Jan Heine "Busts" Another Tire/Wheel Myth...
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
The truth is Jan Heine doesn’t make tires, neither does anyone at Rene Herse. They are contracted out.
Whether anyone at Rene Herse has developed unique tire formulas or whether the actual formulation was done by engineers at the company doing the manufacturing, is anybody’s guess. My guess is that the manufacturer came up with the formula to meet certain specs. I would also imagine a whole bunch of tires made by other manufacturers were first tested.
It is obviously a niche market and Jan Heine is promoting his product. I would think his tests are accurate based on a casing with a limited market share. While it is interesting, I doubt rolling resistance is at the top on most people’s list.
John
Whether anyone at Rene Herse has developed unique tire formulas or whether the actual formulation was done by engineers at the company doing the manufacturing, is anybody’s guess. My guess is that the manufacturer came up with the formula to meet certain specs. I would also imagine a whole bunch of tires made by other manufacturers were first tested.
It is obviously a niche market and Jan Heine is promoting his product. I would think his tests are accurate based on a casing with a limited market share. While it is interesting, I doubt rolling resistance is at the top on most people’s list.
John
Likes For 70sSanO:
#77
Senior Member
#78
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: ATX
Posts: 637
Bikes: CO-OP ADV 3.1 aka Beeftank (stolen, RIP), State All-Road
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 96 Post(s)
Liked 144 Times
in
75 Posts
Jan Heine's science is pretty good. I know a person that sells tires should be suspect when he tests tires, but he does a good job. I'm always looking for someone that has personal interest in "x" and makes "scientific" claims about "x" - one of my hobbies - and Jan Heine has been a pretty solid player in that area. I think he makes a good faith effort to be a straight shooter.
FWIW, I just installed some Compass 650x48 extralights (can’t keep track of the ridiculous names) and my only complaint is how much sealant they leak. It’s crazy. I’ve done a few rides now and hopefully that issue goes away. Otherwise they are pretty smooth. Were they worth upgrading from WTB Horizons? No. But I’ll ride them until they’re no good.
#79
Senior Member
#80
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times
in
707 Posts
I wish we could get back to discussing ways of determining whether wheel size effects speed rather than whether JH is a scientist because, at the end of the day, we are just talking about him and not the idea.
I think many people would be interested in rolling resistance BUT temper that desire against a competing need for puncture resistance. Caveat* unless they are racing.
When I commute or tour I want to get from A to B as fast as I can (all things being equal) but don't want an increase in punctures. That's why I usually default to Gatorskins or, non tour, currently GP 5000's. I have shied away from Compass only because they seem to lack such protection. However, in 700c there are lots of options available to experiment finding the sweet spot between the two values.
The problem I see in the 26" range is a lack of similar performance oriented tires other than the Compass brand. The closest I have come is Paselas in 1.75 which feel like they roll fast (much more so than Marathons) but attract punctures like the plague. Something about the tread catching particles long enough to let them penetrate it seems. I suppose I will try 26" Compass at some point but for most I suspect the price point is very dear to experiment with given the competing concern about puncture protection. Most on 26" road bikes are not racing but using them in a utility sense so that has a higher priority.
I think many people would be interested in rolling resistance BUT temper that desire against a competing need for puncture resistance. Caveat* unless they are racing.
When I commute or tour I want to get from A to B as fast as I can (all things being equal) but don't want an increase in punctures. That's why I usually default to Gatorskins or, non tour, currently GP 5000's. I have shied away from Compass only because they seem to lack such protection. However, in 700c there are lots of options available to experiment finding the sweet spot between the two values.
The problem I see in the 26" range is a lack of similar performance oriented tires other than the Compass brand. The closest I have come is Paselas in 1.75 which feel like they roll fast (much more so than Marathons) but attract punctures like the plague. Something about the tread catching particles long enough to let them penetrate it seems. I suppose I will try 26" Compass at some point but for most I suspect the price point is very dear to experiment with given the competing concern about puncture protection. Most on 26" road bikes are not racing but using them in a utility sense so that has a higher priority.
Likes For Happy Feet:
#81
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
Rene Herse never made tires, nor any facilities to make them. They never had the manufacturing expertise. Nothing wrong with that, but to say their background is similar to Trek is not really comparable.
John
#82
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
What does testing for differences (or lack) between wheel-sizes have anything to do with promoting their tire sales (especially given the majority of the tires they sell are 700C)?
(Also, Panaracer makes their tires, in Japan, from what I understand.)
(Also, Panaracer makes their tires, in Japan, from what I understand.)
#83
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
I suspect that Jan has more experience and expertise testing and designing tires than any of the posters here, but I could be wrong. Instead of posting only criticism, show us your credentials and body of work. Without that, it's all talk.
Likes For AlmostTrick:
#84
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times
in
247 Posts
People are acting like the logical conclusion from this is that we should all dump our 700c wheels and go to 650b and buy rene herse tires. To me, it signifies that maybe we should consider specifying 650b (or smaller) wheels on bikes for people under 5’ 5” so that they fit better on their bikes.
Likes For smashndash:
#85
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 727
Bikes: Current: 2016 Bianchi Volpe; 1973 Peugeot UO-8. Past: 1974 Fuji S-10-S with custom black Imron paint by Stinsman Racing of PA.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 215 Post(s)
Liked 204 Times
in
142 Posts
Except for Specialized, and maybe a couple others, Trek, for example, made their own bikes for many years. The had their own manufacturing facilities, but like everyone else have gone overseas to have bike frames made. For them it was economics.
Rene Herse never made tires, nor any facilities to make them. They never had the manufacturing expertise. Nothing wrong with that, but to say their background is similar to Trek is not really comparable.
John
Rene Herse never made tires, nor any facilities to make them. They never had the manufacturing expertise. Nothing wrong with that, but to say their background is similar to Trek is not really comparable.
John
It must be having a positive effect as Continental offers their GP5000 in 32mm, where the GP4000SII maxed out at 28mm.
Likes For Bill in VA:
#86
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
He promotes certain attributes of his products, or certain attributes that will point to his products. But everything has some give and take.
I do feel his work of wider tires is really valuable. If I had a road bike that accepted wider tires I would entertain going there, but probably not his tires. Just like I don’t buy the lowest rolling resistance mountain bike tires, I‘ll buy what seems to fit where I ride.
John
Likes For woodcraft:
#88
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,975
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
I wish we could get back to discussing ways of determining whether wheel size effects speed rather than whether JH is a scientist because, at the end of the day, we are just talking about him and not the idea.
I think many people would be interested in rolling resistance BUT temper that desire against a competing need for puncture resistance. Caveat* unless they are racing.
When I commute or tour I want to get from A to B as fast as I can (all things being equal) but don't want an increase in punctures. That's why I usually default to Gatorskins or, non tour, currently GP 5000's. I have shied away from Compass only because they seem to lack such protection. However, in 700c there are lots of options available to experiment finding the sweet spot between the two values.
The problem I see in the 26" range is a lack of similar performance oriented tires other than the Compass brand. The closest I have come is Paselas in 1.75 which feel like they roll fast (much more so than Marathons) but attract punctures like the plague. Something about the tread catching particles long enough to let them penetrate it seems. I suppose I will try 26" Compass at some point but for most I suspect the price point is very dear to experiment with given the competing concern about puncture protection. Most on 26" road bikes are not racing but using them in a utility sense so that has a higher priority.
I think many people would be interested in rolling resistance BUT temper that desire against a competing need for puncture resistance. Caveat* unless they are racing.
When I commute or tour I want to get from A to B as fast as I can (all things being equal) but don't want an increase in punctures. That's why I usually default to Gatorskins or, non tour, currently GP 5000's. I have shied away from Compass only because they seem to lack such protection. However, in 700c there are lots of options available to experiment finding the sweet spot between the two values.
The problem I see in the 26" range is a lack of similar performance oriented tires other than the Compass brand. The closest I have come is Paselas in 1.75 which feel like they roll fast (much more so than Marathons) but attract punctures like the plague. Something about the tread catching particles long enough to let them penetrate it seems. I suppose I will try 26" Compass at some point but for most I suspect the price point is very dear to experiment with given the competing concern about puncture protection. Most on 26" road bikes are not racing but using them in a utility sense so that has a higher priority.
Anyway, as we’ve both said, not a lot of wide “roadish” options in 26”. The best alternative I’ve come up with so far is the Continental Contact Speed in the 26x2.0 size. The guy from NL tested the 37mm version and it’s a couple watts more than the 35 Bon Jon Pass. I now have the 26x2.0 version on the rear and I would guess that it is a couple of watts more than the RTP, but pretty close. It should offer better protection against flats for the rear tire than the RTP. We shall see!
Considering how well the RTP has done in front, I figure I will replace it with another RTP once it’s worn out.
Otto
Likes For ofajen:
#89
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,899
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2602 Post(s)
Liked 1,925 Times
in
1,208 Posts
Good point. I'm looking forward to seeing how the GP5000 lasts in MY real world tests -- puncture resistance and longevity being key parameters, now that I'm looking at tires with better rolling resistance.
#90
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times
in
35 Posts
More a case of adjusting labeling to keep up with the times, than anything else in my opinion.
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 727
Bikes: Current: 2016 Bianchi Volpe; 1973 Peugeot UO-8. Past: 1974 Fuji S-10-S with custom black Imron paint by Stinsman Racing of PA.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 215 Post(s)
Liked 204 Times
in
142 Posts
It's also been often discussed that Continental revised their labeling in between those two releases. The GP4000s only ran true to size on narrow (~17mm inside width) rims, which were normal when they were released in 2005 - the "28mm" GP4KSII inflates to a measured 32mm on my wide 22mm-internal wheels, which is a huge discrepancy. The GP5000 with the same markings run narrower on the same rims - the "28mm" GP5KTL on the same rims measures 30.5mm. I can't say if the 32mm 5k is actually 32mm, or if it's actually wider than the old 28s (I also can't speak for the tubed version).
More a case of adjusting labeling to keep up with the times, than anything else in my opinion.
More a case of adjusting labeling to keep up with the times, than anything else in my opinion.
#92
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,975
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
It's also been often discussed that Continental revised their labeling in between those two releases. The GP4000s only ran true to size on narrow (~17mm inside width) rims, which were normal when they were released in 2005 - the "28mm" GP4KSII inflates to a measured 32mm on my wide 22mm-internal wheels, which is a huge discrepancy. The GP5000 with the same markings run narrower on the same rims - the "28mm" GP5KTL on the same rims measures 30.5mm. I can't say if the 32mm 5k is actually 32mm, or if it's actually wider than the old 28s (I also can't speak for the tubed version).
More a case of adjusting labeling to keep up with the times, than anything else in my opinion.
More a case of adjusting labeling to keep up with the times, than anything else in my opinion.
Otto
#93
Some Weirdo
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Rexburg, ID
Posts: 502
Bikes: '86 Schwinn Prelude, '91 Scott Sawtooth, '73 Raleigh "Grand 3"
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 223 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times
in
92 Posts
I don't even believe in tires
__________________
Somewhere, a village is missing its idiot.
Somewhere, a village is missing its idiot.
#94
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
The truth is Jan Heine doesn’t make tires, neither does anyone at Rene Herse. They are contracted out.
Whether anyone at Rene Herse has developed unique tire formulas or whether the actual formulation was done by engineers at the company doing the manufacturing, is anybody’s guess. My guess is that the manufacturer came up with the formula to meet certain specs. I would also imagine a whole bunch of tires made by other manufacturers were first tested.
It is obviously a niche market and Jan Heine is promoting his product. I would think his tests are accurate based on a casing with a limited market share. While it is interesting, I doubt rolling resistance is at the top on most people’s list.
John
Whether anyone at Rene Herse has developed unique tire formulas or whether the actual formulation was done by engineers at the company doing the manufacturing, is anybody’s guess. My guess is that the manufacturer came up with the formula to meet certain specs. I would also imagine a whole bunch of tires made by other manufacturers were first tested.
It is obviously a niche market and Jan Heine is promoting his product. I would think his tests are accurate based on a casing with a limited market share. While it is interesting, I doubt rolling resistance is at the top on most people’s list.
John
The fact that he does not personally mix up the rubber and pour it in the moulds himself is pretty much a non-issue, IMO.
How many bike companies weld up their own frames? Or produce the steel or Al they are made of?
Last edited by Kapusta; 07-25-20 at 06:20 PM.
Likes For Kapusta:
#95
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times
in
289 Posts
Debating the pro's and con's of 700c vs 650c is nothing new. 700c will roll a little smoother, I'll give them that and on rough surfaces that will certainly help.
I ride 650c on a custom bike as I'm only 5'1", and on a group ride a few years ago I rolled away on a decent from a bunch of people on 700c bikes. SO many factors to take into account yet its not like the 650c wheels were an anchor that was holding me back.
I ride 650c on a custom bike as I'm only 5'1", and on a group ride a few years ago I rolled away on a decent from a bunch of people on 700c bikes. SO many factors to take into account yet its not like the 650c wheels were an anchor that was holding me back.
#96
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,945
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3948 Post(s)
Liked 7,291 Times
in
2,945 Posts
Jan Heine and Rene Herse (previously Compass) have always said they worked with Panaracer to develop their tire. Panaracers are well thought of and Rene Herse took a no compromise risk to work with Panaracer to develop a better tire and make (and market) them in previously neglected (or out of fashion) sizes.
It must be having a positive effect as Continental offers their GP5000 in 32mm, where the GP4000SII maxed out at 28mm.
It must be having a positive effect as Continental offers their GP5000 in 32mm, where the GP4000SII maxed out at 28mm.
Likes For tomato coupe:
#97
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
I would think wider tires came about initially for use on gravel bikes since the wider tires provided better shock absorption and stability. The additional comfort on semi-smooth road surfaces was a plus and the fact there wasn’t a rolling penalty made it an even better choice.
700c/29er is the dominant wheel size and will continue to be so. If testing proved that a different size Is better the industry would probably not change after all these years. Too many bikes are already out there for decades. It would have to be earth shattering improvements.
The 29er is 622 and one would think that is was economically more feasible to use the same diameter as a traditional road rim than conduct extensive testing for the exact optimized diameter. As... is 622 really better than 610 or 630, or is just being better than a 26er (559) all that was needed?
John
700c/29er is the dominant wheel size and will continue to be so. If testing proved that a different size Is better the industry would probably not change after all these years. Too many bikes are already out there for decades. It would have to be earth shattering improvements.
The 29er is 622 and one would think that is was economically more feasible to use the same diameter as a traditional road rim than conduct extensive testing for the exact optimized diameter. As... is 622 really better than 610 or 630, or is just being better than a 26er (559) all that was needed?
John
#98
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times
in
760 Posts
I have considered this question over the years, as I like the 26" platform but, in real world application, do find 700c to roll faster. If only it weren't so.
What I think is that it goes beyond tire size to construction considerations.
Until recently, it was hard to get a 26" size tire designed for speed. Most come out of the off road or touring genre where durability is prioritized over speed. The same goes for wheelsets. Again, until recently, most 26" wheels were build for toughness rather than speed while 700c has a longer history (and trickle down effect) related to racing like lower spoke counts, aero design, light weight materials etc... And, lastly the gearing/geometry of 26" bikes usually hasn't been optimized for speed (unlike many 700c road bikes).
Add all those factors up and 700c has been historically faster than 26".
I'd like to see two similar bikes, using similarly designed wheelsets, with 26" and 700c tires go toe to toe. A part of me would be cheering for the underdog
What I think is that it goes beyond tire size to construction considerations.
Until recently, it was hard to get a 26" size tire designed for speed. Most come out of the off road or touring genre where durability is prioritized over speed. The same goes for wheelsets. Again, until recently, most 26" wheels were build for toughness rather than speed while 700c has a longer history (and trickle down effect) related to racing like lower spoke counts, aero design, light weight materials etc... And, lastly the gearing/geometry of 26" bikes usually hasn't been optimized for speed (unlike many 700c road bikes).
Add all those factors up and 700c has been historically faster than 26".
I'd like to see two similar bikes, using similarly designed wheelsets, with 26" and 700c tires go toe to toe. A part of me would be cheering for the underdog
Just writing that, even with good faith effort in controlling, there is so many possible meaningful differences other than simply wheel size. Aerodynamics of the rider being possibly huge.
#99
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,975
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
Jan Heine and Rene Herse (previously Compass) have always said they worked with Panaracer to develop their tire. Panaracers are well thought of and Rene Herse took a no compromise risk to work with Panaracer to develop a better tire and make (and market) them in previously neglected (or out of fashion) sizes.
It must be having a positive effect as Continental offers their GP5000 in 32mm, where the GP4000SII maxed out at 28mm.
It must be having a positive effect as Continental offers their GP5000 in 32mm, where the GP4000SII maxed out at 28mm.
Thus they now make the GP 5000 slightly narrower for a given labeled size, expecting the wider rims now in use to compensate somewhat.
Otto