Bike is VERY sensitive.....
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: 33.85485, -78.53622
Posts: 99
Bikes: A Janky Schwinn
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
14 Posts
Bike is VERY sensitive.....
You can follow my build at https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-m...ld-thread.html
Now that I have it built it is crazy sensitive to steering inputs. Almost scary to ride. Not much on the geometry has changed other than the front fork, but that was minimal.
Now that I have it built it is crazy sensitive to steering inputs. Almost scary to ride. Not much on the geometry has changed other than the front fork, but that was minimal.
#2
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,222
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2585 Post(s)
Liked 5,644 Times
in
2,922 Posts
Sounds like something in the headset needs some real tightening.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Likes For rsbob:
#4
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,222
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2585 Post(s)
Liked 5,644 Times
in
2,922 Posts
Too steep a fork? The closer to vertical, the twitchier the steering.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Likes For rsbob:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 728
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 365 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times
in
248 Posts
Are you sure that it isn't you?
I have two bikes, one is a touring bike and the other is a "racier" geometry. When I ride the "racy" bike after a bunch of time on the touring bike, the "racy" bike feels very twitchy. It takes a while to get used to the racier bike again.
Sorry, I'm not knowledgeable enough about bike geometry to give advice about forks.
I have two bikes, one is a touring bike and the other is a "racier" geometry. When I ride the "racy" bike after a bunch of time on the touring bike, the "racy" bike feels very twitchy. It takes a while to get used to the racier bike again.
Sorry, I'm not knowledgeable enough about bike geometry to give advice about forks.
#7
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,547
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3674 Post(s)
Liked 5,437 Times
in
2,763 Posts
Not surprised....
Likes For shelbyfv:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,601
Bikes: 06 Lemond Reno, 98 GT Timberline mtn.bike
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Liked 700 Times
in
436 Posts
Here's a link that might help, lots of things to consider when replacing a fork (and go thru the Related Pages at the btm of the page): Fork Length - Bike Insights
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 2,397
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 1,825 Times
in
878 Posts
I guess all those number DO mean something.
Fork rake
Axle to crown distance
Head tube angle
Overall diameter wheel diameter
Education costs money, especially after you need it.
Fork rake
Axle to crown distance
Head tube angle
Overall diameter wheel diameter
Education costs money, especially after you need it.
__________________
Likes For nomadmax:
#11
Senior Member
I browsed through the thread and didn't see a pic of the bike with the new fork on it. I think that RSBob hit on it - you installed an incorrect fork, one that dropped the head tube and consequently made the steering angle steeper. Since you started with a suspension fork, you need a fork that maintains your steerer tube at its former height. Is it possible to add an inch or two of spacer between the crown and steerer tube? If not, it's new fork time.
#12
Full Member
Until I see a pic of the complete build, I’m going with the theory that the fork was installed backwards.
Likes For Rogerogeroge:
#13
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,810 Times
in
3,318 Posts
I don't know that there was a picture of the finished product. So how are we to even guess what might be up. Although if nothing is loose and wobbly, then the fork being on backwards might be a good thing to check.
I suppose it's possible that you may have gotten a fork that the rake and your head tube angle just won't work right together. But I also wonder it it's just that you aren't use to sporty handling. What previous bikes do you ride that you are comparing this steering to?
I suppose it's possible that you may have gotten a fork that the rake and your head tube angle just won't work right together. But I also wonder it it's just that you aren't use to sporty handling. What previous bikes do you ride that you are comparing this steering to?
#14
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,182
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
534 Posts
Going by the build thread; OP replaced a suspension fork on his Schwinn hybrid with what I think is a "standard" road disk fork (not suspension -corrected). There was also a change in handlebars / stem as well.
Could totally result in significant changes in geometry/ handling; esp since the spirit of the build was " A Frame is a Frame, and a Part is a Part, and I'm not going to let the naysayers get in my way "
Could totally result in significant changes in geometry/ handling; esp since the spirit of the build was " A Frame is a Frame, and a Part is a Part, and I'm not going to let the naysayers get in my way "
#15
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,985
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26425 Post(s)
Liked 10,381 Times
in
7,209 Posts
.
... that bike took a lot of abuse in the build thread. I can see where it might be sensitive at this point.
... that bike took a lot of abuse in the build thread. I can see where it might be sensitive at this point.
__________________
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
This sounds like a trail issue. Trail is the distance between where an extension of the headtube would hit the road and the point on the road directly under the hub. It can be both observed and calculated. The further the point below the hub is behind the head tube extension point, the more stable the handling.
Another factor that affects perceived "twitchiness" is how far your hands are in front of the headtube/steerer centerline. The further, the more stable. You have a short stem and near straight handlebars that are in fact swept back a little so your hands are maybe 3" forward of that centerline.
Measure or calculate your trail. (And get it right; small differences between trails make a big difference in handling. 45 to 55 mm covers most of the bikes out there.) Until you know the trail, you are just trying to shoot pigeons in a dark barn. (Yes, rule out loose/tight headsets and other mechanical issues.)
Another factor that affects perceived "twitchiness" is how far your hands are in front of the headtube/steerer centerline. The further, the more stable. You have a short stem and near straight handlebars that are in fact swept back a little so your hands are maybe 3" forward of that centerline.
Measure or calculate your trail. (And get it right; small differences between trails make a big difference in handling. 45 to 55 mm covers most of the bikes out there.) Until you know the trail, you are just trying to shoot pigeons in a dark barn. (Yes, rule out loose/tight headsets and other mechanical issues.)
Last edited by 79pmooney; 05-03-23 at 10:54 AM. Reason: multiple typos
Likes For 79pmooney:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
Likes For 79pmooney:
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3513 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
I'm going with the new fork changed the front-end geometry.
Likes For smd4:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Brighton, Michigan
Posts: 662
Bikes: Optima Baron LR, '14 Nishiki Maricopa,'87 Trek 330 Elance, '89 Miyata 1400, '85 Peugeot PGN10, '04 Fuji Ace, '06 Giant Rincon, '95 Giant Allegre, '83 Trek 620, '86 Schwinn High Sierra
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 225 Post(s)
Liked 163 Times
in
107 Posts
Put that bike through USMC boot camp. I will come out less sensitive, even maybe a darker sense of humor.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
Likes For 79pmooney:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,479 Times
in
1,836 Posts
The guy put a shorter, steeper fork on hi8s bike and is surprised that now it responds like it has a shorter, steeper fork.
Kudos for having the courage to try, but in matters where you might end up eating pavement, it is good to do a little research first.
Kudos for having the courage to try, but in matters where you might end up eating pavement, it is good to do a little research first.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3513 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
Compared to the stock photo of your bike posted in the first post of the rebuild thread, I'm still going with "shorter fork." I'd also angle those bars back a bit (make them "flat"), if it were mine.
Kudos for rebuilding it. Maybe you'll get used to the ride.
Kudos for rebuilding it. Maybe you'll get used to the ride.
Last edited by smd4; 05-03-23 at 01:29 PM.
Likes For smd4: