later.
__________________
aham23 is offline  
Old 06-06-10, 11:10 PM
  #25  
loreley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 166
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FlashBazbo
Merlin, I mean no offense, but you need to study your power readouts more closely. All of the named variables have an impact on power -- and you'd obviously be surprised how much they can impact your power levels on a given ride. There is a big difference between generating power against a 20 mph wind and generating power with a 20 mph wind. It's not just about speed. Temperature and clothing impact your body and, hence, your power level, too. Check it out.

Nope Merlin is right.
loreley is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.