You cant judge a tire widrh by its picture?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
You cant judge a tire widrh by its picture?
One of these ties is 40 mil the other 32 mil you tell me which one the one on the left or the one on the right
#2
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
It would be harder if you didn't leave one of the sizes clearly showing in the picture.
Likes For Bah Humbug:
#3
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,543
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3674 Post(s)
Liked 5,433 Times
in
2,759 Posts
^^^^
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 467
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 188 Post(s)
Liked 276 Times
in
161 Posts
The closer one is the 32.
By the way the tire has 3 lanes of tread across it, the slightly narrower look of the tire to the eye, the way the tire has wore in the center vs the overall width, because a highly trained eye can tell the difference between tire widths, I chose the closer tire.
........AND, it says 32 on it!
By the way the tire has 3 lanes of tread across it, the slightly narrower look of the tire to the eye, the way the tire has wore in the center vs the overall width, because a highly trained eye can tell the difference between tire widths, I chose the closer tire.
........AND, it says 32 on it!
Last edited by TheDudeIsHere; 01-17-20 at 10:22 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18377 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
The corollary, of course, is that you can't judge a tire's width by the manufacture's markings.
The one in back does appear to have a deeper sidwall. And, they may also look different if you had a top-down view.
The one in back does appear to have a deeper sidwall. And, they may also look different if you had a top-down view.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
And for my next trick. Pull my finger ...
That was a flop wasn't it.
But it's interesting that the 32mm tire actually blows up to be *taller* than the 40mm tire. This is significant to me, as tire height (for cushioning of road noise) is more important than width.
Do manufacturers assume that width is a surrogate for height? Unless your riding off road, then width is not that an interesting measure of a tire.
That was a flop wasn't it.
But it's interesting that the 32mm tire actually blows up to be *taller* than the 40mm tire. This is significant to me, as tire height (for cushioning of road noise) is more important than width.
Do manufacturers assume that width is a surrogate for height? Unless your riding off road, then width is not that an interesting measure of a tire.
#7
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times
in
4,189 Posts
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18377 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
But it's interesting that the 32mm tire actually blows up to be *taller* than the 40mm tire. This is significant to me, as tire height (for cushioning of road noise) is more important than width.
Do manufacturers assume that width is a surrogate for height? Unless your riding off road, then width is not that an interesting measure of a tire.
Do manufacturers assume that width is a surrogate for height? Unless your riding off road, then width is not that an interesting measure of a tire.
Cars tires get a flat profile by using fixed length circumferential belts around the tire. Thus, the tires are also marked with a width to height aspect ratio.
I hadn't realized those flat profile tires were being used on bikes. I'm trying to imagine the cost/benefit of that.