Time to diversify.
#76
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 8,763
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2184 Post(s)
Liked 546 Times
in
326 Posts
Do you get angry when a high racer passes you when riding into the wind?
Bottom line sticking to an 1890 style of bike is kind of dumb. Time moves on. Dont be an old fud new and better things do get invented you know.
#78
Senior Member
People have a hard time with the concept of incidents per 100,000 vs just raw numbers. Our raw numbers are high, but our population is gigantic.
#79
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,727
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1026 Post(s)
Liked 1,328 Times
in
551 Posts
Bottom line sticking to an 1890 style of bike is kind of dumb. Time moves on. Dont be an old fud new and better things do get invented you know.

#80
Uber Goober
It would seem that recumbent bikes would be the ideal solution for randonneuring. And in the last dozen years or so, I can think of 11 recumbent riders in the local randonneuring club, plus one or two I'm overlooking no doubt. Exactly zero of them are still doing randonneur rides on a regular basis. One of them might sometimes, but he's just as likely to be on road bike or velomobile. I think four of them are currently riding upright bikes rather than recumbents (more gravel/mountain than road bikes).
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
#81
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 8,763
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2184 Post(s)
Liked 546 Times
in
326 Posts
It would seem that recumbent bikes would be the ideal solution for randonneuring. And in the last dozen years or so, I can think of 11 recumbent riders in the local randonneuring club, plus one or two I'm overlooking no doubt. Exactly zero of them are still doing randonneur rides on a regular basis. One of them might sometimes, but he's just as likely to be on road bike or velomobile. I think four of them are currently riding upright bikes rather than recumbents (more gravel/mountain than road bikes).
#82
Senior Member
A Fat Tire trike, unless e-assisted ($$$) is NOT something I would need to be convinced to avoid. Haven't you noticed you don't see any fat tire bikes anymore on the roads? You didn't stop to wonder why that was? And while I am here I might observe that the likelihood of buying anything bike, trike or bike/trike related is very, very low for at least another year! About all that is left is the stuff nobody wants (for good reason) or niche products like cargo bikes and unicycles and frightuflly expensive factory e-assist roadbikes. Being in evangelist mode right now comes off as a bit tone deaf to say the least.
#83
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 8,763
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2184 Post(s)
Liked 546 Times
in
326 Posts
A Fat Tire trike, unless e-assisted ($$$) is NOT something I would need to be convinced to avoid. Haven't you noticed you don't see any fat tire bikes anymore on the roads? You didn't stop to wonder why that was? And while I am here I might observe that the likelihood of buying anything bike, trike or bike/trike related is very, very low for at least another year! About all that is left is the stuff nobody wants (for good reason) or niche products like cargo bikes and unicycles and frightuflly expensive factory e-assist roadbikes. Being in evangelist mode right now comes off as a bit tone deaf to say the least.
#84
Senior Member
Not necessarily a recumbent issue; but you don't need FAT (3-5 inch wide) tires to ride gravel. Most MTBs with 1.75-2.1" tires do gravel just fine. You don't need the fatties until you get into deeper snow or soft sand; and even then there's a limit to how much benefit they have.
PS this is a dead thread. OP has obviously moved on.
PS this is a dead thread. OP has obviously moved on.
#86
Senior Member
Back when I lived in town, I used to cycle-commute year around. Mostly on an upright. Even my mountain bike had problems when the snow got more than a couple of inches deep. Bents were fair-weather only.
Here in Michigan, we hope the groundhog sees his shadow so there's ONLY 6 more weeks of winter.
Ice fishing on inland lakes usually runs until the end of March, and it's hard to define "spring" to be something before ice-out happens.
Here in Michigan, we hope the groundhog sees his shadow so there's ONLY 6 more weeks of winter.

#88
Senior Member
I love my recumbents but I hate to ride them on slippery surfaces such as mud, loose sand/gravel or maybe even snow. Mainly because of the balance. I had two crashes on mud patches because I saw them too late and was not able to stabilize with my legs in time. On an upright bike you can use your legs as counter weight if you start sliding. At least to a certain degree. And with a straight stretched leg on an upright bike you have a better chance and more strength than with a bent leg on a recumbent. Fortunately we don't have snow where I live now. And I avoid gravel where I can and try to ride on pavement only. I really only ride recumbents because of my back problems. They work much better for my back than any upright bike. I am not doing it for speed. Just for comfort. And if we would have snow here in winter I would get a trike for winter to be saver on three wheels.
#89
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 8,763
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2184 Post(s)
Liked 546 Times
in
326 Posts
I love my recumbents but I hate to ride them on slippery surfaces such as mud, loose sand/gravel or maybe even snow. Mainly because of the balance. I had two crashes on mud patches because I saw them too late and was not able to stabilize with my legs in time. On an upright bike you can use your legs as counter weight if you start sliding. At least to a certain degree. And with a straight stretched leg on an upright bike you have a better chance and more strength than with a bent leg on a recumbent. Fortunately we don't have snow where I live now. And I avoid gravel where I can and try to ride on pavement only. I really only ride recumbents because of my back problems. They work much better for my back than any upright bike. I am not doing it for speed. Just for comfort. And if we would have snow here in winter I would get a trike for winter to be saver on three wheels.
#90
Mentally Derailleured
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,248
Bikes: Bilenky Tourlite
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1087 Post(s)
Liked 337 Times
in
230 Posts
I can resonate with this. I have a high school friend, who after years of being a fat slug, finally decided to do something about it and convert to a whole-foods, plant-based lifestyle. I must say that he's very successful at it, but MAN what a pain in the arse he is about it. Constant bragging and holier-than-thou does not even begin to tell the story. So I can see why Rydabent's evangelism can really bug people. I for one am not anti-recumbent, having owned a few myself, but I have yet to find one that speaks to me.
__________________
Breathe! Drink a glass of water! We're getting there!
Breathe! Drink a glass of water! We're getting there!
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,548
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 594 Post(s)
Liked 651 Times
in
393 Posts
I took Prof. David Wilson's recumbent for a spin 1976. Knew right away that bike was the real deal; that had it been equipped with race gear and wheels, it would be fine ride. (Also caught up to him and rode with him several times. He as not slow. I was faster because I was a mid 20s in form racer and he was middle aged.) But that recumbent lacked on feature that I live for. The dance. (Out of the saddle climbing. My happy place.) Gotta solve that or I have to become unable to ride DFs for me to switch.
Oh, and ever since that ride I have known that a small front wheeled, short wheelbase under the knees steerer was it. I don't see a lot of those.
Oh, and ever since that ride I have known that a small front wheeled, short wheelbase under the knees steerer was it. I don't see a lot of those.
Velos are an entire different beast of recumbent, and I love mine...unless I'm climbing a big hill, since it does weigh 80 lbs.

#92
Senior Member
Well I can speak with experience about BENTS
I have ridden them quite a bit and no matter what style of a bent a person rides
They all have at least one sucky issue or more !
LWBs and SWBs are not stable at slower speeds and riding uphill is a real pain
Tadpole bents have numerous issues
1. I dont like being on eye level with a German Shepherd
2. I dont like being on eye level with the hubcaps of a 4x4 pickup
3. front end width on a tadpole is not conducive to narrow spaces such as a lot of mups
4. visibility is limited both for a rider or a car driver
5. Its real hard to jump a curb or bail off if need be (actually more or less impossible)
6. All bents are a PITA to transport in or on a vehicle compared to a "DF"
And last but not least there are a lot of complaints over on BentRideronline.com
About sore necks ,sore sweaty backs sore butts and numb arms just like on a DF bike
You must just skip past them posts over there ?
Bents are not the living room "sofa" for everybody contrary to what some people claim
I could go on and on but I think I made a few points
I have ridden them quite a bit and no matter what style of a bent a person rides
They all have at least one sucky issue or more !
LWBs and SWBs are not stable at slower speeds and riding uphill is a real pain
Tadpole bents have numerous issues
1. I dont like being on eye level with a German Shepherd
2. I dont like being on eye level with the hubcaps of a 4x4 pickup
3. front end width on a tadpole is not conducive to narrow spaces such as a lot of mups
4. visibility is limited both for a rider or a car driver
5. Its real hard to jump a curb or bail off if need be (actually more or less impossible)
6. All bents are a PITA to transport in or on a vehicle compared to a "DF"
And last but not least there are a lot of complaints over on BentRideronline.com
About sore necks ,sore sweaty backs sore butts and numb arms just like on a DF bike
You must just skip past them posts over there ?
Bents are not the living room "sofa" for everybody contrary to what some people claim
I could go on and on but I think I made a few points
Likes For Bent Bill:
#93
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 8,763
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2184 Post(s)
Liked 546 Times
in
326 Posts
Well I can speak with experience about BENTS
I have ridden them quite a bit and no matter what style of a bent a person rides
They all have at least one sucky issue or more !
LWBs and SWBs are not stable at slower speeds and riding uphill is a real pain
Tadpole bents have numerous issues
1. I dont like being on eye level with a German Shepherd
2. I dont like being on eye level with the hubcaps of a 4x4 pickup
3. front end width on a tadpole is not conducive to narrow spaces such as a lot of mups
4. visibility is limited both for a rider or a car driver
5. Its real hard to jump a curb or bail off if need be (actually more or less impossible)
6. All bents are a PITA to transport in or on a vehicle compared to a "DF"
And last but not least there are a lot of complaints over on BentRideronline.com
About sore necks ,sore sweaty backs sore butts and numb arms just like on a DF bike
You must just skip past them posts over there ?
Bents are not the living room "sofa" for everybody contrary to what some people claim
I could go on and on but I think I made a few points
I have ridden them quite a bit and no matter what style of a bent a person rides
They all have at least one sucky issue or more !
LWBs and SWBs are not stable at slower speeds and riding uphill is a real pain
Tadpole bents have numerous issues
1. I dont like being on eye level with a German Shepherd
2. I dont like being on eye level with the hubcaps of a 4x4 pickup
3. front end width on a tadpole is not conducive to narrow spaces such as a lot of mups
4. visibility is limited both for a rider or a car driver
5. Its real hard to jump a curb or bail off if need be (actually more or less impossible)
6. All bents are a PITA to transport in or on a vehicle compared to a "DF"
And last but not least there are a lot of complaints over on BentRideronline.com
About sore necks ,sore sweaty backs sore butts and numb arms just like on a DF bike
You must just skip past them posts over there ?
Bents are not the living room "sofa" for everybody contrary to what some people claim
I could go on and on but I think I made a few points
#94
Senior Member
Yeah and I can more or less track stand at 0.5 mph while waiting for traffic
how many Tadpoles or LWB bikes can you get on a Camaro , Mustang, or a Toyota Camry ?
, A lot more people own cars than P.U. trucks
P.U. trucks you also need either a strong back or ramps to load a Tadpole or LWB in
For a sit up bike or a drop bar bike all someone needs is a $ 50.00 bike rack that will work on just about any car
and it will haul more than one and they wont strain there back loading a 20 pound bike unlike trying to load a 45 pound recumbent
I dont have anything against Recumbents
I own a Cat Trike Dumont and a LWB Sun EZ Sport
But they are not superior to a regular bike and they are not more advanced/modern !
#95
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 8,763
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2184 Post(s)
Liked 546 Times
in
326 Posts
Lol !
Yeah and I can more or less track stand at 0.5 mph while waiting for traffic
how many Tadpoles or LWB bikes can you get on a Camaro , Mustang, or a Toyota Camry ?
, A lot more people own cars than P.U. trucks
P.U. trucks you also need either a strong back or ramps to load a Tadpole or LWB in
For a sit up bike or a drop bar bike all someone needs is a $ 50.00 bike rack that will work on just about any car
and it will haul more than one and they wont strain there back loading a 20 pound bike unlike trying to load a 45 pound recumbent
I dont have anything against Recumbents
I own a Cat Trike Dumont and a LWB Sun EZ Sport
But they are not superior to a regular bike and they are not more advanced/modern !
Yeah and I can more or less track stand at 0.5 mph while waiting for traffic
how many Tadpoles or LWB bikes can you get on a Camaro , Mustang, or a Toyota Camry ?
, A lot more people own cars than P.U. trucks
P.U. trucks you also need either a strong back or ramps to load a Tadpole or LWB in
For a sit up bike or a drop bar bike all someone needs is a $ 50.00 bike rack that will work on just about any car
and it will haul more than one and they wont strain there back loading a 20 pound bike unlike trying to load a 45 pound recumbent
I dont have anything against Recumbents
I own a Cat Trike Dumont and a LWB Sun EZ Sport
But they are not superior to a regular bike and they are not more advanced/modern !
Im 82 and lift my tadpole trike into the bed with no problem at all.
#96
Senior Member
Likes For Bent Bill: