Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

What's so hard about figuring average speed?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

What's so hard about figuring average speed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-12, 09:04 PM
  #1  
Velo Dog
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 3,811
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What's so hard about figuring average speed?

Seems like every week or two there's a new post about figuring average speed, often with a debate over how to do it.
I can think of only two ways: you divide the distance by the total time from start to finish, say 100 miles between 7 a.m. and 2 p.m., for an average of 14mph and change, or you divide the distance by the actual riding time, say five hours, for an average of 20.
What am I missing?
Velo Dog is offline  
Old 05-23-12, 09:07 PM
  #2  
GP
Senior Member
 
GP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,630
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Third way - look at the AVG on your computer.
GP is offline  
Old 05-23-12, 09:08 PM
  #3  
redlude97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 173 Posts
that first 5 miles doesn't count because it was the warmup. Neither does the last 5 miles because I was cooling down. Wait there was that couple I was stuck behind for 3 miles, and those 2 stoplights. That hill too. But those 3 miles I hammered on the flat section felt like I was averaging 25mph sustained, that must have been my real average....
redlude97 is offline  
Old 05-23-12, 09:12 PM
  #4  
Sixty Fiver
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
Originally Posted by redlude97
that first 5 miles doesn't count because it was the warmup. Neither does the last 5 miles because I was cooling down. Wait there was that couple I was stuck behind for 3 miles, and those 2 stoplights. That hill too. But those 3 miles I hammered on the flat section felt like I was averaging 25mph sustained, that must have been my real average....
I usually cover the last 5 miles at speeds as good or better than when I started out... like an old horse running for the barn at the end of a ride.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 05-23-12, 09:14 PM
  #5  
Dan333SP
Serious Cyclist
 
Dan333SP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308

Bikes: Emonda SL6

Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times in 99 Posts
There isn't anything hard about it, and it is meaningless, but it's nice to live in make believe land where it matters and you tell yourself the only reason your bike computer shows an average of 17 mph when you wanted it to show 20 is because you hit those 4 red lights on a 2 hour ride
Dan333SP is offline  
Old 05-23-12, 09:14 PM
  #6  
Machka 
In Real Life
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152

Bikes: Lots

Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times in 329 Posts
Don't most cyclists look at their computers when they are descending a hill, with a good tailwind behind, and call the number they see on their computer their average speed?

Machka is offline  
Old 05-23-12, 09:22 PM
  #7  
hhnngg1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
It's because most of the folks here who want to use their computer to get average speed say that it's only fair to stop the watch fpr all nonmoving time (Garmins can be set to auto do this)

Obviously if you stop for 5 minutes every hour of riding, your average speed will thus be inflated relative to your time without stopping the clock.

I've done both, and at least for me, the only way to keep it honest is to never stop the watch once you're started - I get a full 1-2mph gain in avg speed when I cut out stoppage time from lights etc.
hhnngg1 is offline  
Old 05-23-12, 09:36 PM
  #8  
denvertrout
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Denver
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
You cant calculate average speed if you include time that you weren't moving, or at least that makes sense in my mind. Don't most computers stop when you are stopped? Mine does
denvertrout is offline  
Old 05-23-12, 10:13 PM
  #9  
Reynolds 
Passista
 
Reynolds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,604

Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 870 Post(s)
Liked 723 Times in 398 Posts
Last month I rode 1140 km in 720 hs, for an average speed of 1.58 kph.
Reynolds is offline  
Old 05-23-12, 10:41 PM
  #10  
hhnngg1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by denvertrout
You cant calculate average speed if you include time that you weren't moving, or at least that makes sense in my mind. Don't most computers stop when you are stopped? Mine does
I rest my case. You start a 30 mile loop, you want your average speed, you include every last second of it. Stoplights, water breaks, biobreaks, they all count in the total.

I have a local loop here in Norcal, and there are 11 minutes of lights per hour on average on this loop when I look at the stoppage time, and this isn't even urban riding. Id be joking myself if I thought I could routinely ride a solo 24mph for an hour based upon that average speed given the 11 mins of stoppage time.

I've seen even more egregious cases where riders here say they've average like 22mph solo for a organized century ride, and they're not even competitive roadies. Turns out they stop the clock for all lights, all stopsigns, all slowing to <10mph when there's a pack, stopped for an HOUR+ for lunch, stopped for another HOUR+ for 3 feed stops. You gotta be friggin' kidding me.
hhnngg1 is offline  
Old 05-23-12, 10:47 PM
  #11  
Gallo
Senior Member
 
Gallo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 775

Bikes: 2019 KonaLibre- 2003 Litespeed Vortex -2016 Intense Spider Factory Build -2008 Wilier Mortorolio- Specialized Stumpjumper Hardtail converted to bafang 750 mid drive -1986 Paramount 2014 - --- Pivot Mach 429c

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
In Strava I trust
Gallo is offline  
Old 05-23-12, 11:16 PM
  #12  
Ooompa Loompa
Powered by pie
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 203
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gallo
In Strava I trust
I love Strava for distance traveled and average speed, but for elevation gain I subtract ~35%
Ooompa Loompa is offline  
Old 05-23-12, 11:47 PM
  #13  
jmX
Senior Member
 
jmX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 2,201

Bikes: Roubaix / Shiv

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Velo Dog
Seems like every week or two there's a new post about figuring average speed, often with a debate over how to do it.
I can think of only two ways: you divide the distance by the total time from start to finish, say 100 miles between 7 a.m. and 2 p.m., for an average of 14mph and change, or you divide the distance by the actual riding time, say five hours, for an average of 20.
What am I missing?
I think you just got riled up over a thread that was started as a joke. In turn, you started yet another average speed thread.

Mission accomplished?
jmX is offline  
Old 05-24-12, 02:29 AM
  #14  
AdelaaR
Senior Member
 
AdelaaR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Vlaamse Ardennen, Belgium
Posts: 3,898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Average speed is a very interesting parameter ... but on a personal level.
If consistently measured over time ... it's a good parameter to keep track of overall training and fitness level.
It can also, to some extend, be used to get a general idea of the fitness level of other riders ... but some other parameters like stopping time, total distance and elevation gain need to be mentioned in conjunction with it.
AdelaaR is offline  
Old 05-24-12, 02:39 AM
  #15  
HokuLoa
Blissketeer
 
HokuLoa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Average speed on what? My 50-100mile flat routes or the ones that include 5000-10000ft of climbing? What is the point of AVG speed again....?
HokuLoa is offline  
Old 05-24-12, 06:43 AM
  #16  
halfspeed
Senior Member
 
halfspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275

Bikes: are better than yours.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by hhnngg1
I rest my case. You start a 30 mile loop, you want your average speed, you include every last second of it. Stoplights, water breaks, biobreaks, they all count in the total.

I have a local loop here in Norcal, and there are 11 minutes of lights per hour on average on this loop when I look at the stoppage time, and this isn't even urban riding. Id be joking myself if I thought I could routinely ride a solo 24mph for an hour based upon that average speed given the 11 mins of stoppage time.

I've seen even more egregious cases where riders here say they've average like 22mph solo for a organized century ride, and they're not even competitive roadies. Turns out they stop the clock for all lights, all stopsigns, all slowing to <10mph when there's a pack, stopped for an HOUR+ for lunch, stopped for another HOUR+ for 3 feed stops. You gotta be friggin' kidding me.
I'm having a hard time seeing how any of that matters.
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
halfspeed is offline  
Old 05-24-12, 06:48 AM
  #17  
ilovecycling
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,190

Bikes: LOOK 595 & Cannondale CAAD9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
People make too many excuses for their average speed. That's the only real problem IMO. I set my Garmin device to include zeros for both speed and power. The time spent at a stop light or a food stop during a century is time you are resting. It should still be counted as part of the ride because it's no different than coasting down the road without pedaling. You are conserving energy either way and that energy could be spent while moving to make up for the decrease in average speed. So for me, average speed is purely total distance/total time.
ilovecycling is offline  
Old 05-24-12, 06:49 AM
  #18  
topflightpro
Senior Member
 
topflightpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,570
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1852 Post(s)
Liked 679 Times in 430 Posts
Because sometimes I forget to turn off my Garmin on the drive home, and I have stretches where I"m doing 70 mph driving down the highway.
topflightpro is offline  
Old 05-24-12, 06:53 AM
  #19  
DropDeadFred
Senior Member
 
DropDeadFred's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,429

Bikes: 2013 orca

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've got this chart....but I'm only going to tell you about it, not show you...
DropDeadFred is offline  
Old 05-24-12, 06:55 AM
  #20  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,072

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22614 Post(s)
Liked 8,935 Times in 4,164 Posts
Hey, if they make adblock software why can't they make an app to filter out any posts with "average speed" in the title??
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 05-24-12, 06:56 AM
  #21  
LowCel 
Throw the stick!!!!
 
LowCel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 18,150

Bikes: GMC Denali

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 176 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 31 Posts
Better question, why do people care about average speed?
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
LowCel is offline  
Old 05-24-12, 07:09 AM
  #22  
ilovecycling
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,190

Bikes: LOOK 595 & Cannondale CAAD9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by LowCel
Better question, why do people care about average speed?
So they can say, "I ride this fast for this long."
ilovecycling is offline  
Old 05-24-12, 07:11 AM
  #23  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,072

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22614 Post(s)
Liked 8,935 Times in 4,164 Posts
At work some folks know I am a cyclist. It seems like the novice cyclists are fixated on average speed and folks are coming up to me saying "I rode x miles at average speed y."

I just nod my head and smile, saying "hey that's good."

I have no friggin clue about my average speed and don't give a damn.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 05-24-12, 07:13 AM
  #24  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,072

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22614 Post(s)
Liked 8,935 Times in 4,164 Posts
Also, as a newly minted triathlete, it seems runners (and to a lesser extent, swimmers) are focused on their pace.

"I can run 7 minute miles." "I finally got my 100m time down under 2:00."

What these folks don't get is that average speed or pace may have relevance in running or swimming, but on a bike you have so many variables, wind, hills, stop lights, etc. that average speed/pace is virtually meaningless.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 05-24-12, 07:15 AM
  #25  
Machka 
In Real Life
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152

Bikes: Lots

Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times in 329 Posts
Originally Posted by LowCel
Better question, why do people care about average speed?
The vast majority of the time, I don't care.

The only time I do care is when I'm on a randonnee. The minimum speed on a randonnee (600K and under) is 15 km/h (including all breaks, of course), so on a 200K, I need to finish the ride in less than 13.5 hours. I need to keep my average speed up.
Machka is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.