Orthodoxy Part 1
Likes For cudak888:
Likes For garryg:
12-27-20, 03:14 PM
#28
Senior Member
The OP has a overall point about orthodoxy , and specific to Centurion SN, a good point.
In fact there WAS a bunch of "orthodoxy" on Centurion Ironman.
Also, wake me up when it's 2021.
In fact there WAS a bunch of "orthodoxy" on Centurion Ironman.
Also, wake me up when it's 2021.
12-27-20, 03:32 PM
#29
Member
Part 3: lost me all together, much like why there should never be sequels to great movies
Listen fellas, I love this sight because I can come on here and scroll through cool old bike parts and think of what I can do with them. I can see someones cool rebuild and be inspired. Or I can scroll through great questions about info someone is needing, or a great observation that can be added to a huge database of most other guys that know freaking alot more about this than I do, and I have just been riding 35yr now.
I'm no attorney, actually never wanted to be and when my lovely wife of 31 years starts talking about word usage and splitting hairs about serial numbers intentions....I'm sorry, I'm gonna take a nap
Listen fellas, I love this sight because I can come on here and scroll through cool old bike parts and think of what I can do with them. I can see someones cool rebuild and be inspired. Or I can scroll through great questions about info someone is needing, or a great observation that can be added to a huge database of most other guys that know freaking alot more about this than I do, and I have just been riding 35yr now.
I'm no attorney, actually never wanted to be and when my lovely wife of 31 years starts talking about word usage and splitting hairs about serial numbers intentions....I'm sorry, I'm gonna take a nap
Likes For mosinglespeeder:
12-27-20, 04:01 PM
#30
Senior Member
I thought the letter referred to the manufacturer. I do have a mid 80's Centurion with no letter in the serial number at all. That doesn't seem to be very orthodox.
I do like the way the OP put it in layman's terms. I've had trouble sleeping lately. This thread however, makes me want to lay down and snooze.
I do like the way the OP put it in layman's terms. I've had trouble sleeping lately. This thread however, makes me want to lay down and snooze.
12-27-20, 04:08 PM
#31
Used to be Conspiratemus
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,488
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 281 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
154 Posts
Originally Posted by nlerner
I really don’t think that something is perceived to be a fact because it gets published in a book. Well, maybe some will perceive it that way, but authors have little control over readers’ interpretations.
. . .
Helpful text on this topic is Stephen Jay Gould’s Mismeasure of Man.
. . .
Helpful text on this topic is Stephen Jay Gould’s Mismeasure of Man.
12-27-20, 04:19 PM
#32
Used to be Conspiratemus
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,488
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 281 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
154 Posts
Originally Posted by masi61
There was a recent thread talking about "thread stoppers" or "thread killers" and to be honest I never even got around to reading that thread. . . .
Likes For conspiratemus1:
12-28-20, 12:19 AM
#33
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 25,836
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1234 Post(s)
Liked 1,271 Times
in
777 Posts
TL, DR:
OP disagrees on some of the finer points of Japanese bike serials and wants to know the sources of the information.
/thread
-Kurt
OP disagrees on some of the finer points of Japanese bike serials and wants to know the sources of the information.
/thread
-Kurt
__________________
Likes For cudak888:
12-28-20, 11:21 AM
#34
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Part 4. Korn Ferry Institute
I forgot to assign this as homework yesterday.
Here is a link to "Georgena Terry's Long-Distance Ride", you can read it and see what you think.
https://issuu.com/kornferryinternati...-distance_ride
If at some point this link no longer works I have a copy of the article and can forward that to you.
I know that most vintage bicycle fans know what the Korn Ferry Institute is about, but for those of you who do not:
https://www.kornferry.com/about-us
"Korn Ferry is a global organizational consulting firm
We work with clients to design their organizational structures, roles and responsibilities.
We help them hire the right people and advise them on how to reward, develop and motivate their workforce.
And, we help professionals navigate and advance their careers."
Hmmmm. You just know your going to learn about vintage bicycles and the bicycle industry from this company.
The article, "Georgena Terry's Long-Distance Ride", was written by Lawrence M. Fisher.
"Lawrence M. Fisher has written for the New York Times, Strategy + Business and many other publications.
He is based in San Francisco."
https://www.kornferry.com/about-us/c...lawrencefisher
https://www.strategy-business.com/au...ence+M.+Fisher
He does not appear to have written anything about the bicycle industry prior to this.
In the link, the article is dated April 1, 2011. April Fools day. From the images the article was published 2Q 2011.
The article is in the Cool Companies section. The article is about the career of Georgena Terry and there are some references to the bicycle industry.
The section of the article sub-headed "The Booming '80s" is where the references to H. Tano and Company are. In one sentence before the references to H. Tano and Company the author says,
"Japanese manufacturers, like Nishiki and Bridgestone, faced off with new American brands, like Trek Bicycles and Cannondale Bicycle,
for the cycling enthusist's dollar, while venerable European makes, like Raleigh and Peugeot, faded."
Four paragraphs later the author clearly says "Terry's Japanese manufacturer, H. Tano and Company of Kobe, also produced bikes for Western States Imports, ...".
One can tell that Mr. Lawrence Fisher knocked himself out doing research about the bicycle industry in the 1980s prior to sitting down and writing this article.
"Japanese manufacturers, like Nishiki". Really.
I always thought that Nishiki was a brand name. Well I stand corrected.
We should all just ignore the previous reports about Kawamura Sangyo manufacturing bicycles and putting the "Nishiki" brand on them for West Coast Cycle Supply Company.
How did the author know that H. Tano and Company manufactured bicycles? The same way that he knew that Nishiki was a Japanese manufacturer?
I have my doubts about the research used in this article, but you decide for yourself.
This article was published more than 5 years after member @T-Mar's first assertion of "reportedly Tano" in February 2006.
The author may have done research and used information which included the idea of H. Tano and Co. as manufacturer which originated in bikeforums.net.
Was the author using his own research that referenced bikeforms.net? or
Was the author quoting or summarizing someone else who had read the Tano references in bikeforms.net?
If so, then someone in bikeforums.net referenced this article on the idea that "Tano manufactured", it would be a circular reference.
Is the Korn Ferry Institute article a credible confirmation of H. Tano and Company being a bicycle manufacturing company?
You will have to decide for yourself.
- - - -
Once again ladies and gentlemen, we kindly ask that you hold your questions until the end.
There will be a question and answer period following the presentation.
Also please keep conversations in the audience to a minimum as it distracts others who may be enjoying the presentation.
- - -
"If you can put up with that you can put up with anything."
Johnny Rotten on stage at the Winterland Ballroom, San Francisco, California 01/14/78
Here is a link to "Georgena Terry's Long-Distance Ride", you can read it and see what you think.
https://issuu.com/kornferryinternati...-distance_ride
If at some point this link no longer works I have a copy of the article and can forward that to you.
I know that most vintage bicycle fans know what the Korn Ferry Institute is about, but for those of you who do not:
https://www.kornferry.com/about-us
"Korn Ferry is a global organizational consulting firm
We work with clients to design their organizational structures, roles and responsibilities.
We help them hire the right people and advise them on how to reward, develop and motivate their workforce.
And, we help professionals navigate and advance their careers."
Hmmmm. You just know your going to learn about vintage bicycles and the bicycle industry from this company.
The article, "Georgena Terry's Long-Distance Ride", was written by Lawrence M. Fisher.
"Lawrence M. Fisher has written for the New York Times, Strategy + Business and many other publications.
He is based in San Francisco."
https://www.kornferry.com/about-us/c...lawrencefisher
https://www.strategy-business.com/au...ence+M.+Fisher
He does not appear to have written anything about the bicycle industry prior to this.
In the link, the article is dated April 1, 2011. April Fools day. From the images the article was published 2Q 2011.
The article is in the Cool Companies section. The article is about the career of Georgena Terry and there are some references to the bicycle industry.
The section of the article sub-headed "The Booming '80s" is where the references to H. Tano and Company are. In one sentence before the references to H. Tano and Company the author says,
"Japanese manufacturers, like Nishiki and Bridgestone, faced off with new American brands, like Trek Bicycles and Cannondale Bicycle,
for the cycling enthusist's dollar, while venerable European makes, like Raleigh and Peugeot, faded."
Four paragraphs later the author clearly says "Terry's Japanese manufacturer, H. Tano and Company of Kobe, also produced bikes for Western States Imports, ...".
One can tell that Mr. Lawrence Fisher knocked himself out doing research about the bicycle industry in the 1980s prior to sitting down and writing this article.
"Japanese manufacturers, like Nishiki". Really.
I always thought that Nishiki was a brand name. Well I stand corrected.
We should all just ignore the previous reports about Kawamura Sangyo manufacturing bicycles and putting the "Nishiki" brand on them for West Coast Cycle Supply Company.
How did the author know that H. Tano and Company manufactured bicycles? The same way that he knew that Nishiki was a Japanese manufacturer?
I have my doubts about the research used in this article, but you decide for yourself.
This article was published more than 5 years after member @T-Mar's first assertion of "reportedly Tano" in February 2006.
The author may have done research and used information which included the idea of H. Tano and Co. as manufacturer which originated in bikeforums.net.
Was the author using his own research that referenced bikeforms.net? or
Was the author quoting or summarizing someone else who had read the Tano references in bikeforms.net?
If so, then someone in bikeforums.net referenced this article on the idea that "Tano manufactured", it would be a circular reference.
Is the Korn Ferry Institute article a credible confirmation of H. Tano and Company being a bicycle manufacturing company?
You will have to decide for yourself.
- - - -
Once again ladies and gentlemen, we kindly ask that you hold your questions until the end.
There will be a question and answer period following the presentation.
Also please keep conversations in the audience to a minimum as it distracts others who may be enjoying the presentation.
- - -
"If you can put up with that you can put up with anything."
Johnny Rotten on stage at the Winterland Ballroom, San Francisco, California 01/14/78
Likes For Hummer:
12-28-20, 11:36 AM
#35
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 25,836
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1234 Post(s)
Liked 1,271 Times
in
777 Posts
How about asking @T-Mar himself? He's obviously well versed in the history that he brings to this forum and doesn't have anything to hide by explaining how he has come of his information.
Hint: He has probably spent much effort and many hours of reaching out directly to the people who were involved in the development and import of these products, or making contacts up the pecking order until he could get the ear of the people who were there BITD and have the answers. Their non-disclosure agreements have long since expired, so the information can be freely shared.
That, of course, is a guess - but it is how I've learned a lot about the history of many bike share programs. Most NDAs haven't expired in that field either, making it exceptionally difficult to learn about those bikes.
I can appreciate your desire to learn more about where this information has come from, but you aren't going to get an answer by basically backstabbing him in public, framing a conspiracy theory around him, and blaming him for underachieving journalists who make errors in secondary research by leeching off his writings.
I've done some - though far less - research than T-Mar, and reading your four Theories of Orthodoxy give me sympathy pains for him. @nlerner delivered his criticism of my serial charts with dignity and fact. You, on the other hand, are - well, there's no other way to say it - being an arse about it.
Maybe you don't think of it that way, but that's the way it reads. Especially since your attempt to control the conversations also, in effect, allows you to play judge, jury, and executioner.
If you'd like to know how he came about his information, start by showing a bit of respect. He's not going to give you the time of day the way you're going about it.
There isn't anyone here enjoying the presentation except you, and a few who are getting a whole lot of unintentional laughs out of it.
-Kurt
Hint: He has probably spent much effort and many hours of reaching out directly to the people who were involved in the development and import of these products, or making contacts up the pecking order until he could get the ear of the people who were there BITD and have the answers. Their non-disclosure agreements have long since expired, so the information can be freely shared.
That, of course, is a guess - but it is how I've learned a lot about the history of many bike share programs. Most NDAs haven't expired in that field either, making it exceptionally difficult to learn about those bikes.
I can appreciate your desire to learn more about where this information has come from, but you aren't going to get an answer by basically backstabbing him in public, framing a conspiracy theory around him, and blaming him for underachieving journalists who make errors in secondary research by leeching off his writings.
I've done some - though far less - research than T-Mar, and reading your four Theories of Orthodoxy give me sympathy pains for him. @nlerner delivered his criticism of my serial charts with dignity and fact. You, on the other hand, are - well, there's no other way to say it - being an arse about it.
Maybe you don't think of it that way, but that's the way it reads. Especially since your attempt to control the conversations also, in effect, allows you to play judge, jury, and executioner.
If you'd like to know how he came about his information, start by showing a bit of respect. He's not going to give you the time of day the way you're going about it.
Originally Posted by Hummer
Also please keep conversations in the audience to a minimum as it distracts others who may be enjoying the presentation.
There isn't anyone here enjoying the presentation except you, and a few who are getting a whole lot of unintentional laughs out of it.
-Kurt
__________________
Last edited by cudak888; 12-28-20 at 03:11 PM.
Likes For cudak888:
12-28-20, 12:33 PM
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Washington County, Vermont, USA
Posts: 3,281
Bikes: 1966 Dawes Double Blue, 1976 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1975 Raleigh Sprite 27, 1980 Univega Viva Sport, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1984 Lotus Classique, 1976 Motobecane Grand Record
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 495 Post(s)
Liked 215 Times
in
118 Posts
I'm in agreement with the views expressed in post #36, above. The OP seems to raise a valid question or two, but his patronizing attitude is offensive and inconsistent with the spirit of honest inquiry that has always prevailed around here. I would add that anyone who makes a public issue of misspellings or typos in another's posts would do well to proofread his own posts before pushing the "submit" button.
__________________
www.redclovercomponents.com
"Progress might have been all right once, but it has gone on too long."
--Ogden Nash
www.redclovercomponents.com
"Progress might have been all right once, but it has gone on too long."
--Ogden Nash
Last edited by jonwvara; 12-28-20 at 03:34 PM.
Likes For jonwvara:
12-28-20, 03:02 PM
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,155
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 627 Post(s)
Liked 427 Times
in
234 Posts
BF Orthodoxy:
-my chain lube is better than yours.
-Schwinn Varsity’s are effective boat anchors
-my chain lube is better than yours.
-Schwinn Varsity’s are effective boat anchors
Likes For OldsCOOL:
12-28-20, 03:17 PM
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 2,269
Bikes: CURRENT: '82 Univega Competizione, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '74 Campania Professional, '83 Mercian KOM Touring, '91 Univega Alpina Comp PAST: '72 Puch Bergmeister, '72ish Peugeot UO-8, '86 Univega Gran Premio, '85 Univega Viva Touring
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 704 Post(s)
Liked 468 Times
in
318 Posts
Agreeing with others that "tribunal" is a weird choice to present this extended counterpoint. It's not like T-Mar is a paid researcher for the Institute on Bicycle Arcana for Limited Audiences. I'm more likely to say "thank you" and contribute where I can. But whatever, it's your time and social capital, do with it what you will.
Likes For noobinsf:
12-28-20, 03:21 PM
#39
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,589
Bikes: 1985 Trek 620 - 25.5"
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1175 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times
in
396 Posts
This has been the toughest assemblage of words to read (let alone comprehend) that I've read in some time. I'd advise putting down the shovel.
Likes For RiddleOfSteel:
12-28-20, 04:01 PM
#40
In a Land Without Winter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,750
Bikes: Schwinn Volare ('78); Raleigh Competition GS ('79)
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 644 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
167 Posts
What's amazing to me is the level of effort put into refuting what may be the most obscure little serial number side-note ever posited.
That said, being amazed is fun.
Do please continue.
That said, being amazed is fun.
Do please continue.
__________________
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
Likes For Fahrenheit531:
12-28-20, 04:28 PM
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,434
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 422 Post(s)
Liked 834 Times
in
422 Posts
Never underestimate the ability of pedantic nonsense to suck the fun out of ANY pursuit.
Seems to be an abundance of that on this forum lately.
Still plenty of fantastic threads and contributing members to out weigh the ill effects of the joy vacuum.
Seems to be an abundance of that on this forum lately.
Still plenty of fantastic threads and contributing members to out weigh the ill effects of the joy vacuum.
Likes For BFisher:
12-28-20, 04:29 PM
#42
Youngman Grand
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,003
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1592 Post(s)
Liked 669 Times
in
450 Posts
Most of the regulars here are enthusiasts and openly relate their extensive experiences to others who ask. Sometimes we're in error.
You should write a paper or book about the industry in the 80's. Just don't make the mistake of relying on internet sources and attribution without attempting to do real research and ask the people who were very involved with the industry in that time frame. Like T-Mar and many others here.
We are the orthodoxy and hereby command that we put thee on a scale to see if you weigh the same as a duck. If so, you will be burned as a witch.
Is the Korn Ferry Institute article a credible confirmation of H. Tano and Company being a bicycle manufacturing company?
You will have to decide for yourself.
- - - -
Once again ladies and gentlemen, we kindly ask that you hold your questions until the end.
There will be a question and answer period following the presentation.
Also please keep conversations in the audience to a minimum as it distracts others who may be enjoying the presentation.
- - -
"If you can put up with that you can put up with anything."
Johnny Rotten on stage at the Winterland Ballroom, San Francisco, California 01/14/78
You should write a paper or book about the industry in the 80's. Just don't make the mistake of relying on internet sources and attribution without attempting to do real research and ask the people who were very involved with the industry in that time frame. Like T-Mar and many others here.
We are the orthodoxy and hereby command that we put thee on a scale to see if you weigh the same as a duck. If so, you will be burned as a witch.
Originally Posted by Hummer
Is the Korn Ferry Institute article a credible confirmation of H. Tano and Company being a bicycle manufacturing company?
You will have to decide for yourself.
- - - -
Once again ladies and gentlemen, we kindly ask that you hold your questions until the end.
There will be a question and answer period following the presentation.
Also please keep conversations in the audience to a minimum as it distracts others who may be enjoying the presentation.
- - -
"If you can put up with that you can put up with anything."
Johnny Rotten on stage at the Winterland Ballroom, San Francisco, California 01/14/78
Likes For clubman:
12-28-20, 04:44 PM
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 2,269
Bikes: CURRENT: '82 Univega Competizione, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '74 Campania Professional, '83 Mercian KOM Touring, '91 Univega Alpina Comp PAST: '72 Puch Bergmeister, '72ish Peugeot UO-8, '86 Univega Gran Premio, '85 Univega Viva Touring
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 704 Post(s)
Liked 468 Times
in
318 Posts
Originally Posted by BFisher
joy vacuum.
Likes For noobinsf:
12-28-20, 05:24 PM
#44
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,297
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,368 Times
in
882 Posts
Originally Posted by Hummer
Begin the experiment.
I have been a member of bikeforums.net for several years.
In that time I have seen different ideas presented in threads.
These ideas are sometimes repeated or quoted in other threads by other members.
Eventually some of these ideas are taken as fact, probably because they have been repeated so many times.
These ideas take on an orthodoxy and it becomes difficult for any member to dispute or argue against.
Some of these ideas, which may have started in this forum, even move beyond this forum and are put forward as fact in publications and other websites.
This is in fact why I am writing this series of articles.
Recently I have read in two separate places where an orthodox idea from bikeforums.net, which has not been fully verified, has been published.
This idea will no doubt be considered a fact because it is published in a book.
Sometimes on this forum I read posts that state something that does not sound quite right or does not fit with things that I have observed.
I want to say something about the questionable idea but I do not have anything concrete to counter with or the argument against the idea is complex and cannot be easily presented by me in a sentence or a paragraph.
What to do when you want to question orthodox beliefs?
Over the next days I intend to put forward information that challenges two ideas that have been present in the bikeforums.net for more than a decade.
These ideas relate to the origin and serial numbers of vintage Japanese bicycles largely associated with one brand name, Centurion from Western States Imports.
- - - -
There will be a question and answer period at the end of the presentation. We kindly ask that you hold your questions until that time.
- - - -
"Do you want your ears blown out some more?"
Johnny Rotten on stage at the Winterland Ballroom, San Francisco, California 01/14/78
I have been a member of bikeforums.net for several years.
In that time I have seen different ideas presented in threads.
These ideas are sometimes repeated or quoted in other threads by other members.
Eventually some of these ideas are taken as fact, probably because they have been repeated so many times.
These ideas take on an orthodoxy and it becomes difficult for any member to dispute or argue against.
Some of these ideas, which may have started in this forum, even move beyond this forum and are put forward as fact in publications and other websites.
This is in fact why I am writing this series of articles.
Recently I have read in two separate places where an orthodox idea from bikeforums.net, which has not been fully verified, has been published.
This idea will no doubt be considered a fact because it is published in a book.
Sometimes on this forum I read posts that state something that does not sound quite right or does not fit with things that I have observed.
I want to say something about the questionable idea but I do not have anything concrete to counter with or the argument against the idea is complex and cannot be easily presented by me in a sentence or a paragraph.
What to do when you want to question orthodox beliefs?
Over the next days I intend to put forward information that challenges two ideas that have been present in the bikeforums.net for more than a decade.
These ideas relate to the origin and serial numbers of vintage Japanese bicycles largely associated with one brand name, Centurion from Western States Imports.
- - - -
There will be a question and answer period at the end of the presentation. We kindly ask that you hold your questions until that time.
- - - -
"Do you want your ears blown out some more?"
Johnny Rotten on stage at the Winterland Ballroom, San Francisco, California 01/14/78
Likes For RobbieTunes:
12-28-20, 05:28 PM
#45
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,297
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,368 Times
in
882 Posts
Originally Posted by Hummer
I forgot to assign this as homework yesterday.
Here is a link to "Georgena Terry's Long-Distance Ride", you can read it and see what you think.
https://issuu.com/kornferryinternati...-distance_ride
If at some point this link no longer works I have a copy of the article and can forward that to you.
I know that most vintage bicycle fans know what the Korn Ferry Institute is about, but for those of you who do not:
https://www.kornferry.com/about-us
"Korn Ferry is a global organizational consulting firm
We work with clients to design their organizational structures, roles and responsibilities.
We help them hire the right people and advise them on how to reward, develop and motivate their workforce.
And, we help professionals navigate and advance their careers."
Hmmmm. You just know your going to learn about vintage bicycles and the bicycle industry from this company.
The article, "Georgena Terry's Long-Distance Ride", was written by Lawrence M. Fisher.
"Lawrence M. Fisher has written for the New York Times, Strategy + Business and many other publications.
He is based in San Francisco."
https://www.kornferry.com/about-us/c...lawrencefisher
https://www.strategy-business.com/au...ence+M.+Fisher
He does not appear to have written anything about the bicycle industry prior to this.
In the link, the article is dated April 1, 2011. April Fools day. From the images the article was published 2Q 2011.
The article is in the Cool Companies section. The article is about the career of Georgena Terry and there are some references to the bicycle industry.
The section of the article sub-headed "The Booming '80s" is where the references to H. Tano and Company are. In one sentence before the references to H. Tano and Company the author says,
"Japanese manufacturers, like Nishiki and Bridgestone, faced off with new American brands, like Trek Bicycles and Cannondale Bicycle,
for the cycling enthusist's dollar, while venerable European makes, like Raleigh and Peugeot, faded."
Four paragraphs later the author clearly says "Terry's Japanese manufacturer, H. Tano and Company of Kobe, also produced bikes for Western States Imports, ...".
One can tell that Mr. Lawrence Fisher knocked himself out doing research about the bicycle industry in the 1980s prior to sitting down and writing this article.
"Japanese manufacturers, like Nishiki". Really.
I always thought that Nishiki was a brand name. Well I stand corrected.
We should all just ignore the previous reports about Kawamura Sangyo manufacturing bicycles and putting the "Nishiki" brand on them for West Coast Cycle Supply Company.
How did the author know that H. Tano and Company manufactured bicycles? The same way that he knew that Nishiki was a Japanese manufacturer?
I have my doubts about the research used in this article, but you decide for yourself.
This article was published more than 5 years after member @T-Mar's first assertion of "reportedly Tano" in February 2006.
The author may have done research and used information which included the idea of H. Tano and Co. as manufacturer which originated in bikeforums.net.
Was the author using his own research that referenced bikeforms.net? or
Was the author quoting or summarizing someone else who had read the Tano references in bikeforms.net?
If so, then someone in bikeforums.net referenced this article on the idea that "Tano manufactured", it would be a circular reference.
Is the Korn Ferry Institute article a credible confirmation of H. Tano and Company being a bicycle manufacturing company?
You will have to decide for yourself.
- - - -
Once again ladies and gentlemen, we kindly ask that you hold your questions until the end.
There will be a question and answer period following the presentation.
Also please keep conversations in the audience to a minimum as it distracts others who may be enjoying the presentation.
- - -
"If you can put up with that you can put up with anything."
Johnny Rotten on stage at the Winterland Ballroom, San Francisco, California 01/14/78
Here is a link to "Georgena Terry's Long-Distance Ride", you can read it and see what you think.
https://issuu.com/kornferryinternati...-distance_ride
If at some point this link no longer works I have a copy of the article and can forward that to you.
I know that most vintage bicycle fans know what the Korn Ferry Institute is about, but for those of you who do not:
https://www.kornferry.com/about-us
"Korn Ferry is a global organizational consulting firm
We work with clients to design their organizational structures, roles and responsibilities.
We help them hire the right people and advise them on how to reward, develop and motivate their workforce.
And, we help professionals navigate and advance their careers."
Hmmmm. You just know your going to learn about vintage bicycles and the bicycle industry from this company.
The article, "Georgena Terry's Long-Distance Ride", was written by Lawrence M. Fisher.
"Lawrence M. Fisher has written for the New York Times, Strategy + Business and many other publications.
He is based in San Francisco."
https://www.kornferry.com/about-us/c...lawrencefisher
https://www.strategy-business.com/au...ence+M.+Fisher
He does not appear to have written anything about the bicycle industry prior to this.
In the link, the article is dated April 1, 2011. April Fools day. From the images the article was published 2Q 2011.
The article is in the Cool Companies section. The article is about the career of Georgena Terry and there are some references to the bicycle industry.
The section of the article sub-headed "The Booming '80s" is where the references to H. Tano and Company are. In one sentence before the references to H. Tano and Company the author says,
"Japanese manufacturers, like Nishiki and Bridgestone, faced off with new American brands, like Trek Bicycles and Cannondale Bicycle,
for the cycling enthusist's dollar, while venerable European makes, like Raleigh and Peugeot, faded."
Four paragraphs later the author clearly says "Terry's Japanese manufacturer, H. Tano and Company of Kobe, also produced bikes for Western States Imports, ...".
One can tell that Mr. Lawrence Fisher knocked himself out doing research about the bicycle industry in the 1980s prior to sitting down and writing this article.
"Japanese manufacturers, like Nishiki". Really.
I always thought that Nishiki was a brand name. Well I stand corrected.
We should all just ignore the previous reports about Kawamura Sangyo manufacturing bicycles and putting the "Nishiki" brand on them for West Coast Cycle Supply Company.
How did the author know that H. Tano and Company manufactured bicycles? The same way that he knew that Nishiki was a Japanese manufacturer?
I have my doubts about the research used in this article, but you decide for yourself.
This article was published more than 5 years after member @T-Mar's first assertion of "reportedly Tano" in February 2006.
The author may have done research and used information which included the idea of H. Tano and Co. as manufacturer which originated in bikeforums.net.
Was the author using his own research that referenced bikeforms.net? or
Was the author quoting or summarizing someone else who had read the Tano references in bikeforms.net?
If so, then someone in bikeforums.net referenced this article on the idea that "Tano manufactured", it would be a circular reference.
Is the Korn Ferry Institute article a credible confirmation of H. Tano and Company being a bicycle manufacturing company?
You will have to decide for yourself.
- - - -
Once again ladies and gentlemen, we kindly ask that you hold your questions until the end.
There will be a question and answer period following the presentation.
Also please keep conversations in the audience to a minimum as it distracts others who may be enjoying the presentation.
- - -
"If you can put up with that you can put up with anything."
Johnny Rotten on stage at the Winterland Ballroom, San Francisco, California 01/14/78
12-28-20, 05:30 PM
#46
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,297
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,368 Times
in
882 Posts
Originally Posted by Hummer
One of the orthodox ideas that exists has to do with date encoding within a serial number of a Japanese frame manufacturer.
This in itself is not very important but it demonstrates that once an idea has been put out into the public realm and that idea takes hold, then it is difficult to change the public perception of that idea.
The specific serial number type is the "N" prefix serial number, followed by a digit which indicates the year of frame manufacture, followed by a letter which indicates a time period within the year, followed by four digits. This format of serial number is most often scene on several models of Centurion brand bicycles from 1978 to 1989. This format of serial number is also found with other brands including, but not limited to: Diamond Back MTBs, Novara, and Terry.
It was the orthodox opinion on bikeforums.net that the time period for the letter was a fortnight.
In October of 2017 I showed an analysis of this format of serial number and demonstrated that the time period represented by the letter was more probably a month than a fortnight.
I will not repeat the report on the analysis here. The analysis is in this post in the centurion serial number database thread:
https://www.bikeforums.net/19917187-post2203.html
To my knowledge, no one has contradicted or questioned this analysis.
However within bikeforums.net the belief persists that the letter represents not a month but a fortnight.
Another note on this topic. Bicycle manufacturing goes on a yearly cycle. Bicycle production at a factory is not constant from month to month.
Distributors and retailers in North America order seasonally. They order at the end of one year for the next years spring.
Bicycle factories do much of their production in the last quarter of the year.
If the time period letter in "N" type serial numbers is for a fortnight there should be plenty of letters T, U, V, W, X, Y, and Z. These letters would represent the fourth quarter. In the Centurion serial number record of "N" type serial numbers these letters are never reported or almost never reported. This would mean that almost no bicycles were manufactured in the fourth quarter by whoever was the manufacturer.
In the monthly proposal the Letters N, P, and S would represent the last three months of the year. These letters are reported frequently in the N serial numbers. This correlates with the frame manufacturing season.
Does the letter in the "N" type serial numbers represent fortnight or month? You decide.
- - -
"Hey, what was that that just hit me in the head. It didn't hurt a bit."
Johnny Rotten on stage at the Winterland Ballroom, San Francisco, California 01/14/78
This in itself is not very important but it demonstrates that once an idea has been put out into the public realm and that idea takes hold, then it is difficult to change the public perception of that idea.
The specific serial number type is the "N" prefix serial number, followed by a digit which indicates the year of frame manufacture, followed by a letter which indicates a time period within the year, followed by four digits. This format of serial number is most often scene on several models of Centurion brand bicycles from 1978 to 1989. This format of serial number is also found with other brands including, but not limited to: Diamond Back MTBs, Novara, and Terry.
It was the orthodox opinion on bikeforums.net that the time period for the letter was a fortnight.
In October of 2017 I showed an analysis of this format of serial number and demonstrated that the time period represented by the letter was more probably a month than a fortnight.
I will not repeat the report on the analysis here. The analysis is in this post in the centurion serial number database thread:
https://www.bikeforums.net/19917187-post2203.html
To my knowledge, no one has contradicted or questioned this analysis.
However within bikeforums.net the belief persists that the letter represents not a month but a fortnight.
Another note on this topic. Bicycle manufacturing goes on a yearly cycle. Bicycle production at a factory is not constant from month to month.
Distributors and retailers in North America order seasonally. They order at the end of one year for the next years spring.
Bicycle factories do much of their production in the last quarter of the year.
If the time period letter in "N" type serial numbers is for a fortnight there should be plenty of letters T, U, V, W, X, Y, and Z. These letters would represent the fourth quarter. In the Centurion serial number record of "N" type serial numbers these letters are never reported or almost never reported. This would mean that almost no bicycles were manufactured in the fourth quarter by whoever was the manufacturer.
In the monthly proposal the Letters N, P, and S would represent the last three months of the year. These letters are reported frequently in the N serial numbers. This correlates with the frame manufacturing season.
Does the letter in the "N" type serial numbers represent fortnight or month? You decide.
- - -
"Hey, what was that that just hit me in the head. It didn't hurt a bit."
Johnny Rotten on stage at the Winterland Ballroom, San Francisco, California 01/14/78
Likes For RobbieTunes:
12-28-20, 05:32 PM
#47
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,297
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,368 Times
in
882 Posts
Originally Posted by Hummer
Another orthodox idea that has long been present on the vintage enthusiasts bikeforums.net is about a Japanese company: H. Tano and Company.
The idea that has been put forward is that H. Tano and company is reportedly to have manufactured bicycles for the USA brand name Centurion.
It is unclear to me what is meant by the word "manufactured". Manufactured could mean only the frame of the bicycle was manufactured, or some other component/components were manufactured, or that the bicycle was assembled from other manufactures frames and components.
It is also unclear to me what "reportedly" is supposed to mean. Something concrete or something purposefully ambiguous.
The original idea that "reportedly H. Tano and Company manufactured bicycles" has morphed into "H. Tano and Company manufactured bicycles". The caveat "reportedly" has been removed and this new version of what kind of a company H. Tano and Company was now exists.
The removal of the caveat "reportedly" has gone unnoticed or unchallenged, even by the originator of the first statement where "reportedly" is used.
The idea that is repeated is "H. Tano and company manufactured bicycles".
I have several references to H. Tano and Company as a Japanese export company that supplied bicycles.
The first place that I found the reference to "Tano" as a "manufacturer" is in this post from February of 2006 by bikeforums.net member @T-Mar:
https://www.bikeforums.net/2208689-post62.html
I have not seen where T-Mar reveals the source that reported Tano as a manufacturer.
Two bikeforum.net members have questioned T-Mar about his reportedly Tano assertion, once in May 2017 by member @msl109 and once in August 2019 by member @madpogue.
member mls109 thread with question and T-Mar's response:
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...an-frames.html
Member madpogue question in the Centurion Serial Number Database thread:
https://www.bikeforums.net/21094234-post2248.html
Member T-Mar's response:
https://www.bikeforums.net/21151985-post2255.html
In neither response does member T-Mar say the source of his 2006 assertion of "reportedly Tano".
In both responses member T-Mar cites an article in 2011 publication of the Korn Ferry Institute
written by Lawrence M. Fisher entitled "Georgena Terry's Long-Distance Ride".
(Note: In both responses member T-Mar spelt Georgena incorrectly.)
In the second response member T-Mar also adds a new assertion:
From what I have seen this assertion is true. Other sources do credit H. Tano and Company with suppling bicycles to Western States Imports(WSI) or their predecessor organization.
These sources do not say that H. Tano and Company manufactered the bicycles or any part of the bicycles.
Is the Korn Ferry Institute article a credible confirmation?
What is the Korn Ferry Institute?
- - - -
And remember class, there will be a test on all this material on the third Thursday of January.
The idea that has been put forward is that H. Tano and company is reportedly to have manufactured bicycles for the USA brand name Centurion.
It is unclear to me what is meant by the word "manufactured". Manufactured could mean only the frame of the bicycle was manufactured, or some other component/components were manufactured, or that the bicycle was assembled from other manufactures frames and components.
It is also unclear to me what "reportedly" is supposed to mean. Something concrete or something purposefully ambiguous.
The original idea that "reportedly H. Tano and Company manufactured bicycles" has morphed into "H. Tano and Company manufactured bicycles". The caveat "reportedly" has been removed and this new version of what kind of a company H. Tano and Company was now exists.
The removal of the caveat "reportedly" has gone unnoticed or unchallenged, even by the originator of the first statement where "reportedly" is used.
The idea that is repeated is "H. Tano and company manufactured bicycles".
I have several references to H. Tano and Company as a Japanese export company that supplied bicycles.
The first place that I found the reference to "Tano" as a "manufacturer" is in this post from February of 2006 by bikeforums.net member @T-Mar:
https://www.bikeforums.net/2208689-post62.html
I have not seen where T-Mar reveals the source that reported Tano as a manufacturer.
Two bikeforum.net members have questioned T-Mar about his reportedly Tano assertion, once in May 2017 by member @msl109 and once in August 2019 by member @madpogue.
member mls109 thread with question and T-Mar's response:
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...an-frames.html
Member madpogue question in the Centurion Serial Number Database thread:
https://www.bikeforums.net/21094234-post2248.html
Member T-Mar's response:
https://www.bikeforums.net/21151985-post2255.html
In neither response does member T-Mar say the source of his 2006 assertion of "reportedly Tano".
In both responses member T-Mar cites an article in 2011 publication of the Korn Ferry Institute
written by Lawrence M. Fisher entitled "Georgena Terry's Long-Distance Ride".
(Note: In both responses member T-Mar spelt Georgena incorrectly.)
In the second response member T-Mar also adds a new assertion:
From what I have seen this assertion is true. Other sources do credit H. Tano and Company with suppling bicycles to Western States Imports(WSI) or their predecessor organization.
These sources do not say that H. Tano and Company manufactered the bicycles or any part of the bicycles.
Is the Korn Ferry Institute article a credible confirmation?
What is the Korn Ferry Institute?
- - - -
And remember class, there will be a test on all this material on the third Thursday of January.
Then we created Ironmaidens because, basically, they were all hot and we were not.
As you can see, we are arbitrary. We really don't care. We ride the bikes.
Arbitrary is the only logic these days. Like Portland.
12-28-20, 05:34 PM
#48
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Fahrenheit531
What's amazing to me is the level of effort put into refuting what may be the most obscure little serial number side-note ever posited.
That said, being amazed is fun.
Do please continue.
That said, being amazed is fun.
Do please continue.
Terribly entertaining content
12-28-20, 05:46 PM
#50
Gone riding
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 10,638
Mentioned: 205 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1705 Post(s)
Liked 1,330 Times
in
598 Posts
Originally Posted by RiddleOfSteel
I'd advise putting down the shovel.
On the edge of my seat here
DD
Likes For Drillium Dude:
