2015 Kona Dew Deluxe vs 90s Schwinn Paramount Series 50 PDG
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
2015 Kona Dew Deluxe vs 90s Schwinn Paramount Series 50 PDG
Hi All, I can't decide between the following two bikes, which are identically priced and sized just right for me:
2015 Kona Dew Deluxe vs 90s Schwinn Paramount Series 50 PDG
The Kona is newer and has an alloy fork and disc brakes
The Paramount Series 50 PDG has a steel fork, rim brakes and some nice upgrades
I'm not sure which is lighter, which is better, etc, but I've seen a lot of references that the steel forks are more sturdy. I plan on riding on pavement around the neighborhood, bike trails, so no bumpy terrain really.
Both have been serviced and are in very good shape.
Which one is more appealing to you, any comments are appreciated, thanks in advance!
2015 Kona Dew Deluxe vs 90s Schwinn Paramount Series 50 PDG
The Kona is newer and has an alloy fork and disc brakes
The Paramount Series 50 PDG has a steel fork, rim brakes and some nice upgrades
I'm not sure which is lighter, which is better, etc, but I've seen a lot of references that the steel forks are more sturdy. I plan on riding on pavement around the neighborhood, bike trails, so no bumpy terrain really.
Both have been serviced and are in very good shape.
Which one is more appealing to you, any comments are appreciated, thanks in advance!
#2
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ontario
Posts: 149
Bikes: Road: 1972 Raleigh Competition,1989 Marinoni, 1990 Limongi. MTN: 1990 GT Team Avalanche, 1991 Rocky Mountain Blizzard, GT Team RTS , Rocky Mountain MSL 50 Element, CCM fat bike
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
50 Posts
Both bikes are attractive.
I would go with the Kona. It appears to have less wear. The riding position is more adjustable due to the threadless stem. There are more tire choices with 700c/29" wheels. The hydraulic disc brakes are stronger. Kona makes good bikes, I would not worry about the alloy fork especially on easier terrain.
I would go with the Kona. It appears to have less wear. The riding position is more adjustable due to the threadless stem. There are more tire choices with 700c/29" wheels. The hydraulic disc brakes are stronger. Kona makes good bikes, I would not worry about the alloy fork especially on easier terrain.
Likes For Paul Waque:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA - Southwest PA
Posts: 3,122
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1407 Post(s)
Liked 1,905 Times
in
1,095 Posts
The Kona - is that the OEM fork ?
looks kinda small if it is an aluminum fork
???
looks kinda small if it is an aluminum fork
???
#4
Junior Member
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pioneer Valley
Posts: 1,036
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 759 Times
in
395 Posts
I do like the Schwinn, but the Kona is more versatile, and will be easier to customize/make comfortable. Pretty sure that’s a steel fork on the Kona too, not that I’d sweat it either way.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,448
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4241 Post(s)
Liked 2,949 Times
in
1,808 Posts
There's a big part of me that wants to say go for the Schwinn, but the Kona is 20 years newer, and has 20 years less wear. I'd guess (don't know for sure), that 2015 Deore is probably as good as 1995 Deore DX due to tech trickle down. The Schwinn is prettier (to my eye) and has that magical "Paramount" name on it (and a saddle that would work with my butt better than the Kona's), but I'd probably go with the Kona (even though I have lots of experience with rim brakes and none with disk).
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Western MI
Posts: 2,770
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 656 Post(s)
Liked 469 Times
in
302 Posts
For basic pedaling around, I’m all about that Paramount. One of my fave mtb paint jobs from the 90s. I think it has serious cool factor. The Kona is just too ordinary IMO.
Then again, I unloaded my Specialized Tarmac carbon road racer and have gone 100% vintage steel. I may be biased…
Then again, I unloaded my Specialized Tarmac carbon road racer and have gone 100% vintage steel. I may be biased…
#9
Full Member
I agree with Paul above, but thought I'd emphasis that if you're asking us for our opinion, you might be a newer rider and the riding position on the Kona is going to feel much more comfortable and upright.
You can customize either with bar and stem combos to get the riding position dialed in exactly later down the road. But for newer riders. the Kona is going to be better.
Edit: Just saw your other post about the kona, and it confirms my suspicions of how you'll use the bike. I hope you already bought it and are getting some miles in!
You can customize either with bar and stem combos to get the riding position dialed in exactly later down the road. But for newer riders. the Kona is going to be better.
Edit: Just saw your other post about the kona, and it confirms my suspicions of how you'll use the bike. I hope you already bought it and are getting some miles in!
__________________
Last edited by habes78023; 04-18-24 at 09:28 AM.
#11
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for everyone's feedback. The Paramount does have a sweet paint job, but it's also about 90 mins away. Another bike has entered the conversation for me, so as opposed to starting a new thread (which I might do if this post gets lost in the shuffle, lol), I would love to hear thoughts on this matchup: Kona Dew Deluxe w disc brakes ($225) vs Fuji Crosstown 2.1 rim brakes ($180). They both fit me and are apparently tuned up by the owners. I also would use to ride while running errands and riding around the neighborhood.
basic pictures below:
basic pictures below:
Last edited by NewTandem; 04-18-24 at 05:43 PM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,448
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4241 Post(s)
Liked 2,949 Times
in
1,808 Posts
Assuming everything works on both (and they're both still there) and they both fit you, I'd go with the Kona over the Fuji, though I get it's a 20% more expensive, so, if price is a factor, get the one you're going to ride.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA - Southwest PA
Posts: 3,122
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1407 Post(s)
Liked 1,905 Times
in
1,095 Posts
Kona over the Fuji
if that Paramount was priced around $200 - that is a sweet deal - the frame / fork alone are worth that (and more)
the Paramount is the best bike of the three - but the Kona would probably suit your needs much better
if that Paramount was priced around $200 - that is a sweet deal - the frame / fork alone are worth that (and more)
the Paramount is the best bike of the three - but the Kona would probably suit your needs much better