Steel Frame Bike Options?
#101
Senior Member
J.
#102
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,474 Times
in
4,181 Posts
If a two frames are of different sizes, but the contact points are the same, are either really ill fitting?
The answer is no, even if aesthetically one looks better than the other. That's been the point.
Many frames dont look 'right' once they are fit to individually because many cyclists dont fit the arbitrary dimensions of a showroom bicycle.
#103
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,474 Times
in
4,181 Posts
Agree. Also, most fork manufacturers have a spec on the maximum spacers between the stem and top of the headset. I just went through this with Enve where on the fork I am using they specify a max of 40mm of spacers. Above that, while probably a remote chance, there is a danger of a broken steer tube with the obviously bad consequences that brings. Bottom line, you shouldn't really just start stacking spacers to get to a fit.
J.
J.
It's a steel frame thread and many use steel forks. Stack away on a steel steerer. It's partly why people have 80mm of spacers on a surly last- because the frame stack height isnt high enough and a steel steerer can handle that much without concern.
#104
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
Is that the biggest sized frame they make?
That is a lot of seatpost and I have seen frames structurally compromised through the leverage created by a long seatpost (not to mention the possibility of the post itself breaking.
As JohnJ80 mentioned, fork manufacturers also have rules around the number of spacers that can be used.
#105
Senior Member
True, yet that would require custom and I didnt want to go that route.
If a two frames are of different sizes, but the contact points are the same, are either really ill fitting?
The answer is no, even if aesthetically one looks better than the other. That's been the point.
Many frames dont look 'right' once they are fit to individually because many cyclists dont fit the arbitrary dimensions of a showroom bicycle.
If a two frames are of different sizes, but the contact points are the same, are either really ill fitting?
The answer is no, even if aesthetically one looks better than the other. That's been the point.
Many frames dont look 'right' once they are fit to individually because many cyclists dont fit the arbitrary dimensions of a showroom bicycle.
Just because the contact points are the same, that doesn't mean the the wheelbase, trail, and other specs of the two frames sizes are the same. If those are different, then the frames will have different handling. Sometimes the differences can be fairly dramatic if the frame geometries are not similar.
I just went through this with my wife's bike. Set the same contact points up on a larger frame so they two bikes were identical in fit but first frame was smaller than the other. But she now has a shorter stem, less spacers (now in spec), a longer wheelbase, longer chain stays, etc... She reports the bike is much easier and more comfortable to ride largely because it requires less input (the first bike is "twitchy" in comparison according to her). The bikes are largely the same frame geometry from the same frame manufacturer but two different sizes. I believe her because her average speed when we ride together just took a big jump up without her even knowing it. She's more confident on the bike because it's more stable in it's handing and she's able to ride faster much more easily. So, yes it does matter in performance and that is an example.
You can visualize this too - take two wildly different frames. It's very possible to get the three touch points in the same places over the different frames. Just because those are in the same place is no guarantee that they will handle the same. If that were the case, there would be no need for touring frames or racing frames or any of the different permutations available. You could just set the touchpoint to be consistent and ride away and it all would be the same. That's obviously not true, so yes, it does make a difference and yes they both "fit" but that's far from the end of the story.
J.
#106
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,474 Times
in
4,181 Posts
Sure, they both "fit" but the performance won't be the same.
Just because the contact points are the same, that doesn't mean the the wheelbase, trail, and other specs of the two frames sizes are the same. If those are different, then the frames will have different handling. Sometimes the differences can be fairly dramatic if the frame geometries are not similar.
Just because the contact points are the same, that doesn't mean the the wheelbase, trail, and other specs of the two frames sizes are the same. If those are different, then the frames will have different handling. Sometimes the differences can be fairly dramatic if the frame geometries are not similar.
In this instance, all geometry of the frame was taken into account compared to my prior gravel frame as well as my road bike frames.
#108
Senior Member
#109
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,474 Times
in
4,181 Posts
Why did you need to go custom?
Is that the biggest sized frame they make?
That is a lot of seatpost and I have seen frames structurally compromised through the leverage created by a long seatpost (not to mention the possibility of the post itself breaking.
As JohnJ80 mentioned, fork manufacturers also have rules around the number of spacers that can be used.
Is that the biggest sized frame they make?
That is a lot of seatpost and I have seen frames structurally compromised through the leverage created by a long seatpost (not to mention the possibility of the post itself breaking.
As JohnJ80 mentioned, fork manufacturers also have rules around the number of spacers that can be used.
This is the biggest size and the largest stack height of quality frames at the price I wanted to pay. There are a few taller stack frames that i wasnt interested in due to a variety of reasons(weight, brand, paint, geometry, or features)
It is a lot of seatpost, but it's well less than max so I am not concerned.
And yes I'm aware of spacer limits for forks.
Appreciate all the concern, it's been long considered.
The point of posting the bike was because it applies to the comments since this thread has been resurrected. It isn't a bike with showroom floor geometry, yet it is a bike that will be comfortable and perform as intended for hours on end over rough terrain. That last part, to me, is what's most important.
#110
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,474 Times
in
4,181 Posts
Had this been less of a sloping top tube, it would have less exposed seatpost and that suddenly wouldnt be a potential fitment issue.
I'm good, but thank you for the concern.
#111
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,474 Times
in
4,181 Posts
- At this frame size, the stack and reach are comfortable for me with a proper amount of spacers.
- At this frame size, the other geometry met what I want- the seat tube angle, head tube angle, chainstay length, fork offset and trail, and bottom bracket drop were all what I want to have. So i ultimately know it will fit well for me.
This may open up more work cans, but the fullcourt press seems to be on already, so let's open another can- the bottom bracket height was the only concern for me since it's more than I'm used to on a gravel road bike. That affects the stack height relative to my old frame and its a minor 7mm difference in drop, but the feel would be slightly different as I would sit more in the bike than on it.
I'm not a princess and the bike isn't a mattress, so I haven't been able to feel any negative difference so far.
#112
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
The quality of those fits has ranged from absolutely woeful to fantastic.
And I don't think that the sloping top tube is the problem as it does not seem that great a slope based on the numbers.
Anyway, you seem happy with your bike so nothing anyone will say will change that.
#114
Senior Member
Just remember what Greg Lemond has said.... the amount of seat post visible should be almost equal to the length of your head tube, or as close as possible. Yours seems "in the ballpark" (maybe a tad too much post). As long as you're safely within the limit, I see nothing wrong.
#115
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
Just remember what Greg Lemond has said.... the amount of seat post visible should be almost equal to the length of your head tube, or as close as possible. Yours seems "in the ballpark" (maybe a tad too much post). As long as you're safely within the limit, I see nothing wrong.
That quote from Greg Lemond is interesting, because in this case there is likely almost triple the amount of seatpost exposed vs inside the frame if using a 410mm post.
Edit
The HT is only 18cm, and there is much more than 18cm exposed seatpost IMO.
Last edited by sumgy; 09-09-19 at 06:46 PM.
#116
Senior Member
Given the 61cm frame has a 583mm seat tube, I would guess that the exposed post is somewhere near 30cm.
That quote from Greg Lemond is interesting, because in this case there is likely almost triple the amount of seatpost exposed vs inside the frame if using a 410mm post.
Edit
The HT is only 18cm, and there is much more than 18cm exposed seatpost IMO.
That quote from Greg Lemond is interesting, because in this case there is likely almost triple the amount of seatpost exposed vs inside the frame if using a 410mm post.
Edit
The HT is only 18cm, and there is much more than 18cm exposed seatpost IMO.
#118
Firm but gentle
Yup- they are long and low with a steep hta.
A 52cm had something like a 55.5cm top tube, a short head tube, and a 74deg hta.
A few years ago I thought about buying a frameset for my oldest daughter and holding it until she was older. Framesets dropped to $270 or so at bikewagon/jenson/nashbar. Dont remember where.
Couldn't pull the trigger based on predicting what would work in the future due to the wonked geometry.
Crazy good deal for anyone that fit the geometry.
A 52cm had something like a 55.5cm top tube, a short head tube, and a 74deg hta.
A few years ago I thought about buying a frameset for my oldest daughter and holding it until she was older. Framesets dropped to $270 or so at bikewagon/jenson/nashbar. Dont remember where.
Couldn't pull the trigger based on predicting what would work in the future due to the wonked geometry.
Crazy good deal for anyone that fit the geometry.
#119
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: adelaide, australia
Posts: 2,798
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 227 Post(s)
Liked 388 Times
in
149 Posts
#121
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,280 Times
in
740 Posts
Take a look at Marinoni for the top quality craftsmanship, the custom geometry and their imbattable price .
Marinoni
Marinoni
#122
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,474 Times
in
4,181 Posts
#123
Senior Member
Steel Road Bike Frames Made in Italy!
il massimo makes some nice steel frames, and the prices are reasonable.
Marinoni makes some too, but they might be hard to find in the US.
il massimo makes some nice steel frames, and the prices are reasonable.
Marinoni makes some too, but they might be hard to find in the US.
#124
Senior Member
Ça me fait plaisir que tu ais appris quelques chose de nouveau aujourd'hui. L'anglais n'est pas la langue première de tout le monde. Certaines personnes, comme moi, font des efforts pour apprendre une deuxième langue, voir même une troisième mais il se peut que l'on fassent des erreurs de syntaxe en cours de route.
Bonne journée
Bonne journée
Likes For bruce19:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RNAV
Road Cycling
102
02-23-16 03:00 PM
wannabemekon
General Cycling Discussion
42
09-03-15 12:18 PM