What's so hard about figuring average speed?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 3,811
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What's so hard about figuring average speed?
Seems like every week or two there's a new post about figuring average speed, often with a debate over how to do it.
I can think of only two ways: you divide the distance by the total time from start to finish, say 100 miles between 7 a.m. and 2 p.m., for an average of 14mph and change, or you divide the distance by the actual riding time, say five hours, for an average of 20.
What am I missing?
I can think of only two ways: you divide the distance by the total time from start to finish, say 100 miles between 7 a.m. and 2 p.m., for an average of 14mph and change, or you divide the distance by the actual riding time, say five hours, for an average of 20.
What am I missing?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
that first 5 miles doesn't count because it was the warmup. Neither does the last 5 miles because I was cooling down. Wait there was that couple I was stuck behind for 3 miles, and those 2 stoplights. That hill too. But those 3 miles I hammered on the flat section felt like I was averaging 25mph sustained, that must have been my real average....
#4
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
that first 5 miles doesn't count because it was the warmup. Neither does the last 5 miles because I was cooling down. Wait there was that couple I was stuck behind for 3 miles, and those 2 stoplights. That hill too. But those 3 miles I hammered on the flat section felt like I was averaging 25mph sustained, that must have been my real average....
#5
Serious Cyclist
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308
Bikes: Emonda SL6
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times
in
99 Posts
There isn't anything hard about it, and it is meaningless, but it's nice to live in make believe land where it matters and you tell yourself the only reason your bike computer shows an average of 17 mph when you wanted it to show 20 is because you hit those 4 red lights on a 2 hour ride
#6
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
Don't most cyclists look at their computers when they are descending a hill, with a good tailwind behind, and call the number they see on their computer their average speed?
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
It's because most of the folks here who want to use their computer to get average speed say that it's only fair to stop the watch fpr all nonmoving time (Garmins can be set to auto do this)
Obviously if you stop for 5 minutes every hour of riding, your average speed will thus be inflated relative to your time without stopping the clock.
I've done both, and at least for me, the only way to keep it honest is to never stop the watch once you're started - I get a full 1-2mph gain in avg speed when I cut out stoppage time from lights etc.
Obviously if you stop for 5 minutes every hour of riding, your average speed will thus be inflated relative to your time without stopping the clock.
I've done both, and at least for me, the only way to keep it honest is to never stop the watch once you're started - I get a full 1-2mph gain in avg speed when I cut out stoppage time from lights etc.
#8
Full Member
You cant calculate average speed if you include time that you weren't moving, or at least that makes sense in my mind. Don't most computers stop when you are stopped? Mine does
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I have a local loop here in Norcal, and there are 11 minutes of lights per hour on average on this loop when I look at the stoppage time, and this isn't even urban riding. Id be joking myself if I thought I could routinely ride a solo 24mph for an hour based upon that average speed given the 11 mins of stoppage time.
I've seen even more egregious cases where riders here say they've average like 22mph solo for a organized century ride, and they're not even competitive roadies. Turns out they stop the clock for all lights, all stopsigns, all slowing to <10mph when there's a pack, stopped for an HOUR+ for lunch, stopped for another HOUR+ for 3 feed stops. You gotta be friggin' kidding me.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 775
Bikes: 2019 KonaLibre- 2003 Litespeed Vortex -2016 Intense Spider Factory Build -2008 Wilier Mortorolio- Specialized Stumpjumper Hardtail converted to bafang 750 mid drive -1986 Paramount 2014 - --- Pivot Mach 429c
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times
in
11 Posts
In Strava I trust
#12
Powered by pie
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 203
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 2,201
Bikes: Roubaix / Shiv
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Seems like every week or two there's a new post about figuring average speed, often with a debate over how to do it.
I can think of only two ways: you divide the distance by the total time from start to finish, say 100 miles between 7 a.m. and 2 p.m., for an average of 14mph and change, or you divide the distance by the actual riding time, say five hours, for an average of 20.
What am I missing?
I can think of only two ways: you divide the distance by the total time from start to finish, say 100 miles between 7 a.m. and 2 p.m., for an average of 14mph and change, or you divide the distance by the actual riding time, say five hours, for an average of 20.
What am I missing?
Mission accomplished?
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Vlaamse Ardennen, Belgium
Posts: 3,898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Average speed is a very interesting parameter ... but on a personal level.
If consistently measured over time ... it's a good parameter to keep track of overall training and fitness level.
It can also, to some extend, be used to get a general idea of the fitness level of other riders ... but some other parameters like stopping time, total distance and elevation gain need to be mentioned in conjunction with it.
If consistently measured over time ... it's a good parameter to keep track of overall training and fitness level.
It can also, to some extend, be used to get a general idea of the fitness level of other riders ... but some other parameters like stopping time, total distance and elevation gain need to be mentioned in conjunction with it.
#15
Blissketeer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Average speed on what? My 50-100mile flat routes or the ones that include 5000-10000ft of climbing? What is the point of AVG speed again....?
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I rest my case. You start a 30 mile loop, you want your average speed, you include every last second of it. Stoplights, water breaks, biobreaks, they all count in the total.
I have a local loop here in Norcal, and there are 11 minutes of lights per hour on average on this loop when I look at the stoppage time, and this isn't even urban riding. Id be joking myself if I thought I could routinely ride a solo 24mph for an hour based upon that average speed given the 11 mins of stoppage time.
I've seen even more egregious cases where riders here say they've average like 22mph solo for a organized century ride, and they're not even competitive roadies. Turns out they stop the clock for all lights, all stopsigns, all slowing to <10mph when there's a pack, stopped for an HOUR+ for lunch, stopped for another HOUR+ for 3 feed stops. You gotta be friggin' kidding me.
I have a local loop here in Norcal, and there are 11 minutes of lights per hour on average on this loop when I look at the stoppage time, and this isn't even urban riding. Id be joking myself if I thought I could routinely ride a solo 24mph for an hour based upon that average speed given the 11 mins of stoppage time.
I've seen even more egregious cases where riders here say they've average like 22mph solo for a organized century ride, and they're not even competitive roadies. Turns out they stop the clock for all lights, all stopsigns, all slowing to <10mph when there's a pack, stopped for an HOUR+ for lunch, stopped for another HOUR+ for 3 feed stops. You gotta be friggin' kidding me.
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,190
Bikes: LOOK 595 & Cannondale CAAD9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
People make too many excuses for their average speed. That's the only real problem IMO. I set my Garmin device to include zeros for both speed and power. The time spent at a stop light or a food stop during a century is time you are resting. It should still be counted as part of the ride because it's no different than coasting down the road without pedaling. You are conserving energy either way and that energy could be spent while moving to make up for the decrease in average speed. So for me, average speed is purely total distance/total time.
#20
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,072
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22614 Post(s)
Liked 8,935 Times
in
4,164 Posts
#21
Throw the stick!!!!
Better question, why do people care about average speed?
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
#23
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,072
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22614 Post(s)
Liked 8,935 Times
in
4,164 Posts
At work some folks know I am a cyclist. It seems like the novice cyclists are fixated on average speed and folks are coming up to me saying "I rode x miles at average speed y."
I just nod my head and smile, saying "hey that's good."
I have no friggin clue about my average speed and don't give a damn.
I just nod my head and smile, saying "hey that's good."
I have no friggin clue about my average speed and don't give a damn.
#24
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,072
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22614 Post(s)
Liked 8,935 Times
in
4,164 Posts
Also, as a newly minted triathlete, it seems runners (and to a lesser extent, swimmers) are focused on their pace.
"I can run 7 minute miles." "I finally got my 100m time down under 2:00."
What these folks don't get is that average speed or pace may have relevance in running or swimming, but on a bike you have so many variables, wind, hills, stop lights, etc. that average speed/pace is virtually meaningless.
"I can run 7 minute miles." "I finally got my 100m time down under 2:00."
What these folks don't get is that average speed or pace may have relevance in running or swimming, but on a bike you have so many variables, wind, hills, stop lights, etc. that average speed/pace is virtually meaningless.
#25
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
The vast majority of the time, I don't care.
The only time I do care is when I'm on a randonnee. The minimum speed on a randonnee (600K and under) is 15 km/h (including all breaks, of course), so on a 200K, I need to finish the ride in less than 13.5 hours. I need to keep my average speed up.
The only time I do care is when I'm on a randonnee. The minimum speed on a randonnee (600K and under) is 15 km/h (including all breaks, of course), so on a 200K, I need to finish the ride in less than 13.5 hours. I need to keep my average speed up.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery