PSA: Actual tire widths
#1
Old. Slow. Happy.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 1,797
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
PSA: Actual tire widths
Just wanted to give folks a heads-up on the 700x37c Conti Contact (2011) tires. They measure just over 34mm when mounted on a 24mm (outside) rim. This was after 24 hours at max psi. By contrast, my 700x32 Vittoria Hypers were only 1mm narrower, and actually taller than the Contacts.
I think it would be helpful if we could compile a list of actual widths for the popular commuting tires. Once I replace the batteries in my calipers I'll post some exact measurements.
I think it would be helpful if we could compile a list of actual widths for the popular commuting tires. Once I replace the batteries in my calipers I'll post some exact measurements.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 11,375
Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Good luck!
Tire manufacturers are notorious for bad sizing. Racers want the lightest gear, so tire manufacturers started claiming wider values than actual so they could say they have the lightest tire in its size. It's followed suit with quite a few non-race tires, but for non-racing rubber the problem seems to be batch-to-batch variability due to sloppy manufacturing tolerances. In an article from Velo News over the summer (about UCI changing the 34mm width max in CX racing) it was brought to light that one manufacturer has a tolerance of +/- 2mm. That means one batch of 28mm tires might be 26mm, while the next is 30mm, and they're within spec.
Tire manufacturers are notorious for bad sizing. Racers want the lightest gear, so tire manufacturers started claiming wider values than actual so they could say they have the lightest tire in its size. It's followed suit with quite a few non-race tires, but for non-racing rubber the problem seems to be batch-to-batch variability due to sloppy manufacturing tolerances. In an article from Velo News over the summer (about UCI changing the 34mm width max in CX racing) it was brought to light that one manufacturer has a tolerance of +/- 2mm. That means one batch of 28mm tires might be 26mm, while the next is 30mm, and they're within spec.
__________________
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Tahoe
Posts: 142
Bikes: Motobecane Single Speed, Trek Mountain Track Xtracycle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
interesting, I just ordered a pair of Kendas and went up to 38's for my SS and was worried they were going to be too wide but when I got them today I was surprised by how narrow they actually are.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 11,375
Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Put a caliper to them. My Conti Gatorskin 28s measured between 26.1 and 27. My 28mm Pasela TGs are 27.6 (closest I've ever seen to claimed) but the 32mm version is 30.8mm
__________________
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Continental is notorious for having narrower than advertised tires. That said, it does depend, to some extent, on the rims. I've got 700x28 Conti GP 4 Seasons on one of my bikes. The front tire, on a Salsa Delgado Cross rim, measures at 28.4. The rear tire, on a Ritchey Silhouette rim, measure 26.3.
#6
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 83
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Pasela 28, actual is 27. Michelin Dynamic 28, actual is 29. Michelin Dynamic 32, actual is 33. Michelin City 35, actual is 35.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 8,896
Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 196 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
Width depends on the rims, which accounts for much of the variation.
#8
Old. Slow. Happy.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 1,797
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yes, but if you always use the same rims, you've eliminated that variable. For example, I have a 700x37 Conti that measures 34mm wide, and a 700x32 Vittoria that's 33.5mm. Both were mounted on the same rim, and inflated to their respective max psi. That discrepancy is not due to the rim(s), but the fact that one company's tire is undersized.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Yes, but if you always use the same rims, you've eliminated that variable. For example, I have a 700x37 Conti that measures 34mm wide, and a 700x32 Vittoria that's 33.5mm. Both were mounted on the same rim, and inflated to their respective max psi. That discrepancy is not due to the rim(s), but the fact that one company's tire is undersized.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts