Red Specialized Sirrus
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 559
Bikes: 90 Bridgestone MB2/3, 97 Lemond Zurich, 97 Waterford 2200, 95 Mondonico Futura Leggero
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Red Specialized Sirrus
I picked up a 60cm Red Specialized Sirrus yesterday. I bought it for a friend of mine. He has been looking at newer bikes, mostly aluminum with brifters, but has had a hard time finding a decent one in his size. I paid 70 bucks for it, so even if he decides not to keep he should be able to get his money out of it. With any luck I can convince him that old steel is better than new aluminum.
I am pretty sure this is one of the older, more desirable Sirrus bikes. My guess is an 87 or 88. Anybody know for sure?
My understanding is that the frames have the same geometry as the Allez of that era. But I am not sure of the tubing. Does anybody know what the tubing was for this frame, and how it compares to the Allez of the same time?
I would like to see the specialized catalog with this bike, but I can't find one online. Anyone have an 87 or 88 specialized catalog?
Most of the components are 105's. The rear hub is a 105 six speed, and it appears to be the freehub variety. The front rim is a Saturae (a specialized house brand). The front hub is also a 105, but clearly from a different year, as it has a different finish. The front rim is a wobler.
I think I will ditch the yellow bar tape and just go with black. I also think I will try and find some black hoods. Do you think that would look ok on such a red bike? Does anyone have a set they want to part with?
More pictures are here:
https://s624.photobucket.com/albums/t...ized%20Sirrus/
I am pretty sure this is one of the older, more desirable Sirrus bikes. My guess is an 87 or 88. Anybody know for sure?
My understanding is that the frames have the same geometry as the Allez of that era. But I am not sure of the tubing. Does anybody know what the tubing was for this frame, and how it compares to the Allez of the same time?
I would like to see the specialized catalog with this bike, but I can't find one online. Anyone have an 87 or 88 specialized catalog?
Most of the components are 105's. The rear hub is a 105 six speed, and it appears to be the freehub variety. The front rim is a Saturae (a specialized house brand). The front hub is also a 105, but clearly from a different year, as it has a different finish. The front rim is a wobler.
I think I will ditch the yellow bar tape and just go with black. I also think I will try and find some black hoods. Do you think that would look ok on such a red bike? Does anyone have a set they want to part with?
More pictures are here:
https://s624.photobucket.com/albums/t...ized%20Sirrus/
#2
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,526
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
Just go to the vintage Trek site and look up the component codes for the date. Just pick a component or two that you think is original to the bike. Everything from brake calipers and seat posts to derailleurs and crankarms will have these codes.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,038 Times
in
1,876 Posts
+1. 1987 or 1988, based on the components.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 563
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yep, but not necessarily more desirable. Most likely out of the Giant factory, and it's a nice frame, with good geometry, and handling, but nothing really special or collectable about it. Just a good solid bike.
Not like one of the early Stumpjumpers, or 3Rensho-built Allez.
I'd say '87, cause I think the frame colors in 1988 were blue/white, and a teal color.
Not like one of the early Stumpjumpers, or 3Rensho-built Allez.
I'd say '87, cause I think the frame colors in 1988 were blue/white, and a teal color.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 680
Bikes: 3Rensho Aero with 10 speed Centaure / Record , Lecroco , whatever bike I have for sale at the moment
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Black hoods for these levers are still being made. I was quite amazed to find some at my lbs for 4$ !!! The packaging was branded Babac which is a distributor.
#6
Velocommuter Commando
I picked up a 60cm Red Specialized Sirrus yesterday. I bought it for a friend of mine. He has been looking at newer bikes, mostly aluminum with brifters, but has had a hard time finding a decent one in his size. I paid 70 bucks for it, so even if he decides not to keep he should be able to get his money out of it. With any luck I can convince him that old steel is better than new aluminum.
I am pretty sure this is one of the older, more desirable Sirrus bikes. My guess is an 87 or 88. Anybody know for sure?
My understanding is that the frames have the same geometry as the Allez of that era. But I am not sure of the tubing. Does anybody know what the tubing was for this frame, and how it compares to the Allez of the same time?
I would like to see the specialized catalog with this bike, but I can't find one online. Anyone have an 87 or 88 specialized catalog?
Most of the components are 105's. The rear hub is a 105 six speed, and it appears to be the freehub variety. The front rim is a Saturae (a specialized house brand). The front hub is also a 105, but clearly from a different year, as it has a different finish. The front rim is a wobler.
I think I will ditch the yellow bar tape and just go with black. I also think I will try and find some black hoods. Do you think that would look ok on such a red bike? Does anyone have a set they want to part with?
More pictures are here:
https://s624.photobucket.com/albums/t...ized%20Sirrus/
I am pretty sure this is one of the older, more desirable Sirrus bikes. My guess is an 87 or 88. Anybody know for sure?
My understanding is that the frames have the same geometry as the Allez of that era. But I am not sure of the tubing. Does anybody know what the tubing was for this frame, and how it compares to the Allez of the same time?
I would like to see the specialized catalog with this bike, but I can't find one online. Anyone have an 87 or 88 specialized catalog?
Most of the components are 105's. The rear hub is a 105 six speed, and it appears to be the freehub variety. The front rim is a Saturae (a specialized house brand). The front hub is also a 105, but clearly from a different year, as it has a different finish. The front rim is a wobler.
I think I will ditch the yellow bar tape and just go with black. I also think I will try and find some black hoods. Do you think that would look ok on such a red bike? Does anyone have a set they want to part with?
More pictures are here:
https://s624.photobucket.com/albums/t...ized%20Sirrus/
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,038 Times
in
1,876 Posts
Sole component difference between 1987 & 1988 are the rims. Wolber Alpines were spec for 1987 with Wolber GTX spec'd for 1988. The only geomtery difference listed between years and models are the chainstay length: '87 Sirrus was 40.8cm, '87 Allez was 40.9mm, both '88 models listed as 41cm.
SBI promoted the tubing as their design. They didn't like to disclose the grade and some years even the manufacturer was in question. It was quite common to cut costs by making two models from the fsame rame, so I certainly wouldn't dismiss the possibility of them having identical tubing. However, the only way to be sure would be two have a Sirrus and Allez of the same size and year, strip them to the bare frame and weigh them with a good scale.
Givent the prices and competing models from the era, the tubing should be comparable to Tange 2. Even if we assume that the Allez used something comparable to Tange 1, you're only talking a weight advantage of about 50-70g.
SBI promoted the tubing as their design. They didn't like to disclose the grade and some years even the manufacturer was in question. It was quite common to cut costs by making two models from the fsame rame, so I certainly wouldn't dismiss the possibility of them having identical tubing. However, the only way to be sure would be two have a Sirrus and Allez of the same size and year, strip them to the bare frame and weigh them with a good scale.
Givent the prices and competing models from the era, the tubing should be comparable to Tange 2. Even if we assume that the Allez used something comparable to Tange 1, you're only talking a weight advantage of about 50-70g.
#8
Velocommuter Commando
Sole component difference between 1987 & 1988 are the rims. Wolber Alpines were spec for 1987 with Wolber GTX spec'd for 1988. The only geomtery difference listed between years and models are the chainstay length: '87 Sirrus was 40.8cm, '87 Allez was 40.9mm, both '88 models listed as 41cm.
SBI promoted the tubing as their design. They didn't like to disclose the grade and some years even the manufacturer was in question. It was quite common to cut costs by making two models from the fsame rame, so I certainly wouldn't dismiss the possibility of them having identical tubing. However, the only way to be sure would be two have a Sirrus and Allez of the same size and year, strip them to the bare frame and weigh them with a good scale.
Givent the prices and competing models from the era, the tubing should be comparable to Tange 2. Even if we assume that the Allez used something comparable to Tange 1, you're only talking a weight advantage of about 50-70g.
SBI promoted the tubing as their design. They didn't like to disclose the grade and some years even the manufacturer was in question. It was quite common to cut costs by making two models from the fsame rame, so I certainly wouldn't dismiss the possibility of them having identical tubing. However, the only way to be sure would be two have a Sirrus and Allez of the same size and year, strip them to the bare frame and weigh them with a good scale.
Givent the prices and competing models from the era, the tubing should be comparable to Tange 2. Even if we assume that the Allez used something comparable to Tange 1, you're only talking a weight advantage of about 50-70g.
This is an '88 the '89 had a unicrown front fork and red replaced the aqua in the color scheme and '89 went 7 speed 105. It was also the first year of the sport Triple.
Last edited by Sirrus Rider; 07-01-09 at 10:48 PM.
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I had an allez frame that looked just the same, but dark blue with orange grraphics. It had saturae rims and suntour sprint. Tried to ask specialized about it but they said they had no info pre '91.
The mention of such small differences in chainstay length made me wonder how to measure that with horizontal dropouts.
The mention of such small differences in chainstay length made me wonder how to measure that with horizontal dropouts.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,038 Times
in
1,876 Posts
In '88 they didn't always use Wolber on the Sirrus, they also used their own house brand 'Saturae'....
What I've quoted are from the spec sheets, which would be from late in the previous calendar year. Saturae may have been introduced part way through the year. And before anybody asks, no I don't have any pics, just the spec sheets.
When I saw the 1mm difference in chainstay length for '87 and no other geometry differences, I thought it might be a publisher's error. In fact, the 1988 might be the same frame, with the spec just rounded up to the nearest centimeter. There's certainly very little between them.
Chainstay length is measured at point where the centerline of the seatstay intersects with the centerline of the axle slot.
What I've quoted are from the spec sheets, which would be from late in the previous calendar year. Saturae may have been introduced part way through the year. And before anybody asks, no I don't have any pics, just the spec sheets.
Chainstay length is measured at point where the centerline of the seatstay intersects with the centerline of the axle slot.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 559
Bikes: 90 Bridgestone MB2/3, 97 Lemond Zurich, 97 Waterford 2200, 95 Mondonico Futura Leggero
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The Cranks have a date code of KI. According to vintage trek, that makes this a september 86 manufacture. That corresponds to what everyone else is saying-- it is likely an 87.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 559
Bikes: 90 Bridgestone MB2/3, 97 Lemond Zurich, 97 Waterford 2200, 95 Mondonico Futura Leggero
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The rear wheel is a Saturae.
Both have 105 hubs, but they are clearly from different years. The front has a light, almost white finish.
My guess is that the rear has been replaced. After all, it has a freehub 105 hub. Those did not come out until after 87 right?
Jared
#14
Birotate Charioteer
I had an identical red 56 cm Sirrus I bought in Late September 1986 that I just sold last month. Shiny 105 components and Wolber Gentleman GTX rims. That was a fast bike, and nimble.
I agree; it's a great buy for $70.
I agree; it's a great buy for $70.
#15
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In '88 they didn't always use Wolber on the Sirrus, they also used their own house brand 'Saturae'....
What I've quoted are from the spec sheets, which would be from late in the previous calendar year. Saturae may have been introduced part way through the year. And before anybody asks, no I don't have any pics, just the spec sheets.
When I saw the 1mm difference in chainstay length for '87 and no other geometry differences, I thought it might be a publisher's error. In fact, the 1988 might be the same frame, with the spec just rounded up to the nearest centimeter. There's certainly very little between them.
Chainstay length is measured at point where the centerline of the seatstay intersects with the centerline of the axle slot.
What I've quoted are from the spec sheets, which would be from late in the previous calendar year. Saturae may have been introduced part way through the year. And before anybody asks, no I don't have any pics, just the spec sheets.
When I saw the 1mm difference in chainstay length for '87 and no other geometry differences, I thought it might be a publisher's error. In fact, the 1988 might be the same frame, with the spec just rounded up to the nearest centimeter. There's certainly very little between them.
Chainstay length is measured at point where the centerline of the seatstay intersects with the centerline of the axle slot.
I think that's a great deal too, and I'd be very careful about changing the fork out, seemed to me like they really dialed in the geometry on those framesets.
#16
Steel is real, baby!
..
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,045
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,386 Times
in
3,671 Posts
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,045
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,386 Times
in
3,671 Posts
All of these have a ton of the best builders in the business cred, Neenan, Merz, DiNucci, Tesch, Miki, Kono and many others made many of these some of the best production frames built as well as elevating the industry in Japan to a much higher level than before.
I would encourage you to include a Zombie thread alert when you post on one.
#22
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Absolutely, I have 2 86 Merz edition Allez's.
All of these have a ton of the best builders in the business cred, Neenan, Merz, DiNucci, Tesch, Miki, Kono and many others made many of these some of the best production frames built as well as elevating the industry in Japan to a much higher level than before.
I would encourage you to include a Zombie thread alert when you post on one.
All of these have a ton of the best builders in the business cred, Neenan, Merz, DiNucci, Tesch, Miki, Kono and many others made many of these some of the best production frames built as well as elevating the industry in Japan to a much higher level than before.
I would encourage you to include a Zombie thread alert when you post on one.
Heheh. After riding/racing a 58 (probably was actually a 56) in my youth - bought when we thought I'd continue growing - I finally wound up mostly with bikes the right size for me - 54s.
My bike herd consists of the following: an '87 Sirrus (aqua and white, repainted by Element 6 and refurbed), an '87 Allez SE, an '86 Merz Allez (daily ride), and an '85 Allez SE (have a 2nd frame as well). Unfortunately the '85s are a 56cm frames but still fun to ride and it will be awesome to look all American Flyers, minus the cowboy hat, after I move back to the St. Louis area next year and ride past the Arch on the bike.
The Shimano 600 parts on the '86 Merz Allez are pretty badly worn, wheels in awful condition, so that is the bike that will likely have the stays spread and new Force 22 installed unless I can find an '85 Allez SE frame, 54cm. While I generally prefer to maintain vintage looks, will lose the blue paint and decals and match paint and decals to the '85 SEs...with the Merz signature on the chainstay in black.
Projects... got 'em.
#23
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,403
Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present
Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1556 Post(s)
Liked 2,024 Times
in
989 Posts
This thread needs more red vintage Specializeds. '85 Allez SE checking in. Bought as a frame, fork, headset, BB, and crankset. Then put newer Superbe Pro pieces on it (having collected them), a wheel build, plus some below-Superbe-Pro pieces with plenty of polish (and excellent function).
Likes For RiddleOfSteel:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 2,841
Bikes: 2009 Handsome Devil, 1987 Trek 520 Cirrus, 1978 Motobecane Grand Touring, 1987 Nishiki Cresta GT, 1989 Specialized Allez Former bikes; 1986 Miyata Trail Runner, 1979 Miyata 912, 2011 VO Rando, 1999 Cannondale R800, 1986 Schwinn Passage
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 796 Post(s)
Liked 522 Times
in
367 Posts
89 Allez checking in...
wheels have changed since I took this shot
wheels have changed since I took this shot
Likes For ryansu:
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,045
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4512 Post(s)
Liked 6,386 Times
in
3,671 Posts
And why pray tell would we limit it to Red ones?