Tires for Touring....beaded vs unbeaded and tubeless vs tube
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: McCall Idaho
Posts: 302
Bikes: Salsa Vaya, Salsa Fargo, TREK DS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Tires for Touring....beaded vs unbeaded and tubeless vs tube
Sorry in advance for all the noob questions, but I am really learning a lot from this forum and you expert tourers out there.
In looking at tires for my new bike, I see two confusing areas....one is beaded vs unbeaded tires. Which is better for touring? It seems unbeaded would be better to carry as a spare.
The other area I see on some of the tire manufacturers sites is their push towards tubeless as the "new technology". It seems that you increase the risk of a flat and increase the maintenance required to fix a flat with tubeless, but then I am not sure.
What is your experience?
In looking at tires for my new bike, I see two confusing areas....one is beaded vs unbeaded tires. Which is better for touring? It seems unbeaded would be better to carry as a spare.
The other area I see on some of the tire manufacturers sites is their push towards tubeless as the "new technology". It seems that you increase the risk of a flat and increase the maintenance required to fix a flat with tubeless, but then I am not sure.
What is your experience?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,207
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3461 Post(s)
Liked 1,466 Times
in
1,144 Posts
All tires have a bead, I suspect you are confusing folding tires and those with a wire bead that do not fold that well.
Tubeless becoming popular with mountain bikers in areas of lots of thorns, but so far not many are using it for touring.
Tubeless becoming popular with mountain bikers in areas of lots of thorns, but so far not many are using it for touring.
#3
aka Phil Jungels
Folding tires use Aramid fibre as a bead, to make them fold better.
#4
Banned
Touring I stick with tried and reliable tubes in steel bead wire tires .. IDK what you mean by unbeaded ...
Even the folding tires have a bead , its Kevlar, a synthetic with steel like tensile strength .
only AFAIK bead less tires are Glued to the rim. Tubular or 'Sew-ups' , the pro style racers use those.
Kevlar beaded tires are fine for the 3rd Spare
but last tour in my 50th year I brought another steel bead tire..
pulling the sides closer together makes the tire drape nicely over the rear panniers loaded on top of them .
I went opposite the younger rider's trends , did not prioritize light tires, used thorn resistant tubes .
10 month tour , no puncture flats 3rd tire came in to replace a sidewall rupture, tube bulged out but did not burst
Even the folding tires have a bead , its Kevlar, a synthetic with steel like tensile strength .
only AFAIK bead less tires are Glued to the rim. Tubular or 'Sew-ups' , the pro style racers use those.
Kevlar beaded tires are fine for the 3rd Spare
but last tour in my 50th year I brought another steel bead tire..
pulling the sides closer together makes the tire drape nicely over the rear panniers loaded on top of them .
I went opposite the younger rider's trends , did not prioritize light tires, used thorn resistant tubes .
10 month tour , no puncture flats 3rd tire came in to replace a sidewall rupture, tube bulged out but did not burst
#5
Senior Member
For my part, I wouldn't shy away from a wire bead on the tire you are using, but, as has been said, a foldable tire makes a much more convenient spare, and that means no wire bead.
I don't know of anyone touring on tubeless, but it does seem that some people have gone many, trouble-free miles on a tubeless set-up. Advantages seem to be weight, ability to run lower pressure, and better flat protection as the sealant closes leaks as they occur. The first two do not seem to be of much advantage to tourers. The flat protection might be. Major downside seems to that if the tire does fail, roadside repair of a tubeless tire might be difficult, and you have to be prepared to switch to a tubed set-up.
I don't know of anyone touring on tubeless, but it does seem that some people have gone many, trouble-free miles on a tubeless set-up. Advantages seem to be weight, ability to run lower pressure, and better flat protection as the sealant closes leaks as they occur. The first two do not seem to be of much advantage to tourers. The flat protection might be. Major downside seems to that if the tire does fail, roadside repair of a tubeless tire might be difficult, and you have to be prepared to switch to a tubed set-up.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,207
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3461 Post(s)
Liked 1,466 Times
in
1,144 Posts
I misspoke when I said this, racers on tubular tires do not use a beaded tire - but NOBODY in their right mind would tour on a tubular tire. Sorry, I forgot about tubular tires when I made my comment.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,511 Times
in
3,353 Posts
Anyway, there are 4 basic types of tires.
- Wire Bead
- Folding (kevlar bead)
- Tubular / Sewups
- Tubeless (sealed to rim)
The newer tubular tires are supposed to be better, especially when running with a leak stop. But, perhaps it is best to leave them to the racing.
As far as the folding vs wire... I'm a little late with the change, but I really don't see a big difference between the two. I have encountered old wire bead tires with rusted wire... inevitably headed to a failure. The folding tires are easier to pack.
I certainly would consider the tubeless, and also carry everything needed to swap over to a tube + boot in an emergency (or simply a spare tire).
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,238
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18415 Post(s)
Liked 15,546 Times
in
7,329 Posts
Unless you have 26" wheels and want to ride fat, MTB tires, I am not sure how many (if any) mid sized (e.g., 32c) tubeless tires there are to choose from. I have tubeless on my road bike. Great feel, but I would question the durability under load. Also, the new Schwalbe One aside, which the guy who built my road frame and tubular wheels is skeptical about, they are heavier. Finally, not all punctures will self-seal, so you have to carry at least one tube with you anyway. There is no "extra maintenance" required to install a tube in a tubeless tire if you have to. I wouldn't bother with them for touring.
BTW, I would like to recommend this book to you:
https://www.amazon.com/The-Paradox-Ch.../dp/149151423X
BTW, I would like to recommend this book to you:
https://www.amazon.com/The-Paradox-Ch.../dp/149151423X
#9
Senior Member
Running tubeless is actually a great idea for touring. You get nearly flat-proof protection without the added weight of tire liners, thick tubes, or extra beefy tires. If you do get a flat, you can install a tube just like normal. The only drawbacks would be that on extended tours (over 6 months), you'd probably have to stop by a bike shop to add more sealant, as it dries out over time, and that you have to top off your tires more often because the tire casing loses air faster than a butyl tube.
Since the industry seems to be pushing more mountain bike tech (disc brakes, 1x setups, tubeless, wide tires), I bet we'll see a lot more tourists running tubeless in the near future.
Since the industry seems to be pushing more mountain bike tech (disc brakes, 1x setups, tubeless, wide tires), I bet we'll see a lot more tourists running tubeless in the near future.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: McCall Idaho
Posts: 302
Bikes: Salsa Vaya, Salsa Fargo, TREK DS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
OK, told you I was a noob. I guess I meant steel beaded or folding tires....will go with folding and be able to carry an extra. While tubeless sounds cooler and quicker, think I will stay with tubes...a little to risk aversive to try tubeless right now. Did someone mention not using presta valves in the tubes? I am not sure what the advantages are in presta vs non presta, other than I can always find an airpump that will pump up schrader valves, but do they leak air quicker? Why did the biking industry go to presta in the first place? Always wondered about that.
#11
Senior Member
OK, told you I was a noob. I guess I meant steel beaded or folding tires....will go with folding and be able to carry an extra. While tubeless sounds cooler and quicker, think I will stay with tubes...a little to risk aversive to try tubeless right now. Did someone mention not using presta valves in the tubes? I am not sure what the advantages are in presta vs non presta, other than I can always find an airpump that will pump up schrader valves, but do they leak air quicker? Why did the biking industry go to presta in the first place? Always wondered about that.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,872
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 598 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
194 Posts
Not really, Mavic 719 rims for example are drilled large enough to accept a schrader valve but come with a plastic insert that can be added/removed at will making the rims acceptable for a Presta valve as well.
Also, don't forget that a Kevlar beaded tire doesn't just make the tire more easily foldable which has been mentioned above but it creates a lighter tire and in some cases, the kevlar bead is easier to insert and remove from a rim. Kevlar beaded tires are all I ever use any more.
Also, don't forget that a Kevlar beaded tire doesn't just make the tire more easily foldable which has been mentioned above but it creates a lighter tire and in some cases, the kevlar bead is easier to insert and remove from a rim. Kevlar beaded tires are all I ever use any more.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,150
Bikes: 2013 Surly Disc Trucker, 2004 Novara Randonee , old fixie , etc
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 671 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
43 Posts
Running tubeless is actually a great idea for touring. You get nearly flat-proof protection without the added weight of tire liners, thick tubes, or extra beefy tires. If you do get a flat, you can install a tube just like normal. The only drawbacks would be that on extended tours (over 6 months), you'd probably have to stop by a bike shop to add more sealant, as it dries out over time, and that you have to top off your tires more often because the tire casing loses air faster than a butyl tube.
Since the industry seems to be pushing more mountain bike tech (disc brakes, 1x setups, tubeless, wide tires), I bet we'll see a lot more tourists running tubeless in the near future.
Since the industry seems to be pushing more mountain bike tech (disc brakes, 1x setups, tubeless, wide tires), I bet we'll see a lot more tourists running tubeless in the near future.
As for carrying spare tires, I doubt the utility for shorter tours. My whole life I've never had an incident that wrecked a tire. Frames, wheels, yes...but for tires just simple flats. I'm sure that occasionally one might run over a jagged piece of metal or sharp rock that could slice a tire; & if one is using lightweight narrow tires then a spare will be fairly light anyway. Some savvy tourists know all the hacks like how to make an emergency tire boot. Park even sells a kit which looks far more compact & light than toting a spare tire.
#14
OK, told you I was a noob. I guess I meant steel beaded or folding tires....will go with folding and be able to carry an extra. While tubeless sounds cooler and quicker, think I will stay with tubes...a little to risk aversive to try tubeless right now. Did someone mention not using presta valves in the tubes? I am not sure what the advantages are in presta vs non presta, other than I can always find an airpump that will pump up schrader valves, but do they leak air quicker? Why did the biking industry go to presta in the first place? Always wondered about that.
Presta is fine, you can carry a schrader adapter if you feel the need to pump up at a service station.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,511 Times
in
3,353 Posts
Presta is fine, you can carry a schrader adapter if you feel the need to pump up at a service station.
#16
Senior Member
I did not realize that, which goes to show how observant I am since I have that rim. The OP will likely have a choice as well as I think the Alex Adventure rims that come on the disc Trucker are drilled for Schrader. So presumably there an adapter.
For what it's worth, while I prefer Presta, I have never felt the need to change my rims from how they came. Rims drilled for Presta valves get Presta, and rims drilled for Schrader valves get Schrader. Carry a spare and it won't matter. There's also a Presta to Schrader adapter you can put on your valve stem if you want to pump up your tire from a gas station air compressor. I have one on my tire at all times, but I also keep a Presta pump handy, so the adapter has never been necessary.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,207
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3461 Post(s)
Liked 1,466 Times
in
1,144 Posts
I have no clue why Presta was invented in the first place. I think I once read that because it uses a threaded fitting to hold the valve closed instead of a spring, centrifugal force at high speed (think record attempts at Bonneville salt flats) can't open the valves but can on Shrader valves. But I question if that is really true. But you can always tell others that you need Presta because you go so fast.
I have drilled out my touring rims to take Shrader tubes in the event that I end up in rural USA and find only Shrader valves available, but I also had to buy the adapters to fill in the larger holes in my rims since I try to only use Presta. I think that some rim manufacturers do not like to put large diameter holes in narrow rims, that might be why all narrower racing rims are always Presta.
I prefer Presta, but there are others out there that prefer Shrader.
I also have no clue what the correct spelling is of Shrader, so maybe that is why I prefer Presta.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,207
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3461 Post(s)
Liked 1,466 Times
in
1,144 Posts
#20
Senior Member
An insert takes up the slack around the valve to allow a firm fit for a presto valve.
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Rim-Saver...-/371206103549
or
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Panaracer...-/400545521961
Secondary to that you can get a shrader adaptor to fit a presta valve so you can utilise a service station air pump which suits a schrader valve as per car/truck tubes.
Last edited by rifraf; 08-02-15 at 10:38 PM.
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: McCall Idaho
Posts: 302
Bikes: Salsa Vaya, Salsa Fargo, TREK DS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am not sure about the rims that come on the Surly DT but was wondering about Presta vs Schrader. I have bent the little screw piece on my Presta tubes in the past by not being careful when removing the pump attachment. I did also notice that several of the bikes in my LBS had schrader valves on the wheels. But I have had Presta for the past decade or so and will prolly just stick with them. Keep Schrader/Presta Adaptors in my seat bag, just in case but my pump also has the ability to change valve types. Interesting. Thanks for the good info.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,511 Times
in
3,353 Posts
I don't know if there is any big advantage of presta over schrader. Or visa versa.
I do have to let the air out of my rear wheel to install/remove, and the presta is handy, although it only takes seconds more to release the air from a shrader valve.
I have considered a bike build for a friend's 88 yr old mother. I don't relish the idea of teaching her about presta valves, so she'll get the schrader too.
I do have to let the air out of my rear wheel to install/remove, and the presta is handy, although it only takes seconds more to release the air from a shrader valve.
I have considered a bike build for a friend's 88 yr old mother. I don't relish the idea of teaching her about presta valves, so she'll get the schrader too.
#23
Banned
Why did the biking industry go to presta in the first place?
with every hand pump stroke, Just the air pressure itself.
then there's woods/dunlop valves .. though they rarely leave the continent, they are common on NL Oma/Pa bikes
#24
Senior Member
Running tubeless is actually a great idea for touring. You get nearly flat-proof protection without the added weight of tire liners, thick tubes, or extra beefy tires. If you do get a flat, you can install a tube just like normal. The only drawbacks would be that on extended tours (over 6 months), you'd probably have to stop by a bike shop to add more sealant, as it dries out over time, and that you have to top off your tires more often because the tire casing loses air faster than a butyl tube.
Since the industry seems to be pushing more mountain bike tech (disc brakes, 1x setups, tubeless, wide tires), I bet we'll see a lot more tourists running tubeless in the near future.
Since the industry seems to be pushing more mountain bike tech (disc brakes, 1x setups, tubeless, wide tires), I bet we'll see a lot more tourists running tubeless in the near future.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,207
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3461 Post(s)
Liked 1,466 Times
in
1,144 Posts
Several above have commented that touring could benefit from tubeless. But, quite frankly I have only had one tour related flat after several tours, and that one flat was discovered after my bike got home after hanging on the rack for a few days on the back of a jeep for a long drive.
My past tours were not in thorn country. But I will be doing a tour in thorn country next month for 8 to 10 days while doing a mountain bike trail with camping gear. I will be using slime in tubes for that and one of my wheels will have a thorn resistant tube. Still contemplating using tire liners for that trip.
But other trips I take in the future that are not in thorn country, I expect do to what I have in the past, just use inner tubes without slime, without liners, but with good quality tires. So far I do not see the benefit of tubeless.
I seem to have more trouble with flats around home than touring because I think I average about one flat a year, but I ride several thousand miles a year around home. And I use five different bikes around home.
My past tours were not in thorn country. But I will be doing a tour in thorn country next month for 8 to 10 days while doing a mountain bike trail with camping gear. I will be using slime in tubes for that and one of my wheels will have a thorn resistant tube. Still contemplating using tire liners for that trip.
But other trips I take in the future that are not in thorn country, I expect do to what I have in the past, just use inner tubes without slime, without liners, but with good quality tires. So far I do not see the benefit of tubeless.
I seem to have more trouble with flats around home than touring because I think I average about one flat a year, but I ride several thousand miles a year around home. And I use five different bikes around home.