Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Recumbent
Reload this Page >

Recumbent Efficiency

Search
Notices
Recumbent What IS that thing?! Recumbents may be odd looking, but they have many advantages over a "wedgie" bicycle. Discuss the in's and out's recumbent lifestyle in the recumbent forum.

Recumbent Efficiency

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-05, 05:00 PM
  #1  
Diggy18
. . . rosebud . . .
Thread Starter
 
Diggy18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 875

Bikes: Diamondback Outlook

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Recumbent Efficiency

OK, so largely due to lower wind resistance (?) recumbents are more efficient machines, right? Does that mean that when I ride a recumbent, I need to ride loger in order to get the same workout benefits as when I ride my DF?
Diggy18 is offline  
Old 08-17-05, 07:39 PM
  #2  
BlazingPedals
Senior Member
 
BlazingPedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Posts: 12,485

Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, Catrike Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1514 Post(s)
Liked 734 Times in 455 Posts
Originally Posted by Diggy18
OK, so largely due to lower wind resistance (?) recumbents are more efficient machines, right? Does that mean that when I ride a recumbent, I need to ride loger in order to get the same workout benefits as when I ride my DF?
It's not a 'given' that a recumbent is more efficient. That depends on which model you have. Especially at the lower end of the price range, recumbents are designed for comfort and ease of learning, not speed or efficiency.

Assuming you have an efficient, aerodynamic model, and that you are riding at speeds where aerodynamics mean anything, you have a choice: ride further, harder, or for longer to burn the same Calories. Given that all your other parts won't be hurting, it should be easy to do all three if you want.
BlazingPedals is offline  
Old 08-21-05, 04:02 AM
  #3  
meb
Senior Member
 
meb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: arlington, VA
Posts: 1,764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Diggy18
OK, so largely due to lower wind resistance (?) recumbents are more efficient machines, right? Does that mean that when I ride a recumbent, I need to ride loger in order to get the same workout benefits as when I ride my DF?
Or faster for a given time, of even faster for a shorter time.
meb is offline  
Old 08-22-05, 04:30 PM
  #4  
Dante221
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Please forgive the newbie question: whats a DF?
Dante221 is offline  
Old 08-22-05, 08:14 PM
  #5  
cjs1948
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dante221
Please forgive the newbie question: whats a DF?
Diamond frame, aka wedgie. Like Lance rides.

Chip
cjs1948 is offline  
Old 08-22-05, 10:23 PM
  #6  
tribe3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vienna, VA - USA
Posts: 412
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi guys, don't mean to hijack this thread but I do have a question related to efficiency (at least mine):
Do the "set" of muscles used for pedaling recumbents differ much from traditional bikes? Would I have to start all over again to reach my actual hard earned pseudo-endurance?

Does the short gray beard a'La Sigmund Freud give more speed?? ( OKey forget this one)

Thanks
tribe3 is offline  
Old 08-23-05, 06:02 AM
  #7  
BlazingPedals
Senior Member
 
BlazingPedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Posts: 12,485

Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, Catrike Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1514 Post(s)
Liked 734 Times in 455 Posts
Yes it's a different muscle set. You'll still have most of your endurance but you would probably start a lot slower & have to work back up to your former speed.
BlazingPedals is offline  
Old 08-23-05, 09:24 AM
  #8  
Sensei
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey folks, I'm new and most certainly a neophyte.

However, when I switched (a few weeks ago) from my Bianchi upright to my Burley Recumbent a whole new set of muscles ached for the first time.

It'll take you awhile to get your "new" muscles strong enough for a thorough workout.

I'll prolly try switching between them myself.
Sensei is offline  
Old 09-02-05, 09:18 PM
  #9  
OldShacker
Senior Member
 
OldShacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kettering, Ohio
Posts: 136

Bikes: Cannondale R300, RT1000, Trek1000c, EZ sport cx, EZ Tandem (tuna boat)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would like to say that I am 51 and have been commuting to work for years on road bikes. I like to go fast and push it as much as I can to and from work that is 13 miles one way. Then I got a bent and wow I have taken off the pounds faster and enjoyed the ride a lot better. The funny thing is that I talked this one bent rider that I would see on the path every other day and found that this guy lost over a 75 punds he feels by working out on his bent for a few miles. So I feel that you get a better workout on a bent. I feel better riding my bent.
OldShacker is offline  
Old 09-02-05, 09:57 PM
  #10  
Mars
coitus non circum.
 
Mars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,495
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Regarding the beard: I don't believe that they will sell you a bent without one.
Mars is offline  
Old 09-03-05, 02:30 AM
  #11  
killahkosha
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 112
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey, I'm not a bent rider, but I was just wondering how is the efficiency of a recumbent vs. a road bike that is being rode in the tucked aerodynamic position?

-jason keller
killahkosha is offline  
Old 09-03-05, 06:10 AM
  #12  
LRtrike
Luv2ridebent
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indian Trail, NC
Posts: 30

Bikes: WhizWheelz 3.2, Quetzel Presario, Cannondale (upright)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
OH, NO, now I have to grow a beard! I wonder how my husband will feel about that???? <VBG>
LRtrike is offline  
Old 09-03-05, 07:01 AM
  #13  
Mars
coitus non circum.
 
Mars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,495
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I suppose that you could get a clip on beard for when you ride the bent.... just don't let anyone catch you with it.
Mars is offline  
Old 09-04-05, 03:32 PM
  #14  
gew0419
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Just outside of Portland, OR
Posts: 294

Bikes: Sun EZ Sport, Schwinn Mesa

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think you have to have a beard and at least a little pot belly...any way that's what I've seen.
gew0419 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.