Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

I'm not convinced wider tires are better

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

I'm not convinced wider tires are better

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-18, 07:40 PM
  #1  
uprightbent
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington DC area
Posts: 335
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 57 Times in 25 Posts
I'm not convinced wider tires are better

Since the huge shift to wider tires running at lower pressures, I'm still not giving up my 28's. We've been told that narrower tires just "feel" faster, due to vibrations, and I believe that. So if the wider tires are just as fast, I'm gonna take the ones that feel faster, even though it's all in my head.

I've been riding two vintage Miyatas with 700 x 32's and 35's, the other having 27" wheels running a 28 width. Of course there are many variables involved here, but I can't get over how much faster the narrower feels. I should add this is pavement only for me. I know it's just a feel, but isn't "feel" what theses bikes are all about. How the steel-leather-wool feels. If you're not racing, why not extend that feel bias to the tires as well? I guess I'm in the minority here surrounded by all the fat rubber I see online and in the street.......
uprightbent is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 07:45 PM
  #2  
Cyclist0108
Occam's Rotor
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times in 1,164 Posts
Cyclist0108 is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 07:58 PM
  #3  
brianmcg123
Senior Member
 
brianmcg123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TN
Posts: 1,286

Bikes: 2013 Trek Madone; 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times in 35 Posts
Poor Charlie.
brianmcg123 is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 08:00 PM
  #4  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,802 Times in 2,286 Posts
The undeniable thing about fatter, supple tires is that my rear end approves. Size isn't everything, material and construction is probably more important. You mentioned 32's and 35's, which specific tires did you try?

But if you're happy on your 28's, maybe wider tires are a solution looking for a problem.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 08:23 PM
  #5  
specialmonkey
Fillet-Brazed Member
 
specialmonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 488

Bikes:

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 184 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 13 Posts
I put some folding 27" 1.25 (31.75mm) Paela ProTites on my '87 Trek 520, they look pretty fat but are true to size.

They seem quite fast and smooth on my commute. I run them at max 95 psi since I'm usually carrying a heavy back pack. I'll bet they'd be downright cushy at lower pressure and with no heavy load.

My 23mm GatorSkins do feel faster, but then they are on a faster bike. I'm less inclined to jump a curb with these.
specialmonkey is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 08:26 PM
  #6  
Wildwood 
Veteran, Pacifist
 
Wildwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,333

Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?

Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3900 Post(s)
Liked 4,843 Times in 2,232 Posts
27/28mm are already bigly plush. Thought you were gonna brag about those 19mm on sale at the bike shop you picked up.
Wildwood is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 08:39 PM
  #7  
jimmuller 
What??? Only 2 wheels?
 
jimmuller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,434

Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10

Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 645 Times in 232 Posts
FWIW, I like the skinny tires. My go-fast bikes wear 23mm, my more utilitarian bikes wear 25mm. Even if they aren't faster (and I think they are) how they feel is part of the game.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
jimmuller is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 08:44 PM
  #8  
Classtime 
Senior Member
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,707

Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1952 Post(s)
Liked 2,013 Times in 1,112 Posts
I think the 5mm between 23 and 28 is greater than the 5mm between 28 and 33.
Classtime is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 08:44 PM
  #9  
mountaindave 
tantum vehi
 
mountaindave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,440

Bikes: More than I care to admit

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1167 Post(s)
Liked 992 Times in 491 Posts
In some circles, you’re already riding wide tires at 28mm...
mountaindave is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 08:48 PM
  #10  
catgita
Senior Member
 
catgita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 765

Bikes: Fitz randonneuse, Trek Superfly/AL, Tsunami SS, Bacchetta, HPV Speed Machine, Rans Screamer

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 100 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Yes 28mm is still pretty wide by today’s standard. Pro racing is mostly on 25mm, where in 1990 it was 19 or 21mm.
28mm is like a normal non-racing road bike size.

Perception is perception, whatever gives you the warm fuzzies is all that matters. Currently I am running 44mm at 35psi on my “road” bike, which to me feels fast; like flying. But, I like the handling on 38mm tires better; they are less prone to follow road irregularities. I design my own bikes, and find that it is best to design the bike around a specific size tire.
catgita is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 08:50 PM
  #11  
Chombi1 
Senior Member
 
Chombi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,489
Mentioned: 102 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1641 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 831 Times in 540 Posts
I haven't gone any fatter than 23's.....and that was a big jump for me from the days I rode 19's.....
Maybe, one day, I will try 25's but I will be sad if they suddenly stop making 23's as they're the ones I feel comfortable with on all my bikes....

Last edited by Chombi1; 06-17-18 at 09:43 PM.
Chombi1 is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 08:51 PM
  #12  
Wildwood 
Veteran, Pacifist
 
Wildwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,333

Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?

Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3900 Post(s)
Liked 4,843 Times in 2,232 Posts
At the rate I'm NOT wearing out tires, My extra Conti Sprinters 22mm (for the DeRosa) may out live me.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Wildwood is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 08:54 PM
  #13  
The Golden Boy 
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,649

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,703 Times in 937 Posts
I've got some fluffy 35mm Compass tires, I'm running them around 40. They're swell.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 09:19 PM
  #14  
DrIsotope
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
Better for what? My 43mm wide Gravelkings are a helluva lot better on sandy access roads than 25mm slicks. Out on the road the 25s are measurably faster than the 43s. They don't feel faster. They are faster.

As has been mentioned, 28s aren't exactly skinny.
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 09:38 PM
  #15  
ColonelSanders
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vegemite Island
Posts: 4,130

Bikes: 2017 Surly Troll with XT Drive Train, 2017 Merida Big Nine XT Edition, 2016 Giant Toughroad SLR 2, 1995 Trek 830

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1916 Post(s)
Liked 312 Times in 220 Posts
I'd be getting a bike computer and putting the issue of speed to rest, once and for all.
ColonelSanders is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 09:39 PM
  #16  
davester
Senior Member
 
davester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berkeley CA
Posts: 2,539

Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International"

Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 932 Post(s)
Liked 1,312 Times in 491 Posts
Back in the day, when the old racer's wive's tale was in force that ultra-skinny was faster, I was always riding the skinniest tires I could buy (19 to 23 mm typical width). In the last three years I've totally switched to much wider tires at lower pressures (either 28s or 32s) and have gone the Jan Heine supple tire route in lieu of armored gatorskin-type tires. Guess what...I ride with the same guys on their carbon bikes limited to max 25 mm tires as I was before and I'm still coasting down the same hills pacing or passing them. No speed has been sacrificed. Not only that, I'm vastly more comfortable on my typical 60 to 70 mile weekend rides. Another plus of the wide low pressure tires is that they have way more grip when descending through the hairpins. I am no longer in fear of skittering across the road into the path of an oncoming car. Consider me converted to the wide tire set. I am never going back. That "feeling" of going fast is only the feeling of your bike bouncing up and down on tires inflated to over 100 psi.
davester is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 11:18 PM
  #17  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,802 Times in 2,286 Posts
Would your rather feel faster with skinnier tires or go faster with wider ones?

Cycling is so much about feeling that I'd be hard pressed to try and convince somewhat otherwise. In the meantime, my 33.333's through 42's on the road will stay on my kit. If nothing else, it's a hell of a lot more comfortable.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 11:26 PM
  #18  
Abu Mahendra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Bali
Posts: 2,244

Bikes: In service - FSIR Spin 3.0, Bannard Sunny minivelo, Dahon Dash Altena folder. Several others in construction or temporarily decommissioned.

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 897 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 17 Posts
Originally Posted by uprightbent
Since the huge shift to wider tires running at lower pressures, I'm still not giving up my 28's. We've been told that narrower tires just "feel" faster, due to vibrations, and I believe that. So if the wider tires are just as fast, I'm gonna take the ones that feel faster, even though it's all in my head.

I've been riding two vintage Miyatas with 700 x 32's and 35's, the other having 27" wheels running a 28 width. Of course there are many variables involved here, but I can't get over how much faster the narrower feels. I should add this is pavement only for me. I know it's just a feel, but isn't "feel" what theses bikes are all about. How the steel-leather-wool feels. If you're not racing, why not extend that feel bias to the tires as well? I guess I'm in the minority here surrounded by all the fat rubber I see online and in the street.......
is it all or mostly about speed? can you also say that narrower are more comfy and plush? Fine, narrow is faster. Does the five-minute disadvantage outweigh the comfort and traction benefits?

Last edited by Abu Mahendra; 06-17-18 at 11:27 PM. Reason: why is 'speed' the over-riding consideration?
Abu Mahendra is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 11:31 PM
  #19  
McBTC
Senior Member
 
McBTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,889

Bikes: 2015 22 Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1543 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times in 39 Posts
If I could fit a 28 on the rear of my bike... I'd do it real fast.
McBTC is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 11:48 PM
  #20  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times in 1,800 Posts
Depends on the rims and other stuff. I don't think we can just willy-nilly slap on tires without regard to the rims and overall design.

700x25 felt splashy up front with my Ironman's Araya CTL-370 narrow rim. Felt imprecise on fast turns. Too wide for that rim. Feels fine on the back. But I prefer 700x23 up front. No problems mixing 700x25 on the rear for a little more cushion with 700x23 for handling, at least on my bike.
canklecat is offline  
Old 06-17-18, 11:55 PM
  #21  
Lascauxcaveman 
Senior Member
 
Lascauxcaveman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,922

Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.

Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times in 356 Posts
Originally Posted by davester
... Another plus of the wide low pressure tires is that they have way more grip when descending through the hairpins. I am no longer in fear of skittering across the road into the path of an oncoming car...
That's kinda the whole deal for me. Descending at 40+, which I do even on my commute, the big fat 35mm tires are just the best.

Climbing back up that hill at 5mph at the end of my workday, all tires feel pretty much the same.
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●

Lascauxcaveman is offline  
Old 06-18-18, 12:19 AM
  #22  
Fahrenheit531 
52psi
 
Fahrenheit531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,015

Bikes: Schwinn Volare ('78); Raleigh Competition GS ('79)

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 802 Times in 391 Posts
Originally Posted by Lascauxcaveman
Climbing back up that hill at 5mph at the end of my workday, all tires feel pretty much the same.
__________________
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
Fahrenheit531 is offline  
Old 06-18-18, 12:31 AM
  #23  
gomango
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 14,491
Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 255 Times in 142 Posts
My riding style/habits have changed a great deal over the last five years.

I only have one narrow tire bike left for occasional use.

That 's my Sintesi.

Everything else runs 700x 28s up to 700 x 43s.

The roads here in the Twin Cities are not narrow width friendly and I'm riding gravel most often times anyway.

I could easily see adding a nice 650b to the small stable here.
gomango is offline  
Old 06-18-18, 02:07 AM
  #24  
verktyg 
verktyg
 
verktyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,030

Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro

Mentioned: 207 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 1,238 Times in 654 Posts
Flat Earth Society

Originally Posted by uprightbent
Since the huge shift to wider tires running at lower pressures, I'm still not giving up my 28's. We've been told that narrower tires just "feel" faster, due to vibrations, and I believe that. So if the wider tires are just as fast, I'm gonna take the ones that feel faster, even though it's all in my head..
THE EARTH IS FLAT!!!

Originally Posted by uprightbent
I've been riding two vintage Miyatas with 700 x 32's and 35's, the other having 27" wheels running a 28 width. Of course there are many variables involved here, but I can't get over how much faster the narrower feels. I should add this is pavement only for me. I know it's just a feel, but isn't "feel" what theses bikes are all about. How the steel-leather-wool feels. If you're not racing, why not extend that feel bias to the tires as well? I guess I'm in the minority here surrounded by all the fat rubber I see online and in the street.......
Russian expression (in English shtick): You vun bleeb - bleeb... No bleeb - doan bleeb!

I rode sewups most of the time from 1974 until the early 80's - 30mm wide Clement red label cotton Paris-Robaix or 26mm Del Mundos Setas, both at 90 psi. Occasionally I'd use clinchers on a club ride when everyone else was on tubulars. I was always surprised when I'd pass them coasting down loooong decents. At first I attributed it to a weight advantage as I was 10-25 Lbs. heavier than the other riders. Then I realized that wider tires at lower pressures were much of the reason.

I was using a 1975 Wolber 700x32c Super Sport on the rear at 90 psi and a Wolber 1976 Wolber 700x28c W28 on the front at 85 psi.




They had "fine pitch long staple Egyptian cotton casings" which were stronger and more flexible than most of the European made clinchers available back then.


I still have them mounted on my touring bike and take them out for a ride once or twice a year. I check the treads and casings beforehand. The old gum rubber sidewalls have gotten hard so they're stiff riding for the first 5-10 miles but after that they smooth out. Pretty good for 40+ years old with over 5000 mile on each of them. I'll probably have to switch to some modern tires this year,



"We've been told that narrower tires just "feel" faster, due to vibrations, and I believe that"

Actually what Jan Heine of Bicycle Quarterly suggested was that tires pumped up to higher pressures transmit more road vibrations to the rider thus giving the sensation that they are going faster.

Here's what Continental says about tire size and rolling resistance. I BLEEB the results of their research over the "EXPERT" anecdotal opinions of most riders
I still have 700x23c Continental Grand Prix tires on a number of my bikes. I like the sporty feel and handling at 90 psi. I bought 24 of them on a closeout at $12 apiece around 7-8 years ago. The tread doesn't have much wrap on the casing so they tend to get cuts in the sidewalls. I'm down to a few new ones left.


I also like 700x25c Panaracer Paselas at 90 psi.

I have several bikes with stiff, harsh riding frames. I've switched to 700x28c tires on those bikes at 90 psi.

I built this frame and bike in 1992 for off road rough stuff ridding: lugged butted heavy gage Reynolds 531, 700c wheels, either cyclocross sewups or knobbies. After a while I got rid of the knobbies and switched to Specialized 700x41c Nimbus tires which were about the largest available at the time. they're great both on and off road.




I don't ride it much anymore, mainly during the winter. The Specialized 41mm Nimbus tires have held up for 25 years and still ride well on and off road.

I can appreciate why riders who've been riding 20-25mm tires pumped to 125+ psi like larger tires these days (besides age creeping up on them).

The Fat Tire Bike FAD has exceeded the point of declining returns! Buy a friggin' Harley, throw away the running gear!!!



verktyg
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....

Chas. ;-)


Last edited by verktyg; 06-18-18 at 02:39 AM.
verktyg is offline  
Old 06-18-18, 02:12 AM
  #25  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,072
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4412 Post(s)
Liked 1,567 Times in 1,029 Posts
I have yet to see anything to suggest that speed and tire volume increase together. For a reasonably smooth road there is a going to be a point when the extra rubber is no longer improving the ability to roll over bumps but is just adding rotating mass.

I really doubt light weight people benefit much at all from big tires, but they definitely are affected by hauling more weight around.
Kontact is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.