Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

An infrastructure proposal that just might work!

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

An infrastructure proposal that just might work!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-17, 07:37 AM
  #1  
irwin7638
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
irwin7638's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kalamazoo, Mi.
Posts: 3,097

Bikes: Sam, The Hunq and that Old Guy, Soma Buena Vista, Giant Talon 2, Brompton

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 102 Post(s)
Liked 106 Times in 48 Posts
An infrastructure proposal that just might work!

I think the study completed here in Kalamazoo Mi deserves to be shared with the rest of the community.

Marc
irwin7638 is offline  
Old 11-19-17, 11:22 AM
  #2  
berner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bristol, R. I.
Posts: 4,340

Bikes: Specialized Secteur, old Peugeot

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 663 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times in 299 Posts
Cycling infrastructure in many communities is coming to pass, not as rapidly as we might hope, but it is happening. We just need to keep the pressure on by our support of advocacy efforts.
berner is offline  
Old 11-19-17, 02:02 PM
  #3  
Doug64
Senior Member
 
Doug64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times in 435 Posts
Originally Posted by irwin7638
I think the study completed here in Kalamazoo Mi deserves to be shared with the rest of the community.

Marc
The bike boulevard concept seems to work well in other cities.
Minneapolis, MN
Doug64 is offline  
Old 11-20-17, 12:51 AM
  #4  
B. Carfree
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
I've seen a similar plan locally. The net result has been that since the inception of the plan, we have lost 43% of our cyclists and 30% of our walkers (US Census American Community Survey, looks only at longest mode used to commute to work).

Bottom line for me: Will there be real and meaningful follow-up to measure success/failure and will the plan be modified if it does not achieve its desired outcome? Mostly these things just gather dust on a shelf when it's found that the cycling numbers are largely independent of them.

I'd sure love to see a city do what Davis did in the 1970s and implement zero-tolerance traffic law enforcement. It worked wonders until it was halted in the '80s (which was followed by a cycling collapse).

Also, the notion that there should be discreet cycling routes but that cars have the entire grid seems doomed to failure. What we should be doing is corralling the cars and giving cyclists, walkers and buses unfettered access. I've always said, only partly in jest, that if motorists had to deal with the inconveniences that cyclists do then no one would drive.
B. Carfree is offline  
Old 11-20-17, 04:05 AM
  #5  
irwin7638
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
irwin7638's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kalamazoo, Mi.
Posts: 3,097

Bikes: Sam, The Hunq and that Old Guy, Soma Buena Vista, Giant Talon 2, Brompton

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 102 Post(s)
Liked 106 Times in 48 Posts
Originally Posted by B. Carfree

Bottom line for me: Will there be real and meaningful follow-up to measure success/failure and will the plan be modified if it does not achieve its desired outcome? Mostly these things just gather dust on a shelf when it's found that the cycling numbers are largely independent of them.
As I mentioned in the post, the source of the study is also the gatekeeper for all the Federal money spent on transportation in the area. Whenever a local jurisdiction wants to make improvements they will have to consider these recommendations before applying for a Federal grant. That's what is encouraging about this.

Marc
irwin7638 is offline  
Old 11-20-17, 11:48 AM
  #6  
salcedo
Senior Member
 
salcedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Ontario
Posts: 326

Bikes: Specialized Allez, Trek CrossRip

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 215 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I think bike boulevards are great, in cities with a good cycling culture and good cycling-driving relations. Otherwise, warring the road can be disastrous.

I personally didn't know what sharrows mean until I started cycling to work, and I'm sure most of my non-cyclist friends don't know hat they mean.
salcedo is offline  
Old 11-21-17, 03:05 AM
  #7  
Sullalto
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 1,206

Bikes: Jamis Quest Comp

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by B. Carfree
I've seen a similar plan locally. The net result has been that since the inception of the plan, we have lost 43% of our cyclists and 30% of our walkers (US Census American Community Survey, looks only at longest mode used to commute to work).
You blamed that in another post on a dangerous homeless population.
Sullalto is offline  
Old 11-21-17, 07:51 PM
  #8  
Doug64
Senior Member
 
Doug64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times in 435 Posts
Originally Posted by salcedo
I think bike boulevards are great, in cities with a good cycling culture and good cycling-driving relations. Otherwise, warring the road can be disastrous.

I personally didn't know what sharrows mean until I started cycling to work, and I'm sure most of my non-cyclist friends don't know hat they mean.
You make a good point; it is an educational issue. I'm very lucky. I love in Oregon.
Doug64 is offline  
Old 11-21-17, 07:58 PM
  #9  
jon c. 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,811
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1591 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,018 Times in 571 Posts
Originally Posted by B. Carfree
I've seen a similar plan locally. The net result has been that since the inception of the plan, we have lost 43% of our cyclists and 30% of our walkers (US Census American Community Survey, looks
Why do you think this plan dramatically decreased cycling? What were the changes in infrastructure and why was it better before?
jon c. is offline  
Old 11-21-17, 11:30 PM
  #10  
KD5NRH
Senior Member
 
KD5NRH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stephenville TX
Posts: 3,697

Bikes: 2010 Trek 7100

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 697 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by jon c.
Why do you think this plan dramatically decreased cycling? What were the changes in infrastructure and why was it better before?
Depends on locations, AFAICT. For example, the local MUP is currently a 1.25 mile alternative to a .3 mile straight line ride. It's flatter, and only one road crossing, but that's it.

The plan is currently, by the end of the year, to extend it another ~2 miles, which will provide access from a new apartment complex and an older neighborhood to downtown and the city park, as well as the college's farm on the outskirts of town. That will at least make it useful to ~3-4x as many people as it is now.

Over the next 3-5 years, they plan to extend it about another 2 miles to include a couple of other neighborhoods likely to generate a lot more traffic, but I have to say I'm not impressed with the planning that makes it sound like pulling teeth to pour a simple 10' wide sidewalk: they're not doing major reinforcements to the river bank it follows, as evidenced by the panicked rush to put in the reinforcements when an existing section was undercut by at least the fourth "500 year flood" I've seen in my lifetime.
KD5NRH is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
welshTerrier2
Advocacy & Safety
61
11-15-12 10:16 AM
Bekologist
Advocacy & Safety
6
08-22-12 11:04 PM
SlimRider
Commuting
59
01-29-12 12:07 PM
1nterceptor
Advocacy & Safety
249
10-27-11 06:32 PM
randya
Advocacy & Safety
59
03-30-10 01:24 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.