Disc brakes in road racing
#51
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 348
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
and what age is that?
I myself was thinking leave it up to the individual. If you don't feel like you need disc, then don't buy them. If you feel you need them, then buy them.
Or we can be like Doge and tell other people what they need.
#52
Senior Member
To be fair, I think cross is a different beast. Discs seem to already be on the majority of bikes, at least around here.
#53
Version 7.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 13,127
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 297 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1340 Post(s)
Liked 2,482 Times
in
1,457 Posts
Doge V Erichvoncartman...Grolby waiting to get in.
#56
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 348
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#59
Rides too much bike
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Boston
Posts: 842
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
First standardized adoption of some type of Thru Axle
Then increase pad clearance
Then finally we could see some actual large scale adoption (Hint: Don't do what Specialized did)
Right now I think there are too many issues and too much added complexity for road discs to be worth it. Changing wheels is a PITA, making sure the rotors don't rub is even more of a PITA. Then just go and try to bleed your brakes the night before a race, or better yet, in between stage race days.
Honestly discs are something that, to me, look good on paper.There are definitely cases where it would be nice to have a disc-brake road bike, things like Battenkill in the Northeast, or related "messy" races. But for everyday use and most racing they are just not worth it because the cases where you would actually benefit from having a disc are few enough to not make it worth while to ride them all the time.
Then increase pad clearance
Then finally we could see some actual large scale adoption (Hint: Don't do what Specialized did)
Right now I think there are too many issues and too much added complexity for road discs to be worth it. Changing wheels is a PITA, making sure the rotors don't rub is even more of a PITA. Then just go and try to bleed your brakes the night before a race, or better yet, in between stage race days.
Honestly discs are something that, to me, look good on paper.There are definitely cases where it would be nice to have a disc-brake road bike, things like Battenkill in the Northeast, or related "messy" races. But for everyday use and most racing they are just not worth it because the cases where you would actually benefit from having a disc are few enough to not make it worth while to ride them all the time.
#60
commu*ist spy
Thread Starter
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 4,850
Bikes: Yeti ASRc, Focus Raven 29er, Flyxii FR316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
First standardized adoption of some type of Thru Axle
Then increase pad clearance
Then finally we could see some actual large scale adoption (Hint: Don't do what Specialized did)
Right now I think there are too many issues and too much added complexity for road discs to be worth it. Changing wheels is a PITA, making sure the rotors don't rub is even more of a PITA. Then just go and try to bleed your brakes the night before a race, or better yet, in between stage race days.
Honestly discs are something that, to me, look good on paper.There are definitely cases where it would be nice to have a disc-brake road bike, things like Battenkill in the Northeast, or related "messy" races. But for everyday use and most racing they are just not worth it because the cases where you would actually benefit from having a disc are few enough to not make it worth while to ride them all the time.
Then increase pad clearance
Then finally we could see some actual large scale adoption (Hint: Don't do what Specialized did)
Right now I think there are too many issues and too much added complexity for road discs to be worth it. Changing wheels is a PITA, making sure the rotors don't rub is even more of a PITA. Then just go and try to bleed your brakes the night before a race, or better yet, in between stage race days.
Honestly discs are something that, to me, look good on paper.There are definitely cases where it would be nice to have a disc-brake road bike, things like Battenkill in the Northeast, or related "messy" races. But for everyday use and most racing they are just not worth it because the cases where you would actually benefit from having a disc are few enough to not make it worth while to ride them all the time.
Hydraulic brake bleeding is a piece of cake. Takes 10min per wheel, and I don't do it particularly often.
Also, thru axles aren't any slower than QRs; I'd argue they are probably faster. And, rotor rub with a thru axle only occurs if something physically bends the rotor. Like, a large rock, a log, etc. Looking at the geometry of my 160mm rotor, a disc wheel + tire, and the fork, the only way a rotor would make contact with any foreign object besides a brake pad is if the rider crashed unto an object that protruded from the ground. Meaning, there is a clear "line of sight" between the rotor and the outside of the lever. With 140mm rotors, you'd have even more clearance.
#62
Banned
Well it has been taken up by Marketing .. you can make your own shopping choices .
or maybe you have to wait for someone else to post a revue first.
or maybe you have to wait for someone else to post a revue first.
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
You may not be aware USAC limits equipment based on age. I figured one more thing wouldn't hurt.
Anyway competition authorities normally limit equipment that can be used in an event.
UCI limits - on purpose - things that cause the bike to vary too much for their liking. Many times, "better" things.
Last edited by Doge; 01-08-16 at 06:50 PM.
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
How are discs handled by neutral support? I really don't know. Can SRAM and Shimano slap their discs on any rider who have a mechanical?
I know the pedals are an issue.
I know the pedals are an issue.
#66
Senior Member
Better brakes and better braking and cornering skill = faster cornering. Period. It's not as dominant a factor as it is in motorsport, most of the time, but being able to brake later and harder makes you faster. Rider skill predominates, but better equipment makes it easier. "Braking is a waste of energy" is very naive. There are corners that don't require braking, yes, but there are more that do. And the guys who are flying around them aren't not braking. They're braking better.
#67
commu*ist spy
Thread Starter
Better brakes and better braking and cornering skill = faster cornering. Period. It's not as dominant a factor as it is in motorsport, most of the time, but being able to brake later and harder makes you faster. Rider skill predominates, but better equipment makes it easier. "Braking is a waste of energy" is very naive. There are corners that don't require braking, yes, but there are more that do. And the guys who are flying around them aren't not braking. They're braking better.
#68
Senior Member
#69
commu*ist spy
Thread Starter
#70
Senior Member
As for everything else, cornering is a skill and a tool in your arsenal and it's unwise to dismiss it just because it isn't a silver bullet. Good cornering can be used to gain position, save energy, or help establish a gap. To be clear of course ability makes way more of a difference than equipment, like calipers vs discs, but better equipment makes the job easier. Maybe discs have enough of an aero penalty to negate the braking advantage, but in the specific context of braking, they're better.
#71
Ninny
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Gunks
Posts: 5,295
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
[edit] I posted some stuff generally disagreeing with this, but on second thought, I don't really want to get into a discussion about braking and cornering, because this has all the hallmarks of a thread that is about to go off the rails.
Last edited by globecanvas; 01-08-16 at 09:42 PM.
#72
Senior Member
Here? Never. Seriously, yeah. Hence my trying to bring it back to disc brakes a bit in the next paragraph. Sorry about taking this off-topic.
#73
commu*ist spy
Thread Starter
Sure. The earlier you brake, the lower your average speed through the corner. That's it. If you need an extreme case to picture it, imagine a turn where the max speed you can hold through the apex is 18 mph. Now, you could brake 100 yards before the turn and just do 18 mph all the way to and through the turn. Or you could wait and keep riding at 25 mph (or whatever) until you're almost to the turn, then brake down to 18 mph and go through the turn. Over the total distance, braking when you get close to the turn is clearly faster. Braking early in a more normal sense (near the turn) is slower in the exact same way, for the exact same reason, just over a shorter distance than that example.
As for everything else, cornering is a skill and a tool in your arsenal and it's unwise to dismiss it just because it isn't a silver bullet. Good cornering can be used to gain position, save energy, or help establish a gap. To be clear of course ability makes way more of a difference than equipment, like calipers vs discs, but better equipment makes the job easier. Maybe discs have enough of an aero penalty to negate the braking advantage, but in the specific context of braking, they're better.
As for everything else, cornering is a skill and a tool in your arsenal and it's unwise to dismiss it just because it isn't a silver bullet. Good cornering can be used to gain position, save energy, or help establish a gap. To be clear of course ability makes way more of a difference than equipment, like calipers vs discs, but better equipment makes the job easier. Maybe discs have enough of an aero penalty to negate the braking advantage, but in the specific context of braking, they're better.
#74
Senior Member
Yeah, exit speed could be identical, but if you're able to brake later to that same exit speed you're coming through that turn faster overall than the other guy.