Elwood, Rampart or ??
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Elwood, Rampart or ??
I'm about the buy a new 650b wheelset for my Fuji Jari and am trying to figure out tires. I live in Manhattan, so I ride a lot of pavement – streets & paved trails. But what I really enjoy is gravel trails. Some of the ones I ride are a little rough, but I don't encounter truly rough gravel very often – just now and then. One of the biggest issues is that I don't want tan sidewalls – they'd look pretty horrible on my bike (pic here) – which rules out the ones by WTB, and generally really reduces my options. The two I'm considering are:
Given all the pavement I ride on I'd think the Ramparts might make more sense. But I'm a little surprised they're heavier than the Elwoods which have more tread. Both the reviews of the "light & supple", 510g) version of the Ramparts mention they had no problems with punctures. One review says "the 'Light and Supple' moniker is a little bit optimistic. At 45psi, they ride more like a very sturdy road tire." So maybe the light & supple version actually has adequate puncture protection. That said, I hate flats (especially when riding with other people).
So in my situation which tire would you choose – the Elwood or the Rampart – or something else?
- Terrene Elwood Tough (525g)
- Teravail Rampart Durable (550g)
Given all the pavement I ride on I'd think the Ramparts might make more sense. But I'm a little surprised they're heavier than the Elwoods which have more tread. Both the reviews of the "light & supple", 510g) version of the Ramparts mention they had no problems with punctures. One review says "the 'Light and Supple' moniker is a little bit optimistic. At 45psi, they ride more like a very sturdy road tire." So maybe the light & supple version actually has adequate puncture protection. That said, I hate flats (especially when riding with other people).
So in my situation which tire would you choose – the Elwood or the Rampart – or something else?
#3
Reno/Seattle/NYC
Just to throw out a third option to complicate your choice, I've been riding Gravelking slicks for the last 6 months on my fixed gear, and they seem pretty durable so far. No flats yet, but their use have been limited to city riding in that time. I'm using small diameter tires on that bike, but they feel as fast as any other road tire I've ridden, and I've read that people recommend them for non-rough gravel. Seems like they come in 650x48, are about the same weight (520g) as the other options, and most importantly, have black sidewalls!
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Unfortunately, only seems to have tan sidewalls.
The GravelKing's are cheaper too. I'll look into them a bit further. Thanks!
Just to throw out a third option to complicate your choice, I've been riding Gravelking slicks for the last 6 months on my fixed gear, and they seem pretty durable so far. No flats yet, but their use have been limited to city riding in that time. I'm using small diameter tires on that bike, but they feel as fast as any other road tire I've ridden, and I've read that people recommend them for non-rough gravel. Seems like they come in 650x48, are about the same weight (520g) as the other options, and most importantly, have black sidewalls!
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,063
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1216 Post(s)
Liked 183 Times
in
116 Posts
The GK slicks in 48mm ride similar to iron-shod wagon wheels. Would not recommend.
For some reason tire manufacturers are giving the slick versions of their tires much thicker tread than the knobbie versions. The Horizon has something like ~5mm of tread rubber while the byway has ~2.7mm of tread rubber and the resolute has ~2.5mm.
That's not surprising. Unless the rider is above 210 pounds that's way excessive pressure for a 47mm tire. Sidewall collapse during cornering for supple tires happens around 20-25 psi for riders between 160-190 and the good pressure range seems to be 22-38psi, IME. The casing tension and relative comfort level would be equivalent to a 23mm tire at 120+ psi.
I think your best options are the Rampart light and supple or the Compass Switchback Hill. Those are the two I'd ride if I needed black sidewalls.
For some reason tire manufacturers are giving the slick versions of their tires much thicker tread than the knobbie versions. The Horizon has something like ~5mm of tread rubber while the byway has ~2.7mm of tread rubber and the resolute has ~2.5mm.
At 45psi, they ride more like a very sturdy road tire."
I think your best options are the Rampart light and supple or the Compass Switchback Hill. Those are the two I'd ride if I needed black sidewalls.
#6
Senior Member
And per Josh Poertner's data, the spring rate of a tire loses width-dependence as the deflector gets narrower. Wider tires do need lower pressures than narrower tires in order to achieve comparable compliance, but I think to a less dramatic degree than you think.
Regardless though, I probably wouldn't pump a Rampart to 45PSI and expect a super plush ride.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,063
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1216 Post(s)
Liked 183 Times
in
116 Posts
I know the data, I read the same blog and follow the posts on Slowtwitch and elsewhere. Do a blind test of a 28mm tire at 8bar and a 23mm tire at 8bar and see if it matches the data. Riding on the road isn't going from flat, to 8mm bumps to flat. A 28mm tire at 8bar is significantly different than the chart would have you believe. I'm talking from experience, not spit-balling - I try to moderate and temper what I see in the real world with what I read online.
Regardless, a Switchback hill is significantly more supple than a Rampart. I haven't been able to test very well but I estimate SBH requires 12-15% more pressure for the same relative sag percent/rolling speed as the Rampart due to the tire design. So your 40r/35f would be more equivalent to ~34-35r/29-31f in the Rampart. 45psi would be almost 25% more pressure than what you're running if the reviewer had the same bike+rider weight. Pump them up to 48r/44f and see how they ride.
Although I was talking only rider weight. Figure my remark as at least 235 rider+bike weight.
The spring rate of supple balloon and demi-balloon tires also behaves differently than narrower tires, as well as wheel diameter being a factor. A supple 650b tire 40mm+ wide has much more bounce and vertical motion at the same sag rate percentage as a narrower tire once pressures get high and sag percent gets low. Say a 23mm tire at 3% sag is going to be much more comfortable because it has significantly less spring up/back force than a 48mm tire at 3% sag. It's definitely not a linear relationship, which the data for narrower tires does not directly show but does suggest.
Also, keep in mind that a big part of the wide-tires marketing and "science" is based around the idea that riders cannot or have a very difficult time recognizing and evaluating feedback. This is a massively sweeping dismissal and should be recognized anytime discussion occurs.
A lot of science isn't robust on the face and is using other non-robust science as a building point. So being able to observe and evaluate is more important than just being able to read and apply. More expensive for sure but much better.
Regardless, a Switchback hill is significantly more supple than a Rampart. I haven't been able to test very well but I estimate SBH requires 12-15% more pressure for the same relative sag percent/rolling speed as the Rampart due to the tire design. So your 40r/35f would be more equivalent to ~34-35r/29-31f in the Rampart. 45psi would be almost 25% more pressure than what you're running if the reviewer had the same bike+rider weight. Pump them up to 48r/44f and see how they ride.
Although I was talking only rider weight. Figure my remark as at least 235 rider+bike weight.
The spring rate of supple balloon and demi-balloon tires also behaves differently than narrower tires, as well as wheel diameter being a factor. A supple 650b tire 40mm+ wide has much more bounce and vertical motion at the same sag rate percentage as a narrower tire once pressures get high and sag percent gets low. Say a 23mm tire at 3% sag is going to be much more comfortable because it has significantly less spring up/back force than a 48mm tire at 3% sag. It's definitely not a linear relationship, which the data for narrower tires does not directly show but does suggest.
Also, keep in mind that a big part of the wide-tires marketing and "science" is based around the idea that riders cannot or have a very difficult time recognizing and evaluating feedback. This is a massively sweeping dismissal and should be recognized anytime discussion occurs.
My initial thoughts about this were that the ‘Just Noticeable Difference’ which is the smallest change that can be accurately noticed by humans has been shown to be between 10 and 15% for ride stiffness (much of the work on this was done by Damon Rinard, mentioned in Part 1 and his work on this topic with Cervelo can be found HERE)..and the difference here between the 23 and 28mm tire is only about 8-9%.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
https://www.renehersecycles.com/shop...itchback-hill/
#9
Senior Member
I don't see how it would matter for NYC riding which casing you choose. They use the same tread design, and both casings are just thin rubber-coated fabric.
#10
Senior Member
For the kind of riding you're planning on doing I'd stick to a file-tread, or similar with small knobs at the side.
I've ridden the Elwood (Light) on paved for long stretches. Probably would do the trick at higher pressures (to improve rolling resistance), but I personally found it a little sticky/draggy.
Its too bad you don't want tan-wall, as I would have suggested the Simworks Volummy (42?). Quite a bit of robustness about it.
I've ridden the Elwood (Light) on paved for long stretches. Probably would do the trick at higher pressures (to improve rolling resistance), but I personally found it a little sticky/draggy.
Its too bad you don't want tan-wall, as I would have suggested the Simworks Volummy (42?). Quite a bit of robustness about it.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I’m just assuming “puncture protection” means something. Yeah, a big piece of a broken glass bottle will probably rip though just about anything. But pieces of tempered glass from a broken car window are a lot less sharp and stabby. That’s the sort of stuff I’d like to be able to roll over from time to time without a flat tire. I mean I try to avoid stuff like that, but sometimes it’s just impossible.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I was just thinking… Would it be weird to use a Rampart Durable in the rear and a Rampart Light & Supple in front? That gives me more puncture protection where I need it most without completely giving up on good ride quality. And I doubt anyone would notice they’re not the same tire.
Last edited by JayNYC; 02-26-19 at 04:45 AM.
#13
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,604
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times
in
4,181 Posts
I was just thinking… Would it be weird to use a Rampart Durable in the rear and a Rampart Light & Supple in front? That gives me more puncture protection where I need it most without completely giving up on good ride quality. And I doubt anyone would notice they’re not the same tire.
Also, some ride different width tires for road, gravel, and MTB. Sometimes its due to frame clearance limitations and sometimes its their own little experiment in life.
Beyond the tire fitting the wheel and frame/fork, there are no set rules for tire buying,
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
So I wound up ordering a Rampart "Durable" for the back and a Rampart "Light & Supple" for the front. I was a bit surprised when I weight them though… The light & supple tire was 531g (advertised to be 510g, so 21g overweight), and the durable version was 537g (advertised to be 550g, so 13 grams underweight). The "durable" was only 5.4g heavier than the "light & supple". It makes me wonder if they're not the same tire with different badging, and they just mark the heavier ones that come off the production line "durable" and the lighter ones "light & supple". Very weird.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
335 Posts
That should do you well - in theory at least. Their Elwood has about 100g difference between light and durable constructions - surprised these are the same. I like a light supple front tire - gives me better feel and cush, and the weigh savings is a plus. A little more protection in the rear gives some piece of mind - I never flat on the front unless I hit something pretty hard.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ksdog
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
12
09-23-19 06:02 PM
mkoscienski
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
11
09-29-18 03:51 PM
tomazo
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
7
12-27-16 08:00 PM