Tires: Grippiness vs Harshness vs Resistance
#1
Senior but far from AARP
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 776
Bikes: 2006 Specialized SWorks Tarmac; 2005 Bianchi Giro; 2005 Bianchi Cross Veloce; 1997 Litespeed Catalyst; 1983 Performance Steel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Tires: Grippiness vs Harshness vs Resistance
1-Is it generally true the grippier a tire is, the more rolling resistance it has?
2-Is it generally true the grippier a tire is, the less harsh a ride it yields?
3-Is it generally true the grippier a tire is, the less durable it is?
2-Is it generally true the grippier a tire is, the less harsh a ride it yields?
3-Is it generally true the grippier a tire is, the less durable it is?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,879
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
2 and 3 are obviously false. Harshness is mostly determined by tire pressure and casing stiffness. Durability depends mostly on the thickness (and weight) of the rubber. Published rolling resistance tests have shown that some grippy tires also have low rolling resistance, so I guess 1 is also false.
#3
He drop me
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Central PA
Posts: 11,664
Bikes: '03 Marin Mill Valley, '02 Eddy Merckx Corsa 0.1, '12 Giant Defy Advance, '20 Giant Revolt 1, '20 Giant Defy Advanced Pro 1, some random 6KU fixie
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 138 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
Go get some Mich P2Rs and be done with it. Lowest RR, very smooth and plenty grippy...great tire, sorry it took me so long to find it. Vittoria Rubino Pro slick is pretty good too but the P2R is better IMO.
__________________
The views expressed by this poster do not reflect the views of BikeForums.net.
The views expressed by this poster do not reflect the views of BikeForums.net.
#4
Senior but far from AARP
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 776
Bikes: 2006 Specialized SWorks Tarmac; 2005 Bianchi Giro; 2005 Bianchi Cross Veloce; 1997 Litespeed Catalyst; 1983 Performance Steel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=329393
#5
Senior but far from AARP
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 776
Bikes: 2006 Specialized SWorks Tarmac; 2005 Bianchi Giro; 2005 Bianchi Cross Veloce; 1997 Litespeed Catalyst; 1983 Performance Steel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
2 and 3 are obviously false. Harshness is mostly determined by tire pressure and casing stiffness. Durability depends mostly on the thickness (and weight) of the rubber. Published rolling resistance tests have shown that some grippy tires also have low rolling resistance, so I guess 1 is also false.
Perhaps I should have phrased the questions as "what is the relationship between?" (the different factors). Now rereading, the questions look biased in one direction.
I'd tend to agree w/ you on #'s 2,3. Not sure about #1. How accurate are these published reports?
#6
Certifiable Bike "Expert"
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,647
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#7
Patria O Muerte!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Jerusalem,Israel
Posts: 315
Bikes: Pinarello road bike, Marin Kentfield city bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's not about the thickness of the tire - it's about the compound itself and how supple it is. The softer it is, the faster it will wear and the grippier it will be. Rolling resistance is a phantom variable and shouldn't concern you most of the time - keep the recommended pressure, and you're fine.
Of course, all else being equal - thicker means more durable.
#8
Senior but far from AARP
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 776
Bikes: 2006 Specialized SWorks Tarmac; 2005 Bianchi Giro; 2005 Bianchi Cross Veloce; 1997 Litespeed Catalyst; 1983 Performance Steel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,879
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Yes, some tires have much thicker rubber than others. Those are usually advertised as training tires vs. race tires which are thinner and lighter. Also, some tires use 2 different rubbers, softer on the sides for grip and harder in the center for durability.
#10
Patria O Muerte!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Jerusalem,Israel
Posts: 315
Bikes: Pinarello road bike, Marin Kentfield city bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No, not necessarily. Recommended max pressure for your weight, would be more accurate. More pressure does not always mean less resistance. There's a point where too much pressure equals more resistance, due to reduced grip(the high pressure keeps the bike bouncing, slightly, reducing the amount of power transfered to the ground).
#11
Senior but far from AARP
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 776
Bikes: 2006 Specialized SWorks Tarmac; 2005 Bianchi Giro; 2005 Bianchi Cross Veloce; 1997 Litespeed Catalyst; 1983 Performance Steel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,879
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Here are Michelin's bicycle tire pressure guidelines: https://two-wheels.michelin.com/2w/fr...154733&lang=EN
The table is also printed on the boxes that most Michelin tires come in.
The table is also printed on the boxes that most Michelin tires come in.
#13
Senior but far from AARP
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 776
Bikes: 2006 Specialized SWorks Tarmac; 2005 Bianchi Giro; 2005 Bianchi Cross Veloce; 1997 Litespeed Catalyst; 1983 Performance Steel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here are Michelin's bicycle tire pressure guidelines: https://two-wheels.michelin.com/2w/fr...154733&lang=EN
The table is also printed on the boxes that most Michelin tires come in.
The table is also printed on the boxes that most Michelin tires come in.
If correcting PSI for body weight per the above graph, what are the different riding characteristics (harshness, stickiness, rolling resistance) of a heavier vs a lighter cyclist??
Perhaps a lighterweight person can safely use less PSI, and have a less harsh ride? Or does lees PSI translate into the same ride as more PSI for a heavier cyclist?
Any physicists out there?
#14
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
The more the TPI, the easier it is for a carcass to displace itself...what contributes to rolling resistance and also btw a more compliant ride or #2. The problem with high TPI, is opportunity for road ingression...more holes in the carcass due to more threads. So its a tradeoff generally between rolling resistance and puncture resistance. Out and out racing tires with high TPI count tend to be faster. Grippy has to do with the softness of the tire compound which portends greater wear.
As mentioned, the Michelin PR2 with 127 TPI is a wonderful balance between rolling resistance and puncture resistance. The downside if any is wear due to its upside with is grippiness which is due to it relatively soft tire compound. Tire selection is a balance and mostly a tradeoff. You need to pick the tire based upon what is important to you. No single tire is all things of course. HTH.
#15
Rider
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 231
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
TJ, Already 2 threads about tires. Just buy Mich P2 or Conti GP 4000 and done with it. I like Vredestein Fortezza.
Its not like you are buying a house!
Its not like you are buying a house!
#16
Senior but far from AARP
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 776
Bikes: 2006 Specialized SWorks Tarmac; 2005 Bianchi Giro; 2005 Bianchi Cross Veloce; 1997 Litespeed Catalyst; 1983 Performance Steel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#17
Software for Cyclists
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Redding, California
Posts: 4,618
Bikes: Trek 5200, Specialized MTB
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts