How unsafe is this? ..quill stem in a really long steerer tube
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
How unsafe is this? ..quill stem in a really long steerer tube
I know that framebuilding may be the wrong sub for this but thought I could find legitimate expertise here.
The bike has been ridden this way for years. No visible problems. I didn't measure the length of the quill but the expansion wedge is definitely above the headset by 1-2 inches.
The solution that "follows the rules" would be to cut the threaded portion off the steerer and find a huge 1" threadless stem, but when I stand back and look at it, intuitively, that seems like it would be about the same strength. Doesn't that just move all the stress to a point about 2 inches lower, but now without the center bracing of the quill? Of course, cutting the steerer all the way down will require a freakishly large stem - didn't find anything on ebay.
The bike has been ridden this way for years. No visible problems. I didn't measure the length of the quill but the expansion wedge is definitely above the headset by 1-2 inches.
The solution that "follows the rules" would be to cut the threaded portion off the steerer and find a huge 1" threadless stem, but when I stand back and look at it, intuitively, that seems like it would be about the same strength. Doesn't that just move all the stress to a point about 2 inches lower, but now without the center bracing of the quill? Of course, cutting the steerer all the way down will require a freakishly large stem - didn't find anything on ebay.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 956
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Liked 263 Times
in
212 Posts
I agree, I don't see anything actually wrong with it. Well apart from the fact that it's a bit ugly Either way you've got a long steerer and it's just whether you're attaching the stem with a couple of pinch bolts or an expander thing. Either is capable of holding the stem in place and at least the expander is closer to the bearing than the pinch bolts would be.
it looks like you really need a frame with a much longer head-tube.
it looks like you really need a frame with a much longer head-tube.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,081
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4204 Post(s)
Liked 3,861 Times
in
2,309 Posts
The big long term issue is the stem wedge bears on the threaded portion of the steerer. Which, BTW, is out of sight. The chance of a crack forming in one of the stress risers called threads is real. Every supplier and manufacturer that cares to list limits on their forks make clear that to do the above is wrong and voids warranties. That it requires some disassembly to monitor this possibility just adds the chance of chosen ignorance to the mix. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 956
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Liked 263 Times
in
212 Posts
The big long term issue is the stem wedge bears on the threaded portion of the steerer. Which, BTW, is out of sight. The chance of a crack forming in one of the stress risers called threads is real. Every supplier and manufacturer that cares to list limits on their forks make clear that to do the above is wrong and voids warranties. That it requires some disassembly to monitor this possibility just adds the chance of chosen ignorance to the mix. Andy
#5
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
I would say there are no right ways to get the stem in that position on that frame. It's a flat bar, get a stem that's not 130mm long and mount it within a reasonable distance of the top tube. Do your arms have to be stretched out in front of the bike like that? I say no.
Last edited by unterhausen; 02-09-21 at 12:21 PM.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I am 99% certain the wedge is below the threads. In my records it says quoted $80 to thread the steerer all the way down, and it's 20 bucks per inch.
This can be ran with no spacers - the clamp on the bottom holds the threadless headset in tension like a top cap would. If a stress riser where to form, do you think it would be noticeable if inspected from the outside of the steerer regularly?? Or are you thinking these things are invisible to the naked eye and fail catastrophically?
This can be ran with no spacers - the clamp on the bottom holds the threadless headset in tension like a top cap would. If a stress riser where to form, do you think it would be noticeable if inspected from the outside of the steerer regularly?? Or are you thinking these things are invisible to the naked eye and fail catastrophically?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,081
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4204 Post(s)
Liked 3,861 Times
in
2,309 Posts
I am 99% certain the wedge is below the threads. In my records it says quoted $80 to thread the steerer all the way down, and it's 20 bucks per inch.
That would surely require a custom stem, to have the quill that long. To not have that listed on the build order or service ticket means the place missed either charging you for the custom stem or didn't feel it was important enough to mention. But there's a way to find out, pull the stem and measure. Remember one measurement is worth a thousand assumptions. I would also suggest taking a look at the added threading. If done with a typical fork die the chance of thread form issues is far greater with a die cutting the threads then with a single pointing on a lathe. I will say that the years of use do suggest that the design has worked this long.
This can be ran with no spacers - the clamp on the bottom holds the threadless headset in tension like a top cap would. If a stress riser where to form, do you think it would be noticeable if inspected from the outside of the steerer regularly?? Or are you thinking these things are invisible to the naked eye and fail catastrophically?
That would surely require a custom stem, to have the quill that long. To not have that listed on the build order or service ticket means the place missed either charging you for the custom stem or didn't feel it was important enough to mention. But there's a way to find out, pull the stem and measure. Remember one measurement is worth a thousand assumptions. I would also suggest taking a look at the added threading. If done with a typical fork die the chance of thread form issues is far greater with a die cutting the threads then with a single pointing on a lathe. I will say that the years of use do suggest that the design has worked this long.
This can be ran with no spacers - the clamp on the bottom holds the threadless headset in tension like a top cap would. If a stress riser where to form, do you think it would be noticeable if inspected from the outside of the steerer regularly?? Or are you thinking these things are invisible to the naked eye and fail catastrophically?
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 507
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 103 Post(s)
Liked 144 Times
in
88 Posts
I think the best/better solution would be BMX handlebars. Lower the stem back down to normal height and install BMX bars to get the grips up high. This scares me for the reasons Andrew mentions. It might be fine for decades of normal use but that one time a car pulls out and you slam on the brakes and it shears will be the one time you'll regret it most.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/54319503@N05/
https://www.draper-cycles.com
https://www.flickr.com/photos/54319503@N05/
https://www.draper-cycles.com
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
If the steerer threads were exposed where the stem wedge is at then, yes, any issues due to the wedge's pressure should be in the open. Note I didn't say that a rider will see it (I am continually surprised how blind to easy to see or feel issues many riders can be). Steel has the wonderful quality of tending to tear once the crack has gone far enough to relax the stress. Tearing takes longer and sometimes gives a warning before complete separation. Andy
I think we may have a misunderstanding here - the threads were *not* cut lower, the work was never performed. The bike has a threadless headset held in place by a generic 1" clamp. The lock nut up top is taking the role usually performed by the star-nut. Given that those are 10mm spacers and the original estimate was for a 4 inch extension in order to fit a *threaded* headset, I am interpolating that the threads only go about 2-2.5" from the top of the steerer. I can see from looking up the bottom that the stem is definitely *not* an exotic piece with an extra-long quill. I am quite certain that it is higher than the top cup of the headset by a couple of centimeters.
Of course, I need to take it apart and measure it. But if the *top* of the wedge expander is still *below* the threads, would you call this acceptably safe for casual riding? I know that's a loaded question, I take responsibility for the consequences regardless.
#10
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
The only way I would run something like this is if I was dedicated to taking it apart on a regular schedule. That doesn't seem to be happening, so the answer is it's not safe. It does make me feel better if it's only threaded way up top.
I'm all for meeting people's physical needs. Is there a reason why your arms can't be lower? Can you show us a picture of the entire bike?
I'm all for meeting people's physical needs. Is there a reason why your arms can't be lower? Can you show us a picture of the entire bike?
#11
n00b
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,397
Bikes: Surly Karate Monkey, Twin Six Standard Rando
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 428 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times
in
273 Posts
I burst out laughing when I saw that photo. some people should not be allowed to work on bikes!
threaded steerer tubes can be cut and tapped to a reasonable length.
threaded steerer tubes can be cut and tapped to a reasonable length.
Likes For mack_turtle:
#12
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The only way I would run something like this is if I was dedicated to taking it apart on a regular schedule. That doesn't seem to be happening, so the answer is it's not safe. It does make me feel better if it's only threaded way up top.
I'm all for meeting people's physical needs. Is there a reason why your arms can't be lower? Can you show us a picture of the entire bike?
I'm all for meeting people's physical needs. Is there a reason why your arms can't be lower? Can you show us a picture of the entire bike?
I recently dropped big bucks on these tires, and only then did I realize... should I even be riding this thing? lol
Pro tip: 11 speed sram gripshift plus 11 speed shimano road derailleur = 7/8 speed cassette spacing.
Last edited by studbike1; 02-09-21 at 04:32 PM. Reason: weird URL
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 956
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Liked 263 Times
in
212 Posts
The only way I would run something like this is if I was dedicated to taking it apart on a regular schedule. That doesn't seem to be happening, so the answer is it's not safe. It does make me feel better if it's only threaded way up top.
I'm all for meeting people's physical needs. Is there a reason why your arms can't be lower? Can you show us a picture of the entire bike?
I'm all for meeting people's physical needs. Is there a reason why your arms can't be lower? Can you show us a picture of the entire bike?
The only difference I can see is that the part of the steerer with the wedge in it is more free to bend around. But that should mean it's harder for the wedge to chowder out the inside of the steerer because it will bend rather than allow relative motion.
Having such a long unsupported steerer (however the stem is attached) is unusual but they're often 1.3mm or so seamless cromoly which is stronger than the average seatpost. We have those sticking out by miles these days while we bounce around on them with all our weight. OP will also have less weight on the bar as he's quite likely set it so high in order to take weight off his hands.
#14
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
To the OP: If you were local to me, I have a frame and fork that I would give you that would fit much better than that.
Likes For unterhausen:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,081
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4204 Post(s)
Liked 3,861 Times
in
2,309 Posts
Thank you for your thoughtful reply.
I think we may have a misunderstanding here - the threads were *not* cut lower, the work was never performed. The bike has a threadless headset held in place by a generic 1" clamp. The lock nut up top is taking the role usually performed by the star-nut. Given that those are 10mm spacers and the original estimate was for a 4 inch extension in order to fit a *threaded* headset, I am interpolating that the threads only go about 2-2.5" from the top of the steerer. I can see from looking up the bottom that the stem is definitely *not* an exotic piece with an extra-long quill. I am quite certain that it is higher than the top cup of the headset by a couple of centimeters.
Of course, I need to take it apart and measure it. But if the *top* of the wedge expander is still *below* the threads, would you call this acceptably safe for casual riding? I know that's a loaded question, I take responsibility for the consequences regardless.
I think we may have a misunderstanding here - the threads were *not* cut lower, the work was never performed. The bike has a threadless headset held in place by a generic 1" clamp. The lock nut up top is taking the role usually performed by the star-nut. Given that those are 10mm spacers and the original estimate was for a 4 inch extension in order to fit a *threaded* headset, I am interpolating that the threads only go about 2-2.5" from the top of the steerer. I can see from looking up the bottom that the stem is definitely *not* an exotic piece with an extra-long quill. I am quite certain that it is higher than the top cup of the headset by a couple of centimeters.
Of course, I need to take it apart and measure it. But if the *top* of the wedge expander is still *below* the threads, would you call this acceptably safe for casual riding? I know that's a loaded question, I take responsibility for the consequences regardless.
Yes you are right. I thought that you had a threaded headset and thus the stem. That the steerer is "now" unthreaded my big concern is not as critical as I felt before. But I do agree with the bike's size as being likely not the best. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#16
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
The part of that bike that's going to break first is the top tube/seat tube weld. Nobody that builds frames expects to have the rider's weight cantilevered over the frame like that. Trek had trouble with some bikes breaking there anyway, although that was on aluminum frames.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 956
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Liked 263 Times
in
212 Posts
The part of that bike that's going to break first is the top tube/seat tube weld. Nobody that builds frames expects to have the rider's weight cantilevered over the frame like that. Trek had trouble with some bikes breaking there anyway, although that was on aluminum frames.
Interesting that you had some frames fail at the TT/HT though. DT/HT is also a common failure point I think (that's where my Trek steel frame failed).
#18
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
I happened to see broken MTB treks at the LBS, there were no mtbs when I worked at Trek other than some converted cruisers that were being ridden on dirt roads. Broken MTB frames at the seat tube/top tube is not uncommon, because they have long seat post exposure. Which is why you see extra tubes back there on a lot of bikes.
I like the way you think about the loads at the head tube. OTOH, the TT and DT are there to take up the moment. Certainly there are a lot of failures there, particularly on small frames with short head tubes. The problem at the seat cluster is that the seat tube will bend, and there is essentially a pivot set up by the stays and the top tube.
I like the way you think about the loads at the head tube. OTOH, the TT and DT are there to take up the moment. Certainly there are a lot of failures there, particularly on small frames with short head tubes. The problem at the seat cluster is that the seat tube will bend, and there is essentially a pivot set up by the stays and the top tube.
Likes For unterhausen:
#19
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
337 Posts
Disaster waiting to happen. Or at least, an inappropriate solution for a frame that's WAY too small. I'd get a new frame ASAP. If the steerer doesn't break the seat tube might.
Likes For Nessism:
#20
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Do you think an extra-long seatpost could help mitigate the possibility of a frame failure near the top of the seat tube? Seems intuitive to me that distributing the force over a larger area inside the tube could be helpful. Regardless the post definitely needs to go. It's over an inch above the min insertion line. hadn't even thought to look until i saw this
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 956
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Liked 263 Times
in
212 Posts
Do you think an extra-long seatpost could help mitigate the possibility of a frame failure near the top of the seat tube? Seems intuitive to me that distributing the force over a larger area inside the tube could be helpful. Regardless the post definitely needs to go. It's over an inch above the min insertion line. hadn't even thought to look until i saw this
#23
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts