Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > "The 33"-Road Bike Racing
Reload this Page >

Question when you think USAC results are wrong...

Search
Notices
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

Question when you think USAC results are wrong...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-29-16, 06:52 AM
  #1  
phil_k
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Location
Posts: 54

Bikes: N/A

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question when you think USAC results are wrong...

I finished a cat5 race in the 15-20 area out of 50... I didn't hang around the race, since I wanted to get out before the roads were closed for the Cat3 race. But I clearly finished and rode through the finish line, past the marshals etc and back to the parking lot and drove home about 15 minutes later. After the race are you supposed to go talk to the officials? Quite a few guys just rode through and back to their cars like I did.
I check results today, and it says DNF.

This is my second race, so I'm not sure if I should have done anything differently (the previous race was chip timed). I checked in on time, I wore the number on the correct side, I don't think I was disqualified, as I didn't do anything dangerous, nor did any of the moto refs speak to me during the race. They did not use chip timing, but this is a reputable race, put on by a college cycling team.

I'm pretty unhappy as you might imagine. I have the strava recording showing I finished in the group. So I plan on sending that to them, but I want to make sure I didn't miss anything.
phil_k is offline  
Old 02-29-16, 07:06 AM
  #2  
grolby
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
If you really care about the result, you stick around till results are posted if possible. You can of course try to get them to alter the results. That's pretty much down to discretion. In the long run, it will be just a Cat 5 race early in your racing days. For now, yes, it's frustrating.
grolby is offline  
Old 02-29-16, 07:09 AM
  #3  
gsteinb
out walking the earth
 
gsteinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lake Placid, NY
Posts: 21,441
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 912 Post(s)
Liked 752 Times in 342 Posts
15 minute protest period. Then it's over.
gsteinb is offline  
Old 02-29-16, 07:18 AM
  #4  
phil_k
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Location
Posts: 54

Bikes: N/A

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
sigh, ok, I was afraid of that
phil_k is offline  
Old 02-29-16, 07:30 AM
  #5  
carpediemracing 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tariffville, CT
Posts: 15,405

Bikes: Tsunami road bikes, Dolan DF4 track

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 102 Posts
Technically, 15 minute protest period and you're done.

I understand, it can take a long time to get full results in. However, if you leave, you forfeit the right to "protest a finish" (meaning contest the posted results).

For a new racer, Cat 5, the finish is sort of significant since a race doesn't count until you finish, and you can't upgrade until you get your 10? race finishes. You might get some leeway in changing that DNF to a "DNP" (did not place). However, remember that everyone on the race side of things absolutely has the right to not change it.

Remember that the promoter can't change results willy nilly. They have to have an official correct the results first, then the promoter can update things.

For me, as a promoter (at least I was until 2015, from 1993), I'd want to try to change the result because I'm also a racer. Since I'm not an official I can't do it without getting clearance from one of my officials. They have their lives, they already worked for me all day for basically nothing (say $80-100 for a 12 hour day), they do prep work before and post-race work after, etc etc. Therefore I really hate asking them for corrections/etc, especially when it was the racer at fault (meaning the racer let the 15 minute protest period expire).

I've been racing since 1983, and the protest period was pounded into my head by my club/teammates. Generally speaking I don't care much, if I get 17th or 23rd I really don't care. I do like getting credit for a field finish even if I sat up in the sprint and rolled in 5 or 10 seconds behind everyone else, and I've both gotten and not gotten that credit. When I didn't it's because I didn't care enough to check the results.

I did get 6th one year in a very selective hilly road race. As I'm usually the first rider to get shelled on a hill I got praise on my "strong ride" for more than a year. Each time I did I had to explain that I didn't even finish one lap with the field. I started the race with my sole goal to "lead out" our climber to the base of the climb toward the end of the 10 or 11 mile lap. Once I got our guy to the front and we turned right onto the hill I sat up. I rode to my car, drove home. Obviously I didn't care about my results because I didn't even make one lap in the field. I was probably at home when the race finished a couple/few hours later. Somehow my number got picked for 6th, and the actual 6th place rider didn't care enough to know/protest. The promoter sent me a check and a really nice mug. I promptly returned it.

I once sat up at the bell because I was done. It was a early season crit series (not mine) and I had to beat this one guy (and win) to have a chance at winning the series. I cramped or something so I stopped, watched him win (and wrap up the series), and left, super disappointed in myself. The next week I returned for the final race. Everyone was congratulating me - apparently I'd "won" the prior week. I went to the officials and promoter to point out that I wasn't even racing when the field sprinted. They just shrugged - they couldn't change the results a week later. The guy, Tom, he was actually psyched for the race because it was basically whoever beat the other would win, and he wanted a race. He absolutely annihilated me in the sprint, but I got the place I thought I deserved, second. I ran into him maybe 20 years later and he still talked about that fiasco with a grin.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
carpediemracing is offline  
Old 02-29-16, 07:34 AM
  #6  
canuckbelle
Senior Member
 
canuckbelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 944

Bikes: Scott Foil 10, Di2

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 148 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
As others have said. I stick around until results are posted (which takes 5-15min) and *then* stick around for the protest period. If you care about the results, you have to do that.
canuckbelle is offline  
Old 02-29-16, 07:51 AM
  #7  
phil_k
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Location
Posts: 54

Bikes: N/A

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ugh, while mid-pack-finish is not great (esp in cat5) -- I finished strong -- I had been stuck at the back and unable to get past people because of the centerline rule and lining up in back at the start.
The slight uphill finish was with both lanes, so I was able to average 29mph in the last mile according to gps, and pass 20+ people. I was hoping to see exactly where I ended up.

A very frustrating and expensive learning experience. Hopefully they post some good photos so I can at least see myself finishing in them.

Thank you, I have another race this coming weekend, so I'll get over this. I'll try not to line up at the back, and will stick around afterward, unless I really DNF.
phil_k is offline  
Old 02-29-16, 08:04 AM
  #8  
phil_k
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Location
Posts: 54

Bikes: N/A

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The race director emailed me back and said I got 12th place! He said my number was obscured but he recognized my kit when I described it, and myself and a couple other riders were on their "to-contact" list to confirm places.

The guys who are currently listed in 12th - 50th place and will get dropped a placing won't be happy. Next time I'll stick around and make it easier on everyone. Learned my lesson.
phil_k is offline  
Old 02-29-16, 09:17 AM
  #9  
jdms mvp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: four 1 OHHH , Maryland
Posts: 2,849

Bikes: nagasawa, fuji track pro

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by phil_k
The race director emailed me back and said I got 12th place! He said my number was obscured but he recognized my kit when I described it, and myself and a couple other riders were on their "to-contact" list to confirm places.

The guys who are currently listed in 12th - 50th place and will get dropped a placing won't be happy. Next time I'll stick around and make it easier on everyone. Learned my lesson.
glad it worked out for u!
jdms mvp is offline  
Old 02-29-16, 09:43 AM
  #10  
himespau 
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,445
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4234 Post(s)
Liked 2,949 Times in 1,808 Posts
Originally Posted by phil_k
The race director emailed me back and said I got 12th place! He said my number was obscured but he recognized my kit when I described it, and myself and a couple other riders were on their "to-contact" list to confirm places.

The guys who are currently listed in 12th - 50th place and will get dropped a placing won't be happy. Next time I'll stick around and make it easier on everyone. Learned my lesson.
Glad to hear it worked out and you're one race closer to upgrading - that was the important difference between 12th and DNF, right?
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?), 1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"





himespau is offline  
Old 02-29-16, 09:56 AM
  #11  
phil_k
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Location
Posts: 54

Bikes: N/A

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by himespau
Glad to hear it worked out and you're one race closer to upgrading - that was the important difference between 12th and DNF, right?
Yeah, at this point not getting DNF is all that matters. Being listed DFL would be fine, as long as I was listed as having finished. Still glad to see 12 though, I wondered how many people I caught at the end.

@amkJ4JPQ, oh man, looks like there were bigger issues that simply sticking around afterward wouldn't have caught.
The director was very helpful and accommodating though, hopefully he gets that worked out.
phil_k is offline  
Old 02-29-16, 12:12 PM
  #12  
carpediemracing 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tariffville, CT
Posts: 15,405

Bikes: Tsunami road bikes, Dolan DF4 track

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 102 Posts
Originally Posted by phil_k
Yeah, at this point not getting DNF is all that matters. Being listed DFL would be fine, as long as I was listed as having finished. Still glad to see 12 though, I wondered how many people I caught at the end.

@amkJ4JPQ, oh man, looks like there were bigger issues that simply sticking around afterward wouldn't have caught.
The director was very helpful and accommodating though, hopefully he gets that worked out.
Great news on your 12th. It sounds like there were problems with the scoring, which is actually somewhat normal to see.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
carpediemracing is offline  
Old 03-01-16, 02:50 PM
  #13  
shovelhd
Senior Member
 
shovelhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just FYI, it's generally the responsibility of the race director to be responsible for the results. The Chief Judge signs off on all scoring, both by judges and electronic. Every result sheet that you see will be signed by the Chief Judge. After that, it's usually up to the race director (promoter in smaller races) to post them to USAC, BikeReg, and anywhere else. Once they are signed, and the protest period over, they are the results of record. However, if you nicely contact the race director and explain your situation before they post them, you may be able to get it changed, especially in a situation like yours where there were several "unknown riders" placed in the field. It's a lot more common than people think. So as long as you're not trying to contest 25th place versus 26th or something equally stupid, if you think you finished where you did and the results tell otherwise: first, contact the Chief Judge during the protest period, and second, contact the race director as soon as possible.
shovelhd is offline  
Old 03-01-16, 03:08 PM
  #14  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times in 2,553 Posts
Originally Posted by phil_k
The race director emailed me back and said I got 12th place! He said my number was obscured but he recognized my kit when I described it, and myself and a couple other riders were on their "to-contact" list to confirm places.

The guys who are currently listed in 12th - 50th place and will get dropped a placing won't be happy. Next time I'll stick around and make it easier on everyone. Learned my lesson.
Good for you! Back in the dark ages (1977) I finished in the lead group in a very fast 105 mile Cat 1,2,3 race where that group finished under John Howard's previous course record. 25 places were awarded. 24th was the previous year's winner wearing #1 . I finished on his wheel and went up to the scorer's table to tell them who I finished behind. (It was common then to tell the officals the riders immediately ahead and behind you to help them sort out the order.) They told me they weren't taking that info; that htey had it all on film.

Awards were handed out. Place 24 went to rider #1 . And 25 went to the rider behind me! (They only printed the first 10 places or so. I saw the negative of me right where I told them I was. For their error, they gave me two Hutchinson tires. Small consolation, crappy tires.) I have no idea if I every appeared on record as finishing in that group. Would be nice as it was the hardest and fastest I ever rode, by far.

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Old 03-01-16, 06:52 PM
  #15  
himespau 
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,445
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4234 Post(s)
Liked 2,949 Times in 1,808 Posts
Originally Posted by shovelhd
Just FYI, it's generally the responsibility of the race director to be responsible for the results. The Chief Judge signs off on all scoring, both by judges and electronic. Every result sheet that you see will be signed by the Chief Judge. After that, it's usually up to the race director (promoter in smaller races) to post them to USAC, BikeReg, and anywhere else. Once they are signed, and the protest period over, they are the results of record. However, if you nicely contact the race director and explain your situation before they post them, you may be able to get it changed, especially in a situation like yours where there were several "unknown riders" placed in the field. It's a lot more common than people think. So as long as you're not trying to contest 25th place versus 26th or something equally stupid, if you think you finished where you did and the results tell otherwise: first, contact the Chief Judge during the protest period, and second, contact the race director as soon as possible.
Is it common when there are unknown riders to give the places to the riders you can identify and change it later? Seems like using an unknown as a placeholder until you can identify the rider would create less aggravation than having to slide everyone down later. I'd rather be happily surprised by being moved up than by moving down.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?), 1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"





himespau is offline  
Old 03-01-16, 07:21 PM
  #16  
carpediemracing 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tariffville, CT
Posts: 15,405

Bikes: Tsunami road bikes, Dolan DF4 track

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 102 Posts
Originally Posted by himespau
Is it common when there are unknown riders to give the places to the riders you can identify and change it later? Seems like using an unknown as a placeholder until you can identify the rider would create less aggravation than having to slide everyone down later. I'd rather be happily surprised by being moved up than by moving down.
When placing riders with obscured or otherwise unreadable numbers I just put no number. Then someone will inevitably show up and say, I think I got about 20th but I'm not on there. I look and their kit matches the missing 22nd place or whatever.

Some of the results of races I promote are missing places even now.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
carpediemracing is offline  
Old 03-01-16, 07:29 PM
  #17  
shovelhd
Senior Member
 
shovelhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by himespau
Is it common when there are unknown riders to give the places to the riders you can identify and change it later? Seems like using an unknown as a placeholder until you can identify the rider would create less aggravation than having to slide everyone down later. I'd rather be happily surprised by being moved up than by moving down.
No. The results are the results unless someone complains, then it might be changed after the protest period.
shovelhd is offline  
Old 03-01-16, 07:53 PM
  #18  
wens
Senior Member
 
wens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 3,215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by himespau
Is it common when there are unknown riders to give the places to the riders you can identify and change it later? Seems like using an unknown as a placeholder until you can identify the rider would create less aggravation than having to slide everyone down later. I'd rather be happily surprised by being moved up than by moving down.
Everybody should go read the rules on obscured or illegible numbers.* Unless they changed it from last year, the official is doing you a favor if they place you.

*I've only seen this interpreted as rider fault, if you're on the far side of the camera in a close sprint and blocked by the other body, I've always seen a placeholder/kit description for places in the money.
wens is offline  
Old 03-01-16, 10:34 PM
  #19  
himespau 
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,445
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4234 Post(s)
Liked 2,949 Times in 1,808 Posts
Originally Posted by wens
Everybody should go read the rules on obscured or illegible numbers.* Unless they changed it from last year, the official is doing you a favor if they place you.

*I've only seen this interpreted as rider fault, if you're on the far side of the camera in a close sprint and blocked by the other body, I've always seen a placeholder/kit description for places in the money.
Yeah, that was the way I interpreted OP. His number was blocked, so they knew he was there but couldn't figure out who (apparently that happened for several people) then they just put the lower person in his place until they could contact all the people and ask them what kit they were wearing rather than putting 12th place as ? team X kit and then filling that in when they figured out who was wearing that kit. Could be I misunderstood though.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?), 1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"





himespau is offline  
Old 03-02-16, 08:25 AM
  #20  
topflightpro
Senior Member
 
topflightpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,570
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 679 Times in 430 Posts
At the races we held this year, we had a heck of a time reading numbers on the camera because the angle of the sun was creating a terrible glare. I had to deal with lots of complaints and changes. It was an absolute pain.

In the 4/5 race, which was our biggest event, we ended up only placing the top ten in the 4/5 race and put everyone else as DNP. I got one email from someone complaining that they thought they finished higher among those listed as DNP. It was then that I explained the DNP riders were listed based on their number, so the first guys to register and receive lower numbers were listed higher. It had nothing to do with actual finish order.
topflightpro is offline  
Old 03-02-16, 11:11 AM
  #21  
phil_k
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Location
Posts: 54

Bikes: N/A

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by himespau
Yeah, that was the way I interpreted OP. His number was blocked, so they knew he was there but couldn't figure out who (apparently that happened for several people) then they just put the lower person in his place until they could contact all the people and ask them what kit they were wearing rather than putting 12th place as ? team X kit and then filling that in when they figured out who was wearing that kit. Could be I misunderstood though.
Yes, that's exactly what happened. I was on the far side of the field from the cameras, and they ended up moving people down rather than putting a placeholder in my spot. If it was top 5 or something, it may have gone differently.
phil_k is offline  
Old 04-10-16, 11:16 PM
  #22  
RickDalton
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Officially you are supposed to protest the "official" results within 15 minutes of being posted. This does happen though so I would think you can just message the promoter and let them know. I imagine they can give you a placing in stead of a DNF.
RickDalton is offline  
Old 04-15-16, 11:38 AM
  #23  
EventServices
Announcer
 
EventServices's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Detroit's North Side.
Posts: 5,108

Bikes: More than I need, really.

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times in 13 Posts
Taking a different view here. Don't get upset if you feel I'm knocking you. I'm not.

You know you finished. Having it in print somewhere doesn't really mean anything, does it?

If it were a matter of placing in a paying position (either points or cash), then yes, you need to verify it within the 15-minute protest period.
But otherwise, what's the difference between 12th and 15th place? Or 25th and 28th place?
The farther back in the field you go, the less effort other racers are putting forth. In fact, most are just coasting. Or should be.
There's no need to sprint like a mad man for 25th place when the race pays to the top 5. You only risk running into other riders who aren't sprinting.

You're a new rider, so I understand that you want/need the validation of completing the distance with the bunch. But you know you did it. And that's what counts.
Try to get beyond the need to see your name in the standings. I hate to say it, but nobody cares. Nobody is taking roll call to see how you or anyone else did.

I know that's an unpopular stance, but I'm popular for being un.
EventServices is offline  
Old 04-15-16, 02:57 PM
  #24  
cmh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,910
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 327 Times in 161 Posts
ES - In general, you are absolutely correct, but in this specific case the OP just wanted to be in the results as a placing rather than DNF so it would count towards an upgrade to Cat 4.
cmh is offline  
Old 04-15-16, 07:01 PM
  #25  
EventServices
Announcer
 
EventServices's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Detroit's North Side.
Posts: 5,108

Bikes: More than I need, really.

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times in 13 Posts
That's what I wondered. In this case, it makes sense, surely.
EventServices is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.